Parents must respond by this insanity by getting none of their children injected, healthy children DO NOT need these COVID injections, it confers no benefit, Ioannidis reminded us, 0.0003% risk death
It will be approved and mandated for children. Here's why. I wrote this last year in anticipation this would happen.
Under the United States CARES Act and PREP Act, a vaccine used under an Emergency Use Authorisation has automatic blanket indemnity granted by the state. No one can sue the manufacturers regardless of harm caused.
If this indemnity is to continue once the vaccine is fully approved, the vaccine must be approved for children and recommended/ mandated as part of the childhood vaccination programme.
If the vaccines aren't approved for children, the manufacturers won't enjoy indemnity for any age group.
This is one reason why children are being subjected to this experimental injection under an EUA, even though there isn't an emergency in their age group.
This is also why this vaccine, which isn't a vaccine, is being called a vaccine, because indemnity only applies to vaccines and no other class of pharmaceuticals.
The US Centers for Disease Control estimated children are at a ten fold greater risk from influenza than they are CoVID-19.
The Nuremberg Charter, written after the horror of medical experimentation by the Third Reich to protect bodily autonomy, was never actually ratified by nations rather, it was the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Article 27 – Limitations on the application of the principles
If the application of the principles of this Declaration is to be limited, it should be by law, including laws in the interests of public safety, for the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Any such law needs to be consistent with international human rights law.
Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights enshrines the fundamentals of the Nuremberg Charter into international law and, for the purposes of these CoVID-19 injections, is being criminally subverted by fraudulently invoking Article 27, which suspends Article 6 on the basis of a "public emergency" to justify Emergency Use Authorisation.
These "vaccines" fail all the legal tests for Emergency Use Authorisation.
There is no emergency;
Existing safe and effective treatments are available, especially for early intervention;
These injections do not meet the required efficacy, preventing neither transmission or contagion;
There is substantial evidence of serious injury and death.
None of the vaccines stop infection or transmission. That's always been a huge lie. If Mike receives a COVID shot or whatever, he's now infected. His body then will try to neutralize the contents inserted or to eliminate them in various ways: respiration, perspiration, skin eruption, defecation, etc. If jabbed or unjabbed Tom is exposed to those contaminated secretions, he also will become infected. Tom's body will do the same thing as Mike's. Whether or not either of them becomes symptomatic is not relevant. Their bodies need to get rid of this unwanted stuff.
Almost all vaccines trigger hundreds up to many thousands of wide-ranging adverse reactions in some amount of recipients. They include acute conditions, chronic conditions, and allegedly contagious/infectious diseases. To the vast majority of the population, these people do not exist. Back in Feb 2020, Dr. Palevsky testified about the negative impact prior shots have been having on children and adults. Had he reviewed the central reporting databases he would have painted an even worse picture.
I've seen some of the charts of chronic disease in people who got vaccinated with all manner of vaccines and those who didn't. Quite staggering.
Seems most of these vaccines may stop the target disease but cause havoc on the immune system leading to chronic illness and poor natural immune response to other pathogens.
I never had the MMR injections, think I'm only vaccinated against rabies and distemper. 🤣
This should be the basis of a global class action involving all the countries that signed the Declaration. It's not difficult, Pfizer have already admitted this stuff doesn't prevent transmission, epidemiology shows there is no emergency especially in low risk groups and the evidence of injury and death is overwhelming at this point. Also, ample evidence early treatment protocols using existing pharmaceuticals work.
Court actions, class actions are never slam dunks and not under the conditions in the court system today. It still requires a LOT of preparation and costs.
I thought so too, for quite a while. But then he didn't have the depositions transcribed, then his quality of "experts" declined, they weren't being vetted, and then he came here, did a few conferences with Crimes Against Humanity, then he grabbed 2 of the speakers from the tour, and headed off on his own with them, and did conferences using their original group's name, and scooped fees. They burned the organizers and defamed them, as well as defamed their previous fellow Crimes Against Humanity colleagues. Judy Mikovits who came with Fuellmich did a number of video interviews where she said horrendous untrue things about the original participants. Fuellmich returned to Germany and his Board brought up BIG problems they discovered with uses of the $3+ million in donations to Fuellmich's Grand Jury effort. He did not disclose about all loans he obtained, using the donations as collateral required and attempted to hide his embezzlement of them as well. The Board was placed in a very bad position and had to publicly air his misdoings because of supporters' concerns and banks' questions. Fuellmich went out and promptly badmouthed them, had a friend post an "interview" transcript/news story characterizing Fuellmich as a visioner held to small minded petty mortal standards (such as legally required accounting for said expenditures and personal use). Fuellmich stated that how he was he was relieved and so glad to be out of it. He claimed he was obviously virtuous because the various "experts" had given depositions for him to record, as a reflection on himself. He then flew back to the U.S. and is seeking conference invited to cash in on his grand jury brand.
