caused deaths, but up to today, you have remained silent, so I ask, what was your role in Remdesivir? Tell us...you know I ask questions I already have answers to...but tell us, tell us...
Nanotechnology is not without risk. The question of whether, and under what circumstances, these materials may cause disease in humans is still very much open; however, enough is known about the potential dangers that all stakeholders – and juries – will expect industry to mitigate risk and engage in product stewardship right now.
If a mass tort scenario comes to pass, companies that are not affirmatively acting to assess and limit risk today could face punitive damages claims in the future.
Furthermore, industry cannot assume that the Plaintiffs Bar will continue to wait for the science to develop further.
While some courts -- particularly in the federal system -- demand definitive proof of causation in humans, that is not true everywhere.
Personal injury cases involving scientifically-suspect causation evidence are not uncommon, and some courts will allow such cases to proceed to verdict.
Moreover, perceived risk alone may be sufficient to support certain claims.
They knew Remdesivir would kill.
That, was their plan.
They are all SHI T and either paid off or threatened with death ect but all COWARDS and murderers nontheless
THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS AND PREVIOUS CRIMES.
Cyan agents have a long military history.
Since the First World War, they have come in many forms and have proven to be formidable chemical weapons, such as Zyklon B.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/remdesivir
THIS SCAM HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR TOO LONG
https://outraged.substack.com/p/pcr
https://outraged.substack.com/p/remdesivir-and-other-nanotechnologies
CONCLUSION
Nanotechnology is not without risk. The question of whether, and under what circumstances, these materials may cause disease in humans is still very much open; however, enough is known about the potential dangers that all stakeholders – and juries – will expect industry to mitigate risk and engage in product stewardship right now.
If a mass tort scenario comes to pass, companies that are not affirmatively acting to assess and limit risk today could face punitive damages claims in the future.
Furthermore, industry cannot assume that the Plaintiffs Bar will continue to wait for the science to develop further.
While some courts -- particularly in the federal system -- demand definitive proof of causation in humans, that is not true everywhere.
Personal injury cases involving scientifically-suspect causation evidence are not uncommon, and some courts will allow such cases to proceed to verdict.
Moreover, perceived risk alone may be sufficient to support certain claims.