Best guess is that training and political environment discourage absolutes. All medical folks are reluctant to be extreme in criticisms of what any individual or medical experts decide between them. We have ad campaigns for a long list of Rx that should be used by nobody ever so this transfection is not unique in posing harm without bene…
Best guess is that training and political environment discourage absolutes. All medical folks are reluctant to be extreme in criticisms of what any individual or medical experts decide between them. We have ad campaigns for a long list of Rx that should be used by nobody ever so this transfection is not unique in posing harm without benefit.
Parents of sick children have their own doctors to make recommendations, while parents of healthy children make their best judgement and conditional suggestions land as more reasonable views to folks conflicted.
For those of us who reserved doubt for a short window and quickly saw through the lies we have the incredible Dr. Paul Alexander who pulls no punches is calling out the crimes loudly and with no hint of ambiguity on line and live at events everywhere!!
The adjective ‘healthy’ should be left out entirely. It gives the illusion that the jab is okay for unhealthy kids when we know it can’t possibly be. That way even parents of unhealthy kids might hesitate and ask more questions before they decide to submit their child to the jab. I have an eleven YO grandson who’s been given the jab because his oncologist recommended it to his parents. I could only object.
Unfortunately, there are too many doctors who are following the mainstream narrative either because they are uninformed or are afraid of losing their license if they don’t go along with the mainstream narrative.
Best guess is that training and political environment discourage absolutes. All medical folks are reluctant to be extreme in criticisms of what any individual or medical experts decide between them. We have ad campaigns for a long list of Rx that should be used by nobody ever so this transfection is not unique in posing harm without benefit.
Parents of sick children have their own doctors to make recommendations, while parents of healthy children make their best judgement and conditional suggestions land as more reasonable views to folks conflicted.
For those of us who reserved doubt for a short window and quickly saw through the lies we have the incredible Dr. Paul Alexander who pulls no punches is calling out the crimes loudly and with no hint of ambiguity on line and live at events everywhere!!
The adjective ‘healthy’ should be left out entirely. It gives the illusion that the jab is okay for unhealthy kids when we know it can’t possibly be. That way even parents of unhealthy kids might hesitate and ask more questions before they decide to submit their child to the jab. I have an eleven YO grandson who’s been given the jab because his oncologist recommended it to his parents. I could only object.
Unfortunately, there are too many doctors who are following the mainstream narrative either because they are uninformed or are afraid of losing their license if they don’t go along with the mainstream narrative.
My heart is with yours but I respect the right of others to temper their opinions.