39 Comments

Poor Bob. He and his colleagues didn't intend to kill anyone. All his spook friends didn't intend to kill folks. Oh, no, no, no! It's just an accident. Yeah, that's it. Just a "mass formation" of all you stupid sheep. If you knew how to use it right it would have saved humanity!

Yeadon sees the human element for what it's doing. This is deliberate from the start.

Paul, keep Malone on the horsemen list.

Expand full comment

Malone is very keen to shut down any conversation drawing attention to the orchestrated nature of what has occurred. He is equally as keen to emphasise the chaotic happenstance of the Covid era.

Anything/one drawing attention to specific global orchestrators, or an agenda which extends beyond the Covid era (2019 - 2023) is taboo.

Yeadon, Breggins etc alert us to a master plan by 'Global Predators'. Malone declares they must be silenced. Malone is the 'insider' (who came from 'The Outside') only during the Covid era. He was thrust into leadership of the Freedom Movement with an ability to garner resources others could not, neither during Covid or for decades before. His support of Desmet's 'we all went mad' hypothesis plays all to beautifully into a 'this was all just one big stuff-up' narrative.

Coincidentally, this is precisely what a party implementing a broader, prolonged, orchestrated assault on humanity would like us to believe. So, we all 'get on with our lives'. Whilst they, surrepticiously, get on with their agenda.

Malone's true intent set aside - momentarily. How could we possibly accept a man so acutely aware of the detrimental issues of mRNA and lipid nanoparticles, be dumb enough to inject himself (several times), after actually having had Covid 19? Malone is many things, but dumb is not one of them. So why?

Malone's claim he got the jabs wreaks of a gateway into the freedom movement. He became 'one of Us'. But no, he most definitely was not one of Us. He was distinctly, one of Them.

Expand full comment

Worth an entire repeat. Thank you Dr. Alexander.

Thank you Breggins.

Expand full comment

A great feature that is mind bending and hopefully mind opening .

Clearly, amongst the scientists there is much debate .

When I hear aby scientist speaking OUTSIDE their domain of expertise I get wary of what they say.

Yes, we can call those we EXPECT are so called "chaos agents" (scientist with hidden agendas and working a psychop to help control the narrative ) , even I tend to say STOP ENOUGH - NOW YOU ARE A LIAR .

When Dr. Cole says no graphene oxide , HE IS INDEED both far outside of his field , as well as outright lying .

Because he is expected to at minimum show openness.

The top graphebe oxide EXPERT who first revealed beyond doubt that it was in the shot WAS MURDERD within a week after his video publication .

Moreover Dr. Cole refuses to acknowledge that highly qualified expert scientist with PhD s all say he is outright wrong , as well as outside his expertise .

Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea is truly an expert in this field (graphene oxide and nanotechnology) and would make Dr. Cole look very stupid as well as a bad liar.

Certainly Dr. Cole has lost some respect and rgat is deserved . But remember he also is not "all bad" as he did warn of the toxic jab from literally day one .

And yes, Dr. Robert Malone is truly suspect and makes himself look bad when he criticizes , contradicts or litigated against rhe Breggins .

His views on mass psychosis formation are amateur because again ge is far outside if his education and expertise.

Dr. Breggin is a psychiatrist and a giant in his field . His views of mass hypnosis or brainwashing SHOULD be held high

So what .awesome is what awesome is.

It is an open mind, healthy debate and STICK with what you are an expert in .

Just because you have initials behind yiur name means nothing .

Sure you know a lot on one specific topic .

But in a nutshell , I learned a long time ago SOMETHING THAT IS INCREDABLY VALUABLE .

If you have a question.

Hold it inside of you .

First find out WHO IS (ARE) the world leading experts on that specific topic or field .

If yiu do that and onky that , you will get a good valid answer.

For instance , if you are interested in ICU medicine and want to ask a question of or about critical care ?

You shouod see the name Dr. Paul Mark appear at or near the top .

If you have a question about vitamin C , then look to the world experts and NOT your local or even your trusted GP.

You, in researching top experts in Vitamin C will find names such as Dr. Linus Pauling, Dr. Robet Cathcart , Dr. Frederick Klenner and today's Dr. Steve Hickey who has made almost the recent discoveries.

Interested in vitamin B1 Thiamine. The world researcher at the top is Dr. Derrick Lonsdale.

In summary, you need to ensure if you are smart enough to ask the question, then you shouod also hold it inside until you first find out , who the world expert is.

Asking that most qualified person is why I am alive .

It is a lesson I'll never forget .

Ps anyone that tells yiu we have a powerful will to think and rationalize our thoughts is an idiot .

People are incredibly trend and cycle followers and like sheep we would all March off the cliff .

People in fact are easy to fool if you simply use the correct techniques .

The MK ultra CIA op program (once heavily clasdified) carried out in Canada (Montreal) and the USA started before 90 percent of our planet was born .

Don't believe everything you read or here , especially if on a TV .

TV is bubble gum for your brain . Read a book by an expert .

You live in a POTEMKIN VILLAGE.

Warrior

,

Expand full comment

Malone is controlled opposition. As are many of the people we see as "the good guys." Which is another psyop. The idea of good and evil and we must always pick a side. Every single issue can be worked out via communication/language. How in the world are we supposed to communicate when the communication apparatus (the world wide web) is controlled? Do not look to Elon & his space escapades, he too is controlled opposition. Literally every. Single. Thing. Goes back to Google. Every single type of electronic exchange there is. It is tracked. Yes, even crypto! And then every site you go to now you must enter your email. Again tracking & collecting data on us. I think alot more people want freedom, in every realm, the golden question is how do we do it in a way that were not in fear of being sued. Having our bank accounts drained. Or thrown in jail. Killed. Etc.... there is nothing & nobody that is free. We are all enslaved, with the illusion of choice & freedom. What can we create in terms of space to exchange ideas, survival tactics, health & wellness, education,child care, human relations, abolishing banks, etc. ultimately saving the human race.

