pressure, Darwinian natural selection pressure selecting for the most 'fittest' 'hardiest' subvariants that could surmount the sub-optimal vaccine induced antibodies, & cause severe illness & deaths
Yes. We "get" this, Dr Paul, thank you for keeping original antigenic sin and antibody-dependent enhancement front and center!
This is why more and more Roundup/Glyphosate, neonicitinoids and Chlorpyrifos is literally poured on your produce.
Because the "pests" only evolve in strength, like our own e coli - which now has developed a strain that can be MUCH more pathogenic than any E.coli found 25 years ago. So farmers are screaming they now have to use much, much more of almost every pesticide to produce our food.
How long can we go on weakening our immune systems drinking and eating bug killers and INJECTING God-knows-what as the "bugs" get stronger?
"The debate is that a failure ensued when we mass vaccinated across all age-groups and rapidly, and we did this while pathogen was circulating."
But, it is not a failure at all. Quite the contrary, it is a resounding success.
The target populations are now primed for culling. Not the confected culling we witnessed during the first wave of this pandemic. Rather, a culling of masses of the multi-'vaccinated', no doubt to be, once again, exacerbated by effective treatment suppression and hospital death protocols.
During the second wave, the global population will have a significantly weakened immune response. Not because the virus has become 'more virulent', more so because the recipient immune response has been grossly undermined by mass 'vaccination'.
That’s what I’m most afraid of because, of course, all of my friends and family members have received multiple jabs believing they were doing the right thing and now with their weakened immune systems, I think it’s gonna be really hard on them in the coming months and years.
The concern is for those having had multiple jabs BEFORE natural infection. Those having been infected first, then jabbed, are at less risk - the fewer jabs, the better.
It is the priming with narrow vaccinal induced immune response that is the big problem. Occurring when the immune system is 'trained' by non-neutralizing 'vaccines', rather than natural infection.
For those people, use of ivermectin and HCQ prophylactically, together with povidone iodine, or, hydrogen peroxide nasal/throat treatments (when exposed, or showing symptoms), with a constant intake of vitamins C, D and zinc etc, will place those now vulnerable in good stead.
Hope this is helpful. The difficulty is in getting people to accept the reality.
Even though I read it the part that made sense was experimenting on humans while the flu is circulating is a messy mess of no actual testing the efficacy of a new ingredient.
Did everyone see that "The Usual Suspects" have ensured we get new RSV “vaccines?" I say we shouldn’t forget the biggest Covid lie of all - the narrative that Covid was a top killer of children.
"The debate is that a failure ensued when we mass vaccinated across all age-groups and rapidly, and we did this while pathogen was circulating."
And yet, Michael Yeadon insists the real 'pathogen' was psyop-ticoccus and cannibalized flu numbers. You almost wanna ask Geert 'what vaccine, what virus'? Except he's an esteamy and revered scientist.
Speaking of the waferized 'debate' in the alt-community, it's hard not to think Big Pharma hasn't planted all sorts of dilutive voices that keep us from converging on definitive answers. And don't even mention nanobots to the myocarditis crowd!
Meanwhile, all this dithering has led us to the threshhold of the SAME DAMN THING as early as next month. At least we have the Wellness Company and its sterling business case to show for, during our brief and fleeting Freedom Interegnum. How much does it cost to advertise endoessly on Zero Hedge?
I'm not a scientist nor do I play one on TV and yes, I've no doubt it's all mightily complimacated, but if they've really put us on a multivariate regimen of slow death (some obviously slower than others), we the masses have hardly distinguished ourselves during the intermission. And good luck spending your earnestly accumulated money substitutes after Lockdown 2.
What I don’t like about Geert is his unwillingness to admit the vaccines are doing hard. I don’t trust what he’s saying in large due to this sole fact.
Del Bigtree recently had him and Dr. McCullough on and there’s just something not transparent with Geert. In all the interviews I have heard him on, I just don’t get the feeling he’s being honest.
