"It’s not too late to stop being a tool of oppression"; (Professor Jem Bendell Strategist & educator on social change, focused on Deep Adaptation to societal breakdown); The first thing to recognise
"It’s not too late to stop being a tool of oppression"; (Professor Jem Bendell Strategist & educator on social change, focused on Deep Adaptation to societal breakdown); The first thing to recognise
is the Covid vaccinations offered neither significant transmission reductions nor an opportunity to speed the reaching of ‘herd immunity’ and thus the eradication of the disease.
I don’t think it’s clear that the elderly were helped by the bioweapon spike injections with a toxic soup of adjuvants and lipid nano packaging ingredients (still unknown in terms of unwarranted variations). It’s clear the data plans were wretched-- 1/ obscuring deaths from Covid vs deaths with Covid beneath severe distortion and corruption in hospital reports; 2/ obscuring vaccination status and capturing deaths among the once vaccinated (in the USA) in the non vaccinated class to skew it - when really the once vaccinated were experiencing lowered immunity for 2 weeks post jab during the period they attained diseased status (Scandinavian’s reported this early); 3/ obscuring how many elders with senescence immunity contracted disease from the bioweapon and died without autopsy or histology in the days when treatments were killing people in large numbers and repurposed drugs were denied. This repetition of the the antibodies from the jab helping out much at all (in any proportion to the vast harms they did if you have ever looked at the pathophysiology of the bioweapon implantation) must really be reconciled with Dr Yeadon’s whole discussion of the disjuncture between a nasal -respiratory pathway and a jab that is mediating immune response so-called * along a dangerous and disjoined pathway. Same disjunction seems to prevail in the flu vaccines too, doesn’t it. So, really this essay is perpetuating the same fig leaf mythology regards the elders and vulnerable. And this kind of idea keeps getting published in this generally fine and helpful substack -- it’s a cancer Dr Alexander in the beautiful body of your work unless I’m missing something. We had whole nursing homes saved by repurposed drugs (hydroxychlorquinine) by ferocious brave physicians and to perpetuate the idea that the INFERNAL bioweapon did anything for the vulnerable is obscene. It’s obscene once you wake from the hypnosis that the striving professor is still struggling with May GOD BLESS His Efforts -- and you take in the full witness to the evil. Please stop repeating the talking points of the evil ones, the burbling corrosive hypnotic phrases given to line physicians so they would have some face saving cover story for killing their patients. There is no credible evidential basis for a harms v benefits analysis for the elderly because there are so many corrupted data points with so many confounders. And even if there was an evidential basis w some integrity, the early short term end point measurement has to stand up against a longer term set of end point measurements for the past 65 groups and that’s no where in sight (I.e. theoretically we saved x% mortality in seniors over 4 months BUT we lost XX% to ADE and all cause and dementias and all the adverse events in the subsequent 8 months, 18 months, etc). I have seen and am seeing bioweapon injuries of cancer, neurological, vascular in my family and community. Measuring vaccine injury in extremely narrow observation windows that never capture the cascading harms is such an old trick. It is now unacceptable to fail to look at the complex picture.
So many have been complaining about mRNA. China's vaxxes don't have that tech. I think only one out of the many in India has had it. There are a bunch of videos of Indians suddenly dying while dancing. There are a bunch of videos of Chinese appearing to commit suicide; maybe the agent played a role in some or all of them.
It's possible up to all three of the above people died from the vaxxes but jabbed animals in preclinical trials across 20 years died after "virus" exposure. Imagine the same events occurred in 2020. The spread, shed, and injected versions of the agent trigger many thousands of wide-ranging reactions. Except for injured infectees, almost everyone else was programmed to believe it's only a flu or cold. They shunned and vilified anyone experiencing the vast majority of reactions. There has been endless complaining about "from" vs "with." Can one really tell if someone's heart attack, lethal coma from a dangerous rise/fall in blood sugar, or whatever happened naturally or as a reaction to the poison exposure? Probably not especially with no autopsies.
