Gazit et al. in August 2021 told us COVID naïve vaccinees had a 13.06 increased risk of infection compared to those prior infected; then why did the media, the medical establishment, CDC, NIH, FDA,
Gazit et al. in August 2021 told us COVID naïve vaccinees had a 13.06 increased risk of infection compared to those prior infected; then why did the media, the medical establishment, CDC, NIH, FDA,
PHAC, SAGE, Health Canada etc. disregard this key study that those with natural immunity (prior infection) had far greater protection than that conferred by the COVID mRNA technology vaccine?
Worth noting the Lee county in Florida has just passed a "Ban the jab" resolution 👍👍. We just need to keep pushing in our local areas. More action = faster disclosure = national impact = saving many lives, but especially the children 💯
They have the level of morality of a neocon, i.e., none. They are like neocons but instead seek to butcher their own people rather than just those of othe races. Also, they would not get those big bucks that pay for upgrading their yachts if they did not push the Malone, Weissman and Kariko et al mRNA technology based fraud shots.
One must wonder about the so-called vaccine induced “immunity” if a CDC Massachusetts study of 469 “fully jabbinated” persons resulted 346/74 percent got Covid and 4/5 required hospitalization? Known since July 2021. On what basis does anyone claim the jabs provided any protection? Why did the 26 percent not get Covid?
Why? Does anybody in the world know how to protect the human body against dead viruses??? It is the same as protecting ourselves from dead enemies... They are harmless. But, if an illusion can be created for people to believe they need to protect themselves against dead viruses, or dead people, or something else, and then convince them they need to be injected every few months with something that in reality makes them more likely to be sick, then you can be assured of a continues business in bogus drug developments, so-called vaccines or gene therapies...
It is a perfect business model if you buy enough people and media to spread the propaganda...
If you get a cold or flu, how often do you get it again within years?
Those who haven't had a cold or flu for years are more likely to get sick than those that were recently ill.
So if you compare the 2 groups, those who were recently ill would appear to have greater immunity. No, less incidence in a set, limited, period of time.
If you recently changed the air filter in your car, what are the odds it will plug up vs a filter that hasn't been changed in years?
It's so obvious why they ignored the science. It interfered with their plans.
Worth noting the Lee county in Florida has just passed a "Ban the jab" resolution 👍👍. We just need to keep pushing in our local areas. More action = faster disclosure = national impact = saving many lives, but especially the children 💯
https://www.leegop.org/ban-the-jab-resolution/
They have the level of morality of a neocon, i.e., none. They are like neocons but instead seek to butcher their own people rather than just those of othe races. Also, they would not get those big bucks that pay for upgrading their yachts if they did not push the Malone, Weissman and Kariko et al mRNA technology based fraud shots.
One must wonder about the so-called vaccine induced “immunity” if a CDC Massachusetts study of 469 “fully jabbinated” persons resulted 346/74 percent got Covid and 4/5 required hospitalization? Known since July 2021. On what basis does anyone claim the jabs provided any protection? Why did the 26 percent not get Covid?
Why? Does anybody in the world know how to protect the human body against dead viruses??? It is the same as protecting ourselves from dead enemies... They are harmless. But, if an illusion can be created for people to believe they need to protect themselves against dead viruses, or dead people, or something else, and then convince them they need to be injected every few months with something that in reality makes them more likely to be sick, then you can be assured of a continues business in bogus drug developments, so-called vaccines or gene therapies...
It is a perfect business model if you buy enough people and media to spread the propaganda...
Natural immunity is a safer defense to fight illness than a bioweapon that changes your DNA and weakens your immunity.
Feed your immunity for a strong defense against illness.
It is no SCIENCE. Is an AI image of false and corrupted activities ???
Because the intent was harm, not health.
https://rumble.com/v2zhksy-growth-of-a-monster-the-damning-words-of-depopulator-dennis-meadows-the-clu.html
If you get a cold or flu, how often do you get it again within years?
Those who haven't had a cold or flu for years are more likely to get sick than those that were recently ill.
So if you compare the 2 groups, those who were recently ill would appear to have greater immunity. No, less incidence in a set, limited, period of time.
If you recently changed the air filter in your car, what are the odds it will plug up vs a filter that hasn't been changed in years?