flu-eating supervirus. It does, however, suggest that non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate transmission and mass vaccination against endemic respiratory viruses are two very bad ideas.
I love the guy but this is complete horseshite. You had a fraudulent PCR amplifying a common coronavirus sequence (both C19 and flu) and EVERYTHING was labeled C19 to add to the fearporn. Super virus my arse.
the argument of the piece doesn't depend on mass PCR testing for Covid, at all. and in the subtitle I insist, explicitly, that it *wasn't* a supervirus, my position all along has been that SARS-2 was nothing special. 2009 swine flu was also a total nothingburger, substantially less harmful than ordinary seasonal flu strains, but it also managed to broadly suppress many other common respiratory viruses, including hCoVs.
Statistics were juiced to ramp up the fear porn. EVERYTHING was Covid. The PCR was a component, but not necessarily the major piece. All you needed were those willing to lie and there were many of those.
Super virus that killed mostly the elderly in care homes, and people with hospital protocols.. shhhh, don't tell it to Dr Alexander, he believes there was a virus!
Totally biased measurement error. The health facilities did not have robust sampling techniques and there was high pressure to get the COVID response for the govt funds. Covid 19 was a bioweapon that mimicked respiratory symptoms due toxins in body.
BTW, Eugyppius lives in an echo chamber, he only allows comments from paid subscribers.. otherwise you would have seen a lot more debating on his posts 😕
this not true. comments on public posts are open to all. on this one post, one time in the entire history of my blog, and just as an experiment for the reasons I described in the pinned post, I limited comments for two hours and then opened them. The vast majority of comments on that post were posted after that initial two-hour window.
I think it's reasonable to discourage hostile drive-by comments oblivious to what i'm saying and to encourage people to read what the post actually says before loudly and obliviously disagreeing with it. The problem especially in the last year is that any post on the virus – regardless of what it argues – is overrun in the first 30 minutes by a lot of angry hostile comments from new readers who don't address what I'm saying, effectively burying what other more on-topic commenters (whether they agree or not) have to say. This is especially frustrating for longer and more complex posts, which are a) a lot of work to write, and which b) take a few minutes to read and thus inordinately advantage commenters who are willing to just say anything.
If you have other solutions to this problem, I'm open to hearing them.
comparing official covid deaths to who influenza tallies is the most pointless thing i could imagine. if you can’t see why there’s really nothing more to say.
Well, the flu hits the shotted pretty hard sometimes, it seems:
'“I went into the hospital on December 23rd of last year,” Faber said. “I was there for 22 days at two different hospitals and a nursing home at the end, before I got to come back home, Way [sic] back when COVID was going on, I took the first two shots, no problems whatsoever.
‘Then all of a sudden, I went and took the one booster, and I was down for four days. I couldn’t breathe and I’ve been on oxygen ever since, but it wasn’t severe until the 23rd. The hospital accidentally didn’t get the testing right, but I had the flu when I was in there, which settled into my lungs. They (the flu) had a week’s head start so it just went downhill from there.”’
He'll be okay. If the double lung transplant works. It's the lead story on the latest TROME:
The Rise of the Medical Emergency, Pt. 35
The shots almost take a hit, car inbound at the impound, another plane diverted, another wedding upended, a teen has an emergency in pregnancy, a partygoer stops partying, and a driver stops driving
The CDC FDA had already said that the PCR only measured Influenza A& B during the Covid period. Even Boris Johnson made a public statement stating this . It must have taken a lot to come publicly and make this announcement that the PCR Tests were useless for detecting Covid-19. That covered a period of 2 years. So how does this information work in to this article ?
there is data manipulation all of the time. we have to try to see through it by looking for other, indirect indicators for what is happening in the population.
Interesting Italian stat. first thought flash was 'olive oil.' Paul, end game here is the mortality rate caused by c19 poisons in the next few months. Pharma nerds will gather data of age, gender, race, SES, nationality, culture and whatever for evaluation, assuming they are still employed.
