Dave S - I understand your concern, but there is a viewpoint that Trump's picks have almost all been for a reason. He used Bolton, Barr, and Haley for his purposes, which included exposing their loyalties. Trump is far more intelligent than the establishment gave him credit for.
And Barr has been considered part of "the plan". He played h…
Dave S - I understand your concern, but there is a viewpoint that Trump's picks have almost all been for a reason. He used Bolton, Barr, and Haley for his purposes, which included exposing their loyalties. Trump is far more intelligent than the establishment gave him credit for.
And Barr has been considered part of "the plan". He played his role, and made some critical appointments. Yes, he put a damper on investigating election fraud in PA. I am on the fence about Barr, time will tell.
But have no worries about who is telling Trump who to pick, Trump decides for himself.
I hear ya and have no issues. As long as Trump mans up to his picks, I don't have any problems (politics is politics and perhaps "part of the plan"), but those people whose loyalties were exposed were in pretty high places. I should think those positions are too important to expose traitors. But ANY talk of Haley returning to his possible administration makes my stomach churn.
Remember in 2016 when the GOP made Trump sign a "loyalty pledge". What a joke, and enough GOP'ers stabbed Trump in the back later.
Separate topic, but I still can't get over 51 former US intelligence officals (almost all from the CIA) signed that document about Russian collusion, &c., &c). Talk about traitors! (And some, even though retired, most likely still have TS/SCI security clearances. Disgusting.
Dave S - I understand your concern, but there is a viewpoint that Trump's picks have almost all been for a reason. He used Bolton, Barr, and Haley for his purposes, which included exposing their loyalties. Trump is far more intelligent than the establishment gave him credit for.
And Barr has been considered part of "the plan". He played his role, and made some critical appointments. Yes, he put a damper on investigating election fraud in PA. I am on the fence about Barr, time will tell.
But have no worries about who is telling Trump who to pick, Trump decides for himself.
I hear ya and have no issues. As long as Trump mans up to his picks, I don't have any problems (politics is politics and perhaps "part of the plan"), but those people whose loyalties were exposed were in pretty high places. I should think those positions are too important to expose traitors. But ANY talk of Haley returning to his possible administration makes my stomach churn.
Remember in 2016 when the GOP made Trump sign a "loyalty pledge". What a joke, and enough GOP'ers stabbed Trump in the back later.
Separate topic, but I still can't get over 51 former US intelligence officals (almost all from the CIA) signed that document about Russian collusion, &c., &c). Talk about traitors! (And some, even though retired, most likely still have TS/SCI security clearances. Disgusting.
He got used, and played by pence.