Fuellmich actually has no experience with prosecuting, with the processes, standards for such, nor with the elements that must be present to file reports with LEOs, with civil RICO suits or even trial litigation. He isn't building a case, nor doing the necessary preparation and documentation required. He speaks in vague generalities, throwing in emotional hooks and deflections.
It just got approved based on no clinical data. Now it's up to individual states to reject it. California won't. Newsom is a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum. I'm guessing all red states will reject it.
There was a group in Europe of several hundred physicians and attorneys wanting to invoke the Nuremberg trials. I cannot find it. Guess it was too 'dirty' and had to get scrubbed.
I'm am livid. Foolishly, I thought we were beyond having these poisons on the childhood schedule. On a positive note, at times hard to find, if they move forward with approval, THIS SHOULD be SHOVED down the throats of anyone running for election in 2 weeks. Litmus test everyone running and get them on record on their position on covid vaccines, mandates, and medical freedom. Darwin may just have to sort this out for all of us.
These are not vaccines. They are technology implants making those who receive them chimera and no longer human. This is why they are going after everyone with such fervor, luciferians want no humans left on the planet, only synthetic slaves of some sort. I do not believe they even know fully what they are doing. They are just making it all up as they go along with no regard for human life. The real issue is spiritual here, and as long as it is not addressed that way, it prevails until there is no man kind left (sooner than later now). The big picture is we have been deceived and are now delusional in thinking the same sewer that brought us to our knees is going to save us with the next iteration AI spits out. So yes, insanity is doing over and over what never worked. We get what we allow.
This is symptomatic of a deep actor control of the political/medical system. Just like FJB campaigning from his basement in 2020 and post-“win”, presiding in a way that should be a complete political suicide, these medi-crats know they are supported by the deep state so they sense no fear and willingly make genocidal decisions that the globalist/massvaxist/establishment state demands. Full protection knowing the fox is in. No fear.
No one on the planet needs ANY mRNA gene altering injection for any reason. They have an ARR of less than 1% and the boosters likely have an ARR of less than .5%.
These people make the Mexican drug cartels look like saints
Preach!!!!
This is insanity. Driven by greed and evil. Please parents, please, protect your children.
It will be approved and mandated for children. Here's why. I wrote this last year in anticipation this would happen.
Under the United States CARES Act and PREP Act, a vaccine used under an Emergency Use Authorisation has automatic blanket indemnity granted by the state. No one can sue the manufacturers regardless of harm caused.
If this indemnity is to continue once the vaccine is fully approved, the vaccine must be approved for children and recommended/ mandated as part of the childhood vaccination programme.
If the vaccines aren't approved for children, the manufacturers won't enjoy indemnity for any age group.
This is one reason why children are being subjected to this experimental injection under an EUA, even though there isn't an emergency in their age group.
This is also why this vaccine, which isn't a vaccine, is being called a vaccine, because indemnity only applies to vaccines and no other class of pharmaceuticals.
The US Centers for Disease Control estimated children are at a ten fold greater risk from influenza than they are CoVID-19.
The Nuremberg Charter, written after the horror of medical experimentation by the Third Reich to protect bodily autonomy, was never actually ratified by nations rather, it was the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Article 27 – Limitations on the application of the principles
If the application of the principles of this Declaration is to be limited, it should be by law, including laws in the interests of public safety, for the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Any such law needs to be consistent with international human rights law.
Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights enshrines the fundamentals of the Nuremberg Charter into international law and, for the purposes of these CoVID-19 injections, is being criminally subverted by fraudulently invoking Article 27, which suspends Article 6 on the basis of a "public emergency" to justify Emergency Use Authorisation.
These "vaccines" fail all the legal tests for Emergency Use Authorisation.
There is no emergency;
Existing safe and effective treatments are available, especially for early intervention;
These injections do not meet the required efficacy, preventing neither transmission or contagion;
There is substantial evidence of serious injury and death.
None of the vaccines stop infection or transmission. That's always been a huge lie. If Mike receives a COVID shot or whatever, he's now infected. His body then will try to neutralize the contents inserted or to eliminate them in various ways: respiration, perspiration, skin eruption, defecation, etc. If jabbed or unjabbed Tom is exposed to those contaminated secretions, he also will become infected. Tom's body will do the same thing as Mike's. Whether or not either of them becomes symptomatic is not relevant. Their bodies need to get rid of this unwanted stuff.
Almost all vaccines trigger hundreds up to many thousands of wide-ranging adverse reactions in some amount of recipients. They include acute conditions, chronic conditions, and allegedly contagious/infectious diseases. To the vast majority of the population, these people do not exist. Back in Feb 2020, Dr. Palevsky testified about the negative impact prior shots have been having on children and adults. Had he reviewed the central reporting databases he would have painted an even worse picture.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vZq4pZyQ03ei/
I've seen some of the charts of chronic disease in people who got vaccinated with all manner of vaccines and those who didn't. Quite staggering.
