Look at the top graph; what happened globally especially in western nations, from February March 2021? The COVID vaccine was rolled out! Hugh Akston, Ethical Skeptic, Mercola, Brown hone in
Just curious if it’s was a plan from the get go or they caught the opportunity to write off long term side effects from injection to so-called “Long Covid”. If it was a plan - then how demonically genius it was. I thought to myself in early 2021: if there will be various autoimmune and malignant disorders of the large scale after mass injections, then it will be obvious and undeniable that the reason causing it is this very injection. Who on this earth could think they will twist this to their advantage, masking this devastating occurrence with some mysterious complication of any sort aka “Long Covid”. It’s same anti science as “asymptomatic transmission”. https://www.news-medical.net/amp/news/20221012/Immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases-following-COVID-19.aspx
Personally, I think it was known at the start, and engineered that way. I think they (whoever they are but I think it is DOD/darpa/barda) were merely interested in seeing if they could quickly respond to a bio attack, and get a vaccine into the population...in preparation for possible future bio weapon attacks, and didnt give a damn about what happens after, as long as it cant be tied to the shot, as current science denies there are any long term effects to any vaccine.
And so here we are....and these psycopaths just got Dementia Biden to make bioweapons research the number one strategy that the US will pursue, come hell or high water.
Estimates are these jabs will kill only 6% of the world population....definitely a drop in the bucket, hardly noticeable by us useless eaters, and totally a plus if you believe the world is already too populated.
Please see https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/979565 . This op-ed demonstrates the lengths to which the establishment will go to block real information from getting out. The op-ed focuses on Seneff, who is new to publications, forgetting that the main author is Peter McCullough, a recognized authority who is facing license revocation for speaking up.
Here is a tweet from this group after their letter was rejected: https://twitter.com/barriere_dr/status/1536427197149356038?lang=en. They refer to the article as anti-VAX. How can the article be anti-vax when the injection is not a vaccine? It prevents neither infection nor viral transmission. Maybe the term anti-clotters would be more accurate!
The distinction between "vaccine" and "genetic therapy" is lost on most. You are correct in that the mRNA therapy is not a vaccine, but dwelling on that semantic point is a way to lose the argument.
One should never forget the old adage told to me by the CEO of a business handling nuclear waste: "One man's garbage is another man's bread-and-butter". The lead author of the letter to FCT is a medical oncologist. If Seneff, Cole, and many others who are starting to see substantial increases in cancer are anywhere near correct in their predictions, oncologists will be increasing their incomes drastically for the foreseeable future. Given their ranks will be depleted by those who chose to, or were coerced to, take the shot, the oncologists who remain healthy will be drowning in cash.
It's all part of big pharma's plan to make you sick from mRNA poisons thus requiring you to seek big pharma cancer drugs that are extremely expensive and pretty much useless. Profits...never health...trust us till your dying days.
It’s not really working. A friend has bought a new house - she has had at least 4, maybe 4 or 5 doses (I just couldn’t bear to ask any more). She says she doesn’t know why she bothered with a new house as she probably won’t be in it long. Many friends and acquaintances are dying from very rapidly developing and aggressive cancers - the only blessing she says is that there isn’t even time for the gruelling conventional treatment of chemo and radio they are going so fast!
Cancers and other conditions started increasing at a very alarming rate in the 1800s. A lot of these were rare or didn't exist before. Back then, some doctors publicly blamed vaccines as the culprit. Cancers in the pre-vaxx era vs the vaxx era are so much different.
After the US government started collecting and publishing data, it showed a crazy steady rise for this set of diseases beginning well over a century ago. Researchers now only want to narrowly focus on a tiny blip of this long-term chart.
In 2020 before the COVID shot rollout, there was an explosion of various conditions including cancers in the infected. Big Gov, Big Med, and the public villainized and shunned them. Then, these people were coerced and pressured into taking the shots. The spread, shed, and injected versions seem to be triggering various cancers in some. Injured have been reporting the same phenomenon after receiving the prior vaxxes. Perhaps this is also happening with other pharma products.
From what I've read, 10%-25% of cancer diagnosis are wrong. That may be much higher now because heavily used scans cannot distinguish between cancer, inflammation, infection, and some other issues.
