22 Comments

Trump needs to win for anyone to be held accountable. We need a miracle.

Expand full comment

Why do you say that? Has Trump got a track record for applying the force of law?

Expand full comment

Trump is great at putting off his own form of "Court Justice" - it seems to me that the Justice this time around, is playing a wait and see game, after all, if Trump gets to be POTUS that Justice still wants his job and his pay packet - if Trump is not made POTUS and Harris is, the gloves will come off real quick, I'm thinking. If Trump was a horse in a horse race, I'd say he would be a good bet for a place at least in the final race, if he gets to be POTUS, not my bet anyway - and I don't like Harris either - I wish Bobby had stood his ground and stayed a POTUS candidate, even if he failed. Now there is nobody other than Trump or Harris - damned shame.

Expand full comment

Christine, I may be wrong but I think I heard Booby say he is still on the ballot "by himself" in the Blue States. I think he agreed to "withdraw" only in the swing states and be a supporter, there, of Trump. (Preumably in the red states Trump will win.)

To my recollection, the swing states are Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, oops can't recall the other 2, maybe Wisconsin?

Expand full comment

I am not American and I can't vote - it is just that as an observer, I don't like Harris or Trump and Trump for things past he was part of, but refused to accept any responsibility for - a great leader, Trump leads from behind and lets others take the fall for him and as Berenson said, both he and Biden ducked call up to Vietnam, Trump once and Biden 5 TIMES - not the sort of persons who you need to lead you anywhere, when their first prerogative is me, myself and I.

Expand full comment

This is what we got----- as opposed to the alternative that has its own track record. Which will you choose?

Expand full comment

Yes., reason leads one to believe Trumps' got a record for applying the force of law.

Expand full comment

Hello Terry. Maybe I shouldn't use sarcasm. I really want to know. Did he get anyone indicted for a crime of the sort we substackers are yelping about? How does one "reason" to find evidence of a record? He was president right smack dab up to Jan 20 at 11:59am in 2021.

Expand full comment

We have had two, Millimeter Miracle, God on Golf Course ..Trump 2024

Expand full comment

Ahem. I'll endorse your second statement: We need a miracle.

Expand full comment

"Adding another voice" is fine and good - always welcomed! - but the truth is that we have plenty of voices, what we need now are men of ACTION, not more talkers. First let's get there, then let's see if the talk will materialize. Don't ever forget that "lock her up" and "drain the swamp" **NEVER** happened, despite being chanted *thousands* of times. Words won't impress me, only significant actions will.

Expand full comment
author

kaboom...always on the money

Expand full comment

He might not have drained the swamp, but he cut off their war machine and green policies for four years. As Dr. P says, he has learnt a lot since then, and is recently learning from RFKJr as well as his bioweapon injured supporters.

Expand full comment

Exactly, he provided a **temporary** delay to a PERMANENT problem.

That doesn't cut it in my book. WORSE YET ....

Trump advanced some **permanent** action items on the Globalist's list. One example:

In record time (6 weeks), Trump signed the Banking for All Act (BAA) in May 2020. The BAA was one giant step forward towards a cashless, digital economy -- the one that the Globalists are foaming at the mouth to have ASAP. YUP, Trump did that.

But listen, I'm all for HOPE - maybe Trump has "learned". He may get a chance to prove who/what he actually is. In Round 1 Trump got an F-minus against the Globalists.

Expand full comment

Coders in every hospital have probably witnessed the same as the following whistleblower.

Witness to Tragedy: 'HUGE' Financial Incentives Led Hospitals to Use COVID Treatments That Killed Patients

Zowe Smith had a fairly mundane job. As a medical coder at an Arizona hospital, her job was to take information from patient records and “translate that into diagnosis and procedure codes.”

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Sep 23

READ IN APP

Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:

Zowe Smith and Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. September 19, 2024

Zowe Smith, who left her job as a medical coder in an Arizona hospital, joined “The Defender In-Depth” to discuss how the use of ventilators and remdesivir unnecessarily caused the deaths of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals.

Zowe Smith had a fairly mundane job. As a medical coder at an Arizona hospital, her job was to take information from patient records and “translate that into diagnosis and procedure codes.”

