Dr. Naomi Wolf of War Room/DailyClout interviews Dr. Chris Flowers & Project Director Amy Kelly on emerging devastating data: "One of Five Stroke Sufferers post MRNA Vaccine DIED. Pfizer Documents!"
Dr. Naomi Wolf of War Room/DailyClout interviews Dr. Chris Flowers & Project Director Amy Kelly on emerging devastating data: "One of Five Stroke Sufferers post MRNA Vaccine DIED. Pfizer Documents!"
December 26th documents; 20% of post vaccine strokes were fatal in the 90 days following the vaccine roll-out; it was a brutal lie for FDA & media & Fauci & Walensky to say it was 'safe & effective'
The link to the Dr. Chandler data set I believe puts the issue in a much larger context. Thru 3/1/21 there were as read the data 42,000 A/E's. 1200 fatalities and that data covers a broad range of afflictions. 1/2 or so were in people under the age of 30 50 and a not immaterie al number under the age under the age of 30. 1200 deaths but a lot of data is still lacking "unknown". The gross number of patients administered the jab is also an unknown, but it was early in the launch. I would also assume the adverse events reported were proximal to the administration of the injection. If all those assumptions just the level of AE's should have at the very least raised alarm bells. The level of fatalities (again assuming proximity to the jab and the fact that near 1/2 are under the age of 50 should have stopped the administration then and there. Even more concerning is the fact that the AE's were more heavily skewed towards females. The infant deaths 0-2? Breast milk issues? History would suggest a fraction of these adverse events/deaths would pull a drug immediately at a substantially lower threshold. In my view looking at any individual adverse event like stokes without looking at the totality is a mistake. Just my two cents based on the Chandler data set.
You seem to apply the same standards of evidence to your assumptions about who I am, and what I believe in as you do to whether Strokes that occurred after the vaccination are causal or not. I wish you a happy new year and hope and trust that you will reflect on casting aspersions and making judgments on people you know nothing about. By the way, I have fought the pharmaceutical industry for decades, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t look for evidence before I make the kinds of serious assertions that many here make.
I found the Pfizer source document. The study population size was ~46k so 275/46k is ~0.6 % of the study group were killed by a stroke. Just pencil to napkin math. No judgements, need to break it down by age, gender etc.
Using your calculation, it looks like there is a rate of strokes among adults in the United States that is roughly .3% of the adult population getting a stroke each year. 800,000/250,000,000. That is half the .6% for the Pfizer vaccine. But that is only for 90 days so it seems very crudely that the incidence of strokes is EIGHT times greater amongst those who received the shot than the general population. If that admittedly, very crude calculation is anywhere near accurate, then the vax needs to be stopped immediately. I hope I made an obvious error because the conclusion is too horrible to contemplate.
I concur. Obviously there are professional techs and statisticians on this someplace and I have not heard other than this data sheet from Pfizer and simple back if the napkin statistics ratios.
So with all due haste I urge the CDC or whoever is paid to do this jump in and produce a paper that explains this and other apparent aberrations in the data. I have a science degree, I can read. 😁
275 strokes means nothing without the context there are over 2000 strokes that occur in the United States every single day of the year. You’ve got to do better than that if you want to be taken seriously.
The cardiovascular systems of human beings AGE, and, one of systems which senesce is circulatory. Often there are transient ischemic attacks first, then a major stroke. This is normal life, fate, destiny, biological senescence. Dr. Alexander and Naomi Wolf are pointing to 250 strokes correlated with a vaccination. Would a single one of those people, offered early treatment instead of an effing vaccine, choose to have a stroke and die, presuming that some percentage of those correlations are causal, and the causal link is being made all over the world. You are probably a Pfizer troll. When you die do you want to have to experience everything you've inflicted on people, all your lies, as near death survivors report? Is that worth whatever small change Pfizer is paying you?
(I have no patience at all today---maybe next year.)
It's anecdotal evidence, but my vaccinated next-door neighbor had a stroke about seven months ago. He's now rehabbing at home, trying to walk to the end of his Long driveway and back for PT with a walker. I talked to him the other day and asked him directly if he thinks his vaccine caused his stroke. He said, yes. He's probably 65, but seemed to be in great shape before his stroke. Not overweight, etc. He had just sold his car dealership and was beginning to enjoy retirement when he had his stroke. He also told me he spent 2 months in re-hab hospitals. He said both were over-flowing with patients.
It would be interesting to get census/patient data on all the re-hab hospitals that treat stroke victims. Their numbers post vaccine and pre-vaccine might tell us something (but we won't be able to get this data from official sources, I bet). But business has to be great at the re-hab centers in the world.
I do business fixing my classic 944 with a 70 yo German guy. He does great work. 1.5 years ago he got the jab and had a stroke the same day that put him in a wheelchair. He finally left Seattle to rehab with family in the Manila. It is a great loss to the community snd everyone who owns a German/European car.
Obviously, something in our world has happened. And it began after mandatory vaccination. I’m not a doctor but I can see that much.
