Dr. Rose, McCullough, Steve Kirsch et al., I again implore you to rewrite the abstract of your paper in Cureus, as written it is wrong! Do not fall for the slight of hand by Malone et al. on 'modified
Dr. Rose, McCullough, Steve Kirsch et al., I again implore you to rewrite the abstract of your paper in Cureus, as written it is wrong! Do not fall for the slight of hand by Malone et al. on 'modified
mRNA', these people knew their mRNA technology in any format is/was deadly & they never tested it for safety! They knew it reverse transcribed, left injection site, did not dissolve & said NOTHING!
Exactly why Sage Hana is right in his assessment that there are different tiers or levels among those purportedly seeking the facts and truth; they eventually expose themselves in writings and actions which reveal deliberate obfuscation and contradict facts that have been established; it all points to other hidden agendas in operation with a view to making Covid-like injections acceptable after some minor alterations; Dr Alexander is quite right to vigorously object to that abstract as written.
"It just must be stopped, removed as you have said prior…there is no ‘UNTIL’ as you have written…this is very dangerous language." Absolutely spot on Dr. Alexander!
- "...is this actually about creating a lucrative pandemic industry, overseen by the empire-building World Health Organization, at the behest of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, and other vested interests?"
Why have your name on the paper if you don’t read it? Why publish in fact the Big Lie and say I want to publish my take on the mRNA Big Lie in a fraudulent science journal?
Because I believe Dr. Alexander is beholden to no one, not even the wellness company billionaire, I believe he not only can but is also prudent to express these concerns. After all, who else has the background, self-confidence, and courage to do so?
I was quoting the quote from the end of the main article. If the most outspoken and most professional "doctors" call for not doing anything, what about the rest of them? Where is integrity? We have been "worshipping" them for 4 years for courage and telling as it is. Now they are saying, it's all ok. What is it?
Paul, you excoriated many of your friends and associates in front of all your readers. Was there not some way to round off the edges by preliminary contact with 1 or more of the writers?
No. I applaud his calling them out publicly. This is the only way we'll get any accountability with those who feel they've too much to lose by telling the truth.
Yes! Yes! Just the conveyance these vaccines should be removed from the childhood program makes my blood boil! I get it to an extent that folks have to acquiesce to get something published as Dr. Rose disclaims. I will disclaim and give the benefit of the doubt by saying acquiescing like this now is part of a much bigger plan? Like winning a couple of battles before the war? Yeah it's a tough call, because it feels weak, but this also feels like a long dog fight. I'm growing tired of the pro-vaxx but not this vax camp. They are the ones that would use terms like "pause". The quicker we call a spade a spade and say all vaccines are basically dog shit and there is no such thing as a safe vaccine, and dissolve the phrase, "I'm pro safe vaccine", the better. The natives are getting restless and growing tired of the word salad. Beware the fool that wants to improve the formula. I hope I'm crystal clear, sincere and without wax.
‘The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the to date contraindicates ........ and suggests‘ WTF?
These are a bunch of weasel words. When is risk-benefit ever balanced? (Well, maybe after death.) Pick a side and quit waffling or the paper doesn't warrant publication in the first place. Doing things just to get published is a whores mentality.
Alexander is absolutely right, however if the goal is to wake up as many people (especially scientists and physicians) then maybe it is better to soften the language so that the article can be published and not rejected out of hand. It's verbiage is consistent with the medicalese spoken in all journals. It is not what we all believe, though it is an important step in the right direction. Probably most of the authors would prefer to be more blunt, but getting this out there was more important to them than ranting out the harsh truth. For sure this does add to the evidence that the authors may not be entirely aligned with the whole truth, and this does bear watching.To me, PM association with TWC is very troubling as well.
Exactly why Sage Hana is right in his assessment that there are different tiers or levels among those purportedly seeking the facts and truth; they eventually expose themselves in writings and actions which reveal deliberate obfuscation and contradict facts that have been established; it all points to other hidden agendas in operation with a view to making Covid-like injections acceptable after some minor alterations; Dr Alexander is quite right to vigorously object to that abstract as written.
WELL DONE AND THANK YOU, DR. PAUL ALEXANDER!
So refreshing to find real heroes still among us.
Hear, hear!
Please read these below before you root for this chap.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/is-graphene-oxide-causing-cancer?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/the-wellness-company-doesnt-deserve?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Disappointing to hear he once shilled for Malone, but at least he has now come to his senses!
No, in this circle that does not exist. Don't trust him. He's part of the PsyOp.
"It just must be stopped, removed as you have said prior…there is no ‘UNTIL’ as you have written…this is very dangerous language." Absolutely spot on Dr. Alexander!
Re “We know that the vaccines are unsafe…”
Why does the bleedin’ obvious continue to be ignored?
THE VACCINES ARE UNNECESSARY.
There should never have been a ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
How did this happen? Where are the minutes of the meetings discussing this matter?
