mRNA technology as you put it, can you please go on any podcast of your choosing, with any interviewer of your choosing yet allow us scientists to provide the questions just before interview?
Your continuing attacks on Dr. Malone say more about you than about him. It's unbecoming of you. The Medical Freedom movement is large enough to accommodate a variety of views. You're on the verge of losing the plot.
I am disappointed as well with the ongoing attack on Dr. Malone. It will only lead to the weakening of our efforts to tell the truth. I can only ask, please stop. Thank you.
I disagree. Robert Malone is deeply suspect. He and his wife take to substack & cry & moan knowing that their readers will be sympathetic and outraged.
If they are so bothered, why don’t they retire to their horse farm? Why? Neither of the Malones have contributed anything original to the Freedom Movement. Robert Malone’s substack rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars. For what? He regurgitates information. And he sues and threatens all who dare differ.
He claims he invented mRNA technology. He worked for DoD and brags about his contacts there.
But he is one of us? Please. Rather than answer difficult questions, like a mature adult, Malone sues ppl into oblivion.
he makes hundreds of thousands of dollars off his substack? are you sure? how can you know something like that? anyway it's mere peanuts to the millions he expects to gain off the defendants. he should sue the really deep pockets though, like fox, the atlantic and the nyt.
"Or is it your reputation that's bothering you? But look at how soon we're all forgotten. The abyss of endless time that swallows it all. The emptiness of those applauding hands. The people who praise us; how capricious they are, how arbitrary. And the tiny region it takes place. The whole earth a point in space - and most of it uninhabited."
"For all things fade away, become the stuff of legend, and are soon buried in oblivion. Mind you, this is true only for those who blazed once like bright stars in the firmament, but for the rest, as soon as a few clods of earth cover their corpses, they are 'out of sight, out of mind.' In the end, what would you gain from everlasting remembrance? Absolutely nothing. So what is left worth living for? This alone: justice in thought, goodness in action, speech that cannot deceive, and a disposition glad of whatever comes, welcoming it as necessary, as familiar, as flowing from the same source and fountain as yourself."
Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus, 16th Roman Emperor
What? Why do you think you can tell people what to do? If you don't like something, you leave or handle it. Don't go shifting your preferences on others.
You either want the truth or you want to bully people questioning your hero. You cant have both
Doesnt the man himself say truth will stand? Let the questions be asked. I've asked him many reasonable questions which he refuses to answer.
Not good form to brag about inventing this tech and how you recommended its use as vaccines when they were shown in studies to not be safe. If its true, does this mean it's because of him all of this is happening? Has he ever apologized for his part?
Alexander has made his point. It's time to move on. We have more important battles to fight at this point. Malone is bragging? I think he's remorseful. It's not often that someone comes to regret his past work. And if he's not penitent, he at least is merely stating a fact.
Yes. Malone was bragging about his part in manufacturing the jab up until the point most of the world took it. If someone invested in the injections they might have made a decent profit by the time he began to speak up. He stepped into a movement that was already in high gear.
Agreed. He took the shots I imagine believing they had overcome the issues that made the technology problematic in the first place. He knew the shortcomings of the mRNA from his own original research so I guess he was satisfied that they had come up with a better mousetrap enough to take it himself. I do wish he had come forth sooner but at least he did and he undeniably brought the eyeballs to the movement that were not there before because of his unique position to do so. That you cannot deny. It wasn’t until after Rogan that the movement got mainstream attention and that was necessary.
I dont think its helpful. For me, I have genuine questions. Doesnt defamation infer a motive to tear someone down not ask questions about their invention, their views?
I'm not trying to de-fame anyone.
At times I wonder why he wants fame.
l speak from the heart when I say I would be crying in prayer every night if I were him. As an inventor I would want to see my inventions heal people not harm.
He admits the vaccines are harming others and that he was an integral part of pushing his tech to be used for vaccines.
The field of medicine he got into is fraught with unethical experimentation, lawsuits. The people he has been connected with are the very ones who perpetrated what all of us, including him, stand against. And yet does he truly stand against it? He promotes himself in his interviews, his inventions, his connection.
His lack of transparency, how he doesnt talk about the dark side of his own research, he doesnt directly stand against it, instead wants "fame" to me, makes it appear he stands behind, defends his inventions. He owns a mRNA medicine patent. Is it being used?
I have mixed feelings about mRNA. My main concern is to not use it for vaccines, for any therapeutic where another option exists, never on large portions of the population and never without knowing long term multigenerational effects including everything from immune alterations to gene expression, cell apoptosis, autoimmunity, alterations in other DNA and RNA.
I dont see whats wrong with wanting to know his stance on his own inventions, patents, mRNA vaccines, specific questions about his research and connections.
It makes me uncomfortable to hear him call Anthony fauci "Tony" like a buddy and give him credit for helping him with his patent which would make mRNA medicine take off. Do you want mRNA medicine to take off? Do you like the idea of it?
I didn't read the whole article but I read enough to get a flavor - he thinks defamation is "wrong". The idea of defamation is very hazy. It is often used to stop people from saying something about someone that may injure their reputation, but rightfully so. The wrong part is when someone cannot defend themselves, when they are closed off from defending themselves or when not given the platform to defend themselves. But that isn't the case with Malone - he has much more opportunity to air his views than anyone of his detractors. He has the name and he gets the airings. So that is just waffle about defamation being wrong. He simply doesn't want to confront opposition or criticism. If it's not justified he can speak to it. But he doesn't, he just takes things to court, he has to have a gang to help his case along rather than speak person-to-person in truth.
I think it's very simple. We all want and deserve the truth and to have important questions answered.
If he wants people to stop voicing concerns all he has to do is answer their questions.
Every interview I have seen with him in starts off praising his integral part in the making of these injections. If it isnt him bragging it's the interviewer. He glows, smiling with pride over his inventions.
How many good people would smile over having invented something thats harmed so many people? Wouldnt it be more appropriate to somberly reflect on what a tragedy this is?
To me, he is an enigma wrapped in mystery because of his past inventions, his past and current connections, his comments which seem to forgive people for their evil part in this (they have to feed their family) and his refusal to answer so many peoples questions
That smile you mention might also represent embarrassment or discomfort. But whatever its source and significance, Dr. Malone has answered all my concerns adequately. Now I’m moving on from this discussion.
I did subscribe a long time ago to ask him my own questions and concerns which he didnt address. He got on another substack where I was and I asked him again. He ignored me and called us all trolls.
My son was born with a rare genetic deletion. I've done over 20 years of medical research and have concerns over him being a part in their manufacture, promoting the injections and tech to begin with. The invention and push for them to be turned into vaccines alone is a giant red flag, even without all that followed.
Playing stupid and innocent isnt an option.
A change of heart can happen but his attitude that everyone including him is forgiven because everyone has a family to feed, along with too many unanswered questions and lawsuits against people to shut them up is disconcerting.
if he's so smart etc he should do as Alexander asked and provide the means or information to reverse the effects of the vax. but maybe he ain't that smart. or maybe he's all in with the agenda.
hey he just did that to me! I asked a question for clarification I wasn't even aware of this controversy so no dog in the fight - and he called me a troll and said i needed to learn to read for comprehension - ie - he insulted me, i should sue his ass!