I agree with you. Constantly stating this poison has any benefit for the elderly and other vulnerable people has grown old. IMO they're committing a crime against humanity like those on the other side condemned for doing the same thing.
Well, this was glaringly obvious in the first 5 minutes of the shut down to my husband and I. It was obvious as hell what was going on and the outcomes were easily predictable. That didn't stop my horror when everyone stupidly went along with it. The last hope I had carefully reserved for society has all vanished 3 years ago. Decades ago, we were mocked by "friends," family, and the community for daring to try to educate them on the reality of the medical model. We painfully cut the fat meat from our lives long ago, even walking away from the profession. Everyone is just now experiencing the reality of what my Dr. husband and I went through decades ago. I don't feel sorry for anyone suffering for taking the bio weapon, they made their decision. I don't want any apologies. I want them to repent to God for their offenses. If not, then I pray they enjoy the eternal reward that they deserve. Even now, people are being spoon fed because they can't accept the full truth of what they have done to destroy humanity.
I'm with you; it was glaringly obvious right from the beginning. I, too, walked away from that entire dehumanizing, toxic system a long time ago.......always always their terminology, even, got my hackles up; the word "patient" is a word for a helpless, dependent victim and it is utterly detestable. The body heals itself or it does not. Allopathy is just another religion with another false god; man.
- The continued spoon-feeding is still happening in silos, and this is also maddening. I appreciate that people like this professor are willing and able to take the hit to their ego and admit that they were completely duped and that they were wrong.....but where is the big picture recognition that the other narratives being pushed are ALL being pushed by the very same string-pulling globalist puppeteers? Global warming and climate change.....give me a damn break. These scum are behind the climate problems with their never-ending spraying of horrible toxic chemicals all over every square inch of the planet; they've been doing this for 50 years and there are at least a hundred different geoengineering patents logged. Problem-reaction-solution! Same circus, same monkeys. These people ARE the problem; take them out, and everything else goes away. It's all related, and covid is just one area where the big agenda is being expressed.
Dr. Alexander, please tell your friend if he wants to stop being a tool, to examine his beleifs, uNFOUNDED beleifs with no SCIENCE behind them, that anthropegenic CLIMATE CHANGE has NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH OR EMERGING PATHOGENS. IT IS A LIE. A Dammned lie.
It amazes me that people who now see through the Covid crap, can't get a grip on the climate crap they have been fed.
Oh yes, and global warming is a crock. It stopped in 1998, was not caused by Man at all, and so is yet another tool of oppression, being yet another willful fraud.
So it is not relevant in causing an environment where viruses etc might arise, especially when we also know that covid 19 was manufactured in a lab, for which, courtesy of Dr David E Martin, we have the patent numbers
..."stop being a tool of oppression"...then stop using ALL drugs, vaccines and mRNA gene altering injections. The medical mafia has you at its mercy and they are not merciful as proven by the latest vaccine scam...mRNA injections. You can repair your body and get off most drugs.
Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy is an Australian Professor of Pathology and has a background in Clinical Immunology. His area of expertise is in mucosal Immunology. He was the inventor of the Broncostat vaccine, so it's not easy to write him off as an anti-vaxxer.
Excerpt:
"The muscosal immune response dictates the outcome of COVID-19 infection
Pandemic infection by a respiratory virus, be it influenza or a corona virus, occurs when mutation enables escape from the mucosal compartment to the gas-exchange apparatus of the lungs, where outcome is determined by the systemic immune response. That outcome reflects the balance of viral antigen and IgG antibody: “antigen excess” leads to viral pneumonia, while “antibody excess” (due to previous infection or vaccination) reduces severity of disease. Infection of the mucosal tissues induces profound immune suppression by “suppressor” T reg cells that dominate net immunity in both local and systemic tissues – a physiological mechanism to prevent a profound inflammatory response to the myriad of microbes colonising mucosal sites. This is the forgotten hallmark of mucosal immunology.
How should immunisation against COVID-19 infection be understood within this framework?
