It is time, it is way past time for Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Drew Weissman, Dr. Katalin Karikó et al. & all involved in mRNA technology that is the core basis for the COVID mRNA gene injections, explain
It is time, it is way past time for Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Drew Weissman, Dr. Katalin Karikó et al. & all involved in mRNA technology that is the core basis for the COVID mRNA gene injections, explain
what they did, what they knew about harms, when did they know it! They remained largely silent & we have critical questions! Where is EPOCH, Highwire, CHD on this? Why no substantive interview?
Been watching and listening to Malone since he has casted himself into the Covid realm. He has yet to share any info that has not already been made public. When asked the critical questions , he seems to go way off topic and tell a good long story to change the topic without much push back from anyone. These diversions seem to be quite fluent for him almost as if he has pre determined what he was about to say. He is very calculated when he speaks and is very careful to never say too much!
The tactic he uses to dispose of anyone willing to contradict him or question his authority or intellect is to BLOCK if you a regular citizen or LAWSUITS for a cool 25 mill. If you have a platform and a voice!
IMHO Malone is a triple agent now that Covid has struck. May have been a dbl agent prior but nowadays he is a very busy man spewing the pre publicized information as if he were the man who discovered said info/data!
Malone is very very careful what he speaks and how he speaks. Why? He was telling the elderly to take the EXPERIMENTAL injections way past the time when he should have been calling for a complete removal of all the covid shots from the market. Being elderly I remember that well. Wouldn't we all love to know who that guy really is?
Paul, you should contact EPOCH personally and ask to do an interview with them, ask them about how Malone got the AD pulled. I am a paid subscriber with the Epoch and I find them to be honest with their reporting. Could it be Malone lied to them and threatened them for false advertising, it's possible they pulled the AD because they thought Malone was right and the AD didn't belong on his interview. It's like anyone doing an interview with an AD saying something about gender affirming care or whatever, the person would ask that AD to be pulled if they didn't believe in that. I don't know what to say, but I will not blame Epoch for this, this is all on Malone and his sketchy retarded way of thinking.
Do you question Malone’s assertion that he himself took the injections? I think he did. Doesn’t that speak to what he knew? Not much. Doesn’t it matter that the mRNA platform when Malone was involved did not involve the later adaptation of N-1 Methyl-pseudouridines in the mRNA? Isn’t that truly the feature that makes these products so deadly? Because the spike keeps on giving? Or rather the mRNA keeps on instructing for spike? Malone should’ve known the LNPs would deliver all throughout the body. It’s stunning that so many scientists get blinded by their own faith in technology to do what only the body can do properly - to heal. I think he’s innocent of bad intention but not of a small measure of stupidity. How could he have elected to be injected with the mRNA shots and not seen? So many “smart” people did just that.
Of course he knew, as did other nefarious collaborators, and there was no innocence about it! Research scientist, Astrid Stuckelberger, has shown that it was never about mRNA or the spike protein and that ALL "vaccine" vials are synthetic, not biological in origin; it was about the synthetic, man-made nanoparticles , nano circuits and 5-G! (see www.astridstuckelberger.com)
Injury is one thing. Important issue. Spiritual implications is quite another. After all, our God given genes are now destroyed, rearranged and fully patentable. Are we still human? I think not.
I told you already, you have seriously and inexplicably missed the boat on this one.
The least bad reason for that would be simple ignorance of the history of the origin and use of cell transfection reagents.
You should know, given your education, that cell transfection reagents have been in use for well over forty years for the purpose of introducing exogenous gene constructs into living cells to study the expression and behavior of proteins in a living system in order to discover which parts of the gene were responsible for the structure and functions of the protein.
Robert Malone and others adapted this to in vivo cell transfection of normal genes to offset either missing gene products or defective gene products due to a mutated form of the gene in order to supply a gene product needed for normal function or to offset the effects of deleterious gene products.
Pfizer and all the other viral RNA producers decided to use the most easily commercialized of about 7 cell transfection reagents or procedures to introduce the gene of a pathogenic virus between 1 and 5 times into more than 5.61 BILLION people just since 2021.
Your attitude toward Malone and his approach and others who were engaged in a distinctly different approach is based on at least two fallacies: 1. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc and 2. The undistributed middle.
