"FDA's Peter Marks to Congress: Youngest kids vaccine won't need to hit 50% efficacy mark"; I like Marks, I know him, decent, smart, I dealt with him at HHS; this however is NUTS, batshit crazy nuts!
"FDA's Peter Marks to Congress: Youngest kids vaccine won't need to hit 50% efficacy mark"; I like Marks, I know him, decent, smart, I dealt with him at HHS; this however is NUTS, batshit crazy nuts!
I cannot wrap my head around how he can say this knowing kids bring near zero risk, do not die from it, vax is safety untested, ineffective, outcome is only Abs levels, not hard patient important
Biden and Fauci are pressing him so the vax can be put on the childhood vaccine schedule. The wolves are circling as the Pfizer vax documents are slowly being released. More inconsistencies are surfacing everyday.
I just wish the DOJ would start issuing warrants but nothing with help until the Republicans take Congress. Just a few like Rand Paul, Johnson and Hawley seem to be fighting at the moment.
Even the existing Republicans are silent. There’s zero reason for them to be so mute on this. Even if they think they can’t get anything done, where are the “men with chests” (C. S. Lewis) who will bravely say what needs to be said. Where are our Patrick Henrys?
Big Harma avoids liability for vax harms by only two routes: "emergency" [officially declared by U.S.] use of their harmful product or "recommended" [officially declared by U.S.] use of their harmful product. In other language: EUA, or childhood schedule. THAT'S IT. And the U.S. is going to make damned sure Big H continues to escape liability, because TPTB believe they have no choice but to keep Big H alive in order for the U.S. to be able to respond with warp speed mass vaccination if/when an enemy attack of bioterrorism occurs. That's what gave rise to the 1986 childhood vax law in the first place.
This brings to mind the story as told by, one of my personal heroes, Dr. Tess Lawrie. An excellent account can be found here (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-dr-tess-lawrie?s=r). From her point of view, she fully expected Dr. Andrew Hill to behave as, to use your term, "upright" man and to act based on the mutually known data for the benefit of all of us. Well, he turned out to be a big pharma shill of the worst kind. This is not just idle bad mouthing of a well know researcher, he basically admited he was compromised on a recorded conversation. When I first heard this, it really broke my heart, the pleading from Dr. Tess Lawrie to a compromised, spineless and greedy piece of filth inhabiting the form of Andrew Hill was a dark day for me. It was also a day where I grew a bit to, I now know, there were not many out there, regardless of how smart they think they are, that will do the right thing in the face of temptation and extortion. I no longer take the behaviour of these individuals in fair weather as the basis of their true character. In the presence of a storm is when their true face is exposed and the mask is ripped away.
Perhaps you should rethink you high opinion of him. If he can stand behind this BS that shows he is bought just like the rest of them. Which does not make him a nice or smart person. It makes him a whore for big pharma, Fauci and Gates.
It’s people like him doing things like this that are bringing down the entire vaccine program, not just C0\/ID. I mean, if they are willing to make up this stuff like this for this one, how do most of us know that they haven’t been operating with lack of integrity for decades? RFK already showed us as much in his recent book.
So,I don't know what it is about you so called educated people and trusting anyone who has a diploma or went to some ivy league school,but that means nothing to me probably the opposite, your more likely to be deceived because you trust in the wrong things.It probably means that your swayed by your peers and their level of education, a lot of times that's an impairment to understanding the truth.
This is even worse than it sounds. The "50% efficacy" mark claims to be about preventing infection, but such an outcome is impossible to secure. None of the jab trials have demonstrated any efficacy in preventing transmission. Further, the "50%" figure is RELATIVE risk reduction, not absolute. Haven't we just done this drill for adults? The "95% efficacy" for adults never meant that it was 95% effective in preventing infection (or any effectiveness in preventing infection) but rather 95% RELATIVE risk reduction for "serious illness." When children have a risk of serious Covid approaching zero, absolute risk reduction (if demonstrated at all) would be something like .00001 percent. Further, there are not enough children getting sick (unless injected) to have a meaningful comparison with a control group. This is not only criminal, but stupid. They are playing us for fools.
Marks has an agenda...look back at the original booster meeting where he was brought in because Gruber was stepping down. He was so upset when they voted no and was scrambling to rewrite the question. Next meeting they said "can we rewrite the question" his response is no.
Well, that "decent & smart" people love (lots of) money too. Even if it means deleting "decent & smart" from those bloated CVs they poke your eyes with every time they got the chance.
It is!! Since they do not suffer severe disease how do they justify these shots?? The only reason they are making this claim is due to every other vaccine that hasn’t met that threshold is considered FAILED. Unreal!
“...Arendt's book introduced the expression and concept of the banality of evil.[7] Her thesis is that Eichmann was actually not a fanatic or a sociopath, but instead an extremely average and mundane person who relied on clichéd defenses rather than thinking for himself, was motivated by professional promotion rather than ideology, and believed in success which he considered the chief standard of "good society".”
