Did Fraiman et al. find serious adverse events of special interest following Malone, Kariko, Weissman et al. mRNA technology based COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults? Yes!
Did Fraiman et al. find serious adverse events of special interest following Malone, Kariko, Weissman et al. mRNA technology based COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults? Yes!
This was secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults
In a world devoid of meaning the zombies worship “the science” as defined by the masters. They begged for protection and begged the masters to take their souls in payment. The masters replied “we already have them” and begun the slaughter.
Have you heard the news about the submersible that vanished just recently? They are speculating that it must be a technical issues. But what if that's not the case? With only 5 people on board and only one who was in command, it was a risky trip to go see the Titanic wreck. What if the Capitan was also vaccinated and died suddenly? Since the rest of the group didn't know anything about the submersible how could they ask for help? We don't know if it's vaccine related but it's definitely worth exploring this possibility. There are lots of strange accidents happening lately.
Pull back the black curtain and expose the puppet masters that orchestrated this massive crime on humanity! Those you are focused on are just minor players in this massive crime against humanity! They were not steering the boat!
DR. JOSEPH FRAIMAN: In contrast to actually a lot of the voices here, my perspective throughout the early parts of this pandemic were very different than theirs. You know but I think that sometimes maybe when you're similar to maybe like at a movie when you have the front row you don't necessarily, you can't necessarily see the whole picture. For example, in the first wave, my nurses and I, we were, we saw so many people dying from covid, it horrified us, it was more death than any of us had ever seen. Freezer trucks at our door holding the bodies that were left over, you know, from than our morgue could handle. At that time the only thing I could see was we needed more aggressive covid policies to get this plague under control, stop these deaths from happening. I was confident that all of the locations that didn't embrace this, like, aggressive covid policy, they were going to suffer tremendous deaths. And what we would see next, of course what would follow is they would see how much death they suffered and it would become so painfully obvious that they would adopt all the aggressive policies.
But I was wrong. I was, my views were wrong at that time. Because the states and nations that didn't take aggressive covid policies, they didn't do obviously worse.
You know, it took me a year into the pandemic before it became really clear that it wasn't obvious at all that any policy was strongly effective at reducing covid infections or death outside of within the island nations where clearly border control looked like it did have a pretty strong effect.
So the scientist in me had to take this emerging data that I was seeing and acknowledge my hypothesis had been falsified, I guess you can say, and the covid policies that I was so certain were necessary, they just didn't help the way that I would hope they had helped.
And then I realized something that I kind of ignored that much of the people here have discussed and brought up which is that these policies were harmful. Initially I was, I don't want to say I was ignorant but I was, it was irrelevant because there were lives on the line, I'm an emergency doctor, lives, there's lives, it's, like, no, we have to do it. But if the policies didn't make a big difference and they only cause harm, then you have to start rethinking what we're doing. You take the data that's clearly in front of us and if it is only causing harm and at best can only save few, we need to think about it because if at best, right, an aggressive lockdown policy, imagine it reduced hospitalizations, death by 20%, 20% of deaths hospitalizations reduced. If that was the case then maybe we could come here and debate, is the harms that are caused by those lockdowns worth that benefit? And how do we negotiate that benefit through you know not getting through our freedoms? But the reality is, hospitalizations and deaths were not reduced by 20% by any policies. And because if they were we would have had studies at this point that would have been able to consistently identify that and that just has not occurred at all.
So I think as a society we have to decide if we want to continue like a public policy that's obviously producing large harm and offering only a minimal benefit at best. It's currently unmeasurable.
Also, personally, I would like to apologize to the three other scientists sitting with me here on Zoom, the proponents of the Barrington Declaration* because initially I did think y'all were crazy. Or dumb. Or maybe you just didn't understand what I was seeing. But I now realize actually, I'm sorry, because I believe now, you guys were correct. And you were correct from the beginning. And I wish that more people including myself had realized that sooner. And I hope more people realize that soon enough.
*The Great Barrington Declaration: "As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection."
As Dr. Fraiman is apologizing, the Zoom gallery shows four signers of the Great Barrington Declaration: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and Dr. Harvey Risch.
For more on the Great Barrington Declaration, see Jeffrey A. Tucker's essay "A Short History of the Great Barrington Declaration."
In a world devoid of meaning the zombies worship “the science” as defined by the masters. They begged for protection and begged the masters to take their souls in payment. The masters replied “we already have them” and begun the slaughter.