1. Just because Malone, et al, were attempting an in vivo use of cell transfection reagents to introduce an exogenous gene, doesn’t make them responsible for someone else’s later in vivo use of cell transfection reagents to introduce a gene from a pathogenic virus to avoid having to use much more expensive traditional ways of generating viral protein antigens by turning the recipients of their products into free bioreactors.
2. Just because both groups used cell transfection reagents in vivo to introduce gene constructs doesn’t make the two equivalent in either purpose or outcome, neither does it make one responsible for any negative outcomes caused by the other’s purposes or methods or particular genes used.
You may as well hold lawful gun owners or firearms manufacturers responsible for the criminal and murderous use of guns by crooks. Or hold Ford responsible, since that company was the first to mass produce automobiles, for somebody driving the getaway car in a bank robbery or running down crowds out for a walk or blowing up people with a truck bomb.
The fact that you appear to be ignoring both history and science in this matter poses serious questions about your motives for suddenly, so late in the game, for piling on like this.
I was asking about this over six months ago:
For [Malone] and other critics of the viral RNA products who also have intimate experience with transfection technology, the question is still open as to why they have chosen to criticize the viral RNA products that are wholly dependent on transfection technology while remaining silent about it.
Perhaps it’s because they are reluctant to issue any kind of criticism of those pushing the viral RNA products that could result in public reaction of the truly valuable technology that has been appropriated and misused by Covid, Inc.
Perhaps is because some are reluctant of putting themselves in a position where someone could say of them, “Hey, you’re all hypocrites because you’re criticizing these companies for using the very same technology to HELP people that you guys used for decades to advance your own careers.”
I really hope it’s not the latter because that kind of cowardice would be intolerable, especially because the rejoinder to such an accusation would be one of the easiest and most satisfying of bitch slaps that could ever be laid on a leftist hack.
As far as the companies marketing the products are concerned, though, it’s easy to see why they would want to direct attention away from the experimental research side of it, where “experiment” could make it all sound weird and chancy, and, instead, pitch their “how can we get our viral RNA into your cells without scaring the shit out of you” products as drugs or medicine or vaccines.
And they do that for at least two reasons:
1. Marketing. Although people know nothing is guaranteed in non-Greta (ie real) science, they generally want to believe they can have confidence in medicine, even if their concept of medicine may include getting stuck with needles, whether the Western or Chinese types, high colonics, and the realignment of subluxated joints in the spinal column.
2. Emergency Use Authorization. If the manufacturers went the traditional route of vaccine development, they would be locked into a long, costly, heavily-regulated process before they would ever be able to make any sales:
“But the opportunity—oops, we mean emergency—is now and there’s no time to waste when there’s something we’re pretty sure is mostly going to work, so issue us an EUA and exemption from liability and let the money-making—oops, we mean healing—begin right now!”
The question to be asked of you and of so many others with a background in the biological sciences is, “How could you have gone from late 2020 right up to the present without realizing that it was primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products behaving like one-gene viruses that were responsible for virtually all the immunological and many of the other adverse outcomes of those products?”
I realized from the start that no good could come from deliberately infecting healthy cells with viral genes and I have written about that very often since then.
That's a very interesting post Gregorio. What's your view on the coming mRNA based RSV jabs and do you know what Malone's view is? It sounds like you're opposed to genetic vaccines generally and not just to the anti-COVID shots. Would you expect the anti-RSV shots to be as pathogenic as the anti-COVID shots?
To paraphrase what pandemic hero Dr. Peter McCullough stated very succinctly in his interview w Jay Couey two days ago..
To have the body produce any foreign protein in unknown quantities for an unknown period of time is predictably disastrous... to choose spike a toxin in its own right even worse..
Entire discussion is brilliant and gets into the weeds w science & studies... flippin adore JJ and all his brilliant teaching of biology to those of us who aren't science types too!!
And viral RNA product, by its very nature, is harmful. Cells detect the presence of viral
mRNA and the viral protein translated from it.
Before the rest of the innate is ever aware of it, because the products are designed to be as invisible as possible to the innate or adaptive immune systems, the products make it to and gain entry into the worst possible place: a living healthy cell.
