Discover more from Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack
DEVASTATING BREAKING study: "Karlstad et al. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination & Myocarditis in Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents"; 1st & 2nd doses mRNA vaxx associated with increased myocarditis/peric
In a cohort study of 23.1 million residents across 4 Nordic countries, risk of myocarditis after the first & second doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines was highest in young males aged 16 to 24 years age
“Both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.”
SOURCE:
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents
Brief overview for your perusal:
Researchers sought to examine the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis after SARS-CoV-2 injection/vaccination.
Researchers conduced 4 cohort studies and analyzed via meta-analysis. There were 23, 122, 522 residents who were 12 years or older (followed up from December 27, 2020, until incident myocarditis or pericarditis, censoring, or study end (October 5, 2021) (nationwide health registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden). Researchers assessed the 28-day risk periods following administration date of the 1st and 2nd doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, including BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and AZD1222, also combinations. Measures were hospital admission for myocarditis or pericarditis.
Researchers reported that ‘among 23, 122, 522 Nordic residents (81% vaccinated by study end; 50.2% female), 1077 incident myocarditis events and 1149 incident pericarditis events were identified. Within the 28-day period, for males and females 12 years or older combined who received a homologous schedule, the second dose was associated with higher risk of myocarditis, with adjusted IRRs of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.43-2.14) for BNT162b2 and 6.57 (95% CI, 4.64-9.28) for mRNA-1273. Among males 16 to 24 years of age, adjusted IRRs were 5.31 (95% CI, 3.68-7.68) for a second dose of BNT162b2 and 13.83 (95% CI, 8.08-23.68) for a second dose of mRNA-1273, and numbers of excess events were 5.55 (95% CI, 3.70-7.39) events per 100 000 vaccinees after the second dose of BNT162b2 and 18.39 (9.05-27.72) events per 100 000 vaccinees after the second dose of mRNA-1273. Estimates for pericarditis were similar.’
Researchers concluded that the 1st and 2nd doses of mRNA vaccines were related to elevated risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.
The association was clear. ‘For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose.’ These findings urge the balancing of benefits versus risks of these injections given the emerging myocarditis and pericarditis risks (that have been reported elsewhere and stably since inception of these injections).
DEVASTATING BREAKING study: "Karlstad et al. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination & Myocarditis in Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents"; 1st & 2nd doses mRNA vaxx associated with increased myocarditis/peric
Dear Dr Alexander: Thank you for the tragic updates. Your work is vital. One thing to mention. After I heard Dr Steven Pelech on the pathophysiology of the jab by design (my terms as he was careful) and recalled Dr. Bhadhi's repeated alarms based on path science, followed by the histology images that have been supported by Steve Kirsh's work...my question became how is this safe at all based on the design that attaches spikes to the body's own cells for the immune system to attack it? How is it safe in any way. This risk and benefit analysis that you close with would make sense IF the design pathophysiology was unclear and you had to just analyze from the dismal, corrupted numbers of adverse events. But, basically this horrible news just confirms what the model suggests would happen. Am I missing something? Do we have any data that indicates a return to wellness status or clearing the spikes based on actual empirical evidence vs just the survival of the patients for a period? I would welcome that. We know the packaging of the mRNA is persistent to some degree and the spike making machinery can just keep going. It's just a matter of time for those in whom it persists. Probably 5G is not helping either. And the other ingredients beyond the spike are doing all manner of harm on a schedule and we know it from pre Covid research in toxicology. Maybe alot of immune systems have passed the worse. I pray it is so. Otherwise, please consider using new language to reflect the actual clarity around the growing problems of the situation. Ordinary risk and harm analysis is like watching a prolonged game of russian roulette that keeps circling through a crowd to predict the risks. Are you or others putting into the risk analysis the persistence of the spike making inserts? Because if you are not, then it's possibly not making the most compelling and accurate model. I say this with great respect for you and for the courage you must have. If you have to put it this way about risk and benefit (certainly the classic analysis for a saner time) to preserve yourself from danger... I get it... but otherwise, let's call it what it is and cry out for remedies for the vaccinated. So many people I love got pulled in and I have only the deepest concern that we face the probabilities that in a true model so we can fight back. I believe there are a million minds in science that would rush to this cause once we can do the kind of clarification Dr Martin is talking about. God bless you and keep you safe. All this is not on you, but I was so struck by the last sentence of your essay, I had to write you.
And yet countries like Germany with a complete lunatic as a health minister, are sitting on 77 mio doses of vaccine that they would love to distribute... when will they learn?