The data was so profound that the UK decided to stop reporting at the end of March. … The infection rates in vaccinated persons, particularly after the second and third dose, were skyrocketing,”
Fellow Canadians, I just sent this letter to my local newspaper. I suggest you do something similar. Take any of the ideas or wording here that you find useful:
July 15, 2022
Dear editor,
I hope that you will see fit to publish this letter in the Lethbridge Herald:
On July 14 Health Canada announced its approval of the Moderna Spikevax for children from the ages of 6 months to 5 years old. That evening, on the CBC’s “The World at Six”, in a segment starting at minute 8, a pediatrician, Dr. Daniel Flanders, says with regard to convincing vaccine hesitant parents, “When you weigh the risks and benefits of this vaccine it’s really not debatable.” Not debatable? Really?
In response to the Health Canada decision the Canadian Covid Care Alliance put up a couple of videos and a pdf on its website that walk you through the evidence. They conclude that kids do not need the shots, that they don’t work, and that they have NOT been proven safe. Perhaps they are wrong.
But why does the CBC never put anyone on who actually helps us all grapple with the evidence? All you ever hear is something like “After a thorough and independent scientific review of the evidence, the department has determined that the vaccine is safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 …” Okay, but then why not explain why the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is wrong?
Government funding for the CBC is well over a billion a year. Is that why they never present arguments that go against government policy? Preston Manning has called for a commission that is independent of government funding to assess the way that the government has managed the Covid crisis. You can find his proposal at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. You may not agree with anything else that Manning stands for, but I say let’s support him on this. What say you?
Dr. Alexander, I listened to this and wanted to follow up with you with 2 questions:
1) The vaccinal Abs are Wuhan-specific. When you say they bind with more affinity to the virus than the innate ones, how does this happen if the spike has mutated such that ADEI is now occurring? Do these Abs attach partially but strongly (or not) to the constantly mutating spike?
2) I agree children should NOT get the non-live attenuated virus-spike-making gene-tinkering injection. For those who unfortunately have, does this one hijacking (the shot(s) and subsequent infections that are not neutralized) of their immune response prejudice their innate antibody response to different degrees based on the similarities of the various glycosolated pathogens they will later encounter?
Remember, I am no immunologist or virologist and am trying to explain things how I understand them and to share, even if only a small nugget:
For q 1:
The higher or greater affinity is explained by the specificity of infection-enhancing Abs for spike (innate Abs don’t have this level of specificity). Infection enhancing antibodies or facilitating antibodies so to speak, bind to a site on the spike called the NTD (N terminal domain) which is conserved amongst all SC-2 variants. So any further variants will simply boost them.
For 2:
Problematic. As viral infection rates are only climbing and as these vaccinal Abs render vaccinees highly susceptible to infection (we know this re Yahi and Liu et al. and others I shared), more and more vaccinees (vaccinated persons) as Geert would argue, are now sitting on elevated titers of these vaccinal Abs. Vax’ed children will, of course, not be an exception. Because the facilitating or enhancing vaccinal Abs will continuously outcompete the innate Abs, and bind to the spike, the latter will not be optimally able to educate and train the cell-based innate immune system (NK cells) on how to recognize a COVID infected host cell at an early stage of infection (i.e., at a time where innate Abs are no longer functional or already overridden by foreign-centered immune cells). Remember, the innate Abs first can sterilize and neutralize and stop further entry to the cells. This also applies to host cells infected by other glycosylated viruses that generate acute self-limiting infection/ disease because the patterns these viruses express on the surface of infected host cells (glycosylation, sugars, glycans etc.) are shared (G. vanden Bossche, personal communication based on previous preliminary patent application ). So ‘yes’, these children are at high risk of suffering from irreversible deficiency of their innate immune system to recognize ‘foreign’ from ‘self’. This is a catastrophe. When you prevent innate immune effector cells for long enough from learning how to recognize self-mimicking patterns expressed on host cells infected by glycosylated viruses, these NK cells will never be able to recognize such viruses, nor will they be able to recognize ‘altered self’ patterns expressed on pathologically altered host cells. The latter inability opens the door to immune pathology and cancer…..
Keep telling the truth.
