49 Comments

As if being "under oath" will move the needle. Their oaths are to their manufactured narrative and they'll lie their asses off to keep promulgating it.

Expand full comment

But there's always perjury to be prosecuted...

Expand full comment

Hi Kathleen,

Perjury will be very difficult to prosecute here when there's no official bottom-line on what's fact or fiction.

It'll be more a scenario of which expert is the lesser of the two liars.

Expand full comment

Hi, Barry!

True. However, I was thinking along the lines of catching someone (Fauci or Walensky, for example) in a blatant lie contradicting their earlier sworn testimony before Congress. I'd think it might be very hard for them to keep track of all prior lies.

With the hope Rand Paul succeeds in his plan to do just that with his referral to the (admittedly corrupt) DOJ concerning Fauci.

Regards,

Kathleen

Expand full comment

I hear you Kathleen but, what if either liar were to say: "well, at the time, my view was based on XYZ expert. However, XYZ expert has since been discredited, and I have revised my view to accord with current ABC expert. At the original point in time, I did nothing wrong".

You simply can't win Kathleen when the entire set up is corrupt.

Bless Paul, but his day in court fantasy and the players getting their comeuppance will simply never arrive.

Expand full comment

I don't disagree. But doesn't Fauci hold himself up to be "The Science" personified? One supposes "The Science" IS the "expert."

Expand full comment

Yes, with Fauci, you could probably get some traction with impeaching his credibility and attempting to turn everything he said on its head.

But, even so, you're still back to square one with him because what will happen to him in the end?

At the very least, more than half your country thinks his advice was correct, so he will walk.

Or, if it's truly going south for him, he will feign dementia or age related confusion.

I think where everyone goes wrong, is thinking the individuals themselves - Fauci, Gates, Schwab, Bourla, Bancel, Sahin are personally liable.

They were working at the behest of others in commercial relationships in their capacities as senior corporate executives. You have to go after the entities, the corporations, the govt. Not individuals.

Expand full comment

Or misprision.

Expand full comment

100% in agreement with the sentiments expressed in this article.

Expand full comment

Wow absolutely honest. Thank you!

Expand full comment

We are ALL eager for accountability, but it's hard for me to imagine any of these people suspected of wrongdoing accepting an invitation to be interrogated; and, of course, neither The Highwire nor CHD has subpoena power, or anything but lots of MORAL authority at their command. And of that they have plenty ~ praise god in Her Infinite Mercy for them.

Expand full comment

Here's what happened when Avi Yemini and Ezra Levant from Rebel News spotted one of the 10 Horsemen in Davos on his way to the globalists' WEF meeting and attempted to interview him;

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zRry0WKvqcCo/

Expand full comment

I have to give Avi and Ezra a great deal of credit for pursuing their line of questioning despite Bourla's refusal to engage. Very good to witness stonefaced Bourla being barraged by those pointed questions. Glad he was on camera and HAD to hear them.

Thanks very much for the link to the video, ANW. I'd only ever seen a small snippet of the beginning of that recording.

Expand full comment

I would like to know why EPPOCH and Del Bigtree are part of your story, I know EPPOCH removed an ad for Malone, but other than that what are they guilty of. As for Del, I have no clue what crime he committed, can you please elaborate Paul, thanks.

Expand full comment

I believe you may be reading it wrong - Alexander is calling on Epoch, CHD, Brownstein, Del "interviews" the 10 horsemen (the bad guys). That's the way I read it.

Expand full comment

Yes, me also. Makes sense.

Expand full comment

Oh okay, thanks.

Expand full comment

Agree! I admire Del and RFK Jr. for their hard work in spreading the truth. Same goes for Epoch Times. Don't understand why Paul has listed them.

Expand full comment

Looking at how they avoid touching on the topic of graphene oxide, LNP and venom & Nicotine. Immediately we know they are not sincere.

Expand full comment

There’s nobody else out there like Dr. Paul Alexander! Unfortunately.... hence that is why we’re in this mess to begin with.

Expand full comment

Thank you for keeping us informed on all fronts, for your strong stand for justice and to keep asking for truth!

Expand full comment

Sir, I’m glad you tell us how you really feel! Couldn’t agree more!

Expand full comment

Politician

poly, meaning ‘many’ or ‘much.’

tick, a very small creature like an insect that lives on and sucks the blood of other animals.

Expand full comment

Very creative.

Expand full comment

You need to stop being so vitriolic and divisive. Del Bigtree and RFKjr are noble men, not greedy profiteers

Expand full comment

IMO you are reading it wrong, he is calling them out to interview the others

Expand full comment

Agree!

Expand full comment

RFK's Children's Health Defense has been very frank and accurate about the dangers of the jab and all the lies we've been told about Covid. I've been following it for years and have learned a lot! It's one of the best sources of info. about this subject. Del Bigtree's ICAN/Highwire is another.

Dr. Malone may have been wrong in the beginning, but he has redeemed himself over the past few years by speaking out. The Epoch Times also reports accurately on the jabs and vaccine lies, unlike the mainstream media.

I understand you want the truth revealed and respect your efforts to do so, but I think you're off base here. There are plenty of people and organizations to criticize about lying and manipulating people about Covid and the jab. Focus on them, not the ones who are trying to spread the truth.

Expand full comment

Malone is suing three Dr.s for commenting on Malones past and his involvement in this research for 25 million each to "put a chill on their speech" direct quote...The guy is a menace at best...he is NOT who he would like you to believe he is. Shame on him.

Expand full comment

What was meant by "put a chill on their speech?"

Expand full comment

Censor them.

Expand full comment

I agree…being divisive, vitriolic, and self righteous in every post, Dr Alexander has lost me as a subscriber. And Malone has had a Come to Jesus moment and redeemed himself.

ALSO, I’ve followed Kennedy and Bigtree for over 10 years and they have courage, fortitude, honor, and love for mankind in their hearts. None of us is without fault. We need unity and love for our brothers and sisters during this time….not mud slinging.

Save the actual mud slinging for the likes of Fauci, Walensky, Baric, Collins, Dazsack, and frankly Trump from putting money over people’s health and STILL not acknowledging that the injuries and deaths from Warp Speed have occurred.

RFK2024

Expand full comment

Respectfully, I disagree. For one reason only. Everyone is afraid to give people shit for being bottom feeders and psychopaths. We KNOW Freedom of speech doesn't exist anymore. Sometimes I cringe but I'm still thankful that he gets up and slings mud...I understand your point though. ✌️

Expand full comment

I’m also waiting for inquiry and an explanation of the sept 19,2019 Executive Order.

Expand full comment

OK I get it now. I misread Paul's message. He's asking for Del, RFK Jr., Epoch to interview the offenders. Agree but doubt Fauci et al would agree to be interviewed.

Expand full comment

Good Call Dr. Paul, we all identify the names and go after them

Expand full comment

$$$ to NOT talk? Massive funds, do many things,buy silences, change Data,influence voting....

Expand full comment