13 Comments

Yes there's a link but it's just correlation. Correlation does not prove causation. Ask Big Tobacco. Smoking and ill health are correlated in the same way as jabs and death. But smoking doesn't cause ill health. Ill health causes smoking and it causes getting jabbed. The more comorbidities people have the more likely they are to smoke and the more likely they are to get jabbed. That's why Big Pharma and "the authorities" sound like Big Tobacco. They are using the arguments pioneered by Big Tobacco. It only seems like the jabs are killing people when actually they've saved billions of lives. Relax. Light up a Marlboro and have a booster.

Expand full comment

It's become pretty clear that the correlation v. causation disclaimer is intended to distract from obvious, stark conclusions.

Expand full comment

Yes, especially considering Pfizer used a de facto experimental design in which they manipulated an independent variable (jabs v placebo) and it resulted in significantly more non-covid deaths in the jabs group. Non-covid deaths was not explicitly designated as a dependent variable and thus they had no a priori hypotheses about non-covid deaths so they did not even draw post hoc conclusions and were able to wriggle out of inferring causation but there is little doubt.

Expand full comment

I did not know this.

So it appears Pfizer EXPECTED deaths in the vaxed cohort from causes other than covid (from side effects of the covid shot itself?) but found a way to avoid mentioning death as a trial outcome. The very definition of unethical.

(Did I get that right?)

Expand full comment

I don't know whether they expected it. It's what happened. They didn't formulate any explicit or formal hypotheses in advance of carrying out their trial about whether there would be any difference between the jab and placebo groups in non-covid deaths. They were only explicitly looking at covid outcomes. Therefore, when more people died in the jabs group they just ignored it. Strictly, to have demonstrated causality, in an experimental design, they would have had to have generated a hypothesis about it in advance. Otherwise, it's a retrospective fishing expedition, supposedly. Hoever, the data are what they are. The data didn't know that Pfizer had not generated a hypothesis about them in advance.

Expand full comment

I'd think an ethical drug trial supervisor would have called this to Pfizer’s attention and Pfizer would have formulated an additional hypothesis to test -- halting the (new) trial when the deaths occurred.

But wait, how silly of me. Pfizer would simply have fired the whistleblower.

Expand full comment

Yes I'd think so too but what actually happened was that instead they vaxxed all those in the placebo /control group. It would be interesting to know how many are alive now.

Expand full comment

In a world devoid of meaning the zombies worship “the science” as defined by the masters. They begged for protection and begged the masters to take their souls in payment. The masters replied “we already have them” and begun the slaughter.

More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-psychological-war-in-your-mind

Expand full comment

If you’ve ever ventured onto a message board populated by the vaccinated you’ll find an abundance who state, Do you know anybody who has died suddenly? I don’t. I feel fine. Seems to me the only side effect I’ve heard about is a sore arm, etc…

To those who say they don’t know anybody who died suddenly or had any serious health effects from the vaccines I say, I grew up during the 60s-70s. I never personally knew anyone that got killed in Vietnam but there’s a wall with a whole bunch of names on it of people that did.

So, by the prevailing logic of pro-vaxxers since I didn’t know the dead and maimed I should disregard their existence and dismiss the war as no big deal.

Perhaps a wall with the names of the vaccine casualties would provide clarity and provoke a little empathy.

Expand full comment

New WMC Research substack just out. More bad news for fans of Spike protein. One can extrapolate to the Malone, Kariko, Weissman et al. gene injection fraud shot. " ...vascular effects occur in vivo, as revealed by the intravenous administration of spike, which increased expression of ICAM1, VCAM1, CD45, TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the lung, liver, kidney, and eye, and the intravitreal injection of spike, which disrupted the barrier function of retinal capillaries." Permanent production of Spike or the body cannot clear it. Why anyone would want their own body manufacturing Spike protein is a mystery to me. Nattokinase may provide some hope.

Permanent Endothelial Activation: The Spike Protein and Cell Adhesion: Understanding Why What Appears to be an Endothelial Disease is Actually a Cell Adhesion Disease. Explaining how Spike Protein Endothelial Disease is the first phase of a Cell Adhesion Disease, inducing autoimmune diseases (like diabetes), “transplant rejection” and cachexia.

https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/permanent-endothelial-activation?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment

.

The Vaccinated Are To Be Judged By The Sickness

Of Their Behavior In Society Among Us.

Their Physical Suffering Is Not The Issue.

Their Own Government

Used Their Own Minds Against Them.

If You're Not On That

Your Own Government

Will Use Them Against You.

.

Expand full comment