Geert Vanden Bossche predicted that enhanced infectiousness we have seen with omicron yet limited severity in the lower respiratory tract, will be short lived and now data shows is increased severity
Was at the ice rink earlier - got to chatting with an Aussie tourist who was watching the game...
Summary
1. Everyone is sick in OZ - and really sick ---- he believes that is due to the lockdowns
2. Believes there is no way there can be more lockdowns.
3. Hospitals are jammed
4. I told him hospital are jammed here to -- he said cuz staff is burned out -- I had to take a poke and tell him there's that but the main reason is lots of nurses and docs have walked because they are refusing to boost anymore cuz of all the vax injuries they are seeing come through - I know a nurse who told me that. Silence - look of disbelief
5. Pursuing that I mention that one of my good mates who is top 3 players in NZ is not playing - he can barely walk 500m... cannot work. Oh long covid - no myocarditis -- started the day of the shot.
Gotta run but ... what's your name ... Nathan -- I'm Fast Eddy ... Fast Eddy? Ya Fast Eddy.... ah ok ... c;ya Fast Eddy... yep c'ya ---enjoy the rest of the game....
BTW - he was coughing into his sleeve from time to time .... touch of VAIDS....
I live in a large midwestern city and while at Kroger I heard one the the announcement/commercials for the Pfizer vaccines yesterday. The narrator admitted that the vaccines efficacy wane over time and that in order to “protect” yourself you need to take the boosters. He compared it to how you need to reapply sunscreen. It was so stomach turning. Yes, let’s compare a deadly experimental mRNA shot to f***ing sunscreen and try to fool people while they buy groceries to get more and more and more shots! I think it’s time to stop shopping at Kroger.
The “Omicron” viral immune escape variant has 30 odd more spike proteins than the Wuhan strain. So I gather, apart from being more contagious, it now seems to be evolving with the help sub optimal specific vaccinal antibodies to place much more pressure on the viral virulence binding sites on the many more spike proteins. More virulent and contagious. Good news, some friends of mine got talked out of boosters. They had one shot only.
Half a dozen of one, six of the other. The virus was first identified in mid 2020 when they found the furin cleavage site on the spike protein that was found out to be gain of function. Also chimeric. From an evolutionary point of view this is impossible. PCR tests are most dodgy which may explain, and understandingly so, why the reality of this virus is questioned by some people.
Virologists never do control experiments, otherwise they would prove they are commiting fraud.
Stefan Lanka did the control experiment and proves you get the same cytopathic effect by merely poisoning the cells like virologists do, but without the need of any 'infectious material' whatsoever.
As the Japanese say, ivermectin is a "wonder drug".
It has many benefits, and very few side effects.
Now as far as treating "COVID" (well, people with fever and respiratory issues, basically) it seems that it is highly effective.
What is the mechanism? I don't know, to be honest.
It may just very good at stimulating the immune system, or it helps with cell regeneration (like an antioxidant), or could be one or more other reasons.
I don't know exactly, but for what I have read about it, it is highly effective at treating a range of conditions (from parasites to respiratory illness). Here's a very nice article on it:
For what is worth, I also took ivermectin - I followed the FLCCC treatment for treating 'COVID' at home.
And it was an amazing experience.. After struggling with fever and cough for 2-3 days, I started taking Ivermectin, Aspirin, Quercitin and vitamins. Within 6-8 hours my fever was gone. And within 5-6 days, the cough was gone too.
Or maybe it helps by reducing the inflammation, which in turn, results in cells surviving more (and not producing any more particle-like viruses, or exozomes).
Again, you can't assume there's a pathogenic particle which kills the cell. You have to prove that.
My best guess that 'viruses' are being presented as 'villains', but I am pretty sure that's not the case.
You have to prove first that there's a particle travelling from human to human, infecting them, causing disease, before you can say that this medicine killed the "virus".
'After seven months (30 + weeks), vaccinated people 50 to 69 years old had a 68 percent greater risk of being hospitalized for COVID relative to the unvaccinated who had a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care.'
This sentence needs clarification. I assume it means that the jabbed have a greater risk of being hospitalised AND a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care. As it is now it reads as if the unjabbed have a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care? Or are we simply comparing 68 percent to 41 percent in jabbed and unjabbed?
It is a translation error I imagine but needs to clarified. The way it reads currently is that the purebloods are at 41 percent greater risk of ending up in the ICU but, as you say, greater than what? Than the jabbed?
GVB was certainly right in my case...uninjected, BA.5 had me down for a full month. Ivermectin, even at a late stage, saved me. However, extreme fatigue and headaches continue unabated...presumably thanks to the spike proteins yet to be scoured out of my system.
Omicron is becoming much more severe. I was never afraid, just angry...angry at those who created and unleashed this bioweapon. 50 mutations in the RBD. That's like going from fission to fusion bombs.
I do not doubt this is a mechanism at okay. But also wonder if original antigenic sin and harming/decreasing the effects of T cells is also aiding in the development of more severe disease? Think I have been reading about several mechanisms at play.
