Factscinator's excellent rendition as to the dangerous and yet shown to be safe or actually needed HPV vaccine in girls; support this stack, this is good, provoking, and has good information; I say
this describes the fraud of COVID quite well, 100% on target. could have exchanged the term 'HPV' and inserted COVID and Malone Bourla Bancel Pfizer Moderna Sahin BioNTech Weissman et al. mRNA vaccine
BREAKING NEWS — THIS JUST IN 📺😄
(Cue overly serious music. Anchor stares gravely into camera)
Good evening. We interrupt your evening to bring you an urgent public health announcement that you are not allowed to question.
Authorities have confirmed that an HPV virus has been detected… somewhere.
No, it has not been isolated.
No, it cannot be shown independently.
And no, nobody can quite explain where it is.
But experts agree this is exactly how science works. 🧪✨
Because of the prolific spread of this HPV fear narrative, the public is advised to undergo screening — even if they are perfectly healthy. Screening may cause anxiety, confusion, and a sudden lifelong relationship with hospital waiting rooms, but officials stress this is a feature, not a bug. 🏥😌
Screening will find “abnormalities,” most of which would resolve on their own if left alone. However, once discovered, they must be monitored, biopsied, excised, discussed, coded, invoiced, and worried about forever. Congratulations — you are now a patient. 🎟️
Health officials reassure the public that there is no need to panic, because help is at hand in the form of a vaccine. 💉
The vaccine protects against the HPV virus that cannot be proven to exist, in order to prevent the disease it has never been shown to cause, and to reduce the need for screening — which you will still be required to undergo anyway. 🔁
Asked whether the vaccine works, regulators confirmed it is safe and effective, which in regulatory terms means “approved,” and in practical terms means “please stop asking.” ✔️
Clinical trials compared the vaccine to something that looked like the vaccine, behaved like the vaccine, and caused similar side effects to the vaccine — but was definitely, absolutely, legally described as a placebo. 📄✨
When both groups experienced high rates of adverse events, officials hailed the results as reassuring.
The trials did not establish how long protection lasts, whether boosters would be needed, or whether the vaccine prevents cancer itself — but experts say these are future problems and therefore not relevant to present profits. ⏳💼
Meanwhile, parents are reminded that vaccinating children today will protect them later in life — despite protection wearing off well before the age at which the disease typically appears. This apparent contradiction is described as “nuanced science” and should not be discussed at parents’ evenings. 🎒🤫
Reports of adverse reactions have been logged, catalogued, minimized, reclassified, and gently buried between “fatigue” and “chills.” Officials emphasize that correlation is not causation, unless it supports policy — in which case it absolutely is. 📊✨
A spokesperson added that asking too many questions may cause hesitancy, mistrust, and dangerous independent thinking — all known threats to public health. 🧠🚨
In closing, the public is urged to remain calm, compliant, and fully scheduled.
Roll up your sleeve.
Then roll it up again.
And again.
And if you feel dizzy, confused, or quietly disappear from the data — please remember:
That means the system is working perfectly. ✔️✔️
Good night.
And trust the science. 🌙🧬
excellent
*(Cue overly dramatic parchment unrolling. A man in a lab coat clears his throat while a lute plays.)*
Good evening.
Tonight, we return to a simpler time.
A better time.
A time when science was pure, **pants were itchy, nobody washed their hands and everyone was very confident about things they were wrong about,** and **Robert Koch had already figured disease out,** so everyone else should have just packed it in and gone home.
According to a very serious internet antiquarian, **nothing discovered after 1890 counts,** unless it follows Koch’s Postulates *exactly as written.*
No updates.
No revisions.
No allowance for the last 130 years of awkward discoveries. 🙃
Also, small detail: Koch himself abandoned them.
But let’s not get bogged down. (That would be inconvenient.)
For anyone who hasn’t memorized Victorian checklists lately, Koch’s Postulates say a pathogen must:
• Be found in *every* case of disease
• Be absent from healthy people
• Be grown in pure culture
• Cause disease again when reintroduced
This worked great for a narrow slice of bacteria, briefly, until reality showed up and ruined the whole thing.
They fail for:
• asymptomatic carriers,
• latent infections,
• immune-mediated disease,
• polymicrobial conditions,
• dose effects,
• host genetics,
• prions,
• viruses,
• and, honestly, most of medicine.
In science, this is called *learning.*
Online, it’s called *“kind of suspicious, if you ask me.” * 🤔
When someone gently points out that **viruses can’t be grown in “pure culture”** because they are obligate intracellular parasites — meaning they’re not tiny independent creatures with studio apartments — the response is immediate:
“Then they’re not isolated.”
Ah. Got it.
If it doesn’t behave like a bacterium, it doesn’t exist.
Very normal stance. 🥴
At this point, **“isolation”** gets redefined to mean:
• no host cells,
• no environment,
• no replication machinery,
• no context,
• ideally visible without equipment,
• preferably sitting alone on a table, waiting to be judged.
Applied consistently, this also means we must conclude that:
• thoughts,
• metabolism,
• fire,
• software,
• gravity,
• and the post you’re currently annoyed by
are all fake. 🤡
Entire viral genomes — sequenced, assembled, replicated, mutated, compared, modeled, and repeatedly validated — are waved away because they don’t satisfy a **19th-century purity ritual involving agar and confidence.**
“But that’s moving the goalposts,” comes the reply. 😒
Which is interesting, since those goalposts were planted before:
• electron microscopy,
• molecular genetics,
• immunology,
• cell culture,
• or knowing what DNA was.
But yes.
Updating standards when new evidence shows up?
Huge red flag. 🚩
So, in closing, we are encouraged to reject modern biology and cling tightly to the belief that **nature must obey an antique checklist,** or else be declared imaginary.
Because if your model of disease collapses the second new information appears…
That’s not a problem with the model.
That’s proof the information is fake.
Obviously.
Good night.
*(comments section noises intensify)*
I follow this HPW for at least 15 years, the damage it do to so many kids is beyond words, will not go in to this, all I say for every child damaged or killed those who push for it deserve to be hung when prooven they knew. Such creatures should not walk the Earth. No justice for the innocent. They do not care, profits over everything