Dr Robert Malone has been a leader in the #StopTheShot movement. He is one man with a unique perspective. His career was up ended by the US Covid response as have many physicians and scientists in the Covid truth and medical freedom battle. He has made a valuable contribution. I suspect Dr Alexander attacks and bullies Malone in an attempt to protect the reputation of himself and his colleagues in their current business venture, The Wellness Company. Dr Malone has been critical of the prices charged by this group. I disagree with that criticism as much as the bullying that’s going on here. The potential patients of the Wellness Company can decide for themselves if they want to pay for the services provided. Let capitalism, while we still have it, rule the day. However Dr. Malone also has every right to rebuild some semblance of a career all-be-it very different. If he wants to speak and consult far and wide, so be it. There’s been a great interest in his perspective.
This incessant public negativity toward Dr Malone over work he did while a PhD student is reckless and harmful. He has provided in depth explanations about his work ad nauseam. His disagreements with Dr Karilo should have remained between them but she took her complaints to The Atlantic of all places. That publication appears to be radical left wing and is a part of the vast media effort to suppress and censor the truth about the U.S. and international covid pandemic and response. That was a poor move. All of this cat fighting should cease and desist. We have more important battles to win.
From my understanding he was working for a company in the middle of a large clinical trial proving famotidine helps covid patients, which MIGHT HAVE saved lives if he hadnt QUIT mid trial, closing the trial and starting his own tiny trial. How many tiny trials of repurposed meds have succeeded in altering the coarse of covid therapies?
Glad to know hes onto his next savior scheme which he could then quit to become Fauci.2.0
Look at his history and pattern of moving up
His comments show he is still very provaccine. If everything falls apart for pharma they might rename everything and he could be their insurance that we will all follow along like cattle to whatever he wants.
If this isnt true then why isn't he answering questions regarding all of these things?
His career was not "up-ended." It's going strong. He and Jill are aiming to parlay his prestige and fame into a career in politics and/or talk show host on the backs of the vaccine-injured (injured thanks to him by the way). Anybody gets in the way gets his and Jill's boots in their face.
Tell your master to cease and desist from bullying people with lawsuits to shut them up and make money. 25M is a lot of money, that's a lot of horses and yachts. Tell your master to go out and earn it honestly if he wants to expand his ranchero. tell him to sue the Atlantic. sure.
If you don't want to hear about it then off you go. But others want to continue. Why do you think you can push your preferences on others? This is a big world with lots of people of differing points of view.
I don't know why anyone would brag about inventing this technology. I think it's wicked beyond compare. In fact scientists need to answer for what they do - for experimenting on animals for one and now on humans and secondly for tampering with DNA which doesn't belong to them - it is something we need as a society to discuss before tampering goes ahead or is even started. Just because they can is not a reason to.
Well said these are my concerns exactly. Questioning the ethics of scientific experimentation, the pushing through of products that were proven to be unsafe promoting them as vaccines, not actually studying vaccines in a way that proves they are safe by using placebos all of these are really valid concerns.
In my mind people who are doing the right thing aren't heroes they're humane people nobody belongs in the position of a hero Especially someone who had a integral part in Making these injections possible.
Putting it into perspective Bill Gates is actually less responsible then someone who has medical expertise to know better and yet still does something that may cause great harm. We look to scientists doctors and medical professionals to do the right thing we don't look to Bill Gates to do the right thing hes a business man
I have to laugh at the title Purveyors of hate. What a broad and useless term that is. That's just to shut people up. He also talks a heck of a lot about malice. He uses laws that were passed long ago in a different world and that have no relevance to today, with information being readily available and easily confirmable if people just answered questions or got into dialogue. Publications are made much quicker than previous times and we can clear things up very easily just by dialoguing. But he wants to bring in the courts, and laws that no longer apply to the digital age. They were made for a time before we had this tool.
Thanks for the link. There's an extensive discussion there by Malone on international human rights law. Very interesting. He asserts or implies that the Breggins and others (substack readers making adverse comments) are engaged in psychological projection, i.e, are really describing themselves, not him:
"Aside from it being a familiar concept to those studying or knowing law, defamation, or "slander", is also known as a "smear campaign" in psychology.[23] Those who suffer from narcissism, sociopathy, and psychopathy use it as a weapon to discredit their victims, typically when they feel you are about to expose them, or are dangerous, but oftentimes it can happen with no known motive beyond psychological projection.
I have seen a lot of examples over the last two years of psychological projection masquerading as defamation. The challenge is what to do about this when you are actually experiencing professional and financial damages by those who are so afflicted?"
Malone claims he sent a cease and desist letter which was ignored, so as a last resort he is suing for malicious defamation. He wants a jury to decide the facts. He has to prove malice
Do you think a jury will believe him?
Based on what readers are saying here in the comments section, it should be easy for the Breggins and other defendants to win. They can use the defence of truth. All they need to do is disprove the following:
"The Statements [ made about Dr. Malone by the Breggins and other defendants] are materially false. Dr. Malone is not controlled opposition. He does not work for and has no connection to the CIA/DOD or the intelligence community. He is not an operative of any government or organization. He has never orchestrated a “psyop”. Dr. Malone does not and never has supported totalitarian global predators. He does not and never has supported global predators who have been committing mass murder under the guise of COVID-19. He is not dangerous. He is not a supporter of any apologist for political mass murderers. He is not a Hitler apologist and/or a Hitler “excuser”. Dr. Malone has not ever engaged in fraud and is not engaged in deliberate fraud to blind anyone to any “predators”. He is not a “protector” of any “predators”. He does not and never has promoted baseless scientific theories. Comparing the Statements to the truth, it is beyond peradventure that the Statements are materially false."
Please read my concerns in this comment section. Let me know how I'm projecting when I'm very specific with my concerns. For example how am I projecting when I describe his stance on a subject and I hold the opposite stance? How am I projecting to say I did 20+ years of medical research because my son has a genetic defect and I want these specific questions answered? If I were projecting, wouldnt I be attacking him not stating public facts, things he has said and asking questions? How is it projection to state the fact that he promoted manufacturing products proven to be unsafe as vaccines? Did I push for an unsafe tech to be used for vaccines?
Please answer each one of my comments exactly how I am projecting my own issues onto him by questioning him and being concerned over his behavior and actions. Did I claim to invent the tech that made a toxic product which was unleashed onto the world possible, then smile about it and make sure I introduce myself and others introduce me giving me credit?
All I said about you specifically Heidi was "I'm sure you, Hannalehigh, JonesySmart and Heidi Hell wouldn't have any problem if these things were said about you." All I was saying about you was I'm sure it wouldn't bother you if lots of people were calling you a fraud, a proponent of Hitler, a murderer, controlled opposition etc. If there was a campaign to get hundreds of thousands of people to believe that about you, you'd think that was ok, and you'd be comfortable with that, right? Because, if not, that would make you a hypocrite. That's all I was saying about you.
Where did I say YOU were projecting? However, you've made me think about it more. So, l suppose it could be argued that you stated or imputed that he's not genuine and is motivated by malice, that his demeanour is evidence of this and that he's hiding things, and that he's a bully and a villain, and that you staing or implying that he's a bully or a victim is projection. You have expressed concerns about him not answering questions, but you are not so controlling that he has to do it on your terms, right? And, in court, the defendants get the opportunity to question him, right? All your questions could be asked and he would have to give sworn answers, right? You know this. Therefore, surely it could be reasonably and persuasively argued that in calling him a bully and a victim, that what you were really doing was talking about yourself, because it's a fact and not just an opinion, and your own actions demonstrate, that you are a bully and a villain.
I have never judged him as a person. I try not to do that.
If you really want to know my personal observation, which may be entirely innacurate, I feel he is very personable, charming. His friendly manner make it difficult to see him as anything but innocent. He disarms people by having a cute innocent demeanor as he discusses disconcerting inventions, not discussing the consequences and negative effects, only the amazing findings of his.