Also see for example my substack articles:
- Why was there a 'vaccine solution'? https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/why-was-there-a-vaccine-solution
- "We're not going back to normal" https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/were-not-going-back-to-normal
- "It's a race against the virus disappearing, and against time... https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/its-a-race-against-the-virus-disappearing
- "...is this actually about creating a lucrative pandemic industry, overseen by the empire-building World Health Organization, at the behest of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, and other vested interests?"
https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/is-this-actually-about-creating-a
Why have your name on the paper if you don’t read it? Why publish in fact the Big Lie and say I want to publish my take on the mRNA Big Lie in a fraudulent science journal?
When are you going to realise that these people are liars?
Want to know what was really in those vaccines?
I told the world in December 2020 and was deplatformed for my trouble.
Maybe you will hear me now?
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sarscov2-mrna-is-synthetic
These may be of interest.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/is-graphene-oxide-causing-cancer?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/the-wellness-company-doesnt-deserve?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Because I believe Dr. Alexander is beholden to no one, not even the wellness company billionaire, I believe he not only can but is also prudent to express these concerns. After all, who else has the background, self-confidence, and courage to do so?
You believe? Read on then
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/is-graphene-oxide-causing-cancer?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
https://open.substack.com/pub/kathyclarke/p/the-wellness-company-doesnt-deserve?r=1t06qv&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
They knew it would never get published if they wrote the abstract in 100% truth, is my guess.
not good...this paper raises too many questions and is wishy washy..this is not mccullough...
Oh no. It is the same PM who denies nanotech in vax. Wake up good doctor.
Perhaps like Sage has alluded to as possible, he might have gotten the (threatening) tap on the shoulder. 🤦🏼♀️🙏🏻🙏🏻🌦️
This is the world we live in now. No reason to change it. No reason to "fight" for the purity and honesty of "science" or "scientists".
Maybe it’s not worthy of any effort? Why would we want to “clean up” the science that is contaminated beyond rescue?
So our doctors don't kill us or mutilate our children?
No doctors are "ours". The best of them simply do what is their calling. The rest live and work for themselves.
To clarify:
I was merely referring to my doctors "of record."
Perhaps you don't have one.
I was quoting the quote from the end of the main article. If the most outspoken and most professional "doctors" call for not doing anything, what about the rest of them? Where is integrity? We have been "worshipping" them for 4 years for courage and telling as it is. Now they are saying, it's all ok. What is it?
They will not. And that should be your answer to many troubling questions. You are alone.
Except for us.
Wow. Blown away Seneff put her name on it. Her paper in 2021 probably kept a lot of people from getting the jab. I shared it with everyone I knew.
https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF
I shared it with all my state legislators too. In city of Boston, mayor and elected officials.
Paul, you excoriated many of your friends and associates in front of all your readers. Was there not some way to round off the edges by preliminary contact with 1 or more of the writers?
No. I applaud his calling them out publicly. This is the only way we'll get any accountability with those who feel they've too much to lose by telling the truth.
No, it's all theatre and part of their PsyOp.
I give up. You may be right. But it has now become impossible to keep up with who's real and who's not.
Follow your gut (mine never trusted this chap).
Those who are real are gaslighted and ignored.
These days I learn more from the comments than from the actual article - I had long moved on from these two parasites:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/lies-and-gaslighting-over-the-military
Yes! Yes! Just the conveyance these vaccines should be removed from the childhood program makes my blood boil! I get it to an extent that folks have to acquiesce to get something published as Dr. Rose disclaims. I will disclaim and give the benefit of the doubt by saying acquiescing like this now is part of a much bigger plan? Like winning a couple of battles before the war? Yeah it's a tough call, because it feels weak, but this also feels like a long dog fight. I'm growing tired of the pro-vaxx but not this vax camp. They are the ones that would use terms like "pause". The quicker we call a spade a spade and say all vaccines are basically dog shit and there is no such thing as a safe vaccine, and dissolve the phrase, "I'm pro safe vaccine", the better. The natives are getting restless and growing tired of the word salad. Beware the fool that wants to improve the formula. I hope I'm crystal clear, sincere and without wax.
‘The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the to date contraindicates ........ and suggests‘ WTF?
These are a bunch of weasel words. When is risk-benefit ever balanced? (Well, maybe after death.) Pick a side and quit waffling or the paper doesn't warrant publication in the first place. Doing things just to get published is a whores mentality.
So in your estimate, destroying relationships is the way to go rather than seeking diplomatic ways to address problems?
Alexander is absolutely right, however if the goal is to wake up as many people (especially scientists and physicians) then maybe it is better to soften the language so that the article can be published and not rejected out of hand. It's verbiage is consistent with the medicalese spoken in all journals. It is not what we all believe, though it is an important step in the right direction. Probably most of the authors would prefer to be more blunt, but getting this out there was more important to them than ranting out the harsh truth. For sure this does add to the evidence that the authors may not be entirely aligned with the whole truth, and this does bear watching.To me, PM association with TWC is very troubling as well.
No. Half-truths are still lies. Time to stop pulling the punches.