Those cells detect the viral mRNA and viral protein and put out a high level alert to the innate immune system that they are compromised by viruses that are in the middle of replication. The inevitable result is assault on the organs containing those cells by innate inflammatory attack to kill those cells. Many other healthy adjacent cells get damaged or killed. The greater the level of alerts and the broader the area affected, the harsher and more damaging the attacks.
There is no good reason those at those companies didn’t know this. Maybe they thought, though stupidly, “Hey, it’s not a WHOLE virus. It’s just one gene that’s going to produce one viral protein.”
But there are a number viral protein vaccines that use a single viral protein antigen. And there’s innate immune response to that. And they counted on those spike proteins (once they got outside the cells) to be treated the same way.
But for some reason they it a good idea to invade, infect, and hijack healthy cells in order to do that.
The only way those spike proteins will get out is by the cell dying or getting killed.
And the really weird thing is that Pfizer had already make a traditional viral protein vaccine using the spike protein. It failed.
So why cause trauma to cells and organs to get the spike protein they already knew did not work?
Yes, and in the case of SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein, whether it gets into the cells through transfection or infection, is itself pathogenic, including, it appears, oncogenic.
While it’s possible this was not intentional, it definitely does not seem probable.
Tragically, I think Dr. Elizabeth Eads, as she elucidates on Watchdog USA, is probably correct- that this is a bio weapon; one that she believes will eventually cause 1,200,000,000 deaths.
Jan 12, 2022According to Malone, RelCovax is a "SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate designed to meet global vaccination demands." People are skeptical and frightened! Look for Dr Robert "DARPA" Malone AI generated "novel" bioagents and vaccines to start hitting the market. Looking hard at COVAX and RelCovax. pic.twitter.com/0ooWsL6vzZ
Been watching and listening to Malone since he has casted himself into the Covid realm. He has yet to share any info that has not already been made public. When asked the critical questions , he seems to go way off topic and tell a good long story to change the topic without much push back from anyone. These diversions seem to be quite fluent for him almost as if he has pre determined what he was about to say. He is very calculated when he speaks and is very careful to never say too much!
The tactic he uses to dispose of anyone willing to contradict him or question his authority or intellect is to BLOCK if you a regular citizen or LAWSUITS for a cool 25 mill. If you have a platform and a voice!
IMHO Malone is a triple agent now that Covid has struck. May have been a dbl agent prior but nowadays he is a very busy man spewing the pre publicized information as if he were the man who discovered said info/data!
He is no more then a snake 🐍
Very accurately stated!
Malone is very very careful what he speaks and how he speaks. Why? He was telling the elderly to take the EXPERIMENTAL injections way past the time when he should have been calling for a complete removal of all the covid shots from the market. Being elderly I remember that well. Wouldn't we all love to know who that guy really is?
I’m curious to know just how many non disclosure agreements have his signature on em! Dbl digits I’m sure
Paul, you should contact EPOCH personally and ask to do an interview with them, ask them about how Malone got the AD pulled. I am a paid subscriber with the Epoch and I find them to be honest with their reporting. Could it be Malone lied to them and threatened them for false advertising, it's possible they pulled the AD because they thought Malone was right and the AD didn't belong on his interview. It's like anyone doing an interview with an AD saying something about gender affirming care or whatever, the person would ask that AD to be pulled if they didn't believe in that. I don't know what to say, but I will not blame Epoch for this, this is all on Malone and his sketchy retarded way of thinking.
Get to the bottom of it Dr A.
No one of the Nanotechnology industry wants this out in the open.
Do you question Malone’s assertion that he himself took the injections? I think he did. Doesn’t that speak to what he knew? Not much. Doesn’t it matter that the mRNA platform when Malone was involved did not involve the later adaptation of N-1 Methyl-pseudouridines in the mRNA? Isn’t that truly the feature that makes these products so deadly? Because the spike keeps on giving? Or rather the mRNA keeps on instructing for spike? Malone should’ve known the LNPs would deliver all throughout the body. It’s stunning that so many scientists get blinded by their own faith in technology to do what only the body can do properly - to heal. I think he’s innocent of bad intention but not of a small measure of stupidity. How could he have elected to be injected with the mRNA shots and not seen? So many “smart” people did just that.