If he looked and talked like Klaus Schwab (picture it for a moment), his ability to be proud and smile through conversations about his inventions, connections with Tony (Fauci), his suggestion to use mRNA in vaccines, call to mind inventor scientists who have no regrets. No problem doing the same thing over and over again. No problem with vaccines. He claims to have deep connections with vaccinology from the start (see other comments of mine here with links of him speaking). He includes gene expressing in his expertise. Gene expression would include a potential for unintended consequences of tampering with peoples DNA and RNA.
He talks about collegues involved in all of this as people who just need to feed their family. Might this infer he is innocently trying to feed his family and excuse any negative consequences of his actions? Is this the type of leader we want going forward in our future?
His suing others for questioning him also concern me. I feel open dialogue and answering questions is important going forward.
Note this isn't judging him as a person. He might be the sweetest person in the world especially to those who agree with him on all matters.
I wouldn't have a problem with someone who talked with me the way I am speaking with everyone in this comment section because I don't have a problem answering questions. I never called him a bully, a fraud, a proponent of Hitler, a murderer, controlled opposition etc. I never said any of those things. I asked questions. I said I have concerns. If those questions and concerns make you think he looks like a bully or a villain it's because you think it. You are projecting those things onto him not me.
Fetal tissue isnt even the beginning of why it's against my religion.
Our bodies are so important that the Lord calls them temples of God (see 1 Corinthians 3:16–17; 6:19–20). Our bodies are holy.
How is causing our bodies to manufacture a foreign protein which has proven to damage cells, cause inflammation and turn us into GMO spike factories treating our bodies as holy temples? God didnt make us to manufacture toxic foreign proteins.
Taking in toxins is bad enough. Forcing our cells to make toxins is insanity.
There is nothing more "unbecoming" than lawfare to the tune of $25M. Malone has inserted himself and continues to do so, daily, of his own free will, into every possible aspect of the covid/vaccine/mRNA story. He makes claims about his knowledge and expertise, but doesn't want to own up to or explain decisions or interactions.
Sorry, doesn't cut it. And more people notice every day.
I agree, and I also think you misrepresent what Dr. Malone has actually said and also just becasue you help develop a technology does not mean that you also develop how to dismantle it. You are researcher and you know how reserach works, Gene therapy was originally thought of cure genetic diseases and mRNA research was being used in cancer research, to present cancer specific DNA to antigen presenting cells to prime the body to recognize residual tumor. I worked in this field of research back in the day and when Dr. Malone provided some of his references to early papers, I remembered that we had referenced some of his work in ours, so he clearly was involved in this early research at the time. I dont' really care who invented it. I think Dr. Malone played a role in raising awareness about the dangers of using this technology for Covid, but I also think many others had a hand in using this technology for bad instead of good, or sometimes sitll trying to figure out if people were evil or naive. Either way, the decisions that were made have had horrible consequences. As you know the technology has been around for a long time and much research and development money has been spent on a technology that never made it to people in over 2-3 decades, so I think someone saw this as an opportunity. Lastly, I am ashamed to see the "leaders" who are in this movement to support treating the injured and fighting for our freedoms fighting with each other rather than against what we are up against. This is a huge battle and an "enemy" with many arms, so we need many people willing to fight and lead on many fronts. There is room for all who want to help us win our freedom. I am not an expert and am reading, learning and thinking and trying to figure out how to help us win just like everyone else.
What concerns me the most is, even after knowing this Tech was dangerous, he pushed for it to be used in vaccines knowing it could still pass through safety and be a marketable product.
I personally don't want to promote someone who wants to push something that's toxic because he wants to sell a product
Awake not woke please tell me how I am projecting. I'm not trying to sell any products. I'm not trying to push toxic substances onto others. I'm not manufacturing things that could harm people. I'm not taking credit for inventing any products or pushing for them to be used in vaccines
you make a fair point! My point was just this is extremely complicated technology and from personal research which as more with viral vectors than mRNA, but we had a team that was working on cancer vaccines with mRNA, the orginal intent of its use was for good in my lab at least and this is why I had red flags immediately when this technology was rolled out because 20+ years ago when I was working in this field, we were only looking at diseases with no or limited treatment options like HIV and recurring cancer, and even in those cases we were not able to move into the clinic and while I had not remained fully staying up on the science, I was not aware of the technology every being approved for use in no option disease, let alone to be injected into billions of people including preganant women and moms.
I have to say, I feel sad that I worked in this field, that turned this technology that started with good intentions into what has happened and tell myself perhaps the reason was so that I could preven people from getting the "jab", but even that was only successful for immediate family, I have many friends and colleagues who took it. and some are injured. Stay safe and united in our fight.
I think there's a huge difference between helping people with rare and incurable genetic diseases and wanting to push a genetic vaccine onto an entire population. Like you mentioned, your goals were not to make a one size fits all treatment plan for the yearly flu with something that has questionable long term safety.
My husband's family are carriers of the Lynch syndrome genetic defect which puts them at high risk of many types of cancers. We've watched so many young family members die of incurable Turbo type recurring cancers that won't stop coming back and while I do believe there are natural therapies and solutions in the modern world they aren't being offered people are being allowed to die in this situation the idea of a vaccine that might cure this specific population of people isn't unreasonable in my mind but it's not something that should be used widely across the entire world as if we're all Guinea pigs for some genetic experiment.
Agree. It’s gotten truly pathetic. It’s time to unsubscribe. I paid for this SubStack because I wanted to support Dr Alexander. Now, he’s obsessed with Dr Malone to a point of being unhinged. Too bad.
As someone who has had to subscribe to ministries dealing with abuse I must defend Dr Alexander.
Often victims of abuse are told to forgive and forget. Move on. Meanwhile the perpetrator smiles with little remorse. It is evil and very difficult for victims to move on while others allow the perpetrator to continue with cunning attacks.
Dr Alexander is not obsessed or unhinged. He is simply providing the facts and wanting to move on "only" if Dr Malone would be willing to answer questions.
Dr Breggin has also asked Malone to a discussion to work out the details. Dr Malone refuses. What does he have to hide by facing those he has smeared and ultimately sued?
if the medical freedom "movement" is large enough to accommodate a variety views, why is he trying to shut down the other views by suing them out of house and home? hope they sue him back and he loses his ranch and yachts and his bid for public office.
I’m grateful for your good work, but your constant attacks on Dr. Malone are giving me too much exposure to your petty, vindictive side. You, of all people, should know that we are in the middle of a much bigger battle.
I agree with you, Daniel. Dr. Alexander has done a lot of good work and I appreciate it. I continue to read his Substack posts daily. But can't we move on from these character assassinations? I would say the same to Dr. Malone, but only paid subscribers can comment on his Substack. I'd rather stick to the issues and do away with attacking our own.
It irks me to no end when someone plays victim over their actions. They, without fail, go on the defensive. The internet is forever, and some ace researchers are out there. No surprise they find it hard to get their findings out to the masses, regardless of how well documented. As for being sued, think many are ahead of you in that line. Thankful to you and others like you, Dr. Alexander, for upholding your oath.
I cant imagine there is anything one could do to turn off the mRNA without turning off vital parts of our own cellular processes. It's always good to ask questions though. Anything that might mitigate the damage is worth investigating.
Thank you Paul, you're asking the right questions. For Malone to go on Twitter and say hateful things about you and others is just wrong and I don't blame you for saying what you said in the above letter to him, he has caused so much damage to so many people. If he knows how to reverse the mRNA in the bioweapon shots then he should speak up. Many people have died and are suffering to this day.
