this is the issue, they are approving vaccines you cannot get, and you can only get the usual one, you need to figure out why...yes, there is a reason...
Our people are the enemy. That is the purpose of the bait and switch. They sell the unquestioning public on the new and improved authorized product. The public assumes the FDA is telling them the truth. Those of us who are awake to the scam have seen and lived the lies coming out of our government and it’s three letter agencies.
We know what we must do to escape from medical and public health tyranny, but will we be able to achieve it before too many more are lost?
Yes! But they are trying to eat their cake and have it too. All drug manufacturers are liable for damages when their drugs prove lethal or disabling. Vioxx caused many people to die from heart attacks and was withdrawn after thousands of deaths. The manufacturer was fined millions-but they only consider this an operating expense. Google Pfizer and scandal to see crimes they have committed. However, so many deaths and disabling adverse events have occurred with mRNA vaccines that they never can let their drug be sold until they can guarantee immunity. Not for us-for them. No drug is free from liability. The FDA recalls thousands of drugs every year. However, vaccines ARE free of liability--when they are placed on the childhood vaccine schedule. More and more companies are managing to get their drugs mandated for children who now are required to take over 70 vaccinations. In my childhood, only a few vaccines were offered (not mandated). Children were far healthier then. We didn't suffer from autism, allergies, neurological problems that are now running rampant with our children. It's the toxins in the vaccines (aluminum, mercury) that damage the body and weaken the immune system. So the best way to guarantee profits and avoid liability is to get the "vaccine" (it really isn't a true vaccine because it doesn't offer immunity) approved for young children and then placed on the childhood vaccine schedule. THEN Comirnaty and Spikevax can be sold. Otherwise, if these drugs could be sold, the EUA would not be allowed since it only exists when there is no effective treatment available. Hence why Ivermectin, Hydroxycorisol, Fluvoxamine are all forbidden to be marketed. Because they have proven so effective EUA would have to collapse when they are accepted for treatment. Meanwhile, Pfizer and Moderna profit by claiming they are fully approved by the FDA. No, the mRNA vaccines currently sold and used in the U.S., are authorized for emergency use only. So big Pharma is benefitting from a marketing claim that the FDA fully approved them and confirms they are safe and effective. They are not.
It does seem to boil down to something fairly simple: to keep the EUA in place necessitated suppressing successful treatment options. Follow the money, always.
No. In the US, vaccines are exempt from injury lawsuits, regardless of status:
“ Vaccines are produced by privately held pharmaceutical companies, but they have a unique arrangement with the U.S. government: When a person reports harm that could feasibly be related to a vaccine, a government program—not a pharmaceutical company—pays compensation...
… Developing a novel vaccine that could prevent hundreds of thousands of cases of a deadly disease—but cause a much smaller number of side effects that could lead to multimillion-dollar lawsuits—made a useful product an unappealing business proposition. During the 1970s and ’80s, some manufacturers began to withdraw from vaccine production.
In the midst of this, public-health officials grew concerned about the stability of the country’s continued supply of existing vaccines—and the dwindling business incentive for companies to invest in developing new ones. It was on these grounds that Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (also known as the Vaccine Act), indemnifying drug companies from further lawsuits.”
Teri you are wrong. Vaccines are only exempt if 1)They have emergency use authorization or 2)They are on the childhood vaccine schedule. Otherwise vaccines would be treated just like any other drug. Adults don't get regular vaccine shots so liability for vaccine manufacturers was not a concern until recently. It was in the 1980's that liability claims threatened to make vaccines unprofitable and government provided protection for the industry.
Congress enacted the NCVIA to stabilize the vaccine market and make it possible to provide fast, informal adjudication via the Act’s Vaccine Injury Table, which lists the vaccines covered under the Act; describes each vaccine’s compensable, adverse side effects; and indicates how soon after vaccination those side effects should first manifest themselves.
