'Clinical trials stopped early for efficacy or benefit at risk of overestimating treatment effects and distorting risk-benefit assessments: some guiding principles for the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine'
'Clinical trials stopped early for efficacy or benefit at risk of overestimating treatment effects and distorting risk-benefit assessments: some guiding principles for the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine'
Wrote this July/Aug/2020, at Trump's HHS, I will write more shortly but FDA officials met me one on one & asked me to write follow-up tamping down; I sent to Hahn, Marks, Task Force; did not like it
So, Dr. Alexander, looking back on this, I see an ethical, moral, Physician, researcher, etc. yelling into the wind. Little did you dream, in your wildest imagination that Fauci, Hahn, Marks, the Task Force & many others involved, care not at all what you thought. They had their depopulation plan all in place. Not only did they not care a fig about safety or how terrible the adverse effects would be, they already knew & were planning secret contracts with governments so the horrendous details wouldn’t see the light of day. The Psyop had already begun. And which country did they pick for the cherry on the ice cream sundae? Israel. What an ingenious plan to get rid of that problem that has plagued the world for eternity. You did the right thing, for which I as an American Jewish woman am eternally grateful. It proves to me that the world is not a totally ugly, evil place, because with people like you there are Angels sent by the Eternal One to show us hope.
You are exactly right!!!!! the only reason they would stop the trial “early” is to game the system. They were trying to fake high “relative efficacy” because they knew waiting any longer would show waning antibody levels, immunosuppressive effects, heart attacks, and disastrous side effects. Remember they’ve been studying it a while - remember all the dead rats and ferrets in prior moderna mRNA injection research. Don’t be fooled they knew exactly what they were doing which is why they stopped trials after 8weeks despite months of actual data. The phizer trials for babies are based on 7 days of data and look at antibody levels only. Pure fraud.
Dr Alexander, you are a knight in shining armor. We need your voice! Keep up the excellent work!!!!
Brave Dr. Alexander - we are all truly GRATEFUL for all that you've done, and are continuing to do, to fight the corruption and destruction of the medical profession, our lives and health, and the USA.
To help with that noble cause, I want to share something with you that I came across several days ago, and of which you may not be aware. It appears that Pfizer obtained an authorization from the USA Dept. of Defense for use of their mRNA "vaccine" as a "prototype"...
Some questions come to mind - there may be other questions...
1) How many "prototypes" have ever been PRODUCED in the MILLIONS of units?
2) How many "prototypes" have ever been USED in the millions of units?
3) How many "prototypes" have been authorized by the DOD for use on the PUBLIC?
4) WHY would Pfizer SEEK this type of impunity for their completely "safe and effective" product?
5) Why wouldn't Pfizer rely on the "normal" immunity provided by the Federal gov't for vaccines being sufficient re. "vaccine" related injuries/deaths?
Paul you are a hero. You were right. Your note was professional, fact based, and logical. Your “bosses” had an agenda, which in retrospect is clear. Operation Warp Speed, which the president touted as a good thing, was the cover these bastards needed to line their pockets and reduce the human population. Only question I have for you, why didn’t you let them fire you? You would have had a basis for wrongful termination and a platform to air your point of view?
Most peculiar. The original instance of this appears nowhere.
Searching on the title of the trial gets no results with the "Brave" search engine. Two hits on this substack with the DuckDuckGo search engine and one hit on Alexanders blog with Google search.
For a document that should have been read by every vaccine policy maker and seems to have been buried completely.
never knew trials could be stopped after a few data points are returned. when I got my MS in Psychology many years ago, if I would have stopped my research early and reported the results confirmed my hypothesis, I would have been laughed out of the room to say nothing of not getting the degree. this seems beyond comprehension that these overeducated assholes would/could/do do this kind of stuff. reading now about the history of SSRI trials in '80's. same unscientific behavior--redefining operational definitions after trials commence, not adjusting for multiple tests of significance, revising hypotheses during trials, adding unmentioned other ingredients to the experimental drug (e.g. benzo's). keep beating them over the head, Dr. Alexander! It is fun to read.
We cannot be grateful enough for heroes like you, who are fighting for our health and for the truth. It is mind boggling how such a dangerous substance could be released up on the whol world without proper studies about risks and benefits, and even more shocking, that they are even censoring reports of the serious side effects and are still making this poison mandatory. This is a dystopian nightmare we never imagined that it would come true.
So, Dr. Alexander, looking back on this, I see an ethical, moral, Physician, researcher, etc. yelling into the wind. Little did you dream, in your wildest imagination that Fauci, Hahn, Marks, the Task Force & many others involved, care not at all what you thought. They had their depopulation plan all in place. Not only did they not care a fig about safety or how terrible the adverse effects would be, they already knew & were planning secret contracts with governments so the horrendous details wouldn’t see the light of day. The Psyop had already begun. And which country did they pick for the cherry on the ice cream sundae? Israel. What an ingenious plan to get rid of that problem that has plagued the world for eternity. You did the right thing, for which I as an American Jewish woman am eternally grateful. It proves to me that the world is not a totally ugly, evil place, because with people like you there are Angels sent by the Eternal One to show us hope.