Lockdown, as a social behavior change, considering myself, not the wife has she's been sick from c19s BUT entered the bioweapon illness with prior morbidity of self inflected psoriatic septic arthritis, I felt completely healthy since I first heard of corona about March 1, 2020. Wife over reacted about May, 2020 so I had to stop doing the normal life threatening activities as any injury to me, or death, would ripple hard negative around here.
Above sets up context. Although I never get sick I do feel around the cold season an itchy nose condition that I can tell is one of the corona bugs. Almost every year. But NO itchy nose for two days since March 2020. My first thought was not running around doing anything and kinda thought the dang lockdown simply stopped the funny itchy nose thing. But for the wife, dang jabs got her sick with constant nausea, sore neck, back, legs, fingers, toes.
Bottom line is that lockdowns are no solution against bioweapon jabs! :) Trust me on that. But perhaps lockdowns might help against the itchy nose thingie.
yes, ADE the old timer Thomas Francis came up with 'original antigenic sin.' Early 60s, then one of the pharma techs mentioned Tom's exact phrase in a study, but later was changed to ADE, if I recall. :) These guys will change history and the trail of history immediately to hide links to cover their asses
I love the guy but this is complete horseshite. You had a fraudulent PCR amplifying a common coronavirus sequence (both C19 and flu) and EVERYTHING was labeled C19 to add to the fearporn. Super virus my arse.
EVERYTHING, I mean everything was labeled C19, even car accidents, pneumonia, everything!!!
Yepper
the argument of the piece doesn't depend on mass PCR testing for Covid, at all. and in the subtitle I insist, explicitly, that it *wasn't* a supervirus, my position all along has been that SARS-2 was nothing special. 2009 swine flu was also a total nothingburger, substantially less harmful than ordinary seasonal flu strains, but it also managed to broadly suppress many other common respiratory viruses, including hCoVs.
Maybe then, but not buying it now.
Statistics were juiced to ramp up the fear porn. EVERYTHING was Covid. The PCR was a component, but not necessarily the major piece. All you needed were those willing to lie and there were many of those.
Super virus that killed mostly the elderly in care homes, and people with hospital protocols.. shhhh, don't tell it to Dr Alexander, he believes there was a virus!
Flu shots cause flu. Infection by injection.
Cause far more, and delayed stuff, I suspect. Thinking of SV40, Sabin and Salk;
Totally biased measurement error. The health facilities did not have robust sampling techniques and there was high pressure to get the COVID response for the govt funds. Covid 19 was a bioweapon that mimicked respiratory symptoms due toxins in body.
BTW, Eugyppius lives in an echo chamber, he only allows comments from paid subscribers.. otherwise you would have seen a lot more debating on his posts 😕
this not true. comments on public posts are open to all. on this one post, one time in the entire history of my blog, and just as an experiment for the reasons I described in the pinned post, I limited comments for two hours and then opened them. The vast majority of comments on that post were posted after that initial two-hour window.
I think it's reasonable to discourage hostile drive-by comments oblivious to what i'm saying and to encourage people to read what the post actually says before loudly and obliviously disagreeing with it. The problem especially in the last year is that any post on the virus – regardless of what it argues – is overrun in the first 30 minutes by a lot of angry hostile comments from new readers who don't address what I'm saying, effectively burying what other more on-topic commenters (whether they agree or not) have to say. This is especially frustrating for longer and more complex posts, which are a) a lot of work to write, and which b) take a few minutes to read and thus inordinately advantage commenters who are willing to just say anything.
If you have other solutions to this problem, I'm open to hearing them.
LOL.
Come on, doc.. everyone knows that 'COVID' was just the flu, rebranded.. plus a few more things added on top, to spice it up.
If there were no excess deaths before the 'measures' to contain the 'pandemic', where is the virus? Where is the 'pandemic'?
Think, doctor, think!