The booster needed issue reminds of this tweet reply to Robert Malone which he agreed.
"Yikes, I mistakenly assumed that the risk of ADE would increase with each booster, but actually they are trying to stop ADE by giving boosters....??? But each booster could also increase risk of having spike protein attacks in the body? (Sorry very non-medical way to put it)"
So how do they count the vaxxed and boosted but enough time has not passed? You can't count these people as unvaxxed because that skews all the vaxxed and unvaxxed data for comparison and it is double swing. They absolutely need separate categories like they did in Alberta earlier this year where you can truly evaluate the pure bloods outcomes not comingled with jabbed "unvaxxed" or "unknown" (but it is likely thst shedding of vaxxed to unvaxxed can still skew the data unfortunately but likely not as much as counting some jabbed as unvaxxed).
"Vaccinal antibodies that blocked transmission initially now facilitates infection." How does this ring true when you have already pointed in previous posts how mucosal and systemic immune systems do not transfer antibodies?
Was at the ice rink earlier - got to chatting with an Aussie tourist who was watching the game...
Summary
1. Everyone is sick in OZ - and really sick ---- he believes that is due to the lockdowns
2. Believes there is no way there can be more lockdowns.
3. Hospitals are jammed
4. I told him hospital are jammed here to -- he said cuz staff is burned out -- I had to take a poke and tell him there's that but the main reason is lots of nurses and docs have walked because they are refusing to boost anymore cuz of all the vax injuries they are seeing come through - I know a nurse who told me that. Silence - look of disbelief
5. Pursuing that I mention that one of my good mates who is top 3 players in NZ is not playing - he can barely walk 500m... cannot work. Oh long covid - no myocarditis -- started the day of the shot.
Gotta run but ... what's your name ... Nathan -- I'm Fast Eddy ... Fast Eddy? Ya Fast Eddy.... ah ok ... c;ya Fast Eddy... yep c'ya ---enjoy the rest of the game....
BTW - he was coughing into his sleeve from time to time .... touch of VAIDS....
Please tell the same to any Canadians that you come across.
Seeing this unfold in real time like you predicted gives you the chills...
True. We are lucky to have these brave and sharp minds who have tried to save as many people as they can. Modern David vs. Goliath.
Even though happy to see the good people were correct, this is sad.
I live in a large midwestern city and while at Kroger I heard one the the announcement/commercials for the Pfizer vaccines yesterday. The narrator admitted that the vaccines efficacy wane over time and that in order to “protect” yourself you need to take the boosters. He compared it to how you need to reapply sunscreen. It was so stomach turning. Yes, let’s compare a deadly experimental mRNA shot to f***ing sunscreen and try to fool people while they buy groceries to get more and more and more shots! I think it’s time to stop shopping at Kroger.
now THIS... is F789ing... MAGNIFiCENT!!! https://t.me/TommyRobinsonNews/37661
It might be wrong that I laughed, but it feels so right.
My wife is watching ... and laughing ... 'idiot' hahaha
Artificial selection in action.. what can I say..
And the Darwin Award goes to…
The “Omicron” viral immune escape variant has 30 odd more spike proteins than the Wuhan strain. So I gather, apart from being more contagious, it now seems to be evolving with the help sub optimal specific vaccinal antibodies to place much more pressure on the viral virulence binding sites on the many more spike proteins. More virulent and contagious. Good news, some friends of mine got talked out of boosters. They had one shot only.
There is no virus, it's just a pandemic of fake PCR tests.
People have been PsyOped into taking a poisonous shot, against an imaginary virus.
There's no 'negative protection' against the 'virus'. Because it's obvious that if there is no virus, there cannot be any protection against it.
The clinical trials have been fraudulent, all of them, and CDC is complicit in fraud.
It's just the poison doing what was designed to do in the first place - destroy immune system and cause innumerable other diseases.
Genocide at mass scale is happening. The only way to stop it is to NOT take any more shots.
Do not lockdown, do not wear masks.
DO NOT COMPLY
P.S. here's how you can create a fake pandemic, using PCR tests alone. It has been done before:
https://blog.plan99.net/pseudo-epidemics-7603b2da839
Half a dozen of one, six of the other. The virus was first identified in mid 2020 when they found the furin cleavage site on the spike protein that was found out to be gain of function. Also chimeric. From an evolutionary point of view this is impossible. PCR tests are most dodgy which may explain, and understandingly so, why the reality of this virus is questioned by some people.
The virus has not been 'isolated'.
The virologists definition of an 'isolate' is completely different than what the dictionary says.
Virology is a pseudoscience, based off shaky foundation.
They have never isolated ANY virus according to Koch's postulates, like microbiologists did for any other microorganism.
They isolate viruses by making a soup of organic material.
Virologists couldn't even prove the viruses are transmissible, or they are pathogenic in nature.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/laboratories-us-cant-find-covid-19-one-1500-positive-tests/5754978
I think Jeff here is the closest to the truth:
https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/why-viruses-happen-annually-how-they-dissolve-waste/
Virologists never do control experiments, otherwise they would prove they are commiting fraud.