You are exactly right!!!!! the only reason they would stop the trial “early” is to game the system. They were trying to fake high “relative efficacy” because they knew waiting any longer would show waning antibody levels, immunosuppressive effects, heart attacks, and disastrous side effects. Remember they’ve been studying it a while - remember all the dead rats and ferrets in prior moderna mRNA injection research. Don’t be fooled they knew exactly what they were doing which is why they stopped trials after 8weeks despite months of actual data. The phizer trials for babies are based on 7 days of data and look at antibody levels only. Pure fraud.
Dr Alexander, you are a knight in shining armor. We need your voice! Keep up the excellent work!!!!
Thanks for getting this public. And everything you have been doing.
Brave Dr. Alexander - we are all truly GRATEFUL for all that you've done, and are continuing to do, to fight the corruption and destruction of the medical profession, our lives and health, and the USA.
To help with that noble cause, I want to share something with you that I came across several days ago, and of which you may not be aware. It appears that Pfizer obtained an authorization from the USA Dept. of Defense for use of their mRNA "vaccine" as a "prototype"...
Some questions come to mind - there may be other questions...
1) How many "prototypes" have ever been PRODUCED in the MILLIONS of units?
2) How many "prototypes" have ever been USED in the millions of units?
3) How many "prototypes" have been authorized by the DOD for use on the PUBLIC?
4) WHY would Pfizer SEEK this type of impunity for their completely "safe and effective" product?
5) Why wouldn't Pfizer rely on the "normal" immunity provided by the Federal gov't for vaccines being sufficient re. "vaccine" related injuries/deaths?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/pfizer-moves-to-dismiss-lawsuit-from-covid-19-vaccine-trial-citing-prototype-agreement_4481422.html?utm_source=ai&utm_medium=search
Paul you are a hero. You were right. Your note was professional, fact based, and logical. Your “bosses” had an agenda, which in retrospect is clear. Operation Warp Speed, which the president touted as a good thing, was the cover these bastards needed to line their pockets and reduce the human population. Only question I have for you, why didn’t you let them fire you? You would have had a basis for wrongful termination and a platform to air your point of view?
Paul one more post and you'll have 10 for day. Come on you can do it.
Bravo, once again !!! Dr. Alexander.
Remaining steadfastly standing on the rock of truth will always prove to be the right course in science , medicine & life itself .
Bravo ! , Indeed!
Sincerely thank you Dr Alexander.
Thank you for trying, Dr. Paul. It does matter.
Please Dr A, never stop being the hammer of justice! You're the best. Was great to hear you at Naomi Wolf's book launch.
Most peculiar. The original instance of this appears nowhere.
Searching on the title of the trial gets no results with the "Brave" search engine. Two hits on this substack with the DuckDuckGo search engine and one hit on Alexanders blog with Google search.
For a document that should have been read by every vaccine policy maker and seems to have been buried completely.
never knew trials could be stopped after a few data points are returned. when I got my MS in Psychology many years ago, if I would have stopped my research early and reported the results confirmed my hypothesis, I would have been laughed out of the room to say nothing of not getting the degree. this seems beyond comprehension that these overeducated assholes would/could/do do this kind of stuff. reading now about the history of SSRI trials in '80's. same unscientific behavior--redefining operational definitions after trials commence, not adjusting for multiple tests of significance, revising hypotheses during trials, adding unmentioned other ingredients to the experimental drug (e.g. benzo's). keep beating them over the head, Dr. Alexander! It is fun to read.
It seems that our medical schools have admitted the “smartest people” as long as they are “ethical enough.”
I now know believe we those same schools to admit the “most ethical people” as long as they are “smart enough.”
We need doctors who are both able and willing to tell the truth when it is the hardest thing to do.
I am just so disappointed in most of our medical professionals. Please keep doing what you are doing- we need you!!
We cannot be grateful enough for heroes like you, who are fighting for our health and for the truth. It is mind boggling how such a dangerous substance could be released up on the whol world without proper studies about risks and benefits, and even more shocking, that they are even censoring reports of the serious side effects and are still making this poison mandatory. This is a dystopian nightmare we never imagined that it would come true.
This French lady is an activist and expert/researcher in clinical trials and boy, does she smudge her discontent in these trials. She challenges anyone in the world (French and English) to prove her point: https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-les-debriefings-videos-ne-pas-manquer/christine-cotton-expertise-des-resultats-des-essais.