It is time. It is time to end the pandemic state of emergency and as importantly, end the general Covid-19 vaccinations. Importantly, it is time to stop the vaccine mandates
Paul, your work is brilliant and prolific! So needed right now!
I have one suggestion before you publish: add the word “may” in your sentence:
“…That is, while the vaccines *may* provide individual benefits to the vaccinee, and especially to older high-risk people, the public benefit of universal vaccination is in grave doubt.”
The published data is so lacking in transparency, I recommend against conceding any (talking) point.
Thank you for the summary of how things progressed and where we stand now in the covid saga. Hopefully, state governors, their surgeon generals read your summary.
Thank you for this comprehensive article. I was in contact with many in South Africa before Omicron spread and all that was said by such as Angelique Coertzee and other experts has proved to be accurate. It was seen as a gift from nature and despite some desperately clinging to a narrative that served their cause we now see their attempt at continuous control crumbling. Keep up the good work Paul, many thanks.
Great article - plenty of strong irrefutable facts, supported by evidence.
One small suggestion:-
As it is lengthy (and necessarily so to convey the facts), it may help to have a summary that builds the argument simply - sort of an Occams Razor.
i.e.
>Vacs are not stopping infection and spread - supported by stats of those in hospital
>Vacs appear to be making the vacd more prone to infection - per stats
>Vacs appear to be too risky - per all-cause mortality - particularly comparing countries with similar demographics but different vac profiles, hence ruling out other world phenomena
>Vacs appear very risky in the short term - per VAERS stats on deaths, cardiac issues, athlete deaths compared to prev years (the only new variable is the vac)
>Vacs have no known risk profile in the long term but scientific evidence suggests high risks due to cardiac damage (McCullough/Rose paper) and immune system damage (DNA change paper "immune cells....... impaired)
>Vacs were not tested properly - released quickly under an EUA compared to he typical 10+ years study
>Pfizer docs to date show clearly a high injury rate in trials
>Natural immunity is shown to be considerably more effective than vac - per vac breakthrough stats and deaths in the vacd'
>Omi is mild - per the case stats vs death stats
"Given the above, it is clear that the risk/benefit emphatically supports cessation of the "state of emergency" and the vac mandates
etc
This type of brief summary builds a strong argument that is simple to see.
And using Occams razor, it is easy to see that, given the mass vac programs, this is the only major change globally and points to the simple argument of the vac **not only being ineffective but exacerbating the problem AND causing additional health issues, injuries and deaths** AND **still having the unknown future risks that, based on data to date, also appear considerable**.
"Given the above argument it is evident that anyone in authority pushing the vac agenda will likely be considered criminally negligent, responsible for many deaths, and is clearly not acting in the best interests of humanity and health. And given that this is a medical procedure that they will be promoting, and is experimental, it means also that they are in breach of the Nuremberg code.."
I started a few notes and it expanded a bit - I hope the suggestion is helpful?
Paul, your work is brilliant and prolific! So needed right now!
I have one suggestion before you publish: add the word “may” in your sentence:
“…That is, while the vaccines *may* provide individual benefits to the vaccinee, and especially to older high-risk people, the public benefit of universal vaccination is in grave doubt.”
The published data is so lacking in transparency, I recommend against conceding any (talking) point.
The Victorian, Australia, govt just gave you the finger!
"As predicted the new powers have been used to extend the state of emergency in Victoria for a further 3 months:"
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-pandemic-declaration-support-omicron-response
Thank you for the summary of how things progressed and where we stand now in the covid saga. Hopefully, state governors, their surgeon generals read your summary.
Thank you for this comprehensive article. I was in contact with many in South Africa before Omicron spread and all that was said by such as Angelique Coertzee and other experts has proved to be accurate. It was seen as a gift from nature and despite some desperately clinging to a narrative that served their cause we now see their attempt at continuous control crumbling. Keep up the good work Paul, many thanks.
Superb article
Great article - plenty of strong irrefutable facts, supported by evidence.
One small suggestion:-
As it is lengthy (and necessarily so to convey the facts), it may help to have a summary that builds the argument simply - sort of an Occams Razor.
i.e.
>Vacs are not stopping infection and spread - supported by stats of those in hospital
>Vacs appear to be making the vacd more prone to infection - per stats
>Vacs appear to be too risky - per all-cause mortality - particularly comparing countries with similar demographics but different vac profiles, hence ruling out other world phenomena
>Vacs appear very risky in the short term - per VAERS stats on deaths, cardiac issues, athlete deaths compared to prev years (the only new variable is the vac)
>Vacs have no known risk profile in the long term but scientific evidence suggests high risks due to cardiac damage (McCullough/Rose paper) and immune system damage (DNA change paper "immune cells....... impaired)
>Vacs were not tested properly - released quickly under an EUA compared to he typical 10+ years study
>Pfizer docs to date show clearly a high injury rate in trials
>Natural immunity is shown to be considerably more effective than vac - per vac breakthrough stats and deaths in the vacd'
>Omi is mild - per the case stats vs death stats
"Given the above, it is clear that the risk/benefit emphatically supports cessation of the "state of emergency" and the vac mandates
etc
This type of brief summary builds a strong argument that is simple to see.
And using Occams razor, it is easy to see that, given the mass vac programs, this is the only major change globally and points to the simple argument of the vac **not only being ineffective but exacerbating the problem AND causing additional health issues, injuries and deaths** AND **still having the unknown future risks that, based on data to date, also appear considerable**.
"Given the above argument it is evident that anyone in authority pushing the vac agenda will likely be considered criminally negligent, responsible for many deaths, and is clearly not acting in the best interests of humanity and health. And given that this is a medical procedure that they will be promoting, and is experimental, it means also that they are in breach of the Nuremberg code.."
I started a few notes and it expanded a bit - I hope the suggestion is helpful?