Horowitz & el gato malo (bad cat) on the money again! The case of counting infections, hospitalizations, & deaths immediately post vaccine (1-14 days) as 'unvaccinated'; this is the fraud of Pfizer
Horowitz & el gato malo (bad cat) on the money again! The case of counting infections, hospitalizations, & deaths immediately post vaccine (1-14 days) as 'unvaccinated'; this is the fraud of Pfizer
All who have done this, to count infections, hospitalizations, & deaths immediate post vaccine as 'unvaccinated' is the great CRIME of the vaccine developers, medical journals & FDA to allow it
Thank you for continuing to shine a blinding spotlight on the fundamental issues surrounding the COVID vaccines, Paul. I love el gato malo (bad cat) too!
Recently childhood vaxxes have been uncovered as doing this, causing increased childhood mortality in the vaxxed vs unvaxxed. This has been going on for decades. I caught on years ago, when I realized we got flu every time we got our flu shots (another similar scam, I found after researching), wish I'd seen it sooner.
This is another of the many lies told us. You’re “unvaccinated” until day 15 post dose two. We’ve known this for over a year, but no one gave two shits about it.
Practicing physicians doing elder care know this effect very well, so they don't vaccinate the very sick & old. Thus these very vulnerable cases are including in deaths for unvaccinated, this also skews the results favorably to vaccine efficacy. This also causes survivor bias because the most vulnerable of the vaccinated are killed in the first 2 weeks leaving a more healthy population.
They also test the unvaccinated more frequently thus falsely making the infection rate artificially higher.
We know for sure natural immunity is far superior than vaccine induced immunity. We also know the vaxxed have a high reinfection rate. So if you properly do studies for a longer term i.e. >1 year, the vaxxed will have a much higher hospitalization & death rate compared to the unvaxxed than the short term studies indicate.
And all of that doesn't include all the deaths & hospitalizations due to vaccine side effects.
Despite this, no one will win in all this. The unvaccinated were wise and suspicious enough to avoid this, but they will not be rewarded for their decision or for having endured losing their freedoms never seen before in modern Western democracies.
Many of us have been pointing this out for a year now. It is the biggest fraud of the covid era (among many serious contenders). To label the recently vaccinated as "unvaccinated" hides the fact that 50% of COVID vaccine deaths occur within 48 hours, and 80% (observed so far) occur within two weeks. This mislabeling not only ignores the high morbidity and mortality rates, for which evidence abounds all over the world, but also supported Biden's forecast of "a winter of sickness and death for the unvaccinated," when that was more specifically the case for the recently vaccinated.
Evidence against safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines:
"All who have done this, to count infections, hospitalizations, & deaths immediate post vaccine as 'unvaccinated' is the great CRIME of the vaccine developers, medical journals & FDA to allow it"
Indeed it is crime of the highest order known colloquially as Enron accounting in DC contractor realms. It's highly prized job skill among Congressional staff, Beltway Bandits and K Street lobbyists. It's the secret sauce that gives us $900 hammers and trillions in perpetuity for F-35s.
They took the counting system from casinos' green zero on roulette wheels also with 18 black and red. "Your chances of hitting a black or red are equal, 47.4%. This translates to a 52.6% probability that the house will be scooping up all your chips on a black/red bet. The 5.26% 'spread' is known as the house edge." One of Pfizer's 'green zeros' is the 14 days, those days from injection until you're categorized as vaccinated. This counting system will always favor the house.
Just FYI the math in the el gato post you linked is incorrect, and the conclusion is wrong. In the data presented, no "worry window" effect is evident - the rates for the "early pre-booster" are actually *less* than those for double-vax. (Maybe the effect exists in the 7 days of data they *didn't* include). He then makes a serious error in combining the rates (adding ratios with different denominators).
This is not to say that the "worry window" effect is false - in fact, it is quite evident in the UK weekly data. But the impact of the "worry window" is not very significant for an individual taking the vaccine: the added risk in those two weeks is not large when amortized over the subsequent period of effectiveness.
The more important effect has to do with the *epidemic* impact of many people accepting the vaccine and experiencing the "worry window" together. This effectively increases R0 in the short term, and leads to the dramatic rises in case rates coinciding with vaccine rollouts that have been observed around the world.
And of course, this says nothing about long term consequences, possible damage to the immune system, side effect, etc, which are all somewhere between possible and confirmed.
Anyway, gato is usually pretty on target, and I follow him, but I would caution that this specific post is in error.
They like to play a lot of parlor tricks like that. In this instance, they are illegitimately transferring conclusions which might hold in the immunological domain (not counting as vaxed until advertised antibody count is present and someone is regarded as "immunized") to the domains of whatever other paths the products go and have some sorts of (partially unknown) effects that have nothing to do with the "immunized" status.
