Is the Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole potent enough and HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer? Evidence is accumulating saying so & 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD's
Is the Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole potent enough and HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer? Evidence is accumulating saying so & 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD's
substack is handling this brilliantly & I share the post, this is good scholarship on these 2 drugs as it seems they may be of utility in treating cancer? Why are oncologists silent on this? CDC? FDA?
As many of you know, it is not legal to recommend cancer treatment outside the cut, burn or poison paradigm (with monoclonal antibodies being the exception).
To those cancer patients who came to me for "Wellness Enhancement" I gave them a list of 12 interventions.... Mebendazole and IVM are two of the 12 items.
Now, my list could have been much longer but as it is.... most people can not comply with the list of 12 items for economic or social reasons. Let me just say, for those that did.... I am still in communication with them years after they went into remission.... nudge, nudge... say no more.
You ask WHY is the medical establishment silent on this? The medical establishment has been corrupted by money, and by Big Pharma, who have bought all the doctors and the medical schools.
Their "cancer treatment" system consists of only things that make them money. They have suppressed cures for decades. If they allowed the actual cures to be used across the board their evil system would end, Big Pharma would go broke and the people would be free to live heathy lives.
FDA & CDC are not interested because big pharma will not make billions off it. And most if not all FDA & CDC People are either paid under the table or have stock in big pharma!
FDA, CDC not interested. Captured agencies serve their masters not the people they are chartered to protect☠️
As many of you know, it is not legal to recommend cancer treatment outside the cut, burn or poison paradigm (with monoclonal antibodies being the exception).
To those cancer patients who came to me for "Wellness Enhancement" I gave them a list of 12 interventions.... Mebendazole and IVM are two of the 12 items.
Now, my list could have been much longer but as it is.... most people can not comply with the list of 12 items for economic or social reasons. Let me just say, for those that did.... I am still in communication with them years after they went into remission.... nudge, nudge... say no more.
You ask WHY is the medical establishment silent on this? The medical establishment has been corrupted by money, and by Big Pharma, who have bought all the doctors and the medical schools.
Their "cancer treatment" system consists of only things that make them money. They have suppressed cures for decades. If they allowed the actual cures to be used across the board their evil system would end, Big Pharma would go broke and the people would be free to live heathy lives.
They can't have that.
If in fact ivermectin and fendbendazole prove to be effective against cancer i would bet my life that
the scumbags of big pharma will get it removed from the market-such is the greed and immorality
of these rat bastards
Why are oncologists silent, Paul?
Same reason as big pharma trying to bury it. No money in it for them. The money is in the chemo poisons.
FDA & CDC are not interested because big pharma will not make billions off it. And most if not all FDA & CDC People are either paid under the table or have stock in big pharma!
It would be a blessing.
"Why are oncologists silent on this? CDC? FDA?"
Because not only is it not financially beneficial it would put the entire cancer industrial complex out of business. That's why.
🎯
Money
Huge thanks , again, for spreading very important information, Dr. Paul.
The only way to find out is to try it. Bradford Hill criteria.