First, systemic vaccination (ie injected vaccines) will only stimulate systemic immunity (the IgG antibody system). It will protect against virus that has escaped the mucosal compartment but have essentially no impact on the mucosal site of primary infection.
Early clinical studies of COVID vaccines indicated little to no effect on preventing infection, but a reduction in more serious disease due to escape of virus into the gas-exchange apparatus. This has become less clear over time as the Delta sub-type virus the vaccines developed in 2020 failed to recognise the antigen variants inherent in the Omicron strain.
More importantly, repeated antigen dosing from vaccination, often in combination with intercurrent COVID infection, activates T reg cells, specifically suppressing immunity to COVID infection. This led to “reverse immunity” with more infections and more severe disease reported in multi-vaccinated subjects, so that COVID has now become a pandemic of the vaccinated.
Now vaccination has no significant effect on virus spread as it doesn’t stimulate mucosal immunity. Indeed the multi-vaccinated excrete virus for longer periods, due to the suppression effect discussed above. None of this should surprise, as “desensitisation” (multiple antigen shots for allergy subjects) effectively suppresses allergic reactions for about five years, via activation of the same T reg cells.
The implications for COVID are concerning, as protracted suppression of specific immunity through poorly spaced boosters predicts a predisposition towards more severe disease for a considerable time. Natural immunity from COVID infection is broader and more durable than that following vaccination, while immunisation post-infection adds to the risk of impaired immunity due to specific immune suppression.
Two issues follow. First, systemic immunity to any respiratory tract infection will be less effective and less durable than the protection to which we are accustomed from vaccines used to prevent systemic infection (such as measles), because of its tie to immune suppression. This fact has been neglected by those making vaccination decisions. Second, genetic vaccines are liable to dysregulation and unpredictable outcomes, as synthesis of spike protein (the antigen) is not localised, but present throughout the body, with spike protein manufacture lasting weeks to months. The amount of antigen and the dynamic of its production is uncontrolled, creating critical dose-response parameters that influence the net immune response, underpinned by reports of poor vaccine quality control with variations between lots. These factors promote net immune suppression.
The influenza vaccine model – imperfect though it may be — predicted all the above findings for genetic COVID vaccines: short duration, variable low level community protection (20-60%), but favouring protection against more severe disease. Experience led to annual pre-season influenza immunisation emphasising the critical importance of spaced vaccination, to avoid immune suppression.
Influenza vaccine history emphasises the myth and aura that has spread about the “innovative technology” of genetic vaccines: both mRNA and DNA vector vaccines have been ineffective in earlier limited human studies, with no evidence of advantage over antigen-based vaccines (including a recent study comparing a mRNA influenza vaccine with a split antigen vaccine); development of the COVID vaccine took twice as long to market compared to appropriate influenza antigen vaccines in earlier Influenza pandemics; and they incorporated untested delivery systems capable of dysregulating genetic information, that being the holy ground of human biology no vaccine should dare enter. Genetic vaccines were hoisted on the world at “warp speed” with no idea of their biologic impact, or the adverse event profile. They had great patents creating a huge commercial opportunity which converted into historic and extraordinary windfall profits. It’s as simple as that.
An important difference between influenza vaccination and genetic COVID vaccines is the observation that, following influenza vaccination, there is a 10% reduction in overall mortality in the vaccinated population. That compares with the finding of “increased community deaths of about 10%” across the COVID-19 vaccinated world – correlating with vaccination dynamics ... "
Yes, it’s getting old. Who knows how much from Covid vs with Covid — impossible to know and the best we can do is chart review to detect obvious cases like 6 gunshots to the chest or hit by a car w internal bleeding— you get the picture obviously with your good examples. And, that chart review should be done. If only to vindicate brave whistleblowers who tried to stop the misdiagnosis in their medical networks where they profited from these misdiagnoses at the expense of the public having accurate information. You make a number of interesting points. Enough with the euthanasia! 💜
Great essay. I want to send it to so many people but they're still consumed by the narrative, to greater or lesser degrees. Is this just a very hard lesson in life? We can be artificially convinced to take up opposite sides of a fence and then remain divided for a very long time. Some kind of extreme passivity has been bred in people. Even after finding out that the vaccine doesn't prevent spread, they cling to their thought patterns. Knowing that their numbers are large (or at least appear to be), it's easier for them to alienate a few loved ones than face the idea that they were wrong. Sorry is definitely the hardest word.
on the face of it these two are mutually exclusive, and even if on pondering it i might consider that it is a possibility none of us are spiritual enough to have the kind of love whereby our fury is righteous.
