Game, set, match - thank you. It's $political, not science for vaccinating children. But even "If they have no risk on the table, then we cannot take this chance as parents" why should we mess with something that's working? The children are fine, they don't need the covid-19 vaccines even with the liability protection removed.
A lawsuit…
Game, set, match - thank you. It's $political, not science for vaccinating children. But even "If they have no risk on the table, then we cannot take this chance as parents" why should we mess with something that's working? The children are fine, they don't need the covid-19 vaccines even with the liability protection removed.
A lawsuit it's due, the federal gov can be sued any time with the FTCA if there is harm regardless the covid-19 countermeasures declaration.
Game, set, match - thank you. It's $political, not science for vaccinating children. But even "If they have no risk on the table, then we cannot take this chance as parents" why should we mess with something that's working? The children are fine, they don't need the covid-19 vaccines even with the liability protection removed.
A lawsuit it's due, the federal gov can be sued any time with the FTCA if there is harm regardless the covid-19 countermeasures declaration.
https://guessname.substack.com/p/should-criminal-covid-19-evidence
A longer but better legal path that might open Pfizer and all to lawsuits is
https://guessname.substack.com/p/why-is-the-revelation-of-pfizer-adverse