Since this is so incredibly obvious, fraud must be the right term - they can't be *that* stupid.
My belief from the way Pfizer and all the other culprits down to our local health departments rolling out the numbers was done in such a manner to create fear and panic, early on. The main stream media, social media, professional journals, just everything influencers could get ahold of, all had their hands in it. If anyone had crunched the numbers using simple math you could see it. Dr's and Scientists confirming what was in many of our guts. I have much praise for those who had the courage to speak out. As a nurse seeing patients being sent home sick with out any type of treatment that could have helped prevent them from getting sicker. No methylprednisolone, inhaled medications ect. Nothing. Go home and if you start having having trouble breathing call 911. I have lost respect of those Dr's who bowed to administrative pressure and did this. And so many are still out there pedaling false information about early treatment to patients prevents them from getting early care. Now with everyone of our Frontline Dr's and scientists developing early treatment protocols that I know 1st hand that work, being labeled as frauds providing misinformation make me sick. And these evil beings are doubling down.
Just today I saw a neighbor boy who has autism (nonverbal) and his sitter an ABA behavior therapist all masked up outside for a walk. In Florida. I would have said something but don't know them well and didn't want to cross that line in case the boy's parents insist that she where the mask at their home. We talked for a minute and she told me she was working on his verbal skills. I also have a son with autism and know 1st hand that being visual learners kids with or without autism need to read lips and facial expressions to learn to communicate and social cues. What a complete travesty. My biggest challenge is how to get through the fear porn when trying to educate people so as not to offend. Some of those who have had the shot are now aware that they can still get sick. So the Gov. health tzar fear mongers and big Pharma march on with the fear porn to continue to control people.
The hypocrisy is even worse than you think. The Bar-On et al. NEJM paper which was used to justify boosters way back in late summer 2021 protrays boosters as being effective in… ONLY 1 day!! Go to supplementary appendix figure S4 and observe the left portion of the graph.
In just one day, infections are aupposedly reduced by a factor of 3!! They even have the audacity to show error bars indicating certainty that boosters reduce covid infections by of factor between about 2 and 4… after just ONE DAY. It is an obvious lie! And it obscures the *decrease* in effectiveness (likey to values below 1) in preventing infection between days 2 and about 7.
Clearly, there is a testing bias wherein unvaxed (unboosted) are simply tested more often than vaxed (boosted). Or else the statistical approach is manipulated.
You are right- they know what they are doing! This is a CRIME!!
Thank you for continuing to shine a blinding spotlight on the fundamental issues surrounding the COVID vaccines, Paul. I love el gato malo (bad cat) too!
Recently childhood vaxxes have been uncovered as doing this, causing increased childhood mortality in the vaxxed vs unvaxxed. This has been going on for decades. I caught on years ago, when I realized we got flu every time we got our flu shots (another similar scam, I found after researching), wish I'd seen it sooner.
This is another of the many lies told us. You’re “unvaccinated” until day 15 post dose two. We’ve known this for over a year, but no one gave two shits about it.
Practicing physicians doing elder care know this effect very well, so they don't vaccinate the very sick & old. Thus these very vulnerable cases are including in deaths for unvaccinated, this also skews the results favorably to vaccine efficacy. This also causes survivor bias because the most vulnerable of the vaccinated are killed in the first 2 weeks leaving a more healthy population.
They also test the unvaccinated more frequently thus falsely making the infection rate artificially higher.
We know for sure natural immunity is far superior than vaccine induced immunity. We also know the vaxxed have a high reinfection rate. So if you properly do studies for a longer term i.e. >1 year, the vaxxed will have a much higher hospitalization & death rate compared to the unvaxxed than the short term studies indicate.
And all of that doesn't include all the deaths & hospitalizations due to vaccine side effects.
Yes, yet another of 1000's of crimes.
Despite this, no one will win in all this. The unvaccinated were wise and suspicious enough to avoid this, but they will not be rewarded for their decision or for having endured losing their freedoms never seen before in modern Western democracies.
Many of us have been pointing this out for a year now. It is the biggest fraud of the covid era (among many serious contenders). To label the recently vaccinated as "unvaccinated" hides the fact that 50% of COVID vaccine deaths occur within 48 hours, and 80% (observed so far) occur within two weeks. This mislabeling not only ignores the high morbidity and mortality rates, for which evidence abounds all over the world, but also supported Biden's forecast of "a winter of sickness and death for the unvaccinated," when that was more specifically the case for the recently vaccinated.