He was speaking out early and consistently, you’re correct. But why won’t he admit or even discuss the possibility of the vaccines causing harm? You can tell Del doesn’t agree with this stance either. You can hear it in Del’s voice. Del is being very intentional on his words with Geert but there is certainly a disconnect.
All I can say is that when I discovered Geert back in March 2020, he made me rethink getting this jab, I am forever grateful
Even if his only stance is that mass vaccination during a pandemic will cause the virus to mutate into more virulent, Then that’s enough for me
The vaccine could’ve been the most safe and effective and wonderful vaccine in the world but if you give it to everybody during a pandemic, then that is going to cause the virus to mutate and become more virulent, That was his only message and that was really important to me
He did talked about that and even admitted that these shots are injuring and killing people. I know it because I have listened to every single interview and article he has written.
I saw that interview too with Dr McCullough. I think Geert feels things are going to get pretty bad but doesn’t want to come off as the doom and gloom guy. He doesn’t paint a rosy picture.
How does this square with the findings of Tanaka and Miyazawa? [Aug 2023]
They posit: “The following results presented in this study may support the hypothesis that the Omicron variants may have been artificially synthesized rather than naturally occurring” and continue, “… we should suspect that the other variants (Alpha to Delta) may also be artificially generated viruses. Indeed, the lack of findings to date that many of the various mutations seen, especially in the early variants, are indeed associated with increased viral infection supports the hypothesis that each variant was artificially synthesized to identify the amino acids of the S protein responsible for infectivity and pathogenicity. The possibility that the set of mutants was artificially generated to identify amino acids of the S protein involved in the infectivity and virulence is supported.”
You should watch his latest interview. It always amazes me how fast people are people to judge others without having the evidence of what exactly happened. In his last interview he explaines
What a mess these charlatan scientists have created...
Yes. We "get" this, Dr Paul, thank you for keeping original antigenic sin and antibody-dependent enhancement front and center!
This is why more and more Roundup/Glyphosate, neonicitinoids and Chlorpyrifos is literally poured on your produce.
Because the "pests" only evolve in strength, like our own e coli - which now has developed a strain that can be MUCH more pathogenic than any E.coli found 25 years ago. So farmers are screaming they now have to use much, much more of almost every pesticide to produce our food.
How long can we go on weakening our immune systems drinking and eating bug killers and INJECTING God-knows-what as the "bugs" get stronger?
Not to mention "viruses".........
"The debate is that a failure ensued when we mass vaccinated across all age-groups and rapidly, and we did this while pathogen was circulating."
But, it is not a failure at all. Quite the contrary, it is a resounding success.
The target populations are now primed for culling. Not the confected culling we witnessed during the first wave of this pandemic. Rather, a culling of masses of the multi-'vaccinated', no doubt to be, once again, exacerbated by effective treatment suppression and hospital death protocols.
During the second wave, the global population will have a significantly weakened immune response. Not because the virus has become 'more virulent', more so because the recipient immune response has been grossly undermined by mass 'vaccination'.
That’s what I’m most afraid of because, of course, all of my friends and family members have received multiple jabs believing they were doing the right thing and now with their weakened immune systems, I think it’s gonna be really hard on them in the coming months and years.
The concern is for those having had multiple jabs BEFORE natural infection. Those having been infected first, then jabbed, are at less risk - the fewer jabs, the better.
It is the priming with narrow vaccinal induced immune response that is the big problem. Occurring when the immune system is 'trained' by non-neutralizing 'vaccines', rather than natural infection.
For those people, use of ivermectin and HCQ prophylactically, together with povidone iodine, or, hydrogen peroxide nasal/throat treatments (when exposed, or showing symptoms), with a constant intake of vitamins C, D and zinc etc, will place those now vulnerable in good stead.
Hope this is helpful. The difficulty is in getting people to accept the reality.
Even though I read it the part that made sense was experimenting on humans while the flu is circulating is a messy mess of no actual testing the efficacy of a new ingredient.
