DeSantis smashes corrupted lying media on gender orientation in classrooms for 5, 6, 7 year olds; so that parents can send their children to school without the sexual identify bull in their education
palexander.substack.com
DeSantis smashes corrupted lying media on gender orientation in classrooms for 5, 6, 7 year olds; so that parents can send their children to school without the sexual identify bull in their education
DeSantis smashes corrupted lying media on gender orientation in classrooms for 5, 6, 7 year olds; so that parents can send their children to school without the sexual identify bull in their education
Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Institutionalizing the sexuality of children is child abuse. How can it not be so?
What happened to the child's right to privacy? By what right is this privacy interfered with? By what authority does the invasive sexualization of children in the public classroom with unbargained for institutional conditioning become authorized? How can such authorization legitimately occur without due consideration of trustee duty to the parents or formal agreement of the parents to specifically do so, or to otherwise use the authority of the classroom and attending agent of the institution to invasively sexualize the child to a particular purpose without parental informed consent or documented parental permission to do?
A field trip, the administration of aspirin, and nearly any other form of invasive subordination of a child to a particular purpose requires more documentation, informed consent and formal authority to proceed. This is the standard of the established standard of care and expectation of informed consent and expectation of conscionable behavior that is reasonably expected from the institution and its employees and agents by reasonable people.
I am a stakeholder, as is every other taxpayer. The institutional employees entrusted with the care of children also have a duty to us to be worthy trustees of the child and parental interests and make every good faith effort to perform to a minimum standard of practice and care that would be reasonably expected by reasonable people whose child was so institutionally entrusted.
The adults conducting these forms of sexual bullying are selectively interfering with the private sexuality of the child. The enablers are just as responsible, as are the unions that represent and extend workplace protection and benefits to such violators and predators.
Are not the child's parents are entitled to certain express and implied warranties in the treatment of their child by the institution and employees of said institution? There is a web of contractual and statutory protections in play to ensure and reasonable warrant competent trustee behavior over the child and the parental interest in their child entrusted to the care of the trustees. There are intrinsic standards of care, implied warranties of performance and justiciable threshold of unconscionable acts and behaviors, and betrayals of reasonable expectations of the trustee role.
It may be our entire paradigm of duty and care of children entrusted to others is fatally flawed. It many be our judicial processes have been blinded by institutional fealty of the legal profession to their institutional cousins in the morass of institutionalized education.
Bad lawyering is at the bottom of it. Bad law, bad lawyering, bad enforcement, and pernicious and corrupt exploitation of public assets and taxpayer funding for schooling a child.
Sadly, the inactions of good lawyers and good politicians make it possible. Their inaction has created the institutional sepsis that has allowed the filth to manifest and incubate soul damaging sickness across the institution of schooling.
From the Congress to the classroom it's a seamless web of converting public funds in to the personal pocket of political insiders who feign victimhood as they victimize others.
The constant flow of fetid sepsis from institutional education backwardly infiltrating into government now informs a government that intends to treat you and me no differently than they treat our children in the classroom.
It has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with tyrancy, infantilization and disrespect.
Institutionalizing the sexuality of children is child abuse. How can it not be so?
What happened to the child's right to privacy? By what right is this privacy interfered with? By what authority does the invasive sexualization of children in the public classroom with unbargained for institutional conditioning become authorized? How can such authorization legitimately occur without due consideration of trustee duty to the parents or formal agreement of the parents to specifically do so, or to otherwise use the authority of the classroom and attending agent of the institution to invasively sexualize the child to a particular purpose without parental informed consent or documented parental permission to do?
A field trip, the administration of aspirin, and nearly any other form of invasive subordination of a child to a particular purpose requires more documentation, informed consent and formal authority to proceed. This is the standard of the established standard of care and expectation of informed consent and expectation of conscionable behavior that is reasonably expected from the institution and its employees and agents by reasonable people.
I am a stakeholder, as is every other taxpayer. The institutional employees entrusted with the care of children also have a duty to us to be worthy trustees of the child and parental interests and make every good faith effort to perform to a minimum standard of practice and care that would be reasonably expected by reasonable people whose child was so institutionally entrusted.
The adults conducting these forms of sexual bullying are selectively interfering with the private sexuality of the child. The enablers are just as responsible, as are the unions that represent and extend workplace protection and benefits to such violators and predators.
Are not the child's parents are entitled to certain express and implied warranties in the treatment of their child by the institution and employees of said institution? There is a web of contractual and statutory protections in play to ensure and reasonable warrant competent trustee behavior over the child and the parental interest in their child entrusted to the care of the trustees. There are intrinsic standards of care, implied warranties of performance and justiciable threshold of unconscionable acts and behaviors, and betrayals of reasonable expectations of the trustee role.
It may be our entire paradigm of duty and care of children entrusted to others is fatally flawed. It many be our judicial processes have been blinded by institutional fealty of the legal profession to their institutional cousins in the morass of institutionalized education.
Bad lawyering is at the bottom of it. Bad law, bad lawyering, bad enforcement, and pernicious and corrupt exploitation of public assets and taxpayer funding for schooling a child.
Sadly, the inactions of good lawyers and good politicians make it possible. Their inaction has created the institutional sepsis that has allowed the filth to manifest and incubate soul damaging sickness across the institution of schooling.
From the Congress to the classroom it's a seamless web of converting public funds in to the personal pocket of political insiders who feign victimhood as they victimize others.
The constant flow of fetid sepsis from institutional education backwardly infiltrating into government now informs a government that intends to treat you and me no differently than they treat our children in the classroom.
It has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with tyrancy, infantilization and disrespect.
You tell 'em DeSantis! 👍