9 Comments

It is shocking that Doctors were Gullible enough to fall for this S#!t.

Expand full comment

Personality changes, recipients seem on Edge, angering easily, flying into rages over small things, memory problems, forgetting procedures, I suspect,will only get worse with Time....

Expand full comment

There must be a law about illegal to knowingly inject a death shot into people under threat during an "emergency".

Expand full comment

Be interesting to know what % of people in the NIH, CDC, and Pfizer got the "safe and effective" jab, especially the top honchos. I've seen stuff indicating that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, didn't get it.

Expand full comment

Amazing what you can discover using millions/billions of lab rats.

Expand full comment

Yes the “natural” virus raises blood glucose as well. My fasting blood glucose has always ranged between 64-80. The doctor actually asked me if I feeling okay after the 64 reading 🤣. I intermittent fast (have for years) and eat low carb. After having Covid (no shots) fasting blood glucose was 94! Yes technically “normal”, but high for me. I’m due for new bloodwork next week. So it will be interesting to see if it’s still elevated.

Expand full comment

As one of my smarter friends remarked, the theory that spike is the cause of vaccine injuries has no punch. Natural infection has spike too. Yet, I haven’t seen data that shows the percentage of people suffering vaccine like injuries is comparable to any vaccine. The claim that spike causes problems was what they made in the beginning of pandemic. We haven’t seen people crippled or dead because of natural infection. So, if vaccines were causing injuries, it has to be something else.

Any theory that sets out to explain vaccine injuries will have to explain adenoviral and mRNA vaccines. Either we have multiple problems or the body shuns all external stuff. If latter, why only with these vaccines and not polio or mmr— are the numbers comparable in those cases? Does it have to do with the fact that the immune system in children is very strong and can withstand intrusions as opposed to those who are not teenagers anymore? If so, this would mean that cancers in our futures are already foretold in our 20s or 30s, some 40 years ahead of occurrence.

Expand full comment