Of course he knew, as did other nefarious collaborators, and there was no innocence about it! Research scientist, Astrid Stuckelberger, has shown that it was never about mRNA or the spike protein and that ALL "vaccine" vials are synthetic, not biological in origin; it was about the synthetic, man-made nanoparticles , nano circuits and 5-G! (see www.astridstuckelberger.com)
I remember reading Cornell and UPenn were working on nanotechnology research to wipe out nervous system.
https://rumble.com/v29ftk4-is-there-any-way-to-fix-vaccine-injury.html
Injury is one thing. Important issue. Spiritual implications is quite another. After all, our God given genes are now destroyed, rearranged and fully patentable. Are we still human? I think not.
They’re hiding the bio weapon part , focusing on the “ spike protein “. Why aren’t anyone but Kingston addressing this? & dr Ana M .
I told you already, you have seriously and inexplicably missed the boat on this one.
The least bad reason for that would be simple ignorance of the history of the origin and use of cell transfection reagents.
You should know, given your education, that cell transfection reagents have been in use for well over forty years for the purpose of introducing exogenous gene constructs into living cells to study the expression and behavior of proteins in a living system in order to discover which parts of the gene were responsible for the structure and functions of the protein.
Robert Malone and others adapted this to in vivo cell transfection of normal genes to offset either missing gene products or defective gene products due to a mutated form of the gene in order to supply a gene product needed for normal function or to offset the effects of deleterious gene products.
Pfizer and all the other viral RNA producers decided to use the most easily commercialized of about 7 cell transfection reagents or procedures to introduce the gene of a pathogenic virus between 1 and 5 times into more than 5.61 BILLION people just since 2021.
Your attitude toward Malone and his approach and others who were engaged in a distinctly different approach is based on at least two fallacies: 1. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc and 2. The undistributed middle.
1. Just because Malone, et al, were attempting an in vivo use of cell transfection reagents to introduce an exogenous gene, doesn’t make them responsible for someone else’s later in vivo use of cell transfection reagents to introduce a gene from a pathogenic virus to avoid having to use much more expensive traditional ways of generating viral protein antigens by turning the recipients of their products into free bioreactors.
2. Just because both groups used cell transfection reagents in vivo to introduce gene constructs doesn’t make the two equivalent in either purpose or outcome, neither does it make one responsible for any negative outcomes caused by the other’s purposes or methods or particular genes used.
You may as well hold lawful gun owners or firearms manufacturers responsible for the criminal and murderous use of guns by crooks. Or hold Ford responsible, since that company was the first to mass produce automobiles, for somebody driving the getaway car in a bank robbery or running down crowds out for a walk or blowing up people with a truck bomb.
The fact that you appear to be ignoring both history and science in this matter poses serious questions about your motives for suddenly, so late in the game, for piling on like this.
I was asking about this over six months ago:
For [Malone] and other critics of the viral RNA products who also have intimate experience with transfection technology, the question is still open as to why they have chosen to criticize the viral RNA products that are wholly dependent on transfection technology while remaining silent about it.
Perhaps it’s because they are reluctant to issue any kind of criticism of those pushing the viral RNA products that could result in public reaction of the truly valuable technology that has been appropriated and misused by Covid, Inc.
Perhaps is because some are reluctant of putting themselves in a position where someone could say of them, “Hey, you’re all hypocrites because you’re criticizing these companies for using the very same technology to HELP people that you guys used for decades to advance your own careers.”
I really hope it’s not the latter because that kind of cowardice would be intolerable, especially because the rejoinder to such an accusation would be one of the easiest and most satisfying of bitch slaps that could ever be laid on a leftist hack.
As far as the companies marketing the products are concerned, though, it’s easy to see why they would want to direct attention away from the experimental research side of it, where “experiment” could make it all sound weird and chancy, and, instead, pitch their “how can we get our viral RNA into your cells without scaring the shit out of you” products as drugs or medicine or vaccines.
And they do that for at least two reasons:
1. Marketing. Although people know nothing is guaranteed in non-Greta (ie real) science, they generally want to believe they can have confidence in medicine, even if their concept of medicine may include getting stuck with needles, whether the Western or Chinese types, high colonics, and the realignment of subluxated joints in the spinal column.