Not when anger is deemed righteous by its love FOR the person one is angry at. This is the nature of God's love, but not of anyone else, for if righteous anger is determined only by the evil one is angry at then the Soviet Armies, raping their way across Germany in 1945 were righteously angry.
one thing that seems to be forgotten here is thateven if the vaxx were safe and effective it still is experimental: and if experimental l IT IS ILLEGAL TO COERCE IT BY ANY MEANS. This is the Nuremberg Code and it shows that te law was broken.
even, and i will repeat myself if the vaxx were safe and effective
and at the risk of beabouring the obvious, it is experimental for it takes YEARS to establish by long term observation the long term safety of th treatment offered: until then it is experimetnal buy definition
as for doubting the cause of deaths being the vaxx, there is skepticism and then there is simple refusal to face facts. Dr Mike Yeadon demonstrates that the causality is clear and known. Given the things observed, all appearing after the vaxx rollout and many being never seen before, the burden of proof is on the other side, those who insist that the vaxx is safe and effetive
as for whether it is too late for some to cease being a tool of poopression, well, I think it is. For when one becomes a tool of such the conscience is deadened. and when fully dead it truly is too late for people to come back from their evil choices. EVil is not a party game to be put aside when tired of. It is a lifestyle choice when the evil embraced is virulent enough, and this never repented of
Well written article. I did not get the jab and was skeptical to begin with, and as time went on, I realized my decision was sound. In the article when you stated that some people would stop reading at the point, they became uncomfortable and stop it reminded me of a funny but ridiculous pun I read once. It goes like this someone who smoked read an article about the horrors of smoking that he decided to stop reading altogether lol this is the same kind of twisted thinking that the faithful followers of Fauci have. Once I saw the entire puzzle it became clear to me what the objective is and it is world control of humanity, transhumanism and Malthusian population reduction by several methods. Remember what Benjamin Rush warned us against, A medical terrine becoming a reality and now it is.
You are right. This is just one piece of the puzzle they are using to dominate us all. Are you familiar with James Corbett at the Corbett report? If not, then you should take a look at his archives and videos. He has had his finger on the pulse for a long time and is a brilliant investigator. You will be blown away at the information he has made available.
I don’t think it’s clear that the elderly were helped by the bioweapon spike injections with a toxic soup of adjuvants and lipid nano packaging ingredients (still unknown in terms of unwarranted variations). It’s clear the data plans were wretched-- 1/ obscuring deaths from Covid vs deaths with Covid beneath severe distortion and corruption in hospital reports; 2/ obscuring vaccination status and capturing deaths among the once vaccinated (in the USA) in the non vaccinated class to skew it - when really the once vaccinated were experiencing lowered immunity for 2 weeks post jab during the period they attained diseased status (Scandinavian’s reported this early); 3/ obscuring how many elders with senescence immunity contracted disease from the bioweapon and died without autopsy or histology in the days when treatments were killing people in large numbers and repurposed drugs were denied. This repetition of the the antibodies from the jab helping out much at all (in any proportion to the vast harms they did if you have ever looked at the pathophysiology of the bioweapon implantation) must really be reconciled with Dr Yeadon’s whole discussion of the disjuncture between a nasal -respiratory pathway and a jab that is mediating immune response so-called * along a dangerous and disjoined pathway. Same disjunction seems to prevail in the flu vaccines too, doesn’t it. So, really this essay is perpetuating the same fig leaf mythology regards the elders and vulnerable. And this kind of idea keeps getting published in this generally fine and helpful substack -- it’s a cancer Dr Alexander in the beautiful body of your work unless I’m missing something. We had whole nursing homes saved by repurposed drugs (hydroxychlorquinine) by ferocious brave physicians and to perpetuate the idea that the INFERNAL bioweapon did anything for the vulnerable is obscene. It’s obscene once you wake from the hypnosis that the striving professor is still struggling with May GOD BLESS His Efforts -- and you take in the full witness to the evil. Please stop repeating the talking points of the evil ones, the burbling corrosive hypnotic phrases given to line physicians so they would have some face saving cover story for killing their patients. There is no credible evidential basis for a harms v benefits analysis for the elderly because there are so many corrupted data points with so many confounders. And even if there was an evidential basis w some integrity, the early short term end point measurement has to stand up against a longer term set of end point measurements for the past 65 groups and that’s no where in sight (I.e. theoretically we saved x% mortality in seniors over 4 months BUT we lost XX% to ADE and all cause and dementias and all the adverse events in the subsequent 8 months, 18 months, etc). I have seen and am seeing bioweapon injuries of cancer, neurological, vascular in my family and community. Measuring vaccine injury in extremely narrow observation windows that never capture the cascading harms is such an old trick. It is now unacceptable to fail to look at the complex picture.
Do you think this motorcyclist in China died from or with COVID?
https://twitter.com/Cmama2014/status/1598732664894550018
How about this truck driver in China -- from or with COVID?
https://twitter.com/Allergic2Masks/status/1597261311704203265
How about this dancer in India -- from or with COVID?
https://twitter.com/iamnarendranath/status/1567742667014180864
So many have been complaining about mRNA. China's vaxxes don't have that tech. I think only one out of the many in India has had it. There are a bunch of videos of Indians suddenly dying while dancing. There are a bunch of videos of Chinese appearing to commit suicide; maybe the agent played a role in some or all of them.
It's possible up to all three of the above people died from the vaxxes but jabbed animals in preclinical trials across 20 years died after "virus" exposure. Imagine the same events occurred in 2020. The spread, shed, and injected versions of the agent trigger many thousands of wide-ranging reactions. Except for injured infectees, almost everyone else was programmed to believe it's only a flu or cold. They shunned and vilified anyone experiencing the vast majority of reactions. There has been endless complaining about "from" vs "with." Can one really tell if someone's heart attack, lethal coma from a dangerous rise/fall in blood sugar, or whatever happened naturally or as a reaction to the poison exposure? Probably not especially with no autopsies.
I agree with you. Constantly stating this poison has any benefit for the elderly and other vulnerable people has grown old. IMO they're committing a crime against humanity like those on the other side condemned for doing the same thing.
Well, this was glaringly obvious in the first 5 minutes of the shut down to my husband and I. It was obvious as hell what was going on and the outcomes were easily predictable. That didn't stop my horror when everyone stupidly went along with it. The last hope I had carefully reserved for society has all vanished 3 years ago. Decades ago, we were mocked by "friends," family, and the community for daring to try to educate them on the reality of the medical model. We painfully cut the fat meat from our lives long ago, even walking away from the profession. Everyone is just now experiencing the reality of what my Dr. husband and I went through decades ago. I don't feel sorry for anyone suffering for taking the bio weapon, they made their decision. I don't want any apologies. I want them to repent to God for their offenses. If not, then I pray they enjoy the eternal reward that they deserve. Even now, people are being spoon fed because they can't accept the full truth of what they have done to destroy humanity.
I'm with you; it was glaringly obvious right from the beginning. I, too, walked away from that entire dehumanizing, toxic system a long time ago.......always always their terminology, even, got my hackles up; the word "patient" is a word for a helpless, dependent victim and it is utterly detestable. The body heals itself or it does not. Allopathy is just another religion with another false god; man.