But when the COVID-19 shots and COVID-19 hospital protocols were introduced, Smith began to see things she’d never before seen in her career.

“We all believe that this is where people are supposed to go to get better … the hospital is supposed to help you,” Smith told “The Defender In-Depth” this week. “That’s not what was happening.”

Smith resigned and started speaking out about the suffering she saw recorded on patient medical records. She is the author of “The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult.” She also writes regularly on Substack.

Patients were ‘circling the drain’ soon after administration of COVID protocols

Smith said that medical coding, aside from being used for insurance purposes, is used to track the number of cases of diseases and illnesses regionally and nationwide.

Her job was to expose “the patterns of disease going on” in the population — and she said what she observed during the pandemic led her to begin questioning.

“Even when I was experiencing what I saw, it was almost unbelievable that this could even happen in a hospital,” said Smith, who first noticed abnormalities when the hospital started implementing COVID-19 protocols.

“I started noticing … patients trying to escape the hospital, like unplugging things, pulling out vent tubes and escaping … then I started to hear rumors about the ventilators and I knew that there was a bonus for [giving] remdesivir,” Smith said.

Smith said patients coming in with cold and flu symptoms were treated differently than they had been before the COVID-19 outbreak. “Before COVID, a cold, flu or pneumonia case, you would normally be home within three days, maybe a week, unless you had other major conditions.”

Before the pandemic, patients were rarely placed on ventilators. Smith said:

“Before the pandemic and the hospital protocols began, we did not connect patients to ventilators right away. It wasn’t until they were in dire straits and we had tried every other method that they would be put on a ventilator, and then they would be coming off those ventilators as soon as possible.”

But under the COVID-19 hospital protocols, patients “would be on the ventilators for 30 days or more sometimes, which was incredibly rare,” Smith said. “On top of that, they weren’t talking about disconnecting these patients from the ventilator, which should be something they’re talking about within 24 hours, because the longer you’re on, the less likely you are to come off the ventilator.”

Under the COVID-19 protocols, doctors “went straight to the ventilator” even if patient oxygen levels had not reached “the threshold where we would normally ventilate a person.”

Patients who were given remdesivir developed kidney failure within a few days. “I could see the lab values … they were getting worse almost immediately after the administration of remdesivir,” she said.

Smith described the pattern she observed: “Patient comes in, patient gets COVID diagnosis, patient [is] given a dose of remdesivir,” Smith said. “Pretty soon, they’re on vents. Pretty soon they have kidney failure and then they’re circling the drain and nothing that we could do would save them.”

Visits by loved ones were limited or prohibited due to pandemic restrictions and the hospital protocols — and this took a “horrific” toll on patients, Smith said.

According to Smith, patient records showed instances of “the police getting called to the hospitals” to eject “people that were trying to visit … dying loved ones or loved ones that were … being harmed by the hospital protocols.”

Smith said these patterns were evident to her as a medical coder. “Every note that happens between a nurse and a patient is documented. There’s social information that’s documented. There’s information from ambulance documentation that gets added to the medical record.”

‘Huge incentive’ for ‘financially kneecapped’ hospitals to implement protocols

According to Smith, at the start of the pandemic, hospitals were placed under financial pressure — which later incentivized them to accept payments for implementing the COVID-19 hospital protocols.

“When the world was asked to lock down … hospitals were also issued mandates … that they needed to shut down their OR [operating rooms], which is their bread and butter. That’s where most of their money is made,” she said.

Hospitals also had to “increase their ICU [intensive care unit] bed capacity” and “reduce the number of patients in the ICU beds,” Smith said.

This “financially kneecapped hospitals for many months, from about March [2020] to May, when we were told we had to make room for this expected wave of COVID patients, which never came,” Smith said.

In the summer of 2020, after Congress passed the CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act), the COVID-19 protocols “came down to us from the NIH” — the National Institutes of Health. The protocols prescribed the use of remdesivir and ventilators for suspected COVID-19 patients and financially incentivized struggling hospitals to use them.

Hospitals “got 20% for every single dose of remdesivir they gave to a patient … they got the bonus for it being a COVID patient to begin with. And then if the patient goes on a ventilator … they got the maximum payment,” she said.