Influenza suppression my arse .. when you relabel same symptoms under a different 'disease' that's what happens.
They did it with polio, they did it with smallpox.. they did it with 'COVID' as well.
There was no 'virus' and there was no 'pandemic'
Period.
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/dr-mike-yeadon-comments-on-there?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tq9u1
https://odysee.com/@katie.su:7/thetruthaboutsmallpox:9
https://open.substack.com/pub/boostershots/p/virus-denialism-for-beginners-germ-3af?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tq9u1
https://open.substack.com/pub/boostershots/p/virus-denialism-for-beginners-germ-2b2?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tq9u1
The flu was REBRANDED and RENAMED “covid 19”
No, there is substantial evidence to refute that.
just look at the charts here.....pretty much answers the question. P & I (pnuemonia and influenza) did NOT go away.
https://twitter.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1633929085620719616
comparing official covid deaths to who influenza tallies is the most pointless thing i could imagine. if you can’t see why there’s really nothing more to say.
I haven't seen any quail around my house since I started calling then doves.
Well, the flu hits the shotted pretty hard sometimes, it seems:
'“I went into the hospital on December 23rd of last year,” Faber said. “I was there for 22 days at two different hospitals and a nursing home at the end, before I got to come back home, Way [sic] back when COVID was going on, I took the first two shots, no problems whatsoever.
‘Then all of a sudden, I went and took the one booster, and I was down for four days. I couldn’t breathe and I’ve been on oxygen ever since, but it wasn’t severe until the 23rd. The hospital accidentally didn’t get the testing right, but I had the flu when I was in there, which settled into my lungs. They (the flu) had a week’s head start so it just went downhill from there.”’
He'll be okay. If the double lung transplant works. It's the lead story on the latest TROME:
The Rise of the Medical Emergency, Pt. 35
The shots almost take a hit, car inbound at the impound, another plane diverted, another wedding upended, a teen has an emergency in pregnancy, a partygoer stops partying, and a driver stops driving
https://thechadrabbit.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-medical-emergency-71e
The CDC FDA had already said that the PCR only measured Influenza A& B during the Covid period. Even Boris Johnson made a public statement stating this . It must have taken a lot to come publicly and make this announcement that the PCR Tests were useless for detecting Covid-19. That covered a period of 2 years. So how does this information work in to this article ?
So...there is data manipulation now, but there was none in 2020?
Not buying that.
there is data manipulation all of the time. we have to try to see through it by looking for other, indirect indicators for what is happening in the population.
Interesting Italian stat. first thought flash was 'olive oil.' Paul, end game here is the mortality rate caused by c19 poisons in the next few months. Pharma nerds will gather data of age, gender, race, SES, nationality, culture and whatever for evaluation, assuming they are still employed.
Lockdown, as a social behavior change, considering myself, not the wife has she's been sick from c19s BUT entered the bioweapon illness with prior morbidity of self inflected psoriatic septic arthritis, I felt completely healthy since I first heard of corona about March 1, 2020. Wife over reacted about May, 2020 so I had to stop doing the normal life threatening activities as any injury to me, or death, would ripple hard negative around here.
Above sets up context. Although I never get sick I do feel around the cold season an itchy nose condition that I can tell is one of the corona bugs. Almost every year. But NO itchy nose for two days since March 2020. My first thought was not running around doing anything and kinda thought the dang lockdown simply stopped the funny itchy nose thing. But for the wife, dang jabs got her sick with constant nausea, sore neck, back, legs, fingers, toes.
Bottom line is that lockdowns are no solution against bioweapon jabs! :) Trust me on that. But perhaps lockdowns might help against the itchy nose thingie.
yes, ADE the old timer Thomas Francis came up with 'original antigenic sin.' Early 60s, then one of the pharma techs mentioned Tom's exact phrase in a study, but later was changed to ADE, if I recall. :) These guys will change history and the trail of history immediately to hide links to cover their asses