I never realized until recently what a scam "scans" can be - many of them rely on algorithms and the result will differ depending on which mathematical model is used. Also, many times "markers" are also scams and simply a bad statistical interpretation.
But scans and markers have the sound of definitive proof, and people get angry if you question them. They think they are the same as an Xray, but it is very different.
The COVID-19 official death statistics have been an outright fraud (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/underreporting-factors-for-vaers-are-vastly-underreported-e3a21062). Assume there are a million deaths in the USA reported by the CDC as due to COVID-19. The following three corrections (at least) need to be applied to these re[ported numbers to get actual real-world numbers. First, at least 90% are false positives (see above link). Applying this correction reduces the number of COVID-19 deaths to 100,000. Second, at least 90% of these deaths could have been prevented by early and appropriate treatment that was withheld deliberately (see above link). Applying this correction reduces the number of COVID-19 deaths to 10,000. Third, The CDC has stated that “for over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.”. That means approximately 94 % of the COVID-19 deaths could have been attributed to any of the comorbidities these patients had, and only 6% of the deaths could actually be attributed to COVID-19 uniquely. Applying this correction reduces the number of deaths that could be uniquely attributed to COVID-19 and not to any of the associated comorbidities to 600. Thus, the best the shot could have done was save 600 people dying from COVID-19 in the USA, and for that over 250M people received this dangerous untested shot. Deaths that were really attributable to cancer or any of the other comorbidities were automatically undercounted by assigning any death with COVID-19 as attributable to COVID-19.
Since the beginning of this ‘pandemic’ I’ve always tested negative for Covid. On April 22, 2021 I took the 1st Moderna vax. Of course like any other vaccine (flu, hepatitis b & c, etc) injection site was painful. However, I was vomiting after the Moderna, along with feeling fatigue. Same goes for June 3, 2021. After my experience I decided to not get the “booster” shots. Up to the new year of 2022, I have received negative test results for Covid-19 whether I received tests from a pharmacy or at employer (CVS, Walgreens, and at home test kits). Now to take you back to September-November 2021, I was diagnosed with a skin cancer. Fast forward to February 2022, I ended up being hospitalized with a bowel obstruction that left me in the hospital for a week it seemed, which I tested positive for Covid-19. Here’s the bizarre part of it all; before or after (busy working full time and doing adult things {maintaining residency, being homeless at times, paying more to bills than to eat} and focusing on adequate rest) hospital I would go one week to Walgreens for a test and test positive, another week to CVS and test negative, the third week I went back to Walgreens-that test was inconclusive. Needless to say of what has happened I strongly believe these vaccines are to cause massive health risks that causes patients to seek healthcare, which is only pocketing money into the hands of the greedy. Furthermore, my I.D. Dr in St. Louis persuaded me to take the vaccine while dealing with neurological issues I’ve been experiencing from a car accident of late 2018. Fear was the only virus during this pandemic.
Trial Site News addresses this issue of more younger people being diagnosed with cancer (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/new-cancer-diagnosis-exploding-in-young-people-around-the-world-8177d8ea). We need to get surrogate data to ascertain the full extent of the tragedy. As I show below, cancer death statistics can be easily manipulated. If 94% of those who the government says died of COVID had multiple comorbidities, then the fraction of the 94% that included cancer would not have been counted as a COVID-19 death. That's killing two birds with one stone: ramping up the COVID-19 death numbers to maintain the hysteria, and suppressing the actual increases in deaths from cancer. But this goes way beyond COVID-19. What about people who are dying with multiple comorbidities (one of which is cancer) that don't include COVID-19? Their deaths could also be attributed to one of the comorbidities other than cancer. To circumvent this problem, we need to look at markers closely associated with cancer incidence, such as growth in cancer drugs, growth in other treatments relevant to cancer, visits to oncologists, and other such markers. Data from the health insurance companies on these issues would be invaluable.
