ICELAND: Stillbirths and infant mortality rates increased by 80% between years “The increase in perinatal mortality is 82% in 2021 compared to the average of the previous nine years before that.'

This is horrifying. CDC is trying to bury /distract/lie about impact on pregnant women.

Just noticed yesterday - The CDC website changed its language from from Pregnant Women to Pregnant People. The NIH website is in the process of changing. SMH. Did Congress vote on this change? Please send me the memo. I must have missed it. Screenshots in the tweet below.

Shame on the obgyns and women injecting themselves while pregnant, nursing or even trying to be one pregnant. All the other cations around foods and meds to avoid, but this brand new shot for a nuisance illness makes sense?! Pure stupidity of mothers, evil of doctors.

The NEJM study showed that 82% of first trimester women suffered miscarriages after the jab, though they tried to hide it by adding another 700 women into the survey.

I’ll say this again! Pregnant women are told not eat lunch meat! Cold cuts!

But their docs are telling them to take an experimental, new, gene therapy! Someone has to think about this and stop young women and pregnant women from taking these drugs!

Hmmmm... I wonder if the sample size is too small to draw a definite conclusion. If it continues for another year, then there is a trend. This potential for misreading of statistics happens in any small country, where one death makes a huge difference is statistics.

A retired doctor, Dr. Bruchet, in Vancouver, BC, was tossed into the psych ward for pointing out the increase in perinatal deaths after the vax roll-out there.

I suspect we will hear more about this "adverse effect"

Didn't governments and health czars start telling everyone(including while pregnant) they need flu shots in 2003-2004? Maybe that could explain the high number in 2004🤔

A few of these stats are pretty weird. First off, that male to female birth ratio of 1,119 boys for every 1,000 girls is straight out of one child era China. A normal ratio is about 104 to 100. Iceland is about 150 girls "short" out of a total of about 5000. That's not coincidence. SO... are they aborting girls, or is the "vaccine" impacting girls disproportionately?

Second: the neonatal mortality rate. The US is somewhere around 4 per 1000 and has one of the worst rates in the developed world. So Iceland increasing to 2.3 per 1000 is still quite a bit better than the US.

Third: the infant mortality rate. It's been gyrating pretty wildly. The US's infant mortality rate is around 6 per 1000, again one of the worst in the developed world. On the whole Iceland seems to be doing worse than the US, and it's taken a sharp turn for the worse in the last two years.

I realize that with about 5000 babies born each year, the mortality rate can gyrate just due to the small numbers (if 35 babies die, the infant mortality rate will be 7 per 1000), but still...the gyrations seem to go beyond random variation. I'm a math geek, so let me say - if the true average of infant deaths "should" be 36 in a given year, then one standard deviation would be the square root of 36, or 6. Deaths should be within the range of 30 to 42 2 years out of 3, so the mortality rate would be 6 to 8.4 two years out of three.

I find it just weird that their neonatal mortality rate looks good compared to the US, but the infant mortality rate looks horrible (about twice "normal" US rates in 2020 and worse in 2021).

This is horrifying. CDC is trying to bury /distract/lie about impact on pregnant women.

Just noticed yesterday - The CDC website changed its language from from Pregnant Women to Pregnant People. The NIH website is in the process of changing. SMH. Did Congress vote on this change? Please send me the memo. I must have missed it. Screenshots in the tweet below.

Thx.https://twitter.com/MLMurville/status/1521115419452583936?s=20&t=rHkjVRZ1gphPryvOCICAqw

Shame on the obgyns and women injecting themselves while pregnant, nursing or even trying to be one pregnant. All the other cations around foods and meds to avoid, but this brand new shot for a nuisance illness makes sense?! Pure stupidity of mothers, evil of doctors.

The NEJM study showed that 82% of first trimester women suffered miscarriages after the jab, though they tried to hide it by adding another 700 women into the survey.

This is probably why the criminals behind the "vaccines" refer to them as "effective." Safe, not so much...

Just came to the comments to post this exact observation ... which one also often sees expressed as, "It's working!"

Looks like we're all just going to have to change that expression from "Safe and Effective" to "Not safe, in order to be effective!"

edited May 2, 2022I’ll say this again! Pregnant women are told not eat lunch meat! Cold cuts!

But their docs are telling them to take an experimental, new, gene therapy! Someone has to think about this and stop young women and pregnant women from taking these drugs!

The "gift" of the jabs that just keeps giving.

Horrors just continue to give us greater and greater energy to focus... on Ultimate victory over the Pyschos of the Great Reset..

Hmmmm... I wonder if the sample size is too small to draw a definite conclusion. If it continues for another year, then there is a trend. This potential for misreading of statistics happens in any small country, where one death makes a huge difference is statistics.

edited May 3, 2022A retired doctor, Dr. Bruchet, in Vancouver, BC, was tossed into the psych ward for pointing out the increase in perinatal deaths after the vax roll-out there.

I suspect we will hear more about this "adverse effect"

What is the number of pregnancies “naturally terminated” early from jabs / jab-shedding?

Didn't governments and health czars start telling everyone(including while pregnant) they need flu shots in 2003-2004? Maybe that could explain the high number in 2004🤔

A few of these stats are pretty weird. First off, that male to female birth ratio of 1,119 boys for every 1,000 girls is straight out of one child era China. A normal ratio is about 104 to 100. Iceland is about 150 girls "short" out of a total of about 5000. That's not coincidence. SO... are they aborting girls, or is the "vaccine" impacting girls disproportionately?

Second: the neonatal mortality rate. The US is somewhere around 4 per 1000 and has one of the worst rates in the developed world. So Iceland increasing to 2.3 per 1000 is still quite a bit better than the US.

Third: the infant mortality rate. It's been gyrating pretty wildly. The US's infant mortality rate is around 6 per 1000, again one of the worst in the developed world. On the whole Iceland seems to be doing worse than the US, and it's taken a sharp turn for the worse in the last two years.

I realize that with about 5000 babies born each year, the mortality rate can gyrate just due to the small numbers (if 35 babies die, the infant mortality rate will be 7 per 1000), but still...the gyrations seem to go beyond random variation. I'm a math geek, so let me say - if the true average of infant deaths "should" be 36 in a given year, then one standard deviation would be the square root of 36, or 6. Deaths should be within the range of 30 to 42 2 years out of 3, so the mortality rate would be 6 to 8.4 two years out of three.

I find it just weird that their neonatal mortality rate looks good compared to the US, but the infant mortality rate looks horrible (about twice "normal" US rates in 2020 and worse in 2021).

Wow I hadn't seen this when I wrote my piece.

Very much aligned.

https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/can-vaccines-be-dangerous-to-pregnant?

Those statistics are awful. Psychopaths!!!

This is criminal, why would so many do as there told without thinking for themselves?