this describes the fraud of COVID quite well, 100% on target. could have exchanged the term 'HPV' and inserted COVID and Malone Bourla Bancel Pfizer Moderna Sahin BioNTech Weissman et al. mRNA vaccine
*(Cue overly dramatic parchment unrolling. A man in a lab coat clears his throat while a lute plays.)*
Good evening.
Tonight, we return to a simpler time.
A better time.
A time when science was pure, **pants were itchy, nobody washed their hands and everyone was very confident about things they were wrong about,** and **Robert Koch had already figured disease out,** so everyone else should have just packed it in and gone home.
According to a very serious internet antiquarian, **nothing discovered after 1890 counts,** unless it follows Koch’s Postulates *exactly as written.*
No updates.
No revisions.
No allowance for the last 130 years of awkward discoveries. 🙃
Also, small detail: Koch himself abandoned them.
But let’s not get bogged down. (That would be inconvenient.)
For anyone who hasn’t memorized Victorian checklists lately, Koch’s Postulates say a pathogen must:
• Be found in *every* case of disease
• Be absent from healthy people
• Be grown in pure culture
• Cause disease again when reintroduced
This worked great for a narrow slice of bacteria, briefly, until reality showed up and ruined the whole thing.
They fail for:
• asymptomatic carriers,
• latent infections,
• immune-mediated disease,
• polymicrobial conditions,
• dose effects,
• host genetics,
• prions,
• viruses,
• and, honestly, most of medicine.
In science, this is called *learning.*
Online, it’s called *“kind of suspicious, if you ask me.” * 🤔
When someone gently points out that **viruses can’t be grown in “pure culture”** because they are obligate intracellular parasites — meaning they’re not tiny independent creatures with studio apartments — the response is immediate:
“Then they’re not isolated.”
Ah. Got it.
If it doesn’t behave like a bacterium, it doesn’t exist.
Very normal stance. 🥴
At this point, **“isolation”** gets redefined to mean:
• no host cells,
• no environment,
• no replication machinery,
• no context,
• ideally visible without equipment,
• preferably sitting alone on a table, waiting to be judged.
Applied consistently, this also means we must conclude that:
• thoughts,
• metabolism,
• fire,
• software,
• gravity,
• and the post you’re currently annoyed by
are all fake. 🤡
Entire viral genomes — sequenced, assembled, replicated, mutated, compared, modeled, and repeatedly validated — are waved away because they don’t satisfy a **19th-century purity ritual involving agar and confidence.**
“But that’s moving the goalposts,” comes the reply. 😒
Which is interesting, since those goalposts were planted before:
• electron microscopy,
• molecular genetics,
• immunology,
• cell culture,
• or knowing what DNA was.
But yes.
Updating standards when new evidence shows up?
Huge red flag. 🚩
So, in closing, we are encouraged to reject modern biology and cling tightly to the belief that **nature must obey an antique checklist,** or else be declared imaginary.
Because if your model of disease collapses the second new information appears…
They only updated their tools.🤣 Take their “toys” away and see what they can provide based on their knowledge. What actually does not matter. The insurance companies will decide. 🤡🤡🤡indeed.
And almost everyone here will praise the insurance companies and especially their noble, altruistic CEOs. The only thing they love more (except for themselves) is Pharma CEOs like Bourla and Bancel. They will condemn the judge who took the death penalty off the table for Mangione, saying an example must be made of him.
white spaces, I think he should have been put to death and also those CEOs you refer to...once proven in courts that their handiwork killed, then death penalty again in the confines of law.
So, I didn’t pay a premium for my insurance. But, I did have to make a certain amount of money to qualify for the subsidy. It was all very confusing.
Well, I never used the insurance because the deductible was so high. And doctors visit cost a lot of money. Money I don’t have.
Then I saw where the government was paying the insurance company almost 1300 a month for me to have insurance I couldn’t use. WTF!
I said, hell no! In two years I qualify for Medicare supplemental insurance and part D big pharma. I’m probably gonna pass. All that for my husband is costing 6000 thousand a year.
Something is terribly wrong. My first husband, born in 1938, never had to pay for big pharma, and his supplemental insurance was very very low.
As someone said yesterday, Te, quoting George Carlin:
"...It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good honest hard-working people -- white collar, blue collar, it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on - good honest hard-working people continue - these are people of modest means - continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a fuck about them. They don’t give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all - at all. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on; the fact that Americans will probably remain wilfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that's being jammed up their assholes everyday. Because the owners of this country know the truth: it's called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it."