Just curious if it’s was a plan from the get go or they caught the opportunity to write off long term side effects from injection to so-called “Long Covid”. If it was a plan - then how demonically genius it was. I thought to myself in early 2021: if there will be various autoimmune and malignant disorders of the large scale after mass injections, then it will be obvious and undeniable that the reason causing it is this very injection. Who on this earth could think they will twist this to their advantage, masking this devastating occurrence with some mysterious complication of any sort aka “Long Covid”. It’s same anti science as “asymptomatic transmission”. https://www.news-medical.net/amp/news/20221012/Immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases-following-COVID-19.aspx
Ilana, you have seen this right? https://www.bitchute.com/video/0V2gzkJdWKV3/
Personally, I think it was known at the start, and engineered that way. I think they (whoever they are but I think it is DOD/darpa/barda) were merely interested in seeing if they could quickly respond to a bio attack, and get a vaccine into the population...in preparation for possible future bio weapon attacks, and didnt give a damn about what happens after, as long as it cant be tied to the shot, as current science denies there are any long term effects to any vaccine.
And so here we are....and these psycopaths just got Dementia Biden to make bioweapons research the number one strategy that the US will pursue, come hell or high water.
Estimates are these jabs will kill only 6% of the world population....definitely a drop in the bucket, hardly noticeable by us useless eaters, and totally a plus if you believe the world is already too populated.
Please see https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/979565 . This op-ed demonstrates the lengths to which the establishment will go to block real information from getting out. The op-ed focuses on Seneff, who is new to publications, forgetting that the main author is Peter McCullough, a recognized authority who is facing license revocation for speaking up.
Here is a tweet from this group after their letter was rejected: https://twitter.com/barriere_dr/status/1536427197149356038?lang=en. They refer to the article as anti-VAX. How can the article be anti-vax when the injection is not a vaccine? It prevents neither infection nor viral transmission. Maybe the term anti-clotters would be more accurate!
The distinction between "vaccine" and "genetic therapy" is lost on most. You are correct in that the mRNA therapy is not a vaccine, but dwelling on that semantic point is a way to lose the argument.
One should never forget the old adage told to me by the CEO of a business handling nuclear waste: "One man's garbage is another man's bread-and-butter". The lead author of the letter to FCT is a medical oncologist. If Seneff, Cole, and many others who are starting to see substantial increases in cancer are anywhere near correct in their predictions, oncologists will be increasing their incomes drastically for the foreseeable future. Given their ranks will be depleted by those who chose to, or were coerced to, take the shot, the oncologists who remain healthy will be drowning in cash.
Nice. But the acid dripping from your pen is eating holes in the paper.
Well done!
If you’re on Facebook, check out the group Died Suddenly News. Absolute carnage.
It's all part of big pharma's plan to make you sick from mRNA poisons thus requiring you to seek big pharma cancer drugs that are extremely expensive and pretty much useless. Profits...never health...trust us till your dying days.
It’s not really working. A friend has bought a new house - she has had at least 4, maybe 4 or 5 doses (I just couldn’t bear to ask any more). She says she doesn’t know why she bothered with a new house as she probably won’t be in it long. Many friends and acquaintances are dying from very rapidly developing and aggressive cancers - the only blessing she says is that there isn’t even time for the gruelling conventional treatment of chemo and radio they are going so fast!
They are now creating mRNA vaccines to treat cancer.
Create the problem. Create the solution. Profit $
KNEW THIS 2 YRS PRIOR ...
GREAT EXPERTS FINALLY PROVIDING DATA OF THEIR FINDINGS IN THEIR CLINICAL SETTINGS ...
MY CIRCLES CANCER RATES BLOOMING 🥺🥺
Cancers and other conditions started increasing at a very alarming rate in the 1800s. A lot of these were rare or didn't exist before. Back then, some doctors publicly blamed vaccines as the culprit. Cancers in the pre-vaxx era vs the vaxx era are so much different.
After the US government started collecting and publishing data, it showed a crazy steady rise for this set of diseases beginning well over a century ago. Researchers now only want to narrowly focus on a tiny blip of this long-term chart.
In 2020 before the COVID shot rollout, there was an explosion of various conditions including cancers in the infected. Big Gov, Big Med, and the public villainized and shunned them. Then, these people were coerced and pressured into taking the shots. The spread, shed, and injected versions seem to be triggering various cancers in some. Injured have been reporting the same phenomenon after receiving the prior vaxxes. Perhaps this is also happening with other pharma products.
From what I've read, 10%-25% of cancer diagnosis are wrong. That may be much higher now because heavily used scans cannot distinguish between cancer, inflammation, infection, and some other issues.
I never realized until recently what a scam "scans" can be - many of them rely on algorithms and the result will differ depending on which mathematical model is used. Also, many times "markers" are also scams and simply a bad statistical interpretation.
