57 Comments

Blatant fraud regarding the RT-PCR testing. I've personally used PCR for DNA analysis during my undergrad at Ryerson University Toronto. Our biochemistry professor clearly emphasized that cycling should never exceed 25 cycles, or the result would be considered erroreneous with high false positive rates. This is also mentioned in Lehninger, Principles of Biochemistry textbook which is considered the "Bible" of biochemistry and taught in almost all Universities around the world...clearly says cycling 20-25 and the reasons are obvious to avoid false positives and fake results...

So why on earth did the WHO recommend 45 cycle amplification PCR for convid all throughout 2020 and which Public Health authorities adopted in Canada and then magically toned it down to 35 cycles overnight in January 2021 a few months after vaccine rollout?

This is scientific fraud and this should be at the core of all discussions and debate regarding convid.

Expand full comment

It was as high as 45 here in Quebec. Probably still is. When asked about why it was so high, an academic here (this was in early 2021 maybe late 2020 I can't remember) said it doesn't matter. It's all how you interpret it. Uh-huh.

What a sad twist of fate the inventor of PCR Dr. Mullis died in 2019. Had he been alive, I would have LOVED to see his reaction to how the PCR is being used. He would have ripped and torn Christian Drosten a new one.

Expand full comment

Fauci is covering his ass now because he knows the hammer is coming and its close, bastards should all hang.

Expand full comment

The walk back and rewrite continues by these lying murderous pond scum.

Expand full comment

There is criminal fraud at every turn. Put these criminals in prison now!

Expand full comment

And why I've done what I can to not have taken any of these tests. People are so used to instant gratification. Instead I wait for the time I can do something or take actions to make it so I can do something without following these nonsensical, harmful rules.

Expand full comment

The inventor of the PCR technique (Kary Mullis) stated many times it could not be used for finding viruses. It is not really a test, but a method of discovering DNA in a sample. It is often used to compare DNA from a person with DNA found at a crime scene in criminal forensics.

The PRC scam was the basis for creating cases and the entire fake covid pandemic. They ramped up the cycles trying to find any DNA and then classified it as covid. There was never any standard number of cycles to be used and this was all over the map. How can you get standardized results when you use PCR without knowing what you are looking for? Mengel fauci is an murdering imbecile, not a doctor.

Expand full comment

What cracks me up is the CDC data showing thousands died of covid but the death was by accident. So, they had a fake test with a high threshold a month before death.

We've had a pandemic of fake tests. That's the novel part of covid.

Expand full comment

Anyone else recall viral load analysis for such as HepC? Why was no one told their viral load or PCR-cycle threshold ?

Could it be - the test was never able to differentiate SARS-CoV-2 from run of the mill everyday Coronavirus Cold or for Influenza? Could be high cycle threshold was necessary for CASE FEAR. Could be why Influenza that had plagued mankind for centuries unusually disappeared.

Scientific Fraud - And Effective fear Messaging was Necessary. How else could you get them signing up for rushed through emergency gene therapy jabs?

Expand full comment

Also from Fauci in Oct 2020: “In all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has NEVER been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is ALWAYS a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit [the virus], an epidemic is not driven by an asymptomatic carrier.”

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, stated, “These PCR tests cannot detect infectious free viruses at all. Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.”

“I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.” - Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer.

“If someone is tested by PCR as positive when a [amplification] threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” - Drs. Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Craig

Hundreds of other doctors have stated the PCR test is worthless and falsely inflates the virus numbers.

Expand full comment

I am not a scientist but I very clearly remember at the beginning of the pandemic reading ( from the good doctors, interviewed at the alternative news sources) that if the test was cycled more than 25 times than it would yield a false positive, rendering it essentially useless. Why would the state of Alaska be using a PCR test with 37 cycles? It has all just been a big exercise in futility, covid theater on steroids.

Expand full comment
Oct 7, 2022·edited Oct 7, 2022

I'd really like to know why Fauci is being even asked these questions or why he feels able to answer them in the 1st person as if he's standing before a patient as opposed to 'our team of doctors has come up with the following guidelines based on best practice from real world experience as...' I don't give a damn what this guy believes on medical questions. He's not a practicing doctor. Mafia boss maybe. Dulles CIA reincarnation, a possibility. But not a Dr.

From the comments on the Youtube video with Fauci speaking:

"3:50 Fauci is asked about transmission and viral load as determined by PCR" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE&t=230s

"4:28 mentions a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE&t=268s

Expand full comment

PCR isn't about culturing anything. It is used to replicate nucleic acid sequences.

Expand full comment

That SOB and his cabal of misfits have known this from day one! Look up Drosten, the WHO and the adoption of this RT PCR

test that Dr. Kary Mullis said should Never be used as a diagnostic tool, yet they shut the world down on using a test that

has no accuracy to detect Covid19 or influenza or the flu! It is very inaccurate! Drosten used a DNA breakdown of the virus cuss he could not get a live virus...to use to apply to the RT PCR test! Look up Dr. Reiner Fullmich....lawyer working for the People against the Covid 19 Cabal and for Nuremberg trials against humanity !

Expand full comment

Given that the vaccinated are testing positive despite being asymptomatic (which could be problematic), it is no wonder that Fauci, now, after over 2.5 years, casts doubt on the PCR test as a reliable measure of infectivity‼️

Expand full comment