- The continued spoon-feeding is still happening in silos, and this is also maddening. I appreciate that people like this professor are willing and able to take the hit to their ego and admit that they were completely duped and that they were wrong.....but where is the big picture recognition that the other narratives being pushed are ALL being pushed by the very same string-pulling globalist puppeteers? Global warming and climate change.....give me a damn break. These scum are behind the climate problems with their never-ending spraying of horrible toxic chemicals all over every square inch of the planet; they've been doing this for 50 years and there are at least a hundred different geoengineering patents logged. Problem-reaction-solution! Same circus, same monkeys. These people ARE the problem; take them out, and everything else goes away. It's all related, and covid is just one area where the big agenda is being expressed.
Dr. Alexander, please tell your friend if he wants to stop being a tool, to examine his beleifs, uNFOUNDED beleifs with no SCIENCE behind them, that anthropegenic CLIMATE CHANGE has NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH OR EMERGING PATHOGENS. IT IS A LIE. A Dammned lie.
It amazes me that people who now see through the Covid crap, can't get a grip on the climate crap they have been fed.
Oh yes, and global warming is a crock. It stopped in 1998, was not caused by Man at all, and so is yet another tool of oppression, being yet another willful fraud.
So it is not relevant in causing an environment where viruses etc might arise, especially when we also know that covid 19 was manufactured in a lab, for which, courtesy of Dr David E Martin, we have the patent numbers
..."stop being a tool of oppression"...then stop using ALL drugs, vaccines and mRNA gene altering injections. The medical mafia has you at its mercy and they are not merciful as proven by the latest vaccine scam...mRNA injections. You can repair your body and get off most drugs.
Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy is an Australian Professor of Pathology and has a background in Clinical Immunology. His area of expertise is in mucosal Immunology. He was the inventor of the Broncostat vaccine, so it's not easy to write him off as an anti-vaxxer.
Excerpt:
"The muscosal immune response dictates the outcome of COVID-19 infection
Pandemic infection by a respiratory virus, be it influenza or a corona virus, occurs when mutation enables escape from the mucosal compartment to the gas-exchange apparatus of the lungs, where outcome is determined by the systemic immune response. That outcome reflects the balance of viral antigen and IgG antibody: “antigen excess” leads to viral pneumonia, while “antibody excess” (due to previous infection or vaccination) reduces severity of disease. Infection of the mucosal tissues induces profound immune suppression by “suppressor” T reg cells that dominate net immunity in both local and systemic tissues – a physiological mechanism to prevent a profound inflammatory response to the myriad of microbes colonising mucosal sites. This is the forgotten hallmark of mucosal immunology.
How should immunisation against COVID-19 infection be understood within this framework?
First, systemic vaccination (ie injected vaccines) will only stimulate systemic immunity (the IgG antibody system). It will protect against virus that has escaped the mucosal compartment but have essentially no impact on the mucosal site of primary infection.
Early clinical studies of COVID vaccines indicated little to no effect on preventing infection, but a reduction in more serious disease due to escape of virus into the gas-exchange apparatus. This has become less clear over time as the Delta sub-type virus the vaccines developed in 2020 failed to recognise the antigen variants inherent in the Omicron strain.
More importantly, repeated antigen dosing from vaccination, often in combination with intercurrent COVID infection, activates T reg cells, specifically suppressing immunity to COVID infection. This led to “reverse immunity” with more infections and more severe disease reported in multi-vaccinated subjects, so that COVID has now become a pandemic of the vaccinated.
Now vaccination has no significant effect on virus spread as it doesn’t stimulate mucosal immunity. Indeed the multi-vaccinated excrete virus for longer periods, due to the suppression effect discussed above. None of this should surprise, as “desensitisation” (multiple antigen shots for allergy subjects) effectively suppresses allergic reactions for about five years, via activation of the same T reg cells.
The implications for COVID are concerning, as protracted suppression of specific immunity through poorly spaced boosters predicts a predisposition towards more severe disease for a considerable time. Natural immunity from COVID infection is broader and more durable than that following vaccination, while immunisation post-infection adds to the risk of impaired immunity due to specific immune