of patients with neurological autoimmunity diagnosed in temporal association (≤6 weeks) with SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.
So 12 went into complete remission and the other 8 did not yet the authors still recommended continued vaccinations based on risk/benefit. Very reassuring/not. Did the other 8 go on to become the 8 mice for the bivalent shot? :-)
My thoughts exactly. It seems these “scientists” were more interested in the science than their patient outcomes.
Smoking hot comment 🔥
Authors recommended continued injections despite findings? Am I missing something here?
And for how long post next lot of injections were these patients monitored for?
I am perplexed. Surely, “let’s first do no harm” should apply and the next lot of injections should have been avoided?
So 12 went into complete remission and the other 8 did not yet the authors still recommended continued vaccinations based on risk/benefit. Very reassuring/not. Did the other 8 go on to become the 8 mice for the bivalent shot? :-)
My thoughts exactly. It seems these “scientists” were more interested in the science than their patient outcomes.
Smoking hot comment 🔥
Authors recommended continued injections despite findings? Am I missing something here?
And for how long post next lot of injections were these patients monitored for?
I am perplexed. Surely, “let’s first do no harm” should apply and the next lot of injections should have been avoided?