Biden and Fauci are pressing him so the vax can be put on the childhood vaccine schedule. The wolves are circling as the Pfizer vax documents are slowly being released. More inconsistencies are surfacing everyday.
BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you deserve a prize...over the target.
I just wish the DOJ would start issuing warrants but nothing with help until the Republicans take Congress. Just a few like Rand Paul, Johnson and Hawley seem to be fighting at the moment.
Even the existing Republicans are silent. There’s zero reason for them to be so mute on this. Even if they think they can’t get anything done, where are the “men with chests” (C. S. Lewis) who will bravely say what needs to be said. Where are our Patrick Henrys?
Perhaps they all have Big Pharma stock. It is one of the biggest lobbies in Congress. Money always controls things.
Big Harma avoids liability for vax harms by only two routes: "emergency" [officially declared by U.S.] use of their harmful product or "recommended" [officially declared by U.S.] use of their harmful product. In other language: EUA, or childhood schedule. THAT'S IT. And the U.S. is going to make damned sure Big H continues to escape liability, because TPTB believe they have no choice but to keep Big H alive in order for the U.S. to be able to respond with warp speed mass vaccination if/when an enemy attack of bioterrorism occurs. That's what gave rise to the 1986 childhood vax law in the first place.
Isn't age 5 and up good enough for the childhood vaccine schedule?
This brings to mind the story as told by, one of my personal heroes, Dr. Tess Lawrie. An excellent account can be found here (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-dr-tess-lawrie?s=r). From her point of view, she fully expected Dr. Andrew Hill to behave as, to use your term, "upright" man and to act based on the mutually known data for the benefit of all of us. Well, he turned out to be a big pharma shill of the worst kind. This is not just idle bad mouthing of a well know researcher, he basically admited he was compromised on a recorded conversation. When I first heard this, it really broke my heart, the pleading from Dr. Tess Lawrie to a compromised, spineless and greedy piece of filth inhabiting the form of Andrew Hill was a dark day for me. It was also a day where I grew a bit to, I now know, there were not many out there, regardless of how smart they think they are, that will do the right thing in the face of temptation and extortion. I no longer take the behaviour of these individuals in fair weather as the basis of their true character. In the presence of a storm is when their true face is exposed and the mask is ripped away.
Perhaps you should rethink you high opinion of him. If he can stand behind this BS that shows he is bought just like the rest of them. Which does not make him a nice or smart person. It makes him a whore for big pharma, Fauci and Gates.
More than nuts. This is murder for profit.
It’s people like him doing things like this that are bringing down the entire vaccine program, not just C0\/ID. I mean, if they are willing to make up this stuff like this for this one, how do most of us know that they haven’t been operating with lack of integrity for decades? RFK already showed us as much in his recent book.
So,I don't know what it is about you so called educated people and trusting anyone who has a diploma or went to some ivy league school,but that means nothing to me probably the opposite, your more likely to be deceived because you trust in the wrong things.It probably means that your swayed by your peers and their level of education, a lot of times that's an impairment to understanding the truth.
Money is the answer to your question Dr Paul.
He is either, bribed, threatened or are in cahoots with the globalists agenda. Take your pick.
This is even worse than it sounds. The "50% efficacy" mark claims to be about preventing infection, but such an outcome is impossible to secure. None of the jab trials have demonstrated any efficacy in preventing transmission. Further, the "50%" figure is RELATIVE risk reduction, not absolute. Haven't we just done this drill for adults? The "95% efficacy" for adults never meant that it was 95% effective in preventing infection (or any effectiveness in preventing infection) but rather 95% RELATIVE risk reduction for "serious illness." When children have a risk of serious Covid approaching zero, absolute risk reduction (if demonstrated at all) would be something like .00001 percent. Further, there are not enough children getting sick (unless injected) to have a meaningful comparison with a control group. This is not only criminal, but stupid. They are playing us for fools.
Marks has an agenda...look back at the original booster meeting where he was brought in because Gruber was stepping down. He was so upset when they voted no and was scrambling to rewrite the question. Next meeting they said "can we rewrite the question" his response is no.
Have you tried telling him this, or does he not respond?
I am pretty sure the answer to "why" starts with $ and has a bunch of figures following that.
☕
And what did we learn today ?
Well, that "decent & smart" people love (lots of) money too. Even if it means deleting "decent & smart" from those bloated CVs they poke your eyes with every time they got the chance.
It is!! Since they do not suffer severe disease how do they justify these shots?? The only reason they are making this claim is due to every other vaccine that hasn’t met that threshold is considered FAILED. Unreal!
Banality of evil writ large.
“...Arendt's book introduced the expression and concept of the banality of evil.[7] Her thesis is that Eichmann was actually not a fanatic or a sociopath, but instead an extremely average and mundane person who relied on clichéd defenses rather than thinking for himself, was motivated by professional promotion rather than ideology, and believed in success which he considered the chief standard of "good society".”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem
Need forensic audits of all their bank accounts, their families’ bank accounts, all their assets, everything.