37 Comments

After 3 yrs. Kids are fine. This idiot of a father still wants to have them jabbed. 🤦‍♀️🙈🙉🙊

Expand full comment

And people wonder why murders are committed.. 🤔

Expand full comment

Isn’t that the truth.

Expand full comment

If I was the mother I'd be seriously considering a real encrypted app or a call to the underworld on a burner phone.

Expand full comment

At the very least, grab her kids and... "disappear"... 🤔

Expand full comment

Yup, it's good I'm not the mother, just a bad motherf-cker

Expand full comment

Alas, like the rest of us, not nearly "bad enough"... 😥

Expand full comment

Many a father doesn't want to pay child support.

Hard to be a deadbeat dad when you kill off your own children with court approval...

Expand full comment

Trouble with unprotected sex is the consequences are only apparent to you a couple of days before in a state of sobriety.. or maybe 3 seconds after, but still drunk out of your mind... 🙄

Expand full comment

Where is the law that allows a judge to come between a mother and her children?

Expand full comment

They are the states children. Do you not understand how Social Security and other similar systems work?

Expand full comment

I will venture, she was smeared as an unfit mother due to past incidents, she might have history not mentioned here and if she has a criminal record, uh-oh - credibility goes down the drain.

Expand full comment

How many more need to be harmed before we stop this false premise that we are saving lives when the opposite is the truth! See the data in the US.

https://thomasabraunrph.substack.com/p/shocking-data

Expand full comment

What a d-ckhead of a judge in this case for ruling in favor of the father. It's not often that they rule for the father. Most judges are far left radical feminists. I wonder how big the judge's bribe was.

Expand full comment

I know this may sound outrageous, but I think we would be better off if we just ignored all politicians wholesale. What good does it do anyway - we just waste our steam on them. They go their own way regardless and our energy is wasted because they simply don't care. They have another agenda. Fool us who think that they care about us or solutions (to problems THEY created) They've had enough time to prove themselves. Thus we could be putting that energy into brainstorming about what we can do in this situation now, sans politicians. I bet that's a new way to think. That will scare the bejeesus out of them and they'll be running to suck up but don't fall for it. We need to open discussion about where we can go now, given that government is pernicious and does not have our interests at heart.

Expand full comment

I've been thinking exactly that for some time. The government broke the social contract in Canada, not the people. Dr Trozzi and the World Council for Health have been proposing an alternate to the WHO for some time. We need a people's movement set up as alternative opposition to all current government policies. Trudeau is busily planning digital ID, 15 minute cities, shut down of our natural resource industries, centralised digital currency, and to sign Canada on (with no debate) to the WHO new health regulations that turn our sovereignty over to the United Nations. This is all going on while we are being distracted by BALLOONS.

Expand full comment

We certainly need a whole new direction and just turn our back entirely on any imposition of government of any entity that pushes itself onto us. The first step I feel is declaring that we are sovereign beings. Here is a site that allows us to show this and stand in our sovereignty. No obligation just asserting it publicly. https://www.pc-tamer.com/signatures/index

Expand full comment

Agreed

Expand full comment

💔

Expand full comment

Appalling! I wonder if those children will ever be able to forgive their father.

Expand full comment

Munchauchen by proxy.....enjoyment of making your kids sick.

Expand full comment
Feb 13, 2023·edited Feb 13, 2023

A lot of the judges on the Ontario Court of Appeal are older. They, along with a whole cohort of Boomers currently running the world, think it is totally okay to sacrifice the health and well-being of the young to ensure they themselves have less risk of infection or reinfection

Expand full comment

I read this story yesterday and my first thought was “what about ‘mature minor’ doctrine?” In British Columbia, where I live, a minor (at any age) can give informed consent/refusal of any medical intervention (with or without parental knowledge). So, if this was a case of 10 and 12 year old minors seeking “gender affirming” medical treatments, there’s no way a court would allow either parent to supersede those children’s decisions. The news story is clear that neither child wanted (or, presumably wants) a Covid injection, so, shouldn’t that be the end of the discussion? It would be under BC law (BC Infants Act).

Expand full comment

What screwed up madness is it that allows minors to make decisions about "gender affirming" medical treatments at 10 YO? Depending on the province, you can't (as a minor) have a smoke, go drinking in a bar, drive a car, or vote.

Evidently Moloch is alive and well and demanding his quota of child sacrifices.

Expand full comment
Feb 13, 2023·edited Feb 14, 2023

It is the same in Ontario - there is no actual age of consent rather a matured minor can make their own health decisions. But not for COVD. See how that works?

Expand full comment

The Canadian Court system has been captured by activist Left Wing/Liberal forces. Sadly the court decisions in Canada (or the majority of them I believe) demonstrate one of the most stark differences between Canada and the USA. A large and increasing number of decisions have overturned Government overreach and COVID-related infringement on the rights of US Citizens. Why not the same in Canada where most judgements seem to favour the Canadian Government's COVID positions? Whilst the USA is a Constitutional Republic, Canada is not. Our so-called Bill of Rights is designed to 'GIVE' (Noblesse Oblige?) us rights that can be taken away (notwithstanding clause is the most egregious example of this). In opposition, the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights is designed to protect and guarantee Americans' unalienable (God Given) rights from any infringement on their rights by the US Government. Our Bill of RIghts isn't worth the paper upon which it's written as we can now see, since it appears that our Judges and politicians (Remember the Freedom Convoy) routinely demonstrate disrespect for any of our rights and can imprint their politically motivated beliefs and opinions into their decisions regardless of the obvious data/science.

Expand full comment

this ruling is a travesty of law … judge George argues that all the past incidents mentiones by judge Paratz have no relevance … Thalidomide, Tuskegee, sterilization of Inuit women, forced removal of Indigenous kids to Residential Schools????? wtf???? how is none of that relevant? how many lives were destroyed through those examples???? if there is a judge that exhibits gross lapse in judgement it’s judge George.

Expand full comment

The WHO treaty and rules being explicated by Meryl Nas and James Roguski on substack discuss the "inter-pandemic" period. The assumption is that there will be another one. Check out Catastrophic Contagion, another "simulation" with the hideous obese man-boob-bearing Epstein-adoring half duck and half toad Gatesy Boy https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/ This involves a contagion that attacks kids. Makes you wonder why this decision and the push to let kids, who do not have a fully developed pre-frontal cortex make medical decisions, while they are still in growth spurts with their hormones all over the place. Makes you wonder.

Expand full comment

And if the shots hurt one or both of the kids the father should be charged with criminal negligence (at least).

But of course it would never happen.....

Expand full comment

I feel for the kids. Epoch Times ran a story about how toe Rhode Island Supreme Court just put the order to stay the decision of another judge to allow a mother to vaccinate her children. The father and his lawyers now have to present their case to not vaccinate the children. The pediatrician is supporting vaccination and both kids were Covid recovered. It’s just sad some parents aren’t doing their own research.

Expand full comment