Fellow Canadians, I just sent this letter to my local newspaper. I suggest you do something similar. Take any of the ideas or wording here that you find useful:
July 15, 2022
Dear editor,
I hope that you will see fit to publish this letter in the Lethbridge Herald:
On July 14 Health Canada announced its approval of the Moderna Spikevax for children from the ages of 6 months to 5 years old. That evening, on the CBC’s “The World at Six”, in a segment starting at minute 8, a pediatrician, Dr. Daniel Flanders, says with regard to convincing vaccine hesitant parents, “When you weigh the risks and benefits of this vaccine it’s really not debatable.” Not debatable? Really?
In response to the Health Canada decision the Canadian Covid Care Alliance put up a couple of videos and a pdf on its website that walk you through the evidence. They conclude that kids do not need the shots, that they don’t work, and that they have NOT been proven safe. Perhaps they are wrong.
But why does the CBC never put anyone on who actually helps us all grapple with the evidence? All you ever hear is something like “After a thorough and independent scientific review of the evidence, the department has determined that the vaccine is safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 …” Okay, but then why not explain why the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is wrong?
Government funding for the CBC is well over a billion a year. Is that why they never present arguments that go against government policy? Preston Manning has called for a commission that is independent of government funding to assess the way that the government has managed the Covid crisis. You can find his proposal at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. You may not agree with anything else that Manning stands for, but I say let’s support him on this. What say you?
Sincerely,
Andrew Blair
Do you see —>> they want to make you blind to the truth ! <<—
Thnk you
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/57d675fc46c3c43b07adb974/1657913953210-AECY8DSNOIRXVNH5Q4EZ/Zombie+Sequel+200.jpg?format=1500w
Thank you!
A wonderful interview!
Please indulge me to paraphrase what you stated:
^^We run the risk of creating a variant that is lethal.
Just horrifying....
Dr. Alexander, I listened to this and wanted to follow up with you with 2 questions:
1) The vaccinal Abs are Wuhan-specific. When you say they bind with more affinity to the virus than the innate ones, how does this happen if the spike has mutated such that ADEI is now occurring? Do these Abs attach partially but strongly (or not) to the constantly mutating spike?
2) I agree children should NOT get the non-live attenuated virus-spike-making gene-tinkering injection. For those who unfortunately have, does this one hijacking (the shot(s) and subsequent infections that are not neutralized) of their immune response prejudice their innate antibody response to different degrees based on the similarities of the various glycosolated pathogens they will later encounter?
Remember, I am no immunologist or virologist and am trying to explain things how I understand them and to share, even if only a small nugget:
For q 1:
The higher or greater affinity is explained by the specificity of infection-enhancing Abs for spike (innate Abs don’t have this level of specificity). Infection enhancing antibodies or facilitating antibodies so to speak, bind to a site on the spike called the NTD (N terminal domain) which is conserved amongst all SC-2 variants. So any further variants will simply boost them.
For 2:
Problematic. As viral infection rates are only climbing and as these vaccinal Abs render vaccinees highly susceptible to infection (we know this re Yahi and Liu et al. and others I shared), more and more vaccinees (vaccinated persons) as Geert would argue, are now sitting on elevated titers of these vaccinal Abs. Vax’ed children will, of course, not be an exception. Because the facilitating or enhancing vaccinal Abs will continuously outcompete the innate Abs, and bind to the spike, the latter will not be optimally able to educate and train the cell-based innate immune system (NK cells) on how to recognize a COVID infected host cell at an early stage of infection (i.e., at a time where innate Abs are no longer functional or already overridden by foreign-centered immune cells). Remember, the innate Abs first can sterilize and neutralize and stop further entry to the cells. This also applies to host cells infected by other glycosylated viruses that generate acute self-limiting infection/ disease because the patterns these viruses express on the surface of infected host cells (glycosylation, sugars, glycans etc.) are shared (G. vanden Bossche, personal communication based on previous preliminary patent application ). So ‘yes’, these children are at high risk of suffering from irreversible deficiency of their innate immune system to recognize ‘foreign’ from ‘self’. This is a catastrophe. When you prevent innate immune effector cells for long enough from learning how to recognize self-mimicking patterns expressed on host cells infected by glycosylated viruses, these NK cells will never be able to recognize such viruses, nor will they be able to recognize ‘altered self’ patterns expressed on pathologically altered host cells. The latter inability opens the door to immune pathology and cancer…..