2. Emergency Use Authorization. If the manufacturers went the traditional route of vaccine development, they would be locked into a long, costly, heavily-regulated process before they would ever be able to make any sales:
“But the opportunity—oops, we mean emergency—is now and there’s no time to waste when there’s something we’re pretty sure is mostly going to work, so issue us an EUA and exemption from liability and let the money-making—oops, we mean healing—begin right now!”
The question to be asked of you and of so many others with a background in the biological sciences is, “How could you have gone from late 2020 right up to the present without realizing that it was primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products behaving like one-gene viruses that were responsible for virtually all the immunological and many of the other adverse outcomes of those products?”
I realized from the start that no good could come from deliberately infecting healthy cells with viral genes and I have written about that very often since then.
That's a very interesting post Gregorio. What's your view on the coming mRNA based RSV jabs and do you know what Malone's view is? It sounds like you're opposed to genetic vaccines generally and not just to the anti-COVID shots. Would you expect the anti-RSV shots to be as pathogenic as the anti-COVID shots?
To paraphrase what pandemic hero Dr. Peter McCullough stated very succinctly in his interview w Jay Couey two days ago..
To have the body produce any foreign protein in unknown quantities for an unknown period of time is predictably disastrous... to choose spike a toxin in its own right even worse..
Entire discussion is brilliant and gets into the weeds w science & studies... flippin adore JJ and all his brilliant teaching of biology to those of us who aren't science types too!!
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1860996790
And viral RNA product, by its very nature, is harmful. Cells detect the presence of viral
mRNA and the viral protein translated from it.
Before the rest of the innate is ever aware of it, because the products are designed to be as invisible as possible to the innate or adaptive immune systems, the products make it to and gain entry into the worst possible place: a living healthy cell.
Those cells detect the viral mRNA and viral protein and put out a high level alert to the innate immune system that they are compromised by viruses that are in the middle of replication. The inevitable result is assault on the organs containing those cells by innate inflammatory attack to kill those cells. Many other healthy adjacent cells get damaged or killed. The greater the level of alerts and the broader the area affected, the harsher and more damaging the attacks.
There is no good reason those at those companies didn’t know this. Maybe they thought, though stupidly, “Hey, it’s not a WHOLE virus. It’s just one gene that’s going to produce one viral protein.”
But there are a number viral protein vaccines that use a single viral protein antigen. And there’s innate immune response to that. And they counted on those spike proteins (once they got outside the cells) to be treated the same way.
But for some reason they it a good idea to invade, infect, and hijack healthy cells in order to do that.
The only way those spike proteins will get out is by the cell dying or getting killed.
And the really weird thing is that Pfizer had already make a traditional viral protein vaccine using the spike protein. It failed.
So why cause trauma to cells and organs to get the spike protein they already knew did not work?
Yes, and in the case of SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein, whether it gets into the cells through transfection or infection, is itself pathogenic, including, it appears, oncogenic.
While it’s possible this was not intentional, it definitely does not seem probable.
Tragically, I think Dr. Elizabeth Eads, as she elucidates on Watchdog USA, is probably correct- that this is a bio weapon; one that she believes will eventually cause 1,200,000,000 deaths.
Dr. Alexander, can we send you questions and you ask him? Can we raise money for it?
Hey Paul.
This group your targeting is not going to take your constant baiting to Sue you !
We know that you want the "Discovery" info to nail them.
And they know
It too !!
Money trumps truth every time. Sad to say, but that's the way it is. The only way they'll 'fess up is when it is to their advantage.
cc: Paul
Words Malone ? Or Deeds ?
You Have Toiled Your Life In A Murderous Enterprise.
- Intellectually Captured.
And You Have Come To Realize That.
- Only Breggin Beat You To It.
Your "Guilt" Is Defined As Much By What You Did Not Do - Knowing What You Knew - - As By What You "Did".
The Same Hold's True For Your Suit Against Breggin.
Not Dropping The Suit Only Prolonges Your Capture.
"The Shock" Is That Your Words Require Deeds.
All Limited Hangout
Jan 12, 2022According to Malone, RelCovax is a "SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate designed to meet global vaccination demands." People are skeptical and frightened! Look for Dr Robert "DARPA" Malone AI generated "novel" bioagents and vaccines to start hitting the market. Looking hard at COVAX and RelCovax. pic.twitter.com/0ooWsL6vzZ