26 Comments

.

Over The Target.

.

Expand full comment

MRNA WAS NEVER DESIGNED TO COMBAT A VIRUS-IT WAS A BIO-WEAPON SOUGHT AFTER BY

THE US BIO-WARFARE CENTER OF THE DOD-WE NEED TO GET TOGETHER AN ARMY OF MOMS AND DADS WHO LOST PARENTS AND CHILDREN AND OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS AND LET THEM

RIP THESE BASTARDS TO SHREDS-A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE MADE TO SUFFER FOR NO REASON

AT ALL OTHER THAN THE LUST FOR RETENTION OF POWER AND CONTROL ( the fear of losing it)

aAND THE SON OF A BITCH FAUCI ET AL WHO SAW BIG DOLLAR SIGNS AND BRAGGING RIGHTS-

FAUCI WILL NEVER LIVE LONG ENOUGH IN PEACE TO ENJOY HIS ILL GOTTEN GAINS!-HE LIVES IN COMPLETE FEAR AND TERROR NOT KNOWING WHEN AND WHERE IT WILL COME FOR HIM

Expand full comment

How horrible that this unnecessary shot killed and maimed thousands of people, babies in the womb and young people sterilized. These people rushed head long into destruction of their lives.I can honestly say I'm in shock.The depression, suicide. Animals put down because of the rapid fear mongering. Elders dieing scared and alone...people forever wounded by the memories of what they endured ,the children, who knows how that effected them.I'm devastated..

Expand full comment

Maybe the multiple exposures to Vax ingredients is an attempt to build up tolerance to key ingredients?

Graphene is toxic, but worth trillions and key to global control of the world's population, digital I.D. banking, tracking, data acquisition and sales, commerce, medical treatments, population control, and more. All things considered, the powers that be have a vested interest in the global population becoming tolerant to Graphene based technology and would consider any deaths from vaccines to not only be insignificant collateral damage, but fulfill a goals of at least one of their stakeholders. Gates stated on record that if they did a really good job with vaccines, they could reduce the population by 15%. He wasn't just whistling Dixie.

Expand full comment

Is SARS-CoV-2 a virus? If yes, where does it replicate?

Only in the laboratory eukaryotic cell or also in bacterial cells?

Are the bacteria in the microbiome more numerous than our cells? YES!

And does it seem normal to you that a virus passes through the microbiome layer without bacteria interacting with the virus or producing different substances than usual?

And these bacteria controls we performed and demonstrated

🔷 SARS-CoV-2 replicates first in bacteria

🔷 That orofecal transmission is most important precisely because of the bacterial involvement

🔷 That the bacteria produces toxins

🔷 That antibiotics or a combination of antibiotics can stop both replication, transmission, and toxin production and the clinical picture of patients especially in the early stages of the disease.

🔷 That the intermediate host is bacteria.

🔷 That mutations are numerous in bacteria

CARLO BROGNA

Expand full comment

But, then, other vaccines are vaxxes too? They are injected in muscles.

Just this morning I thought that it’s time for me to get upto speed on immune system/virology…

Dr. Alexander, can you recommend a few credible free/paid courses, please?

Thank you! ❤️‍🔥

Expand full comment

Why being vitamin D3 replete is more effective than any flu “vaccine”: vitD optimizes adaptive immune system function and using a substance called calthecidin optimizes innate (mucosal) immune system function. Calthecidin is similar to a biological antibiotic that patrols mucosal membranes and skin (to some extent) to protect the great apes and above...meaning it is a relatively recently evolved system.

Expand full comment

Sucharit Bahkdi said the same two years ago....it seems to be a well know fact among the more brilliant scientists, but not widely known among the run of the mill doctors and scientists...how come?

Expand full comment

It’s not all in the GI tract. While those elements described are valid and accurate, nasal defenses also play a role in IgA immune development. Ignoring them demands another explanation for the enlargement of regional lymph nodes in the neck when novel infectious agents are sensed in the upper airway.

I would suggest an alternative title–It’s the mucin glycans, stupid. Nasal mucus is covered with what Knowles and Boucher (https://www.jci.org/articles/view/15217) describe as “mucin macromolecules [that] are well adapted to binding and trapping inhaled particles for clearance from the lung, at least in part because of the extraordinary diversity of their carbohydrate [glycan] side chains. Because they provide, in effect, a combinatorial library of carbohydrate sequences, mucins can bind to virtually all particles that land on airway epithelia and can thus clear them from the lung.” According to Costerton, (How Bacteria Stick, Scientific American, Jan 1979) it's the glycans that mediate sticking. He proposes three ways for novel drugs to interfere with this process: blocking glycan production; “block the active site of a lectin mediating the adhesion of bacterial glycocalyx fibers to the fibers of host cells, [and]; Finally. it should be possible to block the "receptor" sites on host cells. that is, the glycoprotein fibers to which bacterial fibers adhere directly.” What glycans do in this process is attenuate the microbes so that they are not as infectious. They are like the Salk rabies vaccine. Costerton adds the comment supporting this idea: “One attractive aspect of an antibiotic directed against the glycocalyx is that it need not enter the host cells or the bacterial cells, thereby avoiding two common problems in antibiotic therapy: toxicity to host cells and the induction of bacterial resistance based on changes in the permeability of the bacterial-cell membrane.”

We have not been able to develop drugs that do what Costerton proposed, but the family of sugar alcohols may help. Sugar alcohols differ from their parent sugars by an added hydrogen atom that opens their aldose form and makes them flexible. At least two of the glycan family, mannose and xylose, have readily available alcohol forms in mannitol and xylitol. Xylitol, in particular, is a common sugar substitute food with many antibacterial properties best explained by its being a glycan mime that accomplishes what Costerton described nearly 50 years ago.

Expand full comment

JJ was just on Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International zoom call and knocked this truth out of the park:

https://rumble.com/v3ljg6i-dr-jonathan-jay-jj-couey-phd.html

Expand full comment