Dr. Peter McCullough resolute in his drive to spread trustworthy reliable data & science for decision-making; ‘Wouldn’t Do Anything Different’: Dr. Peter McCullough Unbowed After Winning Legal Case
Dr. Peter McCullough resolute in his drive to spread trustworthy reliable data & science for decision-making; ‘Wouldn’t Do Anything Different’: Dr. Peter McCullough Unbowed After Winning Legal Case
This is a champion of freedom of expression and no censorship, I am so proud of him to know him and work with him; a true leader, impeccable stewardship rising with angels like Zelenko protecting him
"Baylor Scott & White Health told The Dallas Morning News in a written statement at the time of the filings that McCullough’s views don’t represent those of the health care provider."
How ironic. That corrupt "health care provider" should WANT his views to represent them if they want to be a truthful, ethical, and effective provider of, you know, health care. The medical field is despicable.
DR. PETER McCULLOUGH: Final set of comments. Physician censorship and reprisal.
It is clear now that in the area of Covid that it's open season for censorship and reprisal, not just of physicians, but of nurses and patients and family members and others. And the censorship is because there is a global effort to mass vaccinate the population every six months. And anything that would deter from that is going to be censored.
So if a family member has lost a loved one after the vaccine, that event, if it's written somewhere, would have you censored.
We have widespread censorship in the medical literature now, in social media, and even in oral presentations.
I presented here on May 10th 2021. Five statements that I made here under oath are now subject of censorship and professional reprisal by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Every single statement I made just in my written remarks and my prepared remarks is cited.
The American Board of Internal Medicine, the Texas Medical Board, they don't have a monopoly on the truth. No one holds medical truth. There are always two points of view on everything, or more.
And so Senator Johnson has stepped in and called the American Board of Internal Medicine out to have a roundtable discussion on what's going on now is a giant sweep through the federation of medical boards through the American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine, etcetera, and to have an open conversation. They have not responded, in fact they have doubled-down and said they're joining forces with the American Medical Association, again, in an effort to inflict reprisal on physicians as myself who are attempting to help patients through Covid-19 respond to the pandemic in terms of our patient care, our scholarship and our research, and also give patients a fair appraisal on a brand new set of experimental genetic vaccines which, for some patients, now represents a mortal threat to them. And we must have certainly a conversation about the risks and benefits.
So I think right now the most important thing that this committee can do, is this committee probably ought to have a working group on censorship and reprisal at the professional level. Doctors, nurses, patients, who under the watch of the HHS is actually incurring their constitutional rights being stripped away from free speech? What is going on in this state to actually impair medical progress?
Remember medical progress will not happen unless there is a roundtable discussion on something. What several speakers, a few minutes ago, he talked about a conversation between some doctors and a doctor who wanted to prescribe ivermectin. That conversation to me didn't seem to me didn't seem very fair balanced. It seemed like a disciplinary conversation. There is no disciplinary conversations in a brand new, novel corona virus. This is all about getting the patient better.
The other thing I heard in that conversation is a very, very important act of censorship or a violation of medical ethics. Dr. Bob Hall presented a case where a family member wanted the discussion about ivermectin of a patient in the hospital. There is a principle of medical ethics called shared decision making. When you're a patient in the hospital, you actually have a right to discuss what you want to have happen with your body. If you're taking a medicine as an outpatient, and you want to take that as an inpatient, that's called medication reconciliation. You have that full right to do so. No doctor can lord over you and say, no, you can't have that medication. If you've had a fair, balanced discussion, and drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are supported by hundreds and hundreds of clinical trials. They're in dozens of government guidelines elsewhere in the world as first line therapy. Any American, any Texan, has the right to receive these drugs in the hospital when they engage in a discussion with their doctor. And under no circumstances should any doctor refuse a patient shared decision making and their own personal autonomy. It's unethical, it's immoral, and from a clinical perspective, it's illegal. And don't let it happen on your watch.
There will come a day when Baylor Scott and White Health will wish their views aligned with the inimitable Dr Peter McCullough, and will yearn for a situation in which his reputation rubs off on theirs.
These institutions have sunk to unfathomable depths of depraved 'medical treatment'. Grasping on to anyone, of the few, with honour and integrity may well be their only hope to regain a scrap of credibility.
A man who stayed true to his life long learning in cardiology and used his knowledge to inform the public and to encourage discourse in his expertise!! He was targeted by influential powers who’s only focus was to silence him!! We are grateful for your tenacity and fearless pursuit for all to question and debate under our constitutional Republic ! Thank you!
Baylor USED to have a good reputation. They destroyed it in my mind with this prosecution! Thank God for dismissal WITH PREJUDICE! The smart people would want to have association with Dr. McCullough! Baylor has destroyed itself.
Dr McCullough is awesome!!! Thank you for the update.
