12 Comments
author

Note, I wrote this in 2020-2021

Expand full comment

If the cycle threshold discussion didn't sufficiently move the needle into "Bullshit Red" then people are even more brain dead than I first thought. Holy shit....If I can figure this out, anyone can. I was just a neophyte concerning these matters. Special thanks to Jon Rappoport for bringing it to my attention. Connecting the dots wasn't hard.

Expand full comment

There is another factor among all of these....we all have viruses in the nose.....but the fact remains that the nose is supposed to filter and just because a virus is there it does not mean we will get sick.....

Expand full comment

Many of us knew the pCR cycled that high was a scam but who was there to act on our protestations? No one!

So many were either getting bought or feared the loss of employment so I have to say they all have blood on their hands they will have to deal with in this life or the next.

And what is to stop these misanthropic death cultists from doing this again.?

Expand full comment

The manufactures of PCR tests printed 23ct on the boxes they came in. Kari Mullis said it only detected 'stuff' which could be dead or active but not a specific disease, Drosden was proved to be a fraud. Starting with one bean in a jar, double it 23 times will give about 8 million beans. Continue doubling to 45ct (used by the NHS, UK) and you have about 125,000..........jars. Should be able to find a bug of some sort in that lot. Any scientist,/medic that didn't know this needs their licence , and those that did, locked up.

Expand full comment

I don't know about the rest of Canada, but Lifelabs in BC was routinely doing 40-44 cycles.

Expand full comment

Are you saying there was an infectious pandemic that we needed to test for in the first place are you saying that we needed to be isolated? What about the Denny Rancourt information and study about all cause mortality, and not spread of infection?

Expand full comment

D. Raoult's (sp) research in the lab correlating infectiousness with PCR cycle thresholds was confirmed by your review of the body of evidence. The difficulty is clearly a moral and not scientific one.

Do you think we have enough ppl in clinical medicine/scientific fields who are not manipulable--such that we can set up new institutions, Paul? I can't see this kind of corruption ever turning around within the existing ones and if we do not set up institutions to teach clinical medicine correctly. I'm not sure that there will be anyone left to practice medicine in a way that actually corresponds to scientific evidence. It looks from my vantage point that the goal is the destruction of a moral 'house of medicine', a razing of the healthcare systems that were semi-functional prior to four years ago. 'Nurse-monkeys' /practitioners will man 'Health hubs' at the local pharmacies, driven by AI; with no one left who is able to actually think critically, form a differential diagnosis or look beyond the checkboxes. It's pretty depressing.

Expand full comment

Please excuse the auto txt robot here and there in this text ...

I forgot to go through it and it sometimes revises on the activation of the send icon..

Thanks

Expand full comment

Hi ... great to see this topic emerging of the validity of the “test”..

The creator of the test Kary Mullis.. won a Nobel prize for the process he created that has the acronym PCR..

If you go to an independent video platform such as Brighteon .com you will be able to find videos off Kary Mullis explaining why the so called “ test should not be used as a test.

It’s very clear that the creator of this process says very clearly that it isn’t a diagnostic for illness of cancer infection.

Also a German lawyer that has done a lot of work on the illegalities present in the whole plague and vax circumstance has uncovered the fact that a German Professor hijacked the pcr process to create a statistical platform to provide false positives that enabled a global health drama to be enabled.

This does sound like a move script..

It isn’t ..

If you then look at the work of various people that dates back to way before the year 2000 you will see various components contrived to enable a false “test” to become centre stage on a global scale..

The lawyer and his team had put together the evidence to show that the test was a means to create what is now known as the “plandemic”..

If one uses the main stream internet browsers or video platforms of main stream media you won’t find the information that will tell the factual story.

At one point the pcr”test “ was used to show that various fruit and many obscure items were victims of the plague ...

This information was available 2 years ago and some people were able to predict this whole scenario very early using patent information research programs and tracking funding and so on ...

So ... if Kary Mullis were here he would say something a lot if people don’t want to hear ..

Go to brighteon.com and you will find a huge collection of people that have been saying that the “test” and many more truths have been known for a very long time..

Most of them were silenced or ignored.

But their voices are now being heard .!!

If vs Kary Mullis had been listened to the premise for the plague could not exist.

No pcr Test”.

Strange but true..

Expand full comment