Expand full comment

Malone is truly a pos, he has no business on our side, the side of truth. I am really starting to get a picture of who he is, he's an arrogant asshole who thinks he's better than the rest of the great doctors and scientists trying to save humanity, he should be permanently kicked to the curb, hes no good to anyone.

Expand full comment

I'll take Yeadon over Malone any day. That post by Malone is written in a very glib manner, worded to discredit and deflect from the main concern and threat.

Expand full comment

Paul,

Why doesn’t Peter McCullough talk about the excellence of Peter Breggin…instead recently promoting the junk theory abd book by Belgian, Mattias Desmet?

I sent this to Peter and I suggest you talk to him in earnest Paul…

Peter,

I always like the fact you do due diligence on the science of all the continuing COVID 19 disaster.

But, I take great issue with you regarding promotion of Mattias Desmet, clinical psychologist from Belgium promoting ‘his’ mass formation theory…

First, why would anyone promote this foreigner when America is lucky to have Peter Breggin, a psychiatrist with stellar reputation?

Second, his book is junk. Don’t you think you should talk to Peter Breggin about Desmet’s theory since Peter has many more years as a clinical leader in the psychiatry world…in America!

Third, why did Desmet come up with something ‘new’ in psychology when there are 2 past persons who have already explained what has happened…

Ivan Pavlov…celebrated by Lenin for his incredibly important human SUGGESTIVE THINKING studies, not dog studies! Pavlov says that all it takes is repetitive words, etc placed in a person’s mind for normal persons to ignore reality! This IS what has happened with almost all media sources…repetition, especially of lies! Why does Desmet not mention him?

Joost Meerloo…Dutch doctor who lived in occupied Holland during reign of Hitler. His descriptions of what dangerous propaganda does to individuals and crowds is amazing, coining the RAPE OF THE MIND as menticide. He helped persons after the war whose minds were shattered by all of what happened. His books are all outstanding! Why does Desmet not mention this important doctor?

Why did the globalists pull this Belgian out of the hat to tell us, Americans what is going on here?

Please distance yourself from this guy…whoever he is!

Expand full comment

But some are posing to be against Deathvax. I don't know who.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this article. I have been very suspicious of the whole nanotech angle of this. In part, because I first heard of it through people who are so certain that only DEWs could cause the damage we see in the recent Maui fire that they get angry at me for pointing out evidence that contradicts this theory. However, the treatment given to Dr. Stuckelberger at the “Pandemic Strategies: Lessons and Consequences” conference is a tell, and a huge one.

Still, I must ask, so what? While I think these ideas should be able to be discussed, why do they need to be? Do we not already know enough to act? Are we somehow prevented from taking action against what we already know because we are not allowed to discuss this topic? Is it really necessary to know 100% of each and every minute detail before we can then act? Sorry, but this seems more and more to me to be a cop out.

Events that occurred a century, longer even, ago have been studied and debated ever since. If we must wait until it is”settled” and all agree then there will never be any accountability for those we must hold accountable until many generations of their descendants bones have decayed to dust. Image if they waited until each and every missing female was found and studied and tested to verify if Ted Bundy was or was not responsible for her disappearance before the police could bring him. The situation we are in is as ridiculous as that, IMHO.

The issue of practicality plays a huge role as well. So, they are putting nano bots in all we consume, so what? Or, so what are we going to do about it? Are we all going to stop eating and drinking everything unless grewn or caught and killed by ourselves? Rots-o-ruck with that. The number of people living in a “first world” country with the ability to shift right now to such and existence are few in the extreme. So, what do we do as we aquire the land necessary to support our families and prep it for cultivation for the next growing season? Oh! I forgot about water; Wada we gonna do about clear, untainted water?

Now for the comment that not only got me banned for a substack of a person who provides excellent background knowledge with their extensive research but also got all my comments scrubbed as well. Research and information gathering is essential but if it is not acted upon it is a wasted effort. Folks, the time to act has long since past. Enough is already known. We must act.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Ginger and Peter, for remaining responsible for your freedom.

This applies to Malone:

“He that is not aware of his ignorance, will be only misled by his knowledge.” Richard Whately

Stay free and safe.

Expand full comment

It's often those who cry the loudest for "free speech" who are the first to slam the door in other people's faces (Malone does this blatantly). Dr Jane Ruby has a long list of "things not to do or say" she applies to booting people out of her Telegram page (me included!). She claims she doesn't censor based on "opinions" - but she booted me out for exactly that reason. All I did was suggest that if she didn't want more ongoing "plandemics" perhaps it's really time to come down hard on the non existence of viruses (re Stephan Lanka) and the fraud perpetrated by Louis Pasteur for the French Military. I didn't call this (Germ Theory) a "psyop" - I called it a "mind f**k". Which it is. She blocked me for that. She scowls at those who propose venom "in the water (Ardis)", Terrain Theory(Lanka, Cowan), the vulnerability of Pfizer legally. She plays exactly the same game as Malone but instead pretends to be a victim. Her Telegram account currently loses about 500 subscribers every week. There just seems to be a horrendous level of paranoia amongst those professionals who all seem to want the same thing but who can't get over their professional pride.

Expand full comment