I follow this HPW for at least 15 years, the damage it do to so many kids is beyond words, will not go in to this, all I say for every child damaged or killed those who push for it deserve to be hung when prooven they knew. Such creatures should not walk the Earth. No justice for the innocent. They do not care, profits over everything
I’m so sick of this.. what about all the women already harmed? What about the collusion between FDA and Big Pharma?
It’s, like we’re supposed to celebrate this shit.
How about my granddaughter already got the shot last because her mother said it was ok because she herself got the shot about ten years ago at 33 years old. They told her she might could get cervical cancer and she got the shot. And because she did ok with it, she believed her daughter would be just fine too.
And there’s nothing a grandmother like me can do about it. I’m too old and stupid to be listened to.
This old lady remains unjabbed and I have not been sick at all since December of 2019
I'm not interested in debating whether viruses exist. I am NOT convinced that they do not exist.
However, I AM concerned that little girls who should not be having sex are subject to intense pressure to receive a heavily-promoted vaccine that may cause more harm than good.
Is there merit to this article which raises serious concerns?:
"Experts who analyzed two Cochrane reviews on HPV vaccines suggested the authors dramatically overstated the safety and efficacy of the shots. Media outlets parroted claims made in a Cochrane press release, without subjecting the claims to scrutiny."
Quoting the CHD article:
"Tomljenovic found that data show that since the early 1990s, cervical cancer incidence rates decreased by 25% in females in the U.K., and have remained stable over the last decade.
She found that cervical cancer incidence rates reached their lowest point somewhere between 2004 and 2007 — a year before the HPV vaccine was introduced in the U.K.
“Since then, the incidence rates of cervical cancer have actually slightly increased, not decreased,” Tomljenovic said. “Therefore, these data completely contradict the conclusions of The Lancet study.”
In light of the cervical cancer incidence in the U.K. over time, she said, the claim by the The Lancet study authors that HPV vaccination with high coverage in 12-13-year-old girls has almost eliminated cervical cancer and cervical precancer up to age 25 “is patently absurd.”
I do not have the scientific expertise to evaluate these concerns but I do believe they play an important role in this debate and should be considered.
*(Cue overly dramatic parchment unrolling. A man in a lab coat clears his throat while a lute plays.)*
Good evening.
Tonight, we return to a simpler time.
A better time.
A time when science was pure, **pants were itchy, nobody washed their hands and everyone was very confident about things they were wrong about,** and **Robert Koch had already figured disease out,** so everyone else should have just packed it in and gone home.
According to a very serious internet antiquarian, **nothing discovered after 1890 counts,** unless it follows Koch’s Postulates *exactly as written.*
No updates.
No revisions.
No allowance for the last 130 years of awkward discoveries. 🙃
Also, small detail: Koch himself abandoned them.
But let’s not get bogged down. (That would be inconvenient.)
For anyone who hasn’t memorized Victorian checklists lately, Koch’s Postulates say a pathogen must:
• Be found in *every* case of disease
• Be absent from healthy people
• Be grown in pure culture
• Cause disease again when reintroduced
This worked great for a narrow slice of bacteria, briefly, until reality showed up and ruined the whole thing.
They fail for:
• asymptomatic carriers,
• latent infections,
• immune-mediated disease,
• polymicrobial conditions,
• dose effects,
• host genetics,
• prions,
• viruses,
• and, honestly, most of medicine.
In science, this is called *learning.*
Online, it’s called *“kind of suspicious, if you ask me.” * 🤔
When someone gently points out that **viruses can’t be grown in “pure culture”** because they are obligate intracellular parasites — meaning they’re not tiny independent creatures with studio apartments — the response is immediate:
“Then they’re not isolated.”
Ah. Got it.
If it doesn’t behave like a bacterium, it doesn’t exist.
Very normal stance. 🥴
At this point, **“isolation”** gets redefined to mean:
• no host cells,
• no environment,
• no replication machinery,
• no context,
• ideally visible without equipment,
• preferably sitting alone on a table, waiting to be judged.
Applied consistently, this also means we must conclude that:
• thoughts,
• metabolism,
• fire,
• software,
• gravity,
• and the post you’re currently annoyed by
are all fake. 🤡
Entire viral genomes — sequenced, assembled, replicated, mutated, compared, modeled, and repeatedly validated — are waved away because they don’t satisfy a **19th-century purity ritual involving agar and confidence.**
“But that’s moving the goalposts,” comes the reply. 😒
Which is interesting, since those goalposts were planted before:
• electron microscopy,
• molecular genetics,
• immunology,
• cell culture,
• or knowing what DNA was.
But yes.
Updating standards when new evidence shows up?
Huge red flag. 🚩
So, in closing, we are encouraged to reject modern biology and cling tightly to the belief that **nature must obey an antique checklist,** or else be declared imaginary.