Stefan Lanka did the control experiment and proves you get the same cytopathic effect by merely poisoning the cells like virologists do, but without the need of any 'infectious material' whatsoever.
https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f
There's a lot more to say, but you got the idea.
What do you think of ivermectin?
As the Japanese say, ivermectin is a "wonder drug".
It has many benefits, and very few side effects.
Now as far as treating "COVID" (well, people with fever and respiratory issues, basically) it seems that it is highly effective.
What is the mechanism? I don't know, to be honest.
It may just very good at stimulating the immune system, or it helps with cell regeneration (like an antioxidant), or could be one or more other reasons.
I don't know exactly, but for what I have read about it, it is highly effective at treating a range of conditions (from parasites to respiratory illness). Here's a very nice article on it:
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/ivermectin-works-just-not-for-big?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
For what is worth, I also took ivermectin - I followed the FLCCC treatment for treating 'COVID' at home.
And it was an amazing experience.. After struggling with fever and cough for 2-3 days, I started taking Ivermectin, Aspirin, Quercitin and vitamins. Within 6-8 hours my fever was gone. And within 5-6 days, the cough was gone too.
It works by greatly reducing or stopping viral replication and greatly reduces inflammation.
Or maybe it helps by reducing the inflammation, which in turn, results in cells surviving more (and not producing any more particle-like viruses, or exozomes).
Again, you can't assume there's a pathogenic particle which kills the cell. You have to prove that.
My best guess that 'viruses' are being presented as 'villains', but I am pretty sure that's not the case.
You have to prove first that there's a particle travelling from human to human, infecting them, causing disease, before you can say that this medicine killed the "virus".
And so far, no one has done it.
I always wondered if 500 million viruses could fit on to the head of a pin, how do they know which virus is the one getting people sick.
I don't know how they would squeeze them all on! Amazing.
as you seem to be so very much an expert of the matter of viruses: where can we find the pieces from your hand that are published?
i would love to read them and be educated...
"appeal to authority" logical fallacy
There are plenty of resources already available on the subject, if you are really curious about the truth, you can find out by yourself.
I'll quote someone more intelligent than me though:
"Bees don't waste their time explaining to flies that honey is better than shit".
'After seven months (30 + weeks), vaccinated people 50 to 69 years old had a 68 percent greater risk of being hospitalized for COVID relative to the unvaccinated who had a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care.'
This sentence needs clarification. I assume it means that the jabbed have a greater risk of being hospitalised AND a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care. As it is now it reads as if the unjabbed have a 41 percent greater risk of needing intensive care? Or are we simply comparing 68 percent to 41 percent in jabbed and unjabbed?
That's what I was wondering. This can't be right, why would unvaccinated be at greater risk, and greater than what?
It is a translation error I imagine but needs to clarified. The way it reads currently is that the purebloods are at 41 percent greater risk of ending up in the ICU but, as you say, greater than what? Than the jabbed?
remember: this is all based upon numbers provided by the dutch authorities.
and in view of their track record those numbers are beyond suspicious.
when the number of deaths above the expected weekly number started to rise fast, those deaths were simply retrospectively attributed to covid19 .
News in Ontario: "What we know about the new COVID variant and why there's no cause for alarm"
-CTV
The public does not see any COVID problems anymore. Now what?
GVB was certainly right in my case...uninjected, BA.5 had me down for a full month. Ivermectin, even at a late stage, saved me. However, extreme fatigue and headaches continue unabated...presumably thanks to the spike proteins yet to be scoured out of my system.
Omicron is becoming much more severe. I was never afraid, just angry...angry at those who created and unleashed this bioweapon. 50 mutations in the RBD. That's like going from fission to fusion bombs.
I do not doubt this is a mechanism at okay. But also wonder if original antigenic sin and harming/decreasing the effects of T cells is also aiding in the development of more severe disease? Think I have been reading about several mechanisms at play.
The booster needed issue reminds of this tweet reply to Robert Malone which he agreed.
"Yikes, I mistakenly assumed that the risk of ADE would increase with each booster, but actually they are trying to stop ADE by giving boosters....??? But each booster could also increase risk of having spike protein attacks in the body? (Sorry very non-medical way to put it)"
https://mobile.twitter.com/KarinBarasa/status/1417130424615251975
So how do they count the vaxxed and boosted but enough time has not passed? You can't count these people as unvaxxed because that skews all the vaxxed and unvaxxed data for comparison and it is double swing. They absolutely need separate categories like they did in Alberta earlier this year where you can truly evaluate the pure bloods outcomes not comingled with jabbed "unvaxxed" or "unknown" (but it is likely thst shedding of vaxxed to unvaxxed can still skew the data unfortunately but likely not as much as counting some jabbed as unvaxxed).
"Vaccinal antibodies that blocked transmission initially now facilitates infection." How does this ring true when you have already pointed in previous posts how mucosal and systemic immune systems do not transfer antibodies?