Did everyone see that "The Usual Suspects" have ensured we get new RSV “vaccines?" I say we shouldn’t forget the biggest Covid lie of all - the narrative that Covid was a top killer of children.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-greatest-covid-lie?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
"The debate is that a failure ensued when we mass vaccinated across all age-groups and rapidly, and we did this while pathogen was circulating."
And yet, Michael Yeadon insists the real 'pathogen' was psyop-ticoccus and cannibalized flu numbers. You almost wanna ask Geert 'what vaccine, what virus'? Except he's an esteamy and revered scientist.
Speaking of the waferized 'debate' in the alt-community, it's hard not to think Big Pharma hasn't planted all sorts of dilutive voices that keep us from converging on definitive answers. And don't even mention nanobots to the myocarditis crowd!
Meanwhile, all this dithering has led us to the threshhold of the SAME DAMN THING as early as next month. At least we have the Wellness Company and its sterling business case to show for, during our brief and fleeting Freedom Interegnum. How much does it cost to advertise endoessly on Zero Hedge?
I'm not a scientist nor do I play one on TV and yes, I've no doubt it's all mightily complimacated, but if they've really put us on a multivariate regimen of slow death (some obviously slower than others), we the masses have hardly distinguished ourselves during the intermission. And good luck spending your earnestly accumulated money substitutes after Lockdown 2.
What I don’t like about Geert is his unwillingness to admit the vaccines are doing hard. I don’t trust what he’s saying in large due to this sole fact.
Del Bigtree recently had him and Dr. McCullough on and there’s just something not transparent with Geert. In all the interviews I have heard him on, I just don’t get the feeling he’s being honest.
Damnedest thing I’ve ever heard. Geert was speaking out early and consistently. He’s sticking to what he knows. Personally, I trust him implicitly.
I can't find any reason not to trust him either. He's among the few ones who earned our trust.
He was speaking out early and consistently, you’re correct. But why won’t he admit or even discuss the possibility of the vaccines causing harm? You can tell Del doesn’t agree with this stance either. You can hear it in Del’s voice. Del is being very intentional on his words with Geert but there is certainly a disconnect.
Geert is staying in his lane of expertise. Don’t cast doubt on a most accomplished man for having integrity and discipline.
All I can say is that when I discovered Geert back in March 2020, he made me rethink getting this jab, I am forever grateful
Even if his only stance is that mass vaccination during a pandemic will cause the virus to mutate into more virulent, Then that’s enough for me
The vaccine could’ve been the most safe and effective and wonderful vaccine in the world but if you give it to everybody during a pandemic, then that is going to cause the virus to mutate and become more virulent, That was his only message and that was really important to me
He did talked about that and even admitted that these shots are injuring and killing people. I know it because I have listened to every single interview and article he has written.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions! Glad you have yours too. And glad I can have mine.
I saw that interview too with Dr McCullough. I think Geert feels things are going to get pretty bad but doesn’t want to come off as the doom and gloom guy. He doesn’t paint a rosy picture.
How does this square with the findings of Tanaka and Miyazawa? [Aug 2023]
They posit: “The following results presented in this study may support the hypothesis that the Omicron variants may have been artificially synthesized rather than naturally occurring” and continue, “… we should suspect that the other variants (Alpha to Delta) may also be artificially generated viruses. Indeed, the lack of findings to date that many of the various mutations seen, especially in the early variants, are indeed associated with increased viral infection supports the hypothesis that each variant was artificially synthesized to identify the amino acids of the S protein responsible for infectivity and pathogenicity. The possibility that the set of mutants was artificially generated to identify amino acids of the S protein involved in the infectivity and virulence is supported.”
He's been saying this for over a year. ⏳⏰⌚🕦⌛I'm waiting.
You should watch his latest interview. It always amazes me how fast people are people to judge others without having the evidence of what exactly happened. In his last interview he explaines
Harm, not hard