18 Comments

Yandex, Dr. Paul. When Brave disapoints me, Yandex comes through. Which happens increasingly frequently.

Expand full comment

Thank you, fantastic and detailed share 😊🙏

Expand full comment

Paul, Mike Yeadon has written to Dr Tess Lawrie asking her to stop pushing ivermectin.

He writes:

Tess knows perfectly well by now that there was no pandemic. No new illness called Covid19. 

So I ask her publicly to state why she continues to promote “early treatment” for a non-existent illness.

Now, it’s entirely possible that any agent, used off-label, has some utility. A great many prescription medications have some utility in illnesses that were not the initial illness for which they were developed. I’m not disputing that. 

However, I am very troubled by anyone pushing the line that “regulators sought to block the use of lifesaving medications during the covid pandemic”, because there was no pandemic.

I wish I didn’t think this, but I can find no other motive for pushing this line, except to amplify the campaign of fear that the perpetrators intend you to feel, in relation to “future pandemics”.

There aren’t going to be future pandemics. They are a lie. They are a hobgoblin designed to frighten you into allowing the authorities to steal what’s left of your freedoms and all of your medical autonomy.

Tess, please stop doing this.

All doctors engaged in the same or related activities. Please stop doing this.

If you think I’ve misunderstood what you’re doing, please contact me. If I’ve got it wrong, I will issue a grovelling apology.

Best wishes 

Mike 

Now the Wellness Company is selling ivermectin for use against Covid. If Yeadon is right then there is a problem here!

HOW CAN IT SELL IVERMECTIN IF THERE IS NO PANDEMIC AND POSSIBLY NO VIRUS?

Expand full comment
Apr 29·edited Apr 29

Consider this. Ivrmectin is being studied as a useful drug for curing and preventing cancer. It's great for parasites! It won a Nobel prize..Now, consider that the spike is not a virus, but bioweapon with many mechanisms of action. Ivermectin helps the cells clean themselves out. I think.Dr Yeadon is missing the point

People became deathly ill by SOMETHING. The fact that there are scientists finding nano bots and parasites and snake venom means there are many mechanisms of DEATH. IVERMECTIN seems to help. I wish doctors would stop fighting with eachother and admit, this is not a viral pandemic, but in fact , a mass poisoning. Imo...

Expand full comment

Like your reasoning. I don’t know if Yeadon is right or not.

Expand full comment

Well, all the info about VIRUSES is coming to light. It's hard to accept that the science behind it is flawed. THEY have pushed it for so long. I certainly had to come to terms with the fraud. Having said that, Dr Yeadon has a very militant "moderator" Tim West, on his telegram and substack channels who berates and clown faces anyone who can't wrap their head around the virus theory being a fraud. Maybe , he has been influenced to take a side,. I just think.there is so much more to the story. I've never trusted the medical, scientific community. Too many sociopaths. Funnily, the etymology of the word virus, is poisen, or snake venom. I would like to know how the herpes virus, that effects a majority of the planet, can not exist. SOMETHING IS THERE. And these anti virus people explain it as it being debris from a cell cleaning itself out. Exosomes. But what does that mean and why could you pass that to.somrone else? Those questions have not been answered. Other than to say, poisens can be transfered. I think it would be more advantageous, to discuss whether vaccines actually work? There will.always be poisens. The question is, if we INJECT THEM directly into our bloodstream, will ithat actually provide immunity......

Expand full comment

By their (the no-virus club's) explanation, you get drunk when the guy next to you at the bar drinks 10 whiskeys.

For something shed from one person to affect another, it can't be a toxin, because you're not consuming 1/4th of their body unless you're a cannibal.

Think about that please; you're getting about one part in a million of whatever is in their body and is causing them trouble, when you're inhaling some bits of dander, or aerosol, or droplets from their breath. Even if you're swalling a gram or two of their bodily fluids, that's 2 grams out of 60+ kilograms, or one part in 30,000.

That's not enough to get you drunk, or intoxicated.

The only way to pick up an infectious pathogen from someone else and have it affect you is: if it multiplies in your own body to such an extent that you start noticing effects from it's action - dis-ease from toxins or immune system reaction, cytokine storm, dead cells and autophagy, etc.

We have a solid understanding of the mechanisms - the bio-chemical mechanisms by which viruses infect cells, hijack the machinery and induce replication.

It's not proven by one scientific paper, it's proven by tens of thousands, and the no-virus klown klub has offered only explanations that do not pass the laugh test.

And who has the greatest degree of self-interest in promoting, funding, and spreading the no-virus scam? Why, the people who have been weaponizing and modifying viruses; also known as Satan.

Expand full comment

Yes indeed. The no virus club made a conclusion based on observing a rather unscientific way of culturing a virus. That it was not , infact a virus they were culturing but in fact bits snd pieces of proteins of who knows what.Claiming it was an impossible conclusion to come to. Oddly that solves nothing. Tim west, the moderator on Dr. YEADONs Substack and telegram will torture anyone who dissagrees with the no virus position. I find that strange. Kinda like " the firmament club"

Expand full comment

RO - Did you happen to get Covid? I mean the early nasty version. Not the omicron head cold. My guess is you did not. Or you would not question its existence.

Expand full comment

I had Covid according to the tests. I was weak for 3 days.

Just one point here: I’m reporting what Yeadon says. I’m not saying I believe it. I’m unsure.

But what is true is that IF Yeadon is right then Dr Alexander has a problem. He’s in the camp of believing the pandemic was fake and ( I think ) the Covid virus doesn’t exist.

If he believes that, then he can’t logically promote ivermectin as a cure / help for Covid, a non existent illness.

Expand full comment
May 2·edited May 2

Not necessarily. Ivermectin has many mechanisms of action. It works for parasites, and cancer. If I understand correctly, the notion that there was no pandemic does not deny a virus , or bioweapon existed. It explains that a viral pandemic cannot continue for four years according to Dr Yeadon. The virus adapts to the host to live. No.shut down for a respiratory virus is necessary. What Dr Alexander and others concur is that a biological weapon was sprayed into the air all over the world. Then the Vax spead the biological weapon to everyone vaxed and non vaxed. Conclusion: nothing found in nature would do that to create a pandemic and require the shut down of the whole world. People got deathly I'll and we're refused treatment or simply killed with mendazelomand ventilators to up the hysteria, and death count.

Expand full comment

The PCR test works much like that arcade grapple game where you lower jaws into a pile of trinkets to grab the one you want. The PCR is grappling for exosomes, encapsulated cellular debri that like the plastic bubbles with a toy inside, contain what it's looking for: Fragments of genetic code that matches up with codes on a computer that's been pre-selected to match what's in humans.

If it picks a match, Pharma wins, you lose.

Expand full comment

Glad you picked up my post, Paul!

Expand full comment

💥

Expand full comment

Lanka's fraud has been amply documented elsewhere. Few will look into it.

So Paul Alexander is now on the 'no virus' bilge train.

Lanka's court trial amply demonstrated viruses are real, but the judge ruled (correctly) that by the terms Lanka set-out in his 'challenge', he was free to set any scientifically frivolous conditions he desired, and deny any award at his own discretion.

The court case was in no way an affirmation of Lanka's theories.

Woo woo on the loco-choo choo.

Expand full comment

I have been looking for just such a report.

Thankyou.

Expand full comment

A single publication? Come in sucker! What a scammer! What a lying grifter!

Expand full comment

Indeed, the proofs submitted were from several publications, which failed to meet the criteria of 'one publication.

Woo woo on the loco choo-choo...

Expand full comment