Because if your model of disease collapses the second new information appears…
That’s not a problem with the model.
That’s proof the information is fake.
Obviously.
Good night.
*(comments section noises intensify)*
outstanding post ANW, exceptional, thank you.
They only updated their tools.🤣 Take their “toys” away and see what they can provide based on their knowledge. What actually does not matter. The insurance companies will decide. 🤡🤡🤡indeed.
kaboom
And almost everyone here will praise the insurance companies and especially their noble, altruistic CEOs. The only thing they love more (except for themselves) is Pharma CEOs like Bourla and Bancel. They will condemn the judge who took the death penalty off the table for Mangione, saying an example must be made of him.
white spaces, I think he should have been put to death and also those CEOs you refer to...once proven in courts that their handiwork killed, then death penalty again in the confines of law.
Take some time for this:
https://youtu.be/GSJ2GHI_AdM?si=Mall_1WGs80JTX6t
ANW, watch this:
https://youtu.be/GSJ2GHI_AdM?si=Mall_1WGs80JTX6t
Very interesting, Adriana. Thank you.
I canceled my Obumercare insurance in in 2024
So, I didn’t pay a premium for my insurance. But, I did have to make a certain amount of money to qualify for the subsidy. It was all very confusing.
Well, I never used the insurance because the deductible was so high. And doctors visit cost a lot of money. Money I don’t have.
Then I saw where the government was paying the insurance company almost 1300 a month for me to have insurance I couldn’t use. WTF!
I said, hell no! In two years I qualify for Medicare supplemental insurance and part D big pharma. I’m probably gonna pass. All that for my husband is costing 6000 thousand a year.
Something is terribly wrong. My first husband, born in 1938, never had to pay for big pharma, and his supplemental insurance was very very low.
Obamacare is a nightmare to navigate
terribly wrong.
As someone said yesterday, Te, quoting George Carlin:
"...It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good honest hard-working people -- white collar, blue collar, it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on - good honest hard-working people continue - these are people of modest means - continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a fuck about them. They don’t give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all - at all. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on; the fact that Americans will probably remain wilfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that's being jammed up their assholes everyday. Because the owners of this country know the truth: it's called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it."
Where is anaphylaxis in your list? Just curious......
I follow this HPW for at least 15 years, the damage it do to so many kids is beyond words, will not go in to this, all I say for every child damaged or killed those who push for it deserve to be hung when prooven they knew. Such creatures should not walk the Earth. No justice for the innocent. They do not care, profits over everything
things in your post I/we appreciate.
I’m so sick of this.. what about all the women already harmed? What about the collusion between FDA and Big Pharma?
It’s, like we’re supposed to celebrate this shit.
How about my granddaughter already got the shot last because her mother said it was ok because she herself got the shot about ten years ago at 33 years old. They told her she might could get cervical cancer and she got the shot. And because she did ok with it, she believed her daughter would be just fine too.
And there’s nothing a grandmother like me can do about it. I’m too old and stupid to be listened to.
This old lady remains unjabbed and I have not been sick at all since December of 2019
I'm not interested in debating whether viruses exist. I am NOT convinced that they do not exist.
However, I AM concerned that little girls who should not be having sex are subject to intense pressure to receive a heavily-promoted vaccine that may cause more harm than good.
Is there merit to this article which raises serious concerns?:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/scientists-accuse-cochrane-reviews-biased-studies-hpv-vaccine-prevents-cancer/
Article subtitle:
"Experts who analyzed two Cochrane reviews on HPV vaccines suggested the authors dramatically overstated the safety and efficacy of the shots. Media outlets parroted claims made in a Cochrane press release, without subjecting the claims to scrutiny."
Quoting the CHD article:
"Tomljenovic found that data show that since the early 1990s, cervical cancer incidence rates decreased by 25% in females in the U.K., and have remained stable over the last decade.
She found that cervical cancer incidence rates reached their lowest point somewhere between 2004 and 2007 — a year before the HPV vaccine was introduced in the U.K.
“Since then, the incidence rates of cervical cancer have actually slightly increased, not decreased,” Tomljenovic said. “Therefore, these data completely contradict the conclusions of The Lancet study.”
In light of the cervical cancer incidence in the U.K. over time, she said, the claim by the The Lancet study authors that HPV vaccination with high coverage in 12-13-year-old girls has almost eliminated cervical cancer and cervical precancer up to age 25 “is patently absurd.”
I do not have the scientific expertise to evaluate these concerns but I do believe they play an important role in this debate and should be considered.
It’s very creepy, but seems true.