7 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Releasing rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus or calicivirus into European rabbit populations is typically followed by the rapid development of disease and then death in the rabbits. A very similar thing used to happen when myxoma virus was released into rabbit populations then it didn't which is attributed to the rabbits evolving resistance. If the agents refeered to as.rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus or calicivirus and myxoma virus don't exist then what is the pathogen or process that kills the rabbits? If terrain theory wasn't BS then wouldn't it be used commercially in agriculture to make money? Do capitalists not value the bottom line You appear to think that a similar culling process to that done with rabbits is not taking place among humans, other than through the injections, and that people like Geert Vanden Bossche and Luc Montagnier are wrong. Is it because you think the globalists are so benevolent that you exonerate them of using a virus as a bioweapon along with the injections? Have you considered that maybe it's you who is wrong? I agree with a lot of what you say but terrain theory is an inferior theory to germ theory.

Expand full comment

I recall this myxoma in rabbits.

Expand full comment

It was devastating until the rabbits developed resistance.

Expand full comment

Yes and that is how the body works - when we are first exposed to a new factor, the body doesn't know what to do, but then it identifies it and recognizes it and builds immunity to it. That is why humans are so strong, despite all the poisoning, vaxxing and artificial substances, we keep on going and they have to keep coming up with new onslaughts like chemtraills.

Expand full comment

Question Denise regarding chem trails: if it's true that harmful chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere to kill us all, wouldn't the individuals behind this murderous plot to destroy humanity also be killed? After all don't they breath the same air as us?

Expand full comment

Sorry, but you have it exactly backwards. It's germ theory that's the fraud and the only reason people don't know it is because they don't know what happened in the mid 1800s between Pasteur and Bechamp. Pasteur was nothing more than an average chemist and a decent plagiarist and a fairly good business man. Not a scientist. He just had the right connections. Please read Bechamp or Pasteur by Ethel Hume. And also consider this; virus is from the Latin meaning toxic or toxic. They poisoned the rabbits as they are poisoning humanity. Also, there have been long standing challenges by more than a few serious medical professionals and researchers to the pro virus crowd to prove the no virus crowd is wrong. Just show us a single virus isolated from an infected human. Not a computer generated likeness but the real deal. They have not been able to do so and they refuse to even debate the issue like adults. That alone speaks volumes.

Expand full comment

Well terrain theory may be inferior to germ theory but why is the medical industry refusing to speak about it? Why is it that doctors and nurses are not even familiar with the term? I could be wrong and that's fine, but when information is suppressed it's usually because it is correct, rather than wrong. They make more money from germ theory than they ever could with terrain theory. Plus it would make us see the reality of what constitutes health. I see the problem with discounting germ theory altogether, but we do have to study how this all works without having any information suppressed. That is the only way humanity can go forward.

Expand full comment