24 Comments

There was no testing they have no idea of the long term effects of this experimental drug on infants long term.

Expand full comment

Dr. A

Who won the free subscription if they could present one time that Trump went against the HHS recommendations ?

I noted he closed the border to China.

Expand full comment

I just read the summary of the linked research. Unfortunately THIS is how the authors interpret the results of their study, quoting:

"However, as only trace quantities are present and a clear translational activity is absent, we believe breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe, especially 48 h after vaccination."

Their lack of caution in the face of exposing newborns to the unknowns of a new, untested, suspicious technology is outrageous and infuriating.

Expand full comment

Aww Paul, do you really think the lying greedy sociopaths that don't give a crap about all the documented irreversible damage the conventional vaccines given in pregnancy already cause, or the deaths and autism caused by newborn Hep B vaccines, or the autism et al from infant vaccines given in the first 3 years of life, or the problems annual flu shots cause to seniors especially those with comorbidities and kidney disease, will suddenly get ashamed and contrite because we now have proof that they have not been truthful with us about how artificial modRNA-based chemicals can go systemic and show up in breast milk to possibly harm or kill a baby?

Expand full comment

EXPOSE THEM ALL. The truth is before our eyes. And for billions, it is not just before them, it is in them ... on a cellular level

Expand full comment

F the Lancet, now that they print something you agree with they are experts again.

Again F them, keep them stocked up next to the toilet, but not for reading.

Expand full comment

I read your stories and yes, you did say that right from the beginning, and they denied it every time evil they should all be thrown in jail and the key thrown away

Expand full comment