Malone didn’t cause this problem. As Alexander said, hundreds of scientists have worked on mRNA technology. He didn’t deploy it We can thank our federal government for that.
Malone says he had an initial and 1st booster vax and had serious adverse effects. I question this.
Why did he allow himself to be injected twice with an experimental genetically modifying shots protected by EUA, unless he's lying about getting injected with anything other than saline...
I'm not saying Malone made what's in these shots but he says he invented the mRNA in them. Can he maybe figure out how to reverse some of the damage done, that's what Id like know. Maybe he can ask the hundreds of scientists who worked on it with him if they have an answer.
I don't think he ever said he invented Covid 19, he developed the technology to use mRNA rather than DNA (a particular piece of material, not specifically to inject and repair, that was the original use of this technology, it now has had a twistsed reporpose to be used for your own body to create the SARS COV-2 spike protien (ie the actual bad part of the virus) as a vaccine. So the issue is not the technology, but how the technology has been used in this case and my understanding is Dr. Malone had no role in this and spoke up to provide some science and understanding about the technology. I am not supporting one person over the other, reading what many are writing and proposing, but I do think the infighting only helps the other side. Again, it is becoming clear that even in a fight for freedom, there are good guys and bad guys on the "good team" and it is very possible that there is controlled opposition embedded, but I think we need to stop infighting and move things forward as I stated before for the mRNA injured, restore oversight to unbought agencies, that will generally look out for the population, restore informed consent, conduct appropriate trials and never allow us again to get into these coereced situations, where you have to chose betwween your job and being a guinea pig. And uphold the constitution, and in mind also in a faster matter as things are moving through courts so slowly many had to make a choice they didn't want to to put food on the table.
In say ten years from now, you will be able to hold your head up high, knowing your actions will show you did your well best and you were only concerned for the injected injured and dead; for those who died and who suffered terribly from and during lockdown; for those who lost their money and their livelihoods.
It does not matter what people say or think about you.
I can see you do not care.
And that makes you dangerous and authentic.
Malone does not matter in the bigger scheme of things either.
His type will come and go.
You find false prophets in all walks of life.
It's not about the money.
It's only ever about the empathy for mankind.
Malone will do nothing to you in the courts.
He will not expose himself to cross-examination.
Even a half-arsed lawyer will rip him to shreds on cross-examination.
But one thing, if may say so Paul, you must know when to stop - meaning the principle of only saying what you need to say once or maximum twice; as repetition will only dilute your argument and grind it into dust.
Paul this is fiya! And also can we learn what this guy picked famotidine over hcq and ivm and for a rigged study at a time when hcq and ivm would have saved lives?
Can we also get an explanation if there is graphene in the hydrogel in the Relcovax described and shown in this slide presentation? https://www.bitchute.com/video/IQKb6lL8RxGy/
Thank you Paul for sharing your truths and not bowing to the fear. You share hard truths and that is what we need to see. Don’t let anyone try to silence you. This is what free speech is folks. If you don’t like it move on!!
Dr. Alexander please take a break. In my opinion you are losing perspective. I subscribed to your Substack because you made sense in the beginning but imo not so much now a days. Since my subscription renewed in Jan. I will leave it alone but already put in that I did not wish to renew. I will not be moved by anger or name callings. Also you sent too many emails in a day that I do not read anymore. Please return to your dignity which seemed like it was in the beginning.
Your constant focus on Malone is not doing you any good and I would say is mentally unhealthy. I appreciate your passion and love your other posts however if this continues, I will stop following you and I am sure others will follow. Malone mentioned the supplements that your company sells BUT TOOK IT DOWN after he received backlash. On your posts people say he's suing McCullough and I haven't seen you step in to correct that false information. It almost seems you are taunting him to sue you. I truly hope for the good of everyone, and truly yourself that you stop with this Malone bashing.
I have met him before he went on Rogan. His personality is reserved so it’s easier to feel comfortable with say a Dr. Merik or Kory. It’s what I would expect out of a high level researcher. It makes him harder to read along with the fact that he is highly educated and has so much worldly knowledge. It’s intimidating to me but not unapproachable. I’ve had the same challenge trying to make small talk with Ben Stein before. Still, I am careful to judge based on my personal,brief experience with him. I think it would be easier to judge him as bad because of his reserved personality but that doesn’t make it true. To me, you would have to know him a while before you could judge because he is complicated. I’m still pro Malone. I’d have to have something solid to change my mind but if I did I would.
That doesn't add one bit of information to the discussion at all. I think this all is petty. There, that's my opinion without any real information. See how that works? Both are non-productive.
So you’re ridiculing Malone without him even responding? The Atlantic?? Is that not another MSM propaganda outfit. Do you trust the “other side” more than Malone? Clearly.
Methinks you doth protest to much young man!!!
Are YOU the controlled opposition? Is it your job to demolish Malone?
Why aren’t you uniting?
Why are you causing a divide?
Who went on Joe Rogan and blew the whole thing wide open?
I’m always a sceptic so the jury is still out on BOTH of you.
Dr Robert Malone has been a leader in the #StopTheShot movement. He is one man with a unique perspective. His career was up ended by the US Covid response as have many physicians and scientists in the Covid truth and medical freedom battle. He has made a valuable contribution. I suspect Dr Alexander attacks and bullies Malone in an attempt to protect the reputation of himself and his colleagues in their current business venture, The Wellness Company. Dr Malone has been critical of the prices charged by this group. I disagree with that criticism as much as the bullying that’s going on here. The potential patients of the Wellness Company can decide for themselves if they want to pay for the services provided. Let capitalism, while we still have it, rule the day. However Dr. Malone also has every right to rebuild some semblance of a career all-be-it very different. If he wants to speak and consult far and wide, so be it. There’s been a great interest in his perspective.
This incessant public negativity toward Dr Malone over work he did while a PhD student is reckless and harmful. He has provided in depth explanations about his work ad nauseam. His disagreements with Dr Kariko should have remained between them but she took her complaints to The Atlantic of all places. That publication appears to be radical left wing and is a part of the vast media effort to suppress and censor the truth about the U.S. and international covid pandemic and response. That was a poor move. All of this cat fighting should cease and desist. We have more important battles to win.
Your continuing attacks on Dr. Malone say more about you than about him. It's unbecoming of you. The Medical Freedom movement is large enough to accommodate a variety of views. You're on the verge of losing the plot.
I am disappointed as well with the ongoing attack on Dr. Malone. It will only lead to the weakening of our efforts to tell the truth. I can only ask, please stop. Thank you.
I disagree. Robert Malone is deeply suspect. He and his wife take to substack & cry & moan knowing that their readers will be sympathetic and outraged.
If they are so bothered, why don’t they retire to their horse farm? Why? Neither of the Malones have contributed anything original to the Freedom Movement. Robert Malone’s substack rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars. For what? He regurgitates information. And he sues and threatens all who dare differ.
He claims he invented mRNA technology. He worked for DoD and brags about his contacts there.
But he is one of us? Please. Rather than answer difficult questions, like a mature adult, Malone sues ppl into oblivion.
They are pure evil and using the system to deceive. Usery! Well said August.
he makes hundreds of thousands of dollars off his substack? are you sure? how can you know something like that? anyway it's mere peanuts to the millions he expects to gain off the defendants. he should sue the really deep pockets though, like fox, the atlantic and the nyt.
EYES WIDE WOKE
Oh he should stop because you are disappointed? Paul is trying to get to the truth. How do you think the truth comes out, by not talking about it?
Well said Denise!
Bravo! To me, it just shows how low our once first class health care system has fallen. Shhh, don't talk about it.
