7 Comments

Very interesting - and long - analysis/evaluation. Very much worth reviewing - even if a quick "scan" is all you have time for.

The real value here is in attempting, hopefully succeeding in efforts to educate those who prefer to believe the "safe and effective" narrative told by "trusted leaders".

Remember: No one has regretted NOT rolling up a sleeve for this "vax", whereas...

Expand full comment

If this is the first time you’ve read a Midwestern Doctor, then dig into his other writings! Well worth the time!

Expand full comment

Two questions:

1) Were the answers to the questions mapped geographically over the distribution of the varying doses in each vial of jab? Vials of different toxicity levels were distributed to different areas of the country. Could the distribution and frequency of clots correspond to the distribution of different “vax” formulations? And,

2) Where can one go for testing, if one suspects one is a victim of shedding, to find out if one actually has any detectable blood or other “vax” caused abnormalities?

Expand full comment

Dr Paul, Dr Jane Ruby was the first to expose these clots in August 2022. She's the one who found Hirschman, vetted him and taught him how to interview.

She and Mike Adams were the first to do an analysis of the clots.

https://rumble.com/v2yqt04-dr.-jane-ruby-and-mike-adams-reveal-post-vaccine-clot-analysis-with-new-lab.html

Expand full comment

I second this recommendation. Outstandingly important.

Expand full comment

“don’t worry, trust the experts”

“safe and effective”

“could have been worse”

Expand full comment