This explanatory post was made available when you originally posed this article. I am pleased at least you see it this time. I will tell you another example of misinterpretation of data. I treated my brother in law with late stage 3 Multiple Myeloma with a very grim prognosis of a several months to live and he had rejected highly toxic and I dare say useless chemotherapy wanting to die painlessly.
As his caregiver with nothing to lose he agreed to try a combo of compounds including Quercetin D3 Fenbendazole and agreed to eliminate sugar intake that entailed substituting alcohol with canaboid oil.
Blood metrics trended to normal over a period of several months and when we did bone scans lytic lesions also disappeared but other metqbolic hotspots reappeared leading the oncologist to believe the regime was failing, In fact remineralization of the bones was what was happening and these metabolic hotspots were misinterpreted as damage being done to the bones by cancer when the opposite was true.
This was proven out by the fact that several weeks later he had achieved 100 percent full remission that over two years later held up.
The Oncologist also tried to cite that the drug was not safe because of potential liver damage but when I made him look up the safety profile of the identical counter part menendazole it was shown that liver damage is very rare.
I am not sure why you are giving a platform to a naturopath who refers to the efficacy of this compound as an "urban legend', that does not sound very "balanced" at all to me when we have peer reviewed case series data out of Stanford that clearly show this is not "urban legend at all"
Sometimes I think this Substack is a limited hangout and data/comment collection site. The quality of posts is unusually erratic and this may be one explanation.
good sharing, balance is key...
This explanatory post was made available when you originally posed this article. I am pleased at least you see it this time. I will tell you another example of misinterpretation of data. I treated my brother in law with late stage 3 Multiple Myeloma with a very grim prognosis of a several months to live and he had rejected highly toxic and I dare say useless chemotherapy wanting to die painlessly.
As his caregiver with nothing to lose he agreed to try a combo of compounds including Quercetin D3 Fenbendazole and agreed to eliminate sugar intake that entailed substituting alcohol with canaboid oil.
Blood metrics trended to normal over a period of several months and when we did bone scans lytic lesions also disappeared but other metqbolic hotspots reappeared leading the oncologist to believe the regime was failing, In fact remineralization of the bones was what was happening and these metabolic hotspots were misinterpreted as damage being done to the bones by cancer when the opposite was true.
This was proven out by the fact that several weeks later he had achieved 100 percent full remission that over two years later held up.
The Oncologist also tried to cite that the drug was not safe because of potential liver damage but when I made him look up the safety profile of the identical counter part menendazole it was shown that liver damage is very rare.
I am not sure why you are giving a platform to a naturopath who refers to the efficacy of this compound as an "urban legend', that does not sound very "balanced" at all to me when we have peer reviewed case series data out of Stanford that clearly show this is not "urban legend at all"
https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review-pdfs/fenbendazole-enhancing-antitumor-effect-a-case-series-P3SV.pdf
"Herein, we describe three cases where patients achieved complete responses, including
two who experienced progression after multiple lines of therapy, whenFBZ was used alone or in combination with standard therapies."
How is giving this person you cite any credence any different then the disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine?????
Sometimes I think this Substack is a limited hangout and data/comment collection site. The quality of posts is unusually erratic and this may be one explanation.