Massive respect. 🙏🏽
This man is a true Hero. 🙏🏻❤️
"Baylor Scott & White Health told The Dallas Morning News in a written statement at the time of the filings that McCullough’s views don’t represent those of the health care provider."
How ironic. That corrupt "health care provider" should WANT his views to represent them if they want to be a truthful, ethical, and effective provider of, you know, health care. The medical field is despicable.
God bless Dr. McCullough. He is a national treasure and has been a source of great leadership great in the medical freedom movement.
Excellent news!
Relatedly:
Dr. Peter S. McCullough's Testimony before the Texas State Senate
June 2022, https://metatron.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-testifies-before
TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
13:14
DR. PETER McCULLOUGH: Final set of comments. Physician censorship and reprisal.
It is clear now that in the area of Covid that it's open season for censorship and reprisal, not just of physicians, but of nurses and patients and family members and others. And the censorship is because there is a global effort to mass vaccinate the population every six months. And anything that would deter from that is going to be censored.
So if a family member has lost a loved one after the vaccine, that event, if it's written somewhere, would have you censored.
We have widespread censorship in the medical literature now, in social media, and even in oral presentations.
I presented here on May 10th 2021. Five statements that I made here under oath are now subject of censorship and professional reprisal by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Every single statement I made just in my written remarks and my prepared remarks is cited.
The American Board of Internal Medicine, the Texas Medical Board, they don't have a monopoly on the truth. No one holds medical truth. There are always two points of view on everything, or more.
And so Senator Johnson has stepped in and called the American Board of Internal Medicine out to have a roundtable discussion on what's going on now is a giant sweep through the federation of medical boards through the American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine, etcetera, and to have an open conversation. They have not responded, in fact they have doubled-down and said they're joining forces with the American Medical Association, again, in an effort to inflict reprisal on physicians as myself who are attempting to help patients through Covid-19 respond to the pandemic in terms of our patient care, our scholarship and our research, and also give patients a fair appraisal on a brand new set of experimental genetic vaccines which, for some patients, now represents a mortal threat to them. And we must have certainly a conversation about the risks and benefits.
So I think right now the most important thing that this committee can do, is this committee probably ought to have a working group on censorship and reprisal at the professional level. Doctors, nurses, patients, who under the watch of the HHS is actually incurring their constitutional rights being stripped away from free speech? What is going on in this state to actually impair medical progress?
Remember medical progress will not happen unless there is a roundtable discussion on something. What several speakers, a few minutes ago, he talked about a conversation between some doctors and a doctor who wanted to prescribe ivermectin. That conversation to me didn't seem to me didn't seem very fair balanced. It seemed like a disciplinary conversation. There is no disciplinary conversations in a brand new, novel corona virus. This is all about getting the patient better.
The other thing I heard in that conversation is a very, very important act of censorship or a violation of medical ethics. Dr. Bob Hall presented a case where a family member wanted the discussion about ivermectin of a patient in the hospital. There is a principle of medical ethics called shared decision making. When you're a patient in the hospital, you actually have a right to discuss what you want to have happen with your body. If you're taking a medicine as an outpatient, and you want to take that as an inpatient, that's called medication reconciliation. You have that full right to do so. No doctor can lord over you and say, no, you can't have that medication. If you've had a fair, balanced discussion, and drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are supported by hundreds and hundreds of clinical trials. They're in dozens of government guidelines elsewhere in the world as first line therapy. Any American, any Texan, has the right to receive these drugs in the hospital when they engage in a discussion with their doctor. And under no circumstances should any doctor refuse a patient shared decision making and their own personal autonomy. It's unethical, it's immoral, and from a clinical perspective, it's illegal. And don't let it happen on your watch.
17:52
[END OF EXCERPT]
Thank you Dr. McCullough!!! True Grit!
We’ll not forget those who try to silence us.
There’s always a reckoning.
There will come a day when Baylor Scott and White Health will wish their views aligned with the inimitable Dr Peter McCullough, and will yearn for a situation in which his reputation rubs off on theirs.
These institutions have sunk to unfathomable depths of depraved 'medical treatment'. Grasping on to anyone, of the few, with honour and integrity may well be their only hope to regain a scrap of credibility.
It’s incumbent on all professionals to learn from the examples they see. Don’t follow any narrative.
He is an amazing person. The legal system was designed to stop tyranny. It worked here.
Much respect and love goes out to Dr. McCullough!
God bless him and all the health professionals that take a stand.
There is a resolute man.
A man who stayed true to his life long learning in cardiology and used his knowledge to inform the public and to encourage discourse in his expertise!! He was targeted by influential powers who’s only focus was to silence him!! We are grateful for your tenacity and fearless pursuit for all to question and debate under our constitutional Republic ! Thank you!
Baylor USED to have a good reputation. They destroyed it in my mind with this prosecution! Thank God for dismissal WITH PREJUDICE! The smart people would want to have association with Dr. McCullough! Baylor has destroyed itself.