But scans and markers have the sound of definitive proof, and people get angry if you question them. They think they are the same as an Xray, but it is very different.
Nothing to see here. Safe and effective. Get yourself boosted.
The COVID-19 official death statistics have been an outright fraud (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/underreporting-factors-for-vaers-are-vastly-underreported-e3a21062). Assume there are a million deaths in the USA reported by the CDC as due to COVID-19. The following three corrections (at least) need to be applied to these re[ported numbers to get actual real-world numbers. First, at least 90% are false positives (see above link). Applying this correction reduces the number of COVID-19 deaths to 100,000. Second, at least 90% of these deaths could have been prevented by early and appropriate treatment that was withheld deliberately (see above link). Applying this correction reduces the number of COVID-19 deaths to 10,000. Third, The CDC has stated that “for over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.”. That means approximately 94 % of the COVID-19 deaths could have been attributed to any of the comorbidities these patients had, and only 6% of the deaths could actually be attributed to COVID-19 uniquely. Applying this correction reduces the number of deaths that could be uniquely attributed to COVID-19 and not to any of the associated comorbidities to 600. Thus, the best the shot could have done was save 600 people dying from COVID-19 in the USA, and for that over 250M people received this dangerous untested shot. Deaths that were really attributable to cancer or any of the other comorbidities were automatically undercounted by assigning any death with COVID-19 as attributable to COVID-19.
Since the beginning of this ‘pandemic’ I’ve always tested negative for Covid. On April 22, 2021 I took the 1st Moderna vax. Of course like any other vaccine (flu, hepatitis b & c, etc) injection site was painful. However, I was vomiting after the Moderna, along with feeling fatigue. Same goes for June 3, 2021. After my experience I decided to not get the “booster” shots. Up to the new year of 2022, I have received negative test results for Covid-19 whether I received tests from a pharmacy or at employer (CVS, Walgreens, and at home test kits). Now to take you back to September-November 2021, I was diagnosed with a skin cancer. Fast forward to February 2022, I ended up being hospitalized with a bowel obstruction that left me in the hospital for a week it seemed, which I tested positive for Covid-19. Here’s the bizarre part of it all; before or after (busy working full time and doing adult things {maintaining residency, being homeless at times, paying more to bills than to eat} and focusing on adequate rest) hospital I would go one week to Walgreens for a test and test positive, another week to CVS and test negative, the third week I went back to Walgreens-that test was inconclusive. Needless to say of what has happened I strongly believe these vaccines are to cause massive health risks that causes patients to seek healthcare, which is only pocketing money into the hands of the greedy. Furthermore, my I.D. Dr in St. Louis persuaded me to take the vaccine while dealing with neurological issues I’ve been experiencing from a car accident of late 2018. Fear was the only virus during this pandemic.
What is the source for the first graph?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/how-cancer-deaths-from-the-covid-jabs-are-being-hidden_4796410.html?utm_source=News&src_src=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-10-16-1&src_cmp=breaking-2022-10-16-1&utm_medium=email&est=zNNtD3j%2FHcmm%2BZLTnUaMRRGuyR9s%2BJdBHU5mmrUW2XM6EdSWBfHJodOZvUCfaJ4%3D
That is a heartbreaking story. We must keep exposing the truth for the victims...they deserve no less.
Trial Site News addresses this issue of more younger people being diagnosed with cancer (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/new-cancer-diagnosis-exploding-in-young-people-around-the-world-8177d8ea). We need to get surrogate data to ascertain the full extent of the tragedy. As I show below, cancer death statistics can be easily manipulated. If 94% of those who the government says died of COVID had multiple comorbidities, then the fraction of the 94% that included cancer would not have been counted as a COVID-19 death. That's killing two birds with one stone: ramping up the COVID-19 death numbers to maintain the hysteria, and suppressing the actual increases in deaths from cancer. But this goes way beyond COVID-19. What about people who are dying with multiple comorbidities (one of which is cancer) that don't include COVID-19? Their deaths could also be attributed to one of the comorbidities other than cancer. To circumvent this problem, we need to look at markers closely associated with cancer incidence, such as growth in cancer drugs, growth in other treatments relevant to cancer, visits to oncologists, and other such markers. Data from the health insurance companies on these issues would be invaluable.