Evidence against safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines:
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/trading-covid-for-heart-disease-buys
"All who have done this, to count infections, hospitalizations, & deaths immediate post vaccine as 'unvaccinated' is the great CRIME of the vaccine developers, medical journals & FDA to allow it"
Indeed it is crime of the highest order known colloquially as Enron accounting in DC contractor realms. It's highly prized job skill among Congressional staff, Beltway Bandits and K Street lobbyists. It's the secret sauce that gives us $900 hammers and trillions in perpetuity for F-35s.
A great, clear explanation of the fraud taking place.
They took the counting system from casinos' green zero on roulette wheels also with 18 black and red. "Your chances of hitting a black or red are equal, 47.4%. This translates to a 52.6% probability that the house will be scooping up all your chips on a black/red bet. The 5.26% 'spread' is known as the house edge." One of Pfizer's 'green zeros' is the 14 days, those days from injection until you're categorized as vaccinated. This counting system will always favor the house.
Just FYI the math in the el gato post you linked is incorrect, and the conclusion is wrong. In the data presented, no "worry window" effect is evident - the rates for the "early pre-booster" are actually *less* than those for double-vax. (Maybe the effect exists in the 7 days of data they *didn't* include). He then makes a serious error in combining the rates (adding ratios with different denominators).
This is not to say that the "worry window" effect is false - in fact, it is quite evident in the UK weekly data. But the impact of the "worry window" is not very significant for an individual taking the vaccine: the added risk in those two weeks is not large when amortized over the subsequent period of effectiveness.
The more important effect has to do with the *epidemic* impact of many people accepting the vaccine and experiencing the "worry window" together. This effectively increases R0 in the short term, and leads to the dramatic rises in case rates coinciding with vaccine rollouts that have been observed around the world.
And of course, this says nothing about long term consequences, possible damage to the immune system, side effect, etc, which are all somewhere between possible and confirmed.
Anyway, gato is usually pretty on target, and I follow him, but I would caution that this specific post is in error.
They like to play a lot of parlor tricks like that. In this instance, they are illegitimately transferring conclusions which might hold in the immunological domain (not counting as vaxed until advertised antibody count is present and someone is regarded as "immunized") to the domains of whatever other paths the products go and have some sorts of (partially unknown) effects that have nothing to do with the "immunized" status.
Since this is so incredibly obvious, fraud must be the right term - they can't be *that* stupid.
My belief from the way Pfizer and all the other culprits down to our local health departments rolling out the numbers was done in such a manner to create fear and panic, early on. The main stream media, social media, professional journals, just everything influencers could get ahold of, all had their hands in it. If anyone had crunched the numbers using simple math you could see it. Dr's and Scientists confirming what was in many of our guts. I have much praise for those who had the courage to speak out. As a nurse seeing patients being sent home sick with out any type of treatment that could have helped prevent them from getting sicker. No methylprednisolone, inhaled medications ect. Nothing. Go home and if you start having having trouble breathing call 911. I have lost respect of those Dr's who bowed to administrative pressure and did this. And so many are still out there pedaling false information about early treatment to patients prevents them from getting early care. Now with everyone of our Frontline Dr's and scientists developing early treatment protocols that I know 1st hand that work, being labeled as frauds providing misinformation make me sick. And these evil beings are doubling down.
Just today I saw a neighbor boy who has autism (nonverbal) and his sitter an ABA behavior therapist all masked up outside for a walk. In Florida. I would have said something but don't know them well and didn't want to cross that line in case the boy's parents insist that she where the mask at their home. We talked for a minute and she told me she was working on his verbal skills. I also have a son with autism and know 1st hand that being visual learners kids with or without autism need to read lips and facial expressions to learn to communicate and social cues. What a complete travesty. My biggest challenge is how to get through the fear porn when trying to educate people so as not to offend. Some of those who have had the shot are now aware that they can still get sick. So the Gov. health tzar fear mongers and big Pharma march on with the fear porn to continue to control people.
The hypocrisy is even worse than you think. The Bar-On et al. NEJM paper which was used to justify boosters way back in late summer 2021 protrays boosters as being effective in… ONLY 1 day!! Go to supplementary appendix figure S4 and observe the left portion of the graph.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114255
In just one day, infections are aupposedly reduced by a factor of 3!! They even have the audacity to show error bars indicating certainty that boosters reduce covid infections by of factor between about 2 and 4… after just ONE DAY. It is an obvious lie! And it obscures the *decrease* in effectiveness (likey to values below 1) in preventing infection between days 2 and about 7.
Clearly, there is a testing bias wherein unvaxed (unboosted) are simply tested more often than vaxed (boosted). Or else the statistical approach is manipulated.
You are right- they know what they are doing! This is a CRIME!!
Thank you for all your great work and dedication to truth
Thank you for all your great work and dedication to truth