CDC trying to put COVID gene injections on children's immunization schedule is not about children needing it, NO, kids have near ZERO risk of severe outcomes; it's to keep LIABILITY protection Moderna
CDC trying to put COVID gene injections on children's immunization schedule is not about children needing it, NO, kids have near ZERO risk of severe outcomes; it's to keep LIABILITY protection Moderna
it's about keeping liability protection for Pfizer and Moderna for once the vaccine gets onto the child immunization schedule, the vaccine makers are free from liability if child dies due to the shot
VRBPAC's Eric Rubin said in the Fall of 2021 "But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like coronavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it."
Now we all know the risk benefit ratio of the EUA injections is completely upside down and especially dangerous for infants, children, pregnant women and males under 50.
Is it true that in December 2021, Pfizer announced the two-dose series wasn’t successful and did not provide immunity in 2–5-year-olds?
Is it true that in the trial the confidence intervals went below zero for kids under two? And that the vaccine could possibly increase the risk of infection?
Is it true there have been 4448 hospitalizations and 1959 reports of myocarditis in children age 6 months through 17 years who have received mRNA vaccines reported to VAERS?
Is it true there have been 160 deaths, 674 cases of life-threatening side effects, 526 permanent disabilities and 56,818 total reports in children age 6 months through 17 years who have received mRNA vaccines reported to VAERS?
Children’s innate immune systems are not developed until the age of four – making even safer vaccines relatively useless and worse for this age group.
The FDA has made three indiscriminate broad authorizations without convening its vaccine experts in the last year.
I personally know 7 men in their 40s, 60s and 70s who have had emergency surgery for large clots around their hearts, in their arms and legs and two who have lost mobility soon after their inoculations. I know of at least that many women who quickly developed extremely aggressive cancers, many developed neuropathies and several have died.
The mRNA injections must be halted immediately for every age.
This has been the plan from the beginning, to get these on the childhood vaccination schedule. What better way to sterilize an entire generation or two? How’s that for a Population Bomb?
This is going to be the largest cull in human history, all so those monsters can keep their asses out of court. I'm speechless as to the depravity of the people allowing this crap to happen.
This is already a rubber stamped deal. The gene therapy injections shouldn't even be up for approved use, yet they are already going to put them on the childhood schedule. IIRC, the timelines for studying vaccines and presenting them for approval, the scrutiny for approval should not even begin until Jan. 2023. And that's for actual vaccines. How much longer should it take to study and scrutinize the data of a new, gene therapy?
This should likely come up for consideration in 8 years, yet here it is. They have to protect pharma.
And this also lets us know that they are not going to go forward with the J & J "vaccine", because this is said to be putting the mRNA "vaccines" on the schedule. So, only 2 companies will be covered by the liability shield? I guess they have an entire lineup of mRNA jabs they want to get into people of all age groups, and this opens that door for rubber stamp approval on them too.
Putting it on the childhood vaccine schedule erases liability for everyone, adults too. That's why the flu shot is on the childhood schedule. Neither one of those shots belong on the childhood schedule. By the way, the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) was set up to use your tax dollars to pay for covid shot injuries. There are tons of claims, but not a cent has been paid out. If they put the shot on the childhood schedule, the finger gets pointed at your tax dollars again in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP has paid out billions of your tax dollars since its inception in 1988 for childhood shots. None of the shots called vaccines are safe. They know it, now you know it.
Not sure your info about the held harmless status for pharma corps. That protected status was granted by G. Bush in the 1990's for all vaccines. All those vaccines are approved drugs as far as I know: they are not experimental. It is the EUA status that allows the CDC to keep pushing untested, unapproved drugs. Putting this new drug officially on the children's vaccine schedule ensures that protection no matter what the EUA status is. The scarey thing is that they are still untested, unmonitored and now will become legally mandated. We need to get that held harmless status recinded.
This may be quite difficult to do but the only way it can happen is if a coalition is built with many political sides that stay focused on this one issue. Exposes must find their way into the mainstream and funding for these drugs must be stopped. A divided populace cannot mount such a campaign.
Trump, the self confessed "Father of vaccines" signed the secret contracts forwards until 2036, which is for another 14 years, whether you like the injections or not. with legal moves now coming in to place, where politicians tell us all we need to know and we do what they tell us to do, like Biden for example and doctor's can't question what the politicians say - or lose their licenses to practice - I would say the future of humanity, such as it is and will be then, is not looking very good - what is happening now is the final bleat, before freedom of thought and expression is shut down for good and the term "freedom" has a very different meaning: By 2030 you will own nothing and you will be happy, but what as, an Android, its emotions funneled to it by a super computer, which also decides when it is surplus to requirements, is too old and kills it?
The only thing this will do is give anti vaxxers more proof the vaccines currently injected in children are a bad idea. The ones who were going to give their child this vaccine were already going to do it. The ones on the fence or even close to the fence will now see the absolute insanity of this.
I consider this a win even if they don’t approve it. It should wake up a lot of people.
I don’t understand how at best a therapeutic can be slipped in as a vaccine. There has to be an angle there that can challenge this in court. If a vaccine can be defined as something that boosts your immune system, then an apple or vitamin D from sunlight is now a vaccine...
Anyone, especially children, will have long term damage from the toxic spike proteins. Long term harm to immunity in general. On all levels, increased cancer risk.
