14 Comments

Bro whenever I see somebody wearing a covid mask after 2021 I just laugh in their face.... In 2021 it was more like trying to educate them like "you know you don't really need to wear that".... but at this point.... it's like "hahaha you stupid dumbass!!"

Expand full comment

Masks as psy-op muzzles

Psy-op purposes of face cancelling:

1. Show fear of others: they are a potential threat to you

2. Create fear in others: you are a potential threat to them

3. Create psychological distancing

4. Dehumanization

5. Destroying individuality (our face makes us unique)

6. Massification (mass formation)

7. Reduce social interaction and communication

8. Induce social pressure towards the rebels and show massive compliance

9. Reinforce political and police authority

10. Increase acceptance of an unquestionable police-state

They didn’t care about health, just a covered face. For instance, the ministry of health of Argentina acknowledged they had no scientific basis for recommending cloth masks. The minister even recognized that masks “have an effect of social discipline… social control”. 1

In the biowar book, we’ll cover the weaponization of masks by tampering them to cause illness and disability.

Here are some other attacks and solutions:

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

How about REAL democracy: townhall republican democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

Expand full comment

If I may be so bold: Some people are dumber than a box of rocks. How we've managed to make it to this point is nothing short of miraculous. I wish George Carlin was here.

Expand full comment

"If your mask protects me but doesn't protect you then maybe you have it on backwards."

Expand full comment

Feb. 4th, 2022 there was a court order that said masks are optional. Feb. 8, 2022, I was escorted out of my classroom for not masking and put on non disciplinary leave.

Expand full comment

Horrible, sorry to hear this!

Expand full comment

BRAVO, expertly put! With the financialization of our economy, came outsourcing everything, down to our personalities and our souls. The mask is the latest and most virulent symbol of that.

Finest column you’ve written so far, IMO!

Expand full comment

If you really have to wear one, make it an infowars mask and keep the nose outside the mask so you can breathe fresh air. You get to meet other Alex Jones listeners and the mask maniacs are so stupid, most of them will not realize that having the nose outside the mask is a "problem". I had to wear one for a conference presentation, and halfway through my presentation, I let the mask hang from one ear. Noone bitched about it, but if you think wearing one sucks, try giving a talk while wearing one. No bueno!! That said, I did run into some girl flirting with me over the infowars mask in a restaurant; she was also an Alex Jones listener, which is also no bueno if she is doing it in front of your wife 😂.

Expand full comment

To all you mask-a-nazis...my germs must be the good guys for I have not succumbed to them in over 73 years despite not having any vaccines for over 50 years and taking no regular prescriptions for decades. So, I will gladly pass them on to you...but oh shucks, by you wearing a silly mask, you may not get any of the good guys. Too freaking bad. As a self thinking human, I remain mask-less until my death.

Expand full comment

Paul, please re-read this Gatti article, re-introduced by Jon Rap., about his research on our topic being under attack by govt, Italy, in this case, apparently, and note the attack details linking officials with 'volunteers.'

link fails. I'll link the entire article here. Everyone scan this, most you know, a few new details

In a nutshell, Dr. Gatti’s 2017 study showed an incredible amount of contamination, in a whole host of traditional vaccines. The contamination was in the form of tiny nanoparticles, mostly metallic, and obviously highly harmful and dangerous.

Before reading my summary and analysis of that study—here is an updated communication from Dr. Gatti I received a few days ago. It describes, in a stark and disturbing fashion, what has been happening to her, her work, and her laboratory. This is chilling:

“At the end of last year, our laboratory no longer had the financial capacity to continue its research. The proceeds from the few analyzes requested by private individuals yielded enormously less than what the research cost us. Then, there were two possibilities: close everything or set up a foundation by giving away everything that belonged to us, hoping to find some sponsors. After all, all initiatives, even the most bizarre, find someone willing to contribute financially. Why not a foundation that does fundamental research on health? So, we opted for the latter choice, and the Nanodiagnostics Foundation was born.”

“But, after almost a year, not a cent has arrived. In short, no company, no private citizen, no institution is willing to contribute.”

“Many people continue to demand results and ask questions to which they have no answers from the institutions or their doctors, but, if it is a question of parting from some money, the silence is absolute.”

“It is clear that our work is a threat to billion-dollar businesses that are not exactly clear, at least for most people. For this reason, the most absurd and incredible slanders are invented to our detriment.

Not being able to dispute our scientific results, there are those who publish, usually anonymously, that we earn enormous sums of money, even giving the impression that the Foundation belongs to us, when it should be known that foundations do not belong to anyone, and no one can profit from them. And this is when we have donated everything that belonged to us, and we work for free.”

“Another tactic is trying to isolate and discredit us with lies. What the University of Bologna did a few days ago, the university where I graduated, then specialized and taught, is a small example.”

“A few months ago, that university asked us if we were willing to accept [a] student… who would prepare her graduation thesis with us. We agreed and agreed with the student on how to proceed. A few months passed, then, a couple of weeks ago, when the University authorities realized that the student would work with us, they sent us a message of a few lines in which they informed us that what we do (and which I had taught at that university) was of no interest to them (which, in a way, is true, although very far from the mission of the University). Needless to say, my letter to the Rector asking for explanations remained unanswered.”

“And it is also useless to say how difficult it is to publish the results that we continue to obtain, and which are not liked by those who financially maintain the medical journals, on whose scientific nature I prefer not to comment. For twice the Editor after the publication of an article (on vaccines and on SIDS) asked to retreat [sic] them. Only the work of the Robert Kennedy Jr lawyers stopped the request.”

“[Paper:] Novel chemical-physical autopsy investigation in sudden infant death and sudden intrauterine unexplained death syndromes” (click here)

“Just for your information, in spite of all difficulties, we are now dealing with very critical topics: spontaneously aborted babies, analysis of the brains of infants who died in cots (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, aka SIDS), analysis of what falls from the sky (e.g., recently hail never seen before), food, etc. All this can only be fought with personal discredit.”

“We haven’t had any visits from the regime for a long time. For them it is enough to monitor our computers and phones. The rest is done by ‘volunteers’. As for other scientists, no one deals with our topics in full. It must be realized that doing so represents a risk that is obviously preferable not to take.”

“As long as we can manage, we will continue to work. If, however, no sponsor materializes (idle chatter and empty promises are not only useless: they are a waste of time,) we will have no other option than to declare defeat, a defeat that belongs to the whole world and, above all, to the children who do not deserve the fate they are suffering.”

“…I give some details of our Foundation Nanodiagnostics (click here)...”

IF YOU CAN, PLEASE DONATE TO Dr. Gatti’s vital work at the above website.

Here is my original article on Dr. Gatti’s vaccine-contamination study:

Dangerous nano-particles contaminating many vaccines: groundbreaking study

“The Lung,” Second Edition: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into biological systems.”

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

Expand full comment

Based on the fact that nothing worked to stop the continuas/repeating spikes except natural and heard immunity, can’t we conclude that our scientific understanding of these things is flat wrong? Back to the drawing board with immunology and infectious disease experts and Drs, etc. Their knowledge turned out to be less than useless. And vaccines turned out to be money schemes…grifts.

Expand full comment

Que bueno el gato

Expand full comment

The MSM did a great job following their marching orders.

Expand full comment

Yeah, as soon as they start CLOSING THE DEATH LABS I may consider mask wearing

Expand full comment