Hospitals hid vaccine injuries by not inquiring about vaccination status

Smith said medical records also contained evidence of patient injuries following administration of the COVID-19 vaccines.

“I began seeing some incredibly crazy cases,” Smith said. “I began to notice more cases … of near-instant death, like within an hour of multi-organ failure. Massive inflammation, brain death, things that we had never, ever seen before. In my 11 years of medical coding, I had never seen a case like that.”

She added:

“Most of those patients that had sepsis and the massive, whole-body inflammation did not make it. There were a lot of cases of seizures that were uncontrollable … and then people started to arrive with brain inflammation, encephalitis … some of them suffering from stroke-like symptoms. All of a sudden, massive blood clots coming in. And these were in young people. These were not elderly people with comorbidities.”

Yet, according to Smith, hospitals would not inquire about patients’ vaccination status, making it impossible to diagnose these conditions as vaccine injuries. “They weren’t asking the right questions [and] weren’t writing it in the medical record.”

Smith said she felt the need to turn her experience “into something positive.”

“Maybe I can take this information and put it out there so that people can be warned and they can know what’s going on,” Smith said. “To me, it’s about saving lives and it’s about helping us figure out what happened.”

Watch ‘The Defender In-Depth’ here:

Source: childrenshealthdefense.org

Expand full comment

You are SPOT ON!!!! But one would assume and hope that "he" would rise to the occasion and start the process.

CORRECT!!! Enough with the talk. I agree, Jorge

Expand full comment
author

yes

Expand full comment

Yes! WE ARE COUNTING ON Bobby Jr. to lend the weight of his legal background, expertise. and valuable work to the all-important challenges that stand before us.

Expand full comment
author

yes, he is good but now he appears silent...silenced....troubling to me

Expand full comment

Troubling, or smart. They know from internal polling it's a done deal (also Senate/House) - so why spook the deep state into another assassination or even worse, a nuclear war?

On day one, they clean out the FDA/CDC leadership and others with pharma connections. Then these agencies start releasing the real data, including the 770 safety signals they hid.

On day x, DT states he never would have let the jabs continue if he'd seen that data, including the Pfizer papers from mid-'21 showing massive death/injury in a short time period. He then signs an EO banning all genetic injections in the US.

By then, public outrage will be so great, he can set up a special prosecutor, maybe a hundred or thousand special prosecutors to go after the perps. The food chain is not that long, and Billy boy will also end up in a Fed Supermax, hopefully on death row.

Expand full comment

Trump FINALLY Responds to the COVID Vaccine Question

He answered that studies are on the way, and we’ll find out the truth about the COVID shots, one way or another “over the next 12 months.”

Trump didn’t deny problems with the COVID shots. Instead, he suggested that we’ll find out soon.

What this tells us is that Trump is likely trying to play both sides until AFTER the election. He mentioned that a disaffected Democrat who would surely vote for him continually asks Trump why he doesn’t mention the COVID vaccines more often.

It seems that Trump doesn’t want to alienate these kinds of voters, so don’t expect him to weigh in on whether the COVID vaccines are good or bad this election cycle.

However, what’s promising is that it appears that a resolution to the COVID vaccine question is on the way.

The Viligant Fox

Trump was never televised as being seen having his vaccine shots which he pushed into all American's with his Operation Warp Speed, what's good for the Gander, was not good for this Goose, I'm thinking:

This is the US Army (AUKUS) contract with Pfizer for the supply of the vaccines which Trump signed after giving himself sole responsibility to do that under the Defense Production Act and which the US Army then supplied to all - for Trump's Operation Warp Speed, which you will see referenced third paragraph down.

https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/DOD-ATI-Pfizer-Technical-Direction-Letter-OTA-W15QKN-16-9-1002-21July2020.pdf

Why should the vaccine question be off the table, until after the POTUS, with regards to Trump - we all know about Harris, she is 100% in favour of the vaccines and all of her support staff have to be fully vaccinated, which probably means she is too - but not Trump?

Expand full comment

Swift Justice needed here. This was murder.

Expand full comment