Our people are the enemy. That is the purpose of the bait and switch. They sell the unquestioning public on the new and improved authorized product. The public assumes the FDA is telling them the truth. Those of us who are awake to the scam have seen and lived the lies coming out of our government and it’s three letter agencies.
We know what we must do to escape from medical and public health tyranny, but will we be able to achieve it before too many more are lost?
We need to go all in to save our people.
Bait and switch. Shameful by the drug companies and the FDA!!!
Is it because once approved, the pharma company is liable?
Yes! But they are trying to eat their cake and have it too. All drug manufacturers are liable for damages when their drugs prove lethal or disabling. Vioxx caused many people to die from heart attacks and was withdrawn after thousands of deaths. The manufacturer was fined millions-but they only consider this an operating expense. Google Pfizer and scandal to see crimes they have committed. However, so many deaths and disabling adverse events have occurred with mRNA vaccines that they never can let their drug be sold until they can guarantee immunity. Not for us-for them. No drug is free from liability. The FDA recalls thousands of drugs every year. However, vaccines ARE free of liability--when they are placed on the childhood vaccine schedule. More and more companies are managing to get their drugs mandated for children who now are required to take over 70 vaccinations. In my childhood, only a few vaccines were offered (not mandated). Children were far healthier then. We didn't suffer from autism, allergies, neurological problems that are now running rampant with our children. It's the toxins in the vaccines (aluminum, mercury) that damage the body and weaken the immune system. So the best way to guarantee profits and avoid liability is to get the "vaccine" (it really isn't a true vaccine because it doesn't offer immunity) approved for young children and then placed on the childhood vaccine schedule. THEN Comirnaty and Spikevax can be sold. Otherwise, if these drugs could be sold, the EUA would not be allowed since it only exists when there is no effective treatment available. Hence why Ivermectin, Hydroxycorisol, Fluvoxamine are all forbidden to be marketed. Because they have proven so effective EUA would have to collapse when they are accepted for treatment. Meanwhile, Pfizer and Moderna profit by claiming they are fully approved by the FDA. No, the mRNA vaccines currently sold and used in the U.S., are authorized for emergency use only. So big Pharma is benefitting from a marketing claim that the FDA fully approved them and confirms they are safe and effective. They are not.
It does seem to boil down to something fairly simple: to keep the EUA in place necessitated suppressing successful treatment options. Follow the money, always.
No. In the US, vaccines are exempt from injury lawsuits, regardless of status:
“ Vaccines are produced by privately held pharmaceutical companies, but they have a unique arrangement with the U.S. government: When a person reports harm that could feasibly be related to a vaccine, a government program—not a pharmaceutical company—pays compensation...
… Developing a novel vaccine that could prevent hundreds of thousands of cases of a deadly disease—but cause a much smaller number of side effects that could lead to multimillion-dollar lawsuits—made a useful product an unappealing business proposition. During the 1970s and ’80s, some manufacturers began to withdraw from vaccine production.
In the midst of this, public-health officials grew concerned about the stability of the country’s continued supply of existing vaccines—and the dwindling business incentive for companies to invest in developing new ones. It was on these grounds that Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (also known as the Vaccine Act), indemnifying drug companies from further lawsuits.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/vaccine-safety-program/589354/
Teri you are wrong. Vaccines are only exempt if 1)They have emergency use authorization or 2)They are on the childhood vaccine schedule. Otherwise vaccines would be treated just like any other drug. Adults don't get regular vaccine shots so liability for vaccine manufacturers was not a concern until recently. It was in the 1980's that liability claims threatened to make vaccines unprofitable and government provided protection for the industry.
http://sonorannews.com/2017/07/03/vaccine-manufacturers-exempt-liability/
Congress enacted the NCVIA to stabilize the vaccine market and make it possible to provide fast, informal adjudication via the Act’s Vaccine Injury Table, which lists the vaccines covered under the Act; describes each vaccine’s compensable, adverse side effects; and indicates how soon after vaccination those side effects should first manifest themselves.
But you can tell they are learning — this time they gave the fictional approved version a pronounceable name…