Seems most of these vaccines may stop the target disease but cause havoc on the immune system leading to chronic illness and poor natural immune response to other pathogens.
I never had the MMR injections, think I'm only vaccinated against rabies and distemper. 🤣
Are there any court challenges for this going on?
This should be the basis of a global class action involving all the countries that signed the Declaration. It's not difficult, Pfizer have already admitted this stuff doesn't prevent transmission, epidemiology shows there is no emergency especially in low risk groups and the evidence of injury and death is overwhelming at this point. Also, ample evidence early treatment protocols using existing pharmaceuticals work.
It should be a slam dunk.
Court actions, class actions are never slam dunks and not under the conditions in the court system today. It still requires a LOT of preparation and costs.
We thought that was what Reiner Fullmich was doing.
I thought so too, for quite a while. But then he didn't have the depositions transcribed, then his quality of "experts" declined, they weren't being vetted, and then he came here, did a few conferences with Crimes Against Humanity, then he grabbed 2 of the speakers from the tour, and headed off on his own with them, and did conferences using their original group's name, and scooped fees. They burned the organizers and defamed them, as well as defamed their previous fellow Crimes Against Humanity colleagues. Judy Mikovits who came with Fuellmich did a number of video interviews where she said horrendous untrue things about the original participants. Fuellmich returned to Germany and his Board brought up BIG problems they discovered with uses of the $3+ million in donations to Fuellmich's Grand Jury effort. He did not disclose about all loans he obtained, using the donations as collateral required and attempted to hide his embezzlement of them as well. The Board was placed in a very bad position and had to publicly air his misdoings because of supporters' concerns and banks' questions. Fuellmich went out and promptly badmouthed them, had a friend post an "interview" transcript/news story characterizing Fuellmich as a visioner held to small minded petty mortal standards (such as legally required accounting for said expenditures and personal use). Fuellmich stated that how he was he was relieved and so glad to be out of it. He claimed he was obviously virtuous because the various "experts" had given depositions for him to record, as a reflection on himself. He then flew back to the U.S. and is seeking conference invited to cash in on his grand jury brand.
Fuellmich actually has no experience with prosecuting, with the processes, standards for such, nor with the elements that must be present to file reports with LEOs, with civil RICO suits or even trial litigation. He isn't building a case, nor doing the necessary preparation and documentation required. He speaks in vague generalities, throwing in emotional hooks and deflections.
It's sad for people like Dr. Sam White who put all their faith in Fuellmich. I'd wondered if Fuellmich isn't the ultimate in controlled opposition.
It just got approved based on no clinical data. Now it's up to individual states to reject it. California won't. Newsom is a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum. I'm guessing all red states will reject it.
There was a group in Europe of several hundred physicians and attorneys wanting to invoke the Nuremberg trials. I cannot find it. Guess it was too 'dirty' and had to get scrubbed.
Reiner Fullmich...
https://stopworldcontrol.com/
Thank you for the info. I've read bits and pieces of it before, but nothing like this. All put together into one nasty, evil box.
I'm am livid. Foolishly, I thought we were beyond having these poisons on the childhood schedule. On a positive note, at times hard to find, if they move forward with approval, THIS SHOULD be SHOVED down the throats of anyone running for election in 2 weeks. Litmus test everyone running and get them on record on their position on covid vaccines, mandates, and medical freedom. Darwin may just have to sort this out for all of us.
Adding CV injections to the childhood vax schedule is an in-your-face depop power play on steroids, to put it mildly
These are not vaccines. They are technology implants making those who receive them chimera and no longer human. This is why they are going after everyone with such fervor, luciferians want no humans left on the planet, only synthetic slaves of some sort. I do not believe they even know fully what they are doing. They are just making it all up as they go along with no regard for human life. The real issue is spiritual here, and as long as it is not addressed that way, it prevails until there is no man kind left (sooner than later now). The big picture is we have been deceived and are now delusional in thinking the same sewer that brought us to our knees is going to save us with the next iteration AI spits out. So yes, insanity is doing over and over what never worked. We get what we allow.
This is symptomatic of a deep actor control of the political/medical system. Just like FJB campaigning from his basement in 2020 and post-“win”, presiding in a way that should be a complete political suicide, these medi-crats know they are supported by the deep state so they sense no fear and willingly make genocidal decisions that the globalist/massvaxist/establishment state demands. Full protection knowing the fox is in. No fear.
No one on the planet needs ANY mRNA gene altering injection for any reason. They have an ARR of less than 1% and the boosters likely have an ARR of less than .5%.
contacted the CDC made it very clear how I felt... Somehow someway Nuremberg must be convened soon...
Sent my comments in today. You can too: https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CDC-2022-0111-0001
How can we influence this process?