See the names and faces of those who hold the fate of our children on the line - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/the-names-and-faces-of-those-who
NOW IS THE TIME TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN!
If this passes, it will only be because not enough people knew this was getting voted on. This it is not over! We will never give up!
My comment to the committee;
VRBPAC's Eric Rubin said in the Fall of 2021 "But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like coronavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it."
Now we all know the risk benefit ratio of the EUA injections is completely upside down and especially dangerous for infants, children, pregnant women and males under 50.
Is it true that in December 2021, Pfizer announced the two-dose series wasn’t successful and did not provide immunity in 2–5-year-olds?
Is it true that in the trial the confidence intervals went below zero for kids under two? And that the vaccine could possibly increase the risk of infection?
Is it true there have been 4448 hospitalizations and 1959 reports of myocarditis in children age 6 months through 17 years who have received mRNA vaccines reported to VAERS?
Is it true there have been 160 deaths, 674 cases of life-threatening side effects, 526 permanent disabilities and 56,818 total reports in children age 6 months through 17 years who have received mRNA vaccines reported to VAERS?
Children’s innate immune systems are not developed until the age of four – making even safer vaccines relatively useless and worse for this age group.
The FDA has made three indiscriminate broad authorizations without convening its vaccine experts in the last year.
I personally know 7 men in their 40s, 60s and 70s who have had emergency surgery for large clots around their hearts, in their arms and legs and two who have lost mobility soon after their inoculations. I know of at least that many women who quickly developed extremely aggressive cancers, many developed neuropathies and several have died.
The mRNA injections must be halted immediately for every age.
This has been the plan from the beginning, to get these on the childhood vaccination schedule. What better way to sterilize an entire generation or two? How’s that for a Population Bomb?
This is going to be the largest cull in human history, all so those monsters can keep their asses out of court. I'm speechless as to the depravity of the people allowing this crap to happen.
My God! This is surreal. Life itself has become a cruel and unusual punishment...
This is already a rubber stamped deal. The gene therapy injections shouldn't even be up for approved use, yet they are already going to put them on the childhood schedule. IIRC, the timelines for studying vaccines and presenting them for approval, the scrutiny for approval should not even begin until Jan. 2023. And that's for actual vaccines. How much longer should it take to study and scrutinize the data of a new, gene therapy?
This should likely come up for consideration in 8 years, yet here it is. They have to protect pharma.
And this also lets us know that they are not going to go forward with the J & J "vaccine", because this is said to be putting the mRNA "vaccines" on the schedule. So, only 2 companies will be covered by the liability shield? I guess they have an entire lineup of mRNA jabs they want to get into people of all age groups, and this opens that door for rubber stamp approval on them too.
Putting it on the childhood vaccine schedule erases liability for everyone, adults too. That's why the flu shot is on the childhood schedule. Neither one of those shots belong on the childhood schedule. By the way, the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) was set up to use your tax dollars to pay for covid shot injuries. There are tons of claims, but not a cent has been paid out. If they put the shot on the childhood schedule, the finger gets pointed at your tax dollars again in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP has paid out billions of your tax dollars since its inception in 1988 for childhood shots. None of the shots called vaccines are safe. They know it, now you know it.
Not sure your info about the held harmless status for pharma corps. That protected status was granted by G. Bush in the 1990's for all vaccines. All those vaccines are approved drugs as far as I know: they are not experimental. It is the EUA status that allows the CDC to keep pushing untested, unapproved drugs. Putting this new drug officially on the children's vaccine schedule ensures that protection no matter what the EUA status is. The scarey thing is that they are still untested, unmonitored and now will become legally mandated. We need to get that held harmless status recinded.
This may be quite difficult to do but the only way it can happen is if a coalition is built with many political sides that stay focused on this one issue. Exposes must find their way into the mainstream and funding for these drugs must be stopped. A divided populace cannot mount such a campaign.
Trump, the self confessed "Father of vaccines" signed the secret contracts forwards until 2036, which is for another 14 years, whether you like the injections or not. with legal moves now coming in to place, where politicians tell us all we need to know and we do what they tell us to do, like Biden for example and doctor's can't question what the politicians say - or lose their licenses to practice - I would say the future of humanity, such as it is and will be then, is not looking very good - what is happening now is the final bleat, before freedom of thought and expression is shut down for good and the term "freedom" has a very different meaning: By 2030 you will own nothing and you will be happy, but what as, an Android, its emotions funneled to it by a super computer, which also decides when it is surplus to requirements, is too old and kills it?
The only thing this will do is give anti vaxxers more proof the vaccines currently injected in children are a bad idea. The ones who were going to give their child this vaccine were already going to do it. The ones on the fence or even close to the fence will now see the absolute insanity of this.
I consider this a win even if they don’t approve it. It should wake up a lot of people.
I don’t understand how at best a therapeutic can be slipped in as a vaccine. There has to be an angle there that can challenge this in court. If a vaccine can be defined as something that boosts your immune system, then an apple or vitamin D from sunlight is now a vaccine...
One thing matters the most in this move period.
Anyone, especially children, will have long term damage from the toxic spike proteins. Long term harm to immunity in general. On all levels, increased cancer risk.
Simply evil, no matter what. Fight!
Amen!