Oh I sure won't! wink wink
"Or is it your reputation that's bothering you? But look at how soon we're all forgotten. The abyss of endless time that swallows it all. The emptiness of those applauding hands. The people who praise us; how capricious they are, how arbitrary. And the tiny region it takes place. The whole earth a point in space - and most of it uninhabited."
"For all things fade away, become the stuff of legend, and are soon buried in oblivion. Mind you, this is true only for those who blazed once like bright stars in the firmament, but for the rest, as soon as a few clods of earth cover their corpses, they are 'out of sight, out of mind.' In the end, what would you gain from everlasting remembrance? Absolutely nothing. So what is left worth living for? This alone: justice in thought, goodness in action, speech that cannot deceive, and a disposition glad of whatever comes, welcoming it as necessary, as familiar, as flowing from the same source and fountain as yourself."
Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus, 16th Roman Emperor
What? Why do you think you can tell people what to do? If you don't like something, you leave or handle it. Don't go shifting your preferences on others.
Agree Denise. People seem to forget that the door they came into functions as an exit door as well.
You either want the truth or you want to bully people questioning your hero. You cant have both
Doesnt the man himself say truth will stand? Let the questions be asked. I've asked him many reasonable questions which he refuses to answer.
Not good form to brag about inventing this tech and how you recommended its use as vaccines when they were shown in studies to not be safe. If its true, does this mean it's because of him all of this is happening? Has he ever apologized for his part?
Alexander has made his point. It's time to move on. We have more important battles to fight at this point. Malone is bragging? I think he's remorseful. It's not often that someone comes to regret his past work. And if he's not penitent, he at least is merely stating a fact.
Quit being a Malone Shrill !!!
Just answer the key questions Dr. Malone. Then we can all over on.
Malone actions all represent Deep State DOD approaches. SUING PEOPLE ARE INTIMIDATION TACTICS !
Malone is embedded in the Freedom Movement for one reason only.
TO DIVIDE & SILENCE !!
So do you think this movement would be where it is today, with so many now questioning Covid if Malone had stayed silent?
Yes. Malone was bragging about his part in manufacturing the jab up until the point most of the world took it. If someone invested in the injections they might have made a decent profit by the time he began to speak up. He stepped into a movement that was already in high gear.
Agreed. He took the shots I imagine believing they had overcome the issues that made the technology problematic in the first place. He knew the shortcomings of the mRNA from his own original research so I guess he was satisfied that they had come up with a better mousetrap enough to take it himself. I do wish he had come forth sooner but at least he did and he undeniably brought the eyeballs to the movement that were not there before because of his unique position to do so. That you cannot deny. It wasn’t until after Rogan that the movement got mainstream attention and that was necessary.
This is absolutely not true. Listen to Dark Horse podcast June 2021.
BINGO!!
Ad hominem attacks are deplorable; therefore, I will not accuse you of being a shill for Dr. Alexander.
Seek a second opinion from his victim:
https://open.substack.com/pub/rwmalonemd/p/purveyors-of-hate?r=71l80&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I dont think its helpful. For me, I have genuine questions. Doesnt defamation infer a motive to tear someone down not ask questions about their invention, their views?
I'm not trying to de-fame anyone.
At times I wonder why he wants fame.
l speak from the heart when I say I would be crying in prayer every night if I were him. As an inventor I would want to see my inventions heal people not harm.
He admits the vaccines are harming others and that he was an integral part of pushing his tech to be used for vaccines.
The field of medicine he got into is fraught with unethical experimentation, lawsuits. The people he has been connected with are the very ones who perpetrated what all of us, including him, stand against. And yet does he truly stand against it? He promotes himself in his interviews, his inventions, his connection.
His lack of transparency, how he doesnt talk about the dark side of his own research, he doesnt directly stand against it, instead wants "fame" to me, makes it appear he stands behind, defends his inventions. He owns a mRNA medicine patent. Is it being used?
I have mixed feelings about mRNA. My main concern is to not use it for vaccines, for any therapeutic where another option exists, never on large portions of the population and never without knowing long term multigenerational effects including everything from immune alterations to gene expression, cell apoptosis, autoimmunity, alterations in other DNA and RNA.
I dont see whats wrong with wanting to know his stance on his own inventions, patents, mRNA vaccines, specific questions about his research and connections.
It makes me uncomfortable to hear him call Anthony fauci "Tony" like a buddy and give him credit for helping him with his patent which would make mRNA medicine take off. Do you want mRNA medicine to take off? Do you like the idea of it?
Him saying "Tony" was the part that really jumped out at me. like WTF?
I didn't read the whole article but I read enough to get a flavor - he thinks defamation is "wrong". The idea of defamation is very hazy. It is often used to stop people from saying something about someone that may injure their reputation, but rightfully so. The wrong part is when someone cannot defend themselves, when they are closed off from defending themselves or when not given the platform to defend themselves. But that isn't the case with Malone - he has much more opportunity to air his views than anyone of his detractors. He has the name and he gets the airings. So that is just waffle about defamation being wrong. He simply doesn't want to confront opposition or criticism. If it's not justified he can speak to it. But he doesn't, he just takes things to court, he has to have a gang to help his case along rather than speak person-to-person in truth.
I think it's very simple. We all want and deserve the truth and to have important questions answered.
If he wants people to stop voicing concerns all he has to do is answer their questions.
Every interview I have seen with him in starts off praising his integral part in the making of these injections. If it isnt him bragging it's the interviewer. He glows, smiling with pride over his inventions.
How many good people would smile over having invented something thats harmed so many people? Wouldnt it be more appropriate to somberly reflect on what a tragedy this is?
To me, he is an enigma wrapped in mystery because of his past inventions, his past and current connections, his comments which seem to forgive people for their evil part in this (they have to feed their family) and his refusal to answer so many peoples questions
That smile you mention might also represent embarrassment or discomfort. But whatever its source and significance, Dr. Malone has answered all my concerns adequately. Now I’m moving on from this discussion.
"That smile you mention might also represent embarrassment or discomfort"
Says every villain when they're caught smiling and bragging over their accomplishments.
I'm curious, do you give this same excuse to Bill Gates when he smiles at inappropriate moments?
the smile and laughter of a psychopath is termed "duper's delight."
He has answered some of these questions on his substack which you can subscribe to.
I did subscribe a long time ago to ask him my own questions and concerns which he didnt address. He got on another substack where I was and I asked him again. He ignored me and called us all trolls.
My son was born with a rare genetic deletion. I've done over 20 years of medical research and have concerns over him being a part in their manufacture, promoting the injections and tech to begin with. The invention and push for them to be turned into vaccines alone is a giant red flag, even without all that followed.
Playing stupid and innocent isnt an option.
A change of heart can happen but his attitude that everyone including him is forgiven because everyone has a family to feed, along with too many unanswered questions and lawsuits against people to shut them up is disconcerting.
if he's so smart etc he should do as Alexander asked and provide the means or information to reverse the effects of the vax. but maybe he ain't that smart. or maybe he's all in with the agenda.
hey he just did that to me! I asked a question for clarification I wasn't even aware of this controversy so no dog in the fight - and he called me a troll and said i needed to learn to read for comprehension - ie - he insulted me, i should sue his ass!
Dr Robert Malone has been a leader in the #StopTheShot movement. He is one man with a unique perspective. His career was up ended by the US Covid response as have many physicians and scientists in the Covid truth and medical freedom battle. He has made a valuable contribution. I suspect Dr Alexander attacks and bullies Malone in an attempt to protect the reputation of himself and his colleagues in their current business venture, The Wellness Company. Dr Malone has been critical of the prices charged by this group. I disagree with that criticism as much as the bullying that’s going on here. The potential patients of the Wellness Company can decide for themselves if they want to pay for the services provided. Let capitalism, while we still have it, rule the day. However Dr. Malone also has every right to rebuild some semblance of a career all-be-it very different. If he wants to speak and consult far and wide, so be it. There’s been a great interest in his perspective.
This incessant public negativity toward Dr Malone over work he did while a PhD student is reckless and harmful. He has provided in depth explanations about his work ad nauseam. His disagreements with Dr Karilo should have remained between them but she took her complaints to The Atlantic of all places. That publication appears to be radical left wing and is a part of the vast media effort to suppress and censor the truth about the U.S. and international covid pandemic and response. That was a poor move. All of this cat fighting should cease and desist. We have more important battles to win.
From my understanding he was working for a company in the middle of a large clinical trial proving famotidine helps covid patients, which MIGHT HAVE saved lives if he hadnt QUIT mid trial, closing the trial and starting his own tiny trial. How many tiny trials of repurposed meds have succeeded in altering the coarse of covid therapies?
Glad to know hes onto his next savior scheme which he could then quit to become Fauci.2.0
Look at his history and pattern of moving up
His comments show he is still very provaccine. If everything falls apart for pharma they might rename everything and he could be their insurance that we will all follow along like cattle to whatever he wants.
If this isnt true then why isn't he answering questions regarding all of these things?
His career was not "up-ended." It's going strong. He and Jill are aiming to parlay his prestige and fame into a career in politics and/or talk show host on the backs of the vaccine-injured (injured thanks to him by the way). Anybody gets in the way gets his and Jill's boots in their face.
Tell your master to cease and desist from bullying people with lawsuits to shut them up and make money. 25M is a lot of money, that's a lot of horses and yachts. Tell your master to go out and earn it honestly if he wants to expand his ranchero. tell him to sue the Atlantic. sure.
penitent? penitents don't file S.L.A.P.P. suits to ruin the people they hate.
If you don't want to hear about it then off you go. But others want to continue. Why do you think you can push your preferences on others? This is a big world with lots of people of differing points of view.
I don't know why anyone would brag about inventing this technology. I think it's wicked beyond compare. In fact scientists need to answer for what they do - for experimenting on animals for one and now on humans and secondly for tampering with DNA which doesn't belong to them - it is something we need as a society to discuss before tampering goes ahead or is even started. Just because they can is not a reason to.
Well said these are my concerns exactly. Questioning the ethics of scientific experimentation, the pushing through of products that were proven to be unsafe promoting them as vaccines, not actually studying vaccines in a way that proves they are safe by using placebos all of these are really valid concerns.
In my mind people who are doing the right thing aren't heroes they're humane people nobody belongs in the position of a hero Especially someone who had a integral part in Making these injections possible.
Putting it into perspective Bill Gates is actually less responsible then someone who has medical expertise to know better and yet still does something that may cause great harm. We look to scientists doctors and medical professionals to do the right thing we don't look to Bill Gates to do the right thing hes a business man
You could be easily charged with being willfully blind if you think that this is all about "the truth."
https://open.substack.com/pub/rwmalonemd/p/purveyors-of-hate?r=71l80&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I have to laugh at the title Purveyors of hate. What a broad and useless term that is. That's just to shut people up. He also talks a heck of a lot about malice. He uses laws that were passed long ago in a different world and that have no relevance to today, with information being readily available and easily confirmable if people just answered questions or got into dialogue. Publications are made much quicker than previous times and we can clear things up very easily just by dialoguing. But he wants to bring in the courts, and laws that no longer apply to the digital age. They were made for a time before we had this tool.
I felt the same way but it was just the title. Read further and see if your confirmation bias (like mine) was affected.
Thanks for the link. There's an extensive discussion there by Malone on international human rights law. Very interesting. He asserts or implies that the Breggins and others (substack readers making adverse comments) are engaged in psychological projection, i.e, are really describing themselves, not him:
"Aside from it being a familiar concept to those studying or knowing law, defamation, or "slander", is also known as a "smear campaign" in psychology.[23] Those who suffer from narcissism, sociopathy, and psychopathy use it as a weapon to discredit their victims, typically when they feel you are about to expose them, or are dangerous, but oftentimes it can happen with no known motive beyond psychological projection.
I have seen a lot of examples over the last two years of psychological projection masquerading as defamation. The challenge is what to do about this when you are actually experiencing professional and financial damages by those who are so afflicted?"
Malone claims he sent a cease and desist letter which was ignored, so as a last resort he is suing for malicious defamation. He wants a jury to decide the facts. He has to prove malice
Do you think a jury will believe him?
Based on what readers are saying here in the comments section, it should be easy for the Breggins and other defendants to win. They can use the defence of truth. All they need to do is disprove the following:
"The Statements [ made about Dr. Malone by the Breggins and other defendants] are materially false. Dr. Malone is not controlled opposition. He does not work for and has no connection to the CIA/DOD or the intelligence community. He is not an operative of any government or organization. He has never orchestrated a “psyop”. Dr. Malone does not and never has supported totalitarian global predators. He does not and never has supported global predators who have been committing mass murder under the guise of COVID-19. He is not dangerous. He is not a supporter of any apologist for political mass murderers. He is not a Hitler apologist and/or a Hitler “excuser”. Dr. Malone has not ever engaged in fraud and is not engaged in deliberate fraud to blind anyone to any “predators”. He is not a “protector” of any “predators”. He does not and never has promoted baseless scientific theories. Comparing the Statements to the truth, it is beyond peradventure that the Statements are materially false."
Please read my concerns in this comment section. Let me know how I'm projecting when I'm very specific with my concerns. For example how am I projecting when I describe his stance on a subject and I hold the opposite stance? How am I projecting to say I did 20+ years of medical research because my son has a genetic defect and I want these specific questions answered? If I were projecting, wouldnt I be attacking him not stating public facts, things he has said and asking questions? How is it projection to state the fact that he promoted manufacturing products proven to be unsafe as vaccines? Did I push for an unsafe tech to be used for vaccines?
Please answer each one of my comments exactly how I am projecting my own issues onto him by questioning him and being concerned over his behavior and actions. Did I claim to invent the tech that made a toxic product which was unleashed onto the world possible, then smile about it and make sure I introduce myself and others introduce me giving me credit?
All I said about you specifically Heidi was "I'm sure you, Hannalehigh, JonesySmart and Heidi Hell wouldn't have any problem if these things were said about you." All I was saying about you was I'm sure it wouldn't bother you if lots of people were calling you a fraud, a proponent of Hitler, a murderer, controlled opposition etc. If there was a campaign to get hundreds of thousands of people to believe that about you, you'd think that was ok, and you'd be comfortable with that, right? Because, if not, that would make you a hypocrite. That's all I was saying about you.
Where did I say YOU were projecting? However, you've made me think about it more. So, l suppose it could be argued that you stated or imputed that he's not genuine and is motivated by malice, that his demeanour is evidence of this and that he's hiding things, and that he's a bully and a villain, and that you staing or implying that he's a bully or a victim is projection. You have expressed concerns about him not answering questions, but you are not so controlling that he has to do it on your terms, right? And, in court, the defendants get the opportunity to question him, right? All your questions could be asked and he would have to give sworn answers, right? You know this. Therefore, surely it could be reasonably and persuasively argued that in calling him a bully and a victim, that what you were really doing was talking about yourself, because it's a fact and not just an opinion, and your own actions demonstrate, that you are a bully and a villain.
I have never judged him as a person. I try not to do that.
If you really want to know my personal observation, which may be entirely innacurate, I feel he is very personable, charming. His friendly manner make it difficult to see him as anything but innocent. He disarms people by having a cute innocent demeanor as he discusses disconcerting inventions, not discussing the consequences and negative effects, only the amazing findings of his.
If he looked and talked like Klaus Schwab (picture it for a moment), his ability to be proud and smile through conversations about his inventions, connections with Tony (Fauci), his suggestion to use mRNA in vaccines, call to mind inventor scientists who have no regrets. No problem doing the same thing over and over again. No problem with vaccines. He claims to have deep connections with vaccinology from the start (see other comments of mine here with links of him speaking). He includes gene expressing in his expertise. Gene expression would include a potential for unintended consequences of tampering with peoples DNA and RNA.
He talks about collegues involved in all of this as people who just need to feed their family. Might this infer he is innocently trying to feed his family and excuse any negative consequences of his actions? Is this the type of leader we want going forward in our future?
His suing others for questioning him also concern me. I feel open dialogue and answering questions is important going forward.
Note this isn't judging him as a person. He might be the sweetest person in the world especially to those who agree with him on all matters.
No to all of this.
I wouldn't have a problem with someone who talked with me the way I am speaking with everyone in this comment section because I don't have a problem answering questions. I never called him a bully, a fraud, a proponent of Hitler, a murderer, controlled opposition etc. I never said any of those things. I asked questions. I said I have concerns. If those questions and concerns make you think he looks like a bully or a villain it's because you think it. You are projecting those things onto him not me.
This is sick.
They hijacked religion just like they hijack our RNA and DNA with their injections. The entire concept of combining the 2 is an oxymoron.
Fetal tissue isnt even the beginning of why it's against my religion.
Our bodies are so important that the Lord calls them temples of God (see 1 Corinthians 3:16–17; 6:19–20). Our bodies are holy.
How is causing our bodies to manufacture a foreign protein which has proven to damage cells, cause inflammation and turn us into GMO spike factories treating our bodies as holy temples? God didnt make us to manufacture toxic foreign proteins.
Taking in toxins is bad enough. Forcing our cells to make toxins is insanity.
There is nothing more "unbecoming" than lawfare to the tune of $25M. Malone has inserted himself and continues to do so, daily, of his own free will, into every possible aspect of the covid/vaccine/mRNA story. He makes claims about his knowledge and expertise, but doesn't want to own up to or explain decisions or interactions.
Sorry, doesn't cut it. And more people notice every day.
“Freedom” allows people to speak. Malone is the opposite of freedom.
I agree, and I also think you misrepresent what Dr. Malone has actually said and also just becasue you help develop a technology does not mean that you also develop how to dismantle it. You are researcher and you know how reserach works, Gene therapy was originally thought of cure genetic diseases and mRNA research was being used in cancer research, to present cancer specific DNA to antigen presenting cells to prime the body to recognize residual tumor. I worked in this field of research back in the day and when Dr. Malone provided some of his references to early papers, I remembered that we had referenced some of his work in ours, so he clearly was involved in this early research at the time. I dont' really care who invented it. I think Dr. Malone played a role in raising awareness about the dangers of using this technology for Covid, but I also think many others had a hand in using this technology for bad instead of good, or sometimes sitll trying to figure out if people were evil or naive. Either way, the decisions that were made have had horrible consequences. As you know the technology has been around for a long time and much research and development money has been spent on a technology that never made it to people in over 2-3 decades, so I think someone saw this as an opportunity. Lastly, I am ashamed to see the "leaders" who are in this movement to support treating the injured and fighting for our freedoms fighting with each other rather than against what we are up against. This is a huge battle and an "enemy" with many arms, so we need many people willing to fight and lead on many fronts. There is room for all who want to help us win our freedom. I am not an expert and am reading, learning and thinking and trying to figure out how to help us win just like everyone else.
What concerns me the most is, even after knowing this Tech was dangerous, he pushed for it to be used in vaccines knowing it could still pass through safety and be a marketable product.
I personally don't want to promote someone who wants to push something that's toxic because he wants to sell a product
Awake not woke please tell me how I am projecting. I'm not trying to sell any products. I'm not trying to push toxic substances onto others. I'm not manufacturing things that could harm people. I'm not taking credit for inventing any products or pushing for them to be used in vaccines
you make a fair point! My point was just this is extremely complicated technology and from personal research which as more with viral vectors than mRNA, but we had a team that was working on cancer vaccines with mRNA, the orginal intent of its use was for good in my lab at least and this is why I had red flags immediately when this technology was rolled out because 20+ years ago when I was working in this field, we were only looking at diseases with no or limited treatment options like HIV and recurring cancer, and even in those cases we were not able to move into the clinic and while I had not remained fully staying up on the science, I was not aware of the technology every being approved for use in no option disease, let alone to be injected into billions of people including preganant women and moms.
I have to say, I feel sad that I worked in this field, that turned this technology that started with good intentions into what has happened and tell myself perhaps the reason was so that I could preven people from getting the "jab", but even that was only successful for immediate family, I have many friends and colleagues who took it. and some are injured. Stay safe and united in our fight.
I think there's a huge difference between helping people with rare and incurable genetic diseases and wanting to push a genetic vaccine onto an entire population. Like you mentioned, your goals were not to make a one size fits all treatment plan for the yearly flu with something that has questionable long term safety.
My husband's family are carriers of the Lynch syndrome genetic defect which puts them at high risk of many types of cancers. We've watched so many young family members die of incurable Turbo type recurring cancers that won't stop coming back and while I do believe there are natural therapies and solutions in the modern world they aren't being offered people are being allowed to die in this situation the idea of a vaccine that might cure this specific population of people isn't unreasonable in my mind but it's not something that should be used widely across the entire world as if we're all Guinea pigs for some genetic experiment.
🙏
See my reply to Reggie VanderVeen above. It looks like the Breggins can't lose.
Agree. It’s gotten truly pathetic. It’s time to unsubscribe. I paid for this SubStack because I wanted to support Dr Alexander. Now, he’s obsessed with Dr Malone to a point of being unhinged. Too bad.
As someone who has had to subscribe to ministries dealing with abuse I must defend Dr Alexander.
Often victims of abuse are told to forgive and forget. Move on. Meanwhile the perpetrator smiles with little remorse. It is evil and very difficult for victims to move on while others allow the perpetrator to continue with cunning attacks.
Dr Alexander is not obsessed or unhinged. He is simply providing the facts and wanting to move on "only" if Dr Malone would be willing to answer questions.
Dr Breggin has also asked Malone to a discussion to work out the details. Dr Malone refuses. What does he have to hide by facing those he has smeared and ultimately sued?
Nice screen name. And apt.
He's asking Malone to have a debate. What's wrong with that?
if the medical freedom "movement" is large enough to accommodate a variety views, why is he trying to shut down the other views by suing them out of house and home? hope they sue him back and he loses his ranch and yachts and his bid for public office.
I’m grateful for your good work, but your constant attacks on Dr. Malone are giving me too much exposure to your petty, vindictive side. You, of all people, should know that we are in the middle of a much bigger battle.
I agree with you, Daniel. Dr. Alexander has done a lot of good work and I appreciate it. I continue to read his Substack posts daily. But can't we move on from these character assassinations? I would say the same to Dr. Malone, but only paid subscribers can comment on his Substack. I'd rather stick to the issues and do away with attacking our own.
It irks me to no end when someone plays victim over their actions. They, without fail, go on the defensive. The internet is forever, and some ace researchers are out there. No surprise they find it hard to get their findings out to the masses, regardless of how well documented. As for being sued, think many are ahead of you in that line. Thankful to you and others like you, Dr. Alexander, for upholding your oath.
I cant imagine there is anything one could do to turn off the mRNA without turning off vital parts of our own cellular processes. It's always good to ask questions though. Anything that might mitigate the damage is worth investigating.
Thank you Paul, you're asking the right questions. For Malone to go on Twitter and say hateful things about you and others is just wrong and I don't blame you for saying what you said in the above letter to him, he has caused so much damage to so many people. If he knows how to reverse the mRNA in the bioweapon shots then he should speak up. Many people have died and are suffering to this day.
Malone didn’t cause this problem. As Alexander said, hundreds of scientists have worked on mRNA technology. He didn’t deploy it We can thank our federal government for that.
Malone says he had an initial and 1st booster vax and had serious adverse effects. I question this.
Why did he allow himself to be injected twice with an experimental genetically modifying shots protected by EUA, unless he's lying about getting injected with anything other than saline...
I'm not saying Malone made what's in these shots but he says he invented the mRNA in them. Can he maybe figure out how to reverse some of the damage done, that's what Id like know. Maybe he can ask the hundreds of scientists who worked on it with him if they have an answer.
I don't think he ever said he invented Covid 19, he developed the technology to use mRNA rather than DNA (a particular piece of material, not specifically to inject and repair, that was the original use of this technology, it now has had a twistsed reporpose to be used for your own body to create the SARS COV-2 spike protien (ie the actual bad part of the virus) as a vaccine. So the issue is not the technology, but how the technology has been used in this case and my understanding is Dr. Malone had no role in this and spoke up to provide some science and understanding about the technology. I am not supporting one person over the other, reading what many are writing and proposing, but I do think the infighting only helps the other side. Again, it is becoming clear that even in a fight for freedom, there are good guys and bad guys on the "good team" and it is very possible that there is controlled opposition embedded, but I think we need to stop infighting and move things forward as I stated before for the mRNA injured, restore oversight to unbought agencies, that will generally look out for the population, restore informed consent, conduct appropriate trials and never allow us again to get into these coereced situations, where you have to chose betwween your job and being a guinea pig. And uphold the constitution, and in mind also in a faster matter as things are moving through courts so slowly many had to make a choice they didn't want to to put food on the table.
Great Great Great Great stuff Mr Paul!!! Truth truth truth truth is the only way!!! And you are getting at it!!!!
Hi Paul,
In say ten years from now, you will be able to hold your head up high, knowing your actions will show you did your well best and you were only concerned for the injected injured and dead; for those who died and who suffered terribly from and during lockdown; for those who lost their money and their livelihoods.
It does not matter what people say or think about you.
I can see you do not care.
And that makes you dangerous and authentic.
Malone does not matter in the bigger scheme of things either.
His type will come and go.
You find false prophets in all walks of life.
It's not about the money.
It's only ever about the empathy for mankind.
Malone will do nothing to you in the courts.
He will not expose himself to cross-examination.
Even a half-arsed lawyer will rip him to shreds on cross-examination.
But one thing, if may say so Paul, you must know when to stop - meaning the principle of only saying what you need to say once or maximum twice; as repetition will only dilute your argument and grind it into dust.
Wishing you the very best.
Barry
Malone has a history of being slime
No surprise to me
He always came off slimy and disingenuous
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgewebb/p/where-was-robert-malone-on-911?r=g0c5w&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
And more...the man is evil and a horrible human being
https://open.substack.com/pub/karenkingston/p/is-dr-malone-invested-in-humanity?r=g0c5w&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
where WAS malone on 911 and what was he into?
Paul this is fiya! And also can we learn what this guy picked famotidine over hcq and ivm and for a rigged study at a time when hcq and ivm would have saved lives?
Can we also get an explanation if there is graphene in the hydrogel in the Relcovax described and shown in this slide presentation? https://www.bitchute.com/video/IQKb6lL8RxGy/
Thank you Paul for sharing your truths and not bowing to the fear. You share hard truths and that is what we need to see. Don’t let anyone try to silence you. This is what free speech is folks. If you don’t like it move on!!
Dr. Alexander please take a break. In my opinion you are losing perspective. I subscribed to your Substack because you made sense in the beginning but imo not so much now a days. Since my subscription renewed in Jan. I will leave it alone but already put in that I did not wish to renew. I will not be moved by anger or name callings. Also you sent too many emails in a day that I do not read anymore. Please return to your dignity which seemed like it was in the beginning.
Your constant focus on Malone is not doing you any good and I would say is mentally unhealthy. I appreciate your passion and love your other posts however if this continues, I will stop following you and I am sure others will follow. Malone mentioned the supplements that your company sells BUT TOOK IT DOWN after he received backlash. On your posts people say he's suing McCullough and I haven't seen you step in to correct that false information. It almost seems you are taunting him to sue you. I truly hope for the good of everyone, and truly yourself that you stop with this Malone bashing.
malone is a snake...too bad you can't see it
@Victoria Hill: That’s strong language. Do you know him personally?
I have met him before he went on Rogan. His personality is reserved so it’s easier to feel comfortable with say a Dr. Merik or Kory. It’s what I would expect out of a high level researcher. It makes him harder to read along with the fact that he is highly educated and has so much worldly knowledge. It’s intimidating to me but not unapproachable. I’ve had the same challenge trying to make small talk with Ben Stein before. Still, I am careful to judge based on my personal,brief experience with him. I think it would be easier to judge him as bad because of his reserved personality but that doesn’t make it true. To me, you would have to know him a while before you could judge because he is complicated. I’m still pro Malone. I’d have to have something solid to change my mind but if I did I would.
That doesn't add one bit of information to the discussion at all. I think this all is petty. There, that's my opinion without any real information. See how that works? Both are non-productive.
Agree. I stopped following today. Too much of this.
I like to listen to all sides and make my own decision.
So you’re ridiculing Malone without him even responding? The Atlantic?? Is that not another MSM propaganda outfit. Do you trust the “other side” more than Malone? Clearly.
Methinks you doth protest to much young man!!!
Are YOU the controlled opposition? Is it your job to demolish Malone?
Why aren’t you uniting?
Why are you causing a divide?
Who went on Joe Rogan and blew the whole thing wide open?
I’m always a sceptic so the jury is still out on BOTH of you.
Cheers.
I could see malones dark aura from the start
Dr Robert Malone has been a leader in the #StopTheShot movement. He is one man with a unique perspective. His career was up ended by the US Covid response as have many physicians and scientists in the Covid truth and medical freedom battle. He has made a valuable contribution. I suspect Dr Alexander attacks and bullies Malone in an attempt to protect the reputation of himself and his colleagues in their current business venture, The Wellness Company. Dr Malone has been critical of the prices charged by this group. I disagree with that criticism as much as the bullying that’s going on here. The potential patients of the Wellness Company can decide for themselves if they want to pay for the services provided. Let capitalism, while we still have it, rule the day. However Dr. Malone also has every right to rebuild some semblance of a career all-be-it very different. If he wants to speak and consult far and wide, so be it. There’s been a great interest in his perspective.
This incessant public negativity toward Dr Malone over work he did while a PhD student is reckless and harmful. He has provided in depth explanations about his work ad nauseam. His disagreements with Dr Kariko should have remained between them but she took her complaints to The Atlantic of all places. That publication appears to be radical left wing and is a part of the vast media effort to suppress and censor the truth about the U.S. and international covid pandemic and response. That was a poor move. All of this cat fighting should cease and desist. We have more important battles to win.