More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-psychological-war-in-your-mind
Have you heard the news about the submersible that vanished just recently? They are speculating that it must be a technical issues. But what if that's not the case? With only 5 people on board and only one who was in command, it was a risky trip to go see the Titanic wreck. What if the Capitan was also vaccinated and died suddenly? Since the rest of the group didn't know anything about the submersible how could they ask for help? We don't know if it's vaccine related but it's definitely worth exploring this possibility. There are lots of strange accidents happening lately.
.
The Vaccinated Are To Be Judged By The Sickness
Of Their Behavior In Society Among Us.
Their Physical Suffering Is Not The Issue.
Their Own Government
Used Their Own Minds Against Them.
If You're Not On That
Your Own Government
Will Use Them Against You.
.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/lies-to-inject-people-with-nanotoxins
Pull back the black curtain and expose the puppet masters that orchestrated this massive crime on humanity! Those you are focused on are just minor players in this massive crime against humanity! They were not steering the boat!
Relatedly:
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD: Closing the Curtain on Covid Theater
March 7, 2022
https://rumble.com/vwrd6z-dr.-joseph-fraiman-closing-the-curtain-on-covid-theater.html
From the conference hosted by Governor of Florida Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. See
https://flgov.com/2022/03/07/governor-desantis-closes-the-curtain-on-covid-theater/
TRANSCRIPT - PARTIAL
3:06
DR. JOSEPH FRAIMAN: In contrast to actually a lot of the voices here, my perspective throughout the early parts of this pandemic were very different than theirs. You know but I think that sometimes maybe when you're similar to maybe like at a movie when you have the front row you don't necessarily, you can't necessarily see the whole picture. For example, in the first wave, my nurses and I, we were, we saw so many people dying from covid, it horrified us, it was more death than any of us had ever seen. Freezer trucks at our door holding the bodies that were left over, you know, from than our morgue could handle. At that time the only thing I could see was we needed more aggressive covid policies to get this plague under control, stop these deaths from happening. I was confident that all of the locations that didn't embrace this, like, aggressive covid policy, they were going to suffer tremendous deaths. And what we would see next, of course what would follow is they would see how much death they suffered and it would become so painfully obvious that they would adopt all the aggressive policies.
But I was wrong. I was, my views were wrong at that time. Because the states and nations that didn't take aggressive covid policies, they didn't do obviously worse.
You know, it took me a year into the pandemic before it became really clear that it wasn't obvious at all that any policy was strongly effective at reducing covid infections or death outside of within the island nations where clearly border control looked like it did have a pretty strong effect.
So the scientist in me had to take this emerging data that I was seeing and acknowledge my hypothesis had been falsified, I guess you can say, and the covid policies that I was so certain were necessary, they just didn't help the way that I would hope they had helped.
And then I realized something that I kind of ignored that much of the people here have discussed and brought up which is that these policies were harmful. Initially I was, I don't want to say I was ignorant but I was, it was irrelevant because there were lives on the line, I'm an emergency doctor, lives, there's lives, it's, like, no, we have to do it. But if the policies didn't make a big difference and they only cause harm, then you have to start rethinking what we're doing. You take the data that's clearly in front of us and if it is only causing harm and at best can only save few, we need to think about it because if at best, right, an aggressive lockdown policy, imagine it reduced hospitalizations, death by 20%, 20% of deaths hospitalizations reduced. If that was the case then maybe we could come here and debate, is the harms that are caused by those lockdowns worth that benefit? And how do we negotiate that benefit through you know not getting through our freedoms? But the reality is, hospitalizations and deaths were not reduced by 20% by any policies. And because if they were we would have had studies at this point that would have been able to consistently identify that and that just has not occurred at all.
So I think as a society we have to decide if we want to continue like a public policy that's obviously producing large harm and offering only a minimal benefit at best. It's currently unmeasurable.
Also, personally, I would like to apologize to the three other scientists sitting with me here on Zoom, the proponents of the Barrington Declaration* because initially I did think y'all were crazy. Or dumb. Or maybe you just didn't understand what I was seeing. But I now realize actually, I'm sorry, because I believe now, you guys were correct. And you were correct from the beginning. And I wish that more people including myself had realized that sooner. And I hope more people realize that soon enough.
7:28
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
Dr. Fraiman's twitter is https://twitter.com/JosephFraiman
*The Great Barrington Declaration: "As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection."
For the full text of the declaration and all signatures to date, see https://gbdeclaration.org
As Dr. Fraiman is apologizing, the Zoom gallery shows four signers of the Great Barrington Declaration: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and Dr. Harvey Risch.
For more on the Great Barrington Declaration, see Jeffrey A. Tucker's essay "A Short History of the Great Barrington Declaration."
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-short-history-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/