8 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Carter's avatar

It looks like this is one more study where these were symptomatic people. Once this was known as an adverse event why didn't we start evaluating every vaccinated person to discover the real incidence. We are assuming this myocarditis is like every other. We assume 80% recovery. We assume these people's cardiac function in the future will be the same as it would have been. We assume it clears up completely. We still don't know the real incidence but only the symptomatic incidence. We don't know exactly what the spike protein or whatever ends up in the myocardium will do in the future. It appears no one really wants to know. We are treating this problem and every vaccine adverse event like "oh it's ok, there are not that many with myocarditis, or pericarditis, or that died" Insanity.

Sharon Wood's avatar

Dr. Peter McCullough said up to 30% of those jabbed had sub-clinical heart issues which means they don’t know yet (those with these conditions). I suppose it means their symptoms will become undeniable at some point. Also, I imagine this might include those who had an initial post vax heart issue but has been told to come back in six months or a year for re-check.

Michael Carter's avatar

No doubt. So many people were sitting in front of screens. Without physical activity there may be many cases not manifest. Sad that we say "all resolved". We just don't know that without long term followup. Like you said "at some point" we will find out if they are fine or not.

Annie's avatar

Nothin’ to see here folks, keep on movin’…

NC ForSubstack's avatar

Remember this story in the Toronto Sun about myocarditis in Ontario early on following the inoculations?

http://TinyURL.com/CanadaHearts

Terry McDonald's avatar

Can you Dr. Alexander or anyone fill me in on the Peters/Ruby/Breggin attack on Malone and Desmet? What on Earth is going on?

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 15, 2022
Comment deleted
Steve C's avatar

Well Matt, I’m afraid the clock’s still ticking...,