There is no personal interest by Dr. Breggin or Dr. Ruby. FYI, it's the other way around. Malone is a darpa funded deep state plant. Are you aware of his 25 million dollars defamation suits filed against both Dr. Breggin and Dr. Ruby, to put a chill on dissent on the internet? These are malone's words. Why in the hell would people on the…
There is no personal interest by Dr. Breggin or Dr. Ruby. FYI, it's the other way around. Malone is a darpa funded deep state plant. Are you aware of his 25 million dollars defamation suits filed against both Dr. Breggin and Dr. Ruby, to put a chill on dissent on the internet? These are malone's words. Why in the hell would people on the medical freedom side do that against each other? Debate is healthy, so is difference in opinions. One may disagree with another, but suing for 25 million? As for Dr. Breggin's credibility, I suggest you read his book, Covid 19 and the global predators. Malone is a lying piece of garbage. He inserted himself into the medical freedom movement late in the game for a personal calculated benefit. Also, mrna technology is inherently deadly, not to be used for humans even experimentally. It has no therapeutic benefit. I am shocked people on this substack still think it has anything good to offer. My background: I am a doctor and have the degree in biochemistry. And I am ashamed of 95% of doctors in today's medicine.
The preponderance of evidence suggests Malone is not a plant because they tried absolutely everything to silence him and anyone associated with him. If he was controlled opposition, then they would have simply fact checked him (like they do with Stew Peters).
I am aware of the lawsuit. Have you read the specific claims in the lawsuit? When I read the claims by Malone (which are easily validated), it strongly suggests there is a personal interest by the Breggins. There is certainly a personal (beyond academic) interest in Prof Desmet's theories that Malone supported. It's clear to me, because Breggins et al made and continue to make personal claims and smears about Malone over this matter which should remain an academic debate, not personal attacks like they have been doing. It was those personal attacks that started the whole dispute and I would say that's strong evidence he's clearly taking it personally.
If you have verified lies from Malone, please produce them.
"I am shocked people on this substack still think it has anything good to offer."
No question that it's not safe for any type of mass therapeutic right now (or perhaps ever). No argument there. Dismissing it as eternally useless I think is extreme, because who knows what type of application it might have in a laboratory, or in animal experiments.
I feel very sorry for good doctors as the entire profession is disgraced. However, you might take consolation in the fact that most professional groups also disgraced themselves by going alone in each of their domains when they also should have known better. Doctors were simply the front and center profession in the fraud.
There is no personal interest by Dr. Breggin or Dr. Ruby. FYI, it's the other way around. Malone is a darpa funded deep state plant. Are you aware of his 25 million dollars defamation suits filed against both Dr. Breggin and Dr. Ruby, to put a chill on dissent on the internet? These are malone's words. Why in the hell would people on the medical freedom side do that against each other? Debate is healthy, so is difference in opinions. One may disagree with another, but suing for 25 million? As for Dr. Breggin's credibility, I suggest you read his book, Covid 19 and the global predators. Malone is a lying piece of garbage. He inserted himself into the medical freedom movement late in the game for a personal calculated benefit. Also, mrna technology is inherently deadly, not to be used for humans even experimentally. It has no therapeutic benefit. I am shocked people on this substack still think it has anything good to offer. My background: I am a doctor and have the degree in biochemistry. And I am ashamed of 95% of doctors in today's medicine.
The preponderance of evidence suggests Malone is not a plant because they tried absolutely everything to silence him and anyone associated with him. If he was controlled opposition, then they would have simply fact checked him (like they do with Stew Peters).
I am aware of the lawsuit. Have you read the specific claims in the lawsuit? When I read the claims by Malone (which are easily validated), it strongly suggests there is a personal interest by the Breggins. There is certainly a personal (beyond academic) interest in Prof Desmet's theories that Malone supported. It's clear to me, because Breggins et al made and continue to make personal claims and smears about Malone over this matter which should remain an academic debate, not personal attacks like they have been doing. It was those personal attacks that started the whole dispute and I would say that's strong evidence he's clearly taking it personally.
If you have verified lies from Malone, please produce them.
"I am shocked people on this substack still think it has anything good to offer."
No question that it's not safe for any type of mass therapeutic right now (or perhaps ever). No argument there. Dismissing it as eternally useless I think is extreme, because who knows what type of application it might have in a laboratory, or in animal experiments.
I feel very sorry for good doctors as the entire profession is disgraced. However, you might take consolation in the fact that most professional groups also disgraced themselves by going alone in each of their domains when they also should have known better. Doctors were simply the front and center profession in the fraud.