The link to the Dr. Chandler data set I believe puts the issue in a much larger context. Thru 3/1/21 there were as read the data 42,000 A/E's. 1200 fatalities and that data covers a broad range of afflictions. 1/2 or so were in people under the age of 30 50 and a not immaterie al number under the age under the age of 30. 1200 deaths but a lot of data is still lacking "unknown". The gross number of patients administered the jab is also an unknown, but it was early in the launch. I would also assume the adverse events reported were proximal to the administration of the injection. If all those assumptions just the level of AE's should have at the very least raised alarm bells. The level of fatalities (again assuming proximity to the jab and the fact that near 1/2 are under the age of 50 should have stopped the administration then and there. Even more concerning is the fact that the AE's were more heavily skewed towards females. The infant deaths 0-2? Breast milk issues? History would suggest a fraction of these adverse events/deaths would pull a drug immediately at a substantially lower threshold. In my view looking at any individual adverse event like stokes without looking at the totality is a mistake. Just my two cents based on the Chandler data set.
You seem to apply the same standards of evidence to your assumptions about who I am, and what I believe in as you do to whether Strokes that occurred after the vaccination are causal or not. I wish you a happy new year and hope and trust that you will reflect on casting aspersions and making judgments on people you know nothing about. By the way, I have fought the pharmaceutical industry for decades, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t look for evidence before I make the kinds of serious assertions that many here make.
I found the Pfizer source document. The study population size was ~46k so 275/46k is ~0.6 % of the study group were killed by a stroke. Just pencil to napkin math. No judgements, need to break it down by age, gender etc.
Here:
https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/post-files/61999172/cf5afc12-21c4-406e-8c5a-5881628f7da2.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAVVKH7VVUEG6D4OWY&Expires=1672453353&Signature=v989lhaY%2FxOB%2BGMh%2BW57FW7l8j8%3D&response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%3D%22cf5afc12-21c4-406e-8c5a-5881628f7da2.pdf.pdf%22
Using your calculation, it looks like there is a rate of strokes among adults in the United States that is roughly .3% of the adult population getting a stroke each year. 800,000/250,000,000. That is half the .6% for the Pfizer vaccine. But that is only for 90 days so it seems very crudely that the incidence of strokes is EIGHT times greater amongst those who received the shot than the general population. If that admittedly, very crude calculation is anywhere near accurate, then the vax needs to be stopped immediately. I hope I made an obvious error because the conclusion is too horrible to contemplate.
I concur. Obviously there are professional techs and statisticians on this someplace and I have not heard other than this data sheet from Pfizer and simple back if the napkin statistics ratios.
So with all due haste I urge the CDC or whoever is paid to do this jump in and produce a paper that explains this and other apparent aberrations in the data. I have a science degree, I can read. 😁
https://robertchandler.substack.com/p/pfizer-document-536-cumulative-analysis
275 strokes means nothing without the context there are over 2000 strokes that occur in the United States every single day of the year. You’ve got to do better than that if you want to be taken seriously.
The cardiovascular systems of human beings AGE, and, one of systems which senesce is circulatory. Often there are transient ischemic attacks first, then a major stroke. This is normal life, fate, destiny, biological senescence. Dr. Alexander and Naomi Wolf are pointing to 250 strokes correlated with a vaccination. Would a single one of those people, offered early treatment instead of an effing vaccine, choose to have a stroke and die, presuming that some percentage of those correlations are causal, and the causal link is being made all over the world. You are probably a Pfizer troll. When you die do you want to have to experience everything you've inflicted on people, all your lies, as near death survivors report? Is that worth whatever small change Pfizer is paying you?
(I have no patience at all today---maybe next year.)
Thank you!
Ok, big pharma troll. Don't worry, you're going straight to hell.
It's anecdotal evidence, but my vaccinated next-door neighbor had a stroke about seven months ago. He's now rehabbing at home, trying to walk to the end of his Long driveway and back for PT with a walker. I talked to him the other day and asked him directly if he thinks his vaccine caused his stroke. He said, yes. He's probably 65, but seemed to be in great shape before his stroke. Not overweight, etc. He had just sold his car dealership and was beginning to enjoy retirement when he had his stroke. He also told me he spent 2 months in re-hab hospitals. He said both were over-flowing with patients.
It would be interesting to get census/patient data on all the re-hab hospitals that treat stroke victims. Their numbers post vaccine and pre-vaccine might tell us something (but we won't be able to get this data from official sources, I bet). But business has to be great at the re-hab centers in the world.
That would be good to do and so so sad for him.
I do business fixing my classic 944 with a 70 yo German guy. He does great work. 1.5 years ago he got the jab and had a stroke the same day that put him in a wheelchair. He finally left Seattle to rehab with family in the Manila. It is a great loss to the community snd everyone who owns a German/European car.
:( 😡😔
Happy new year to you as well!
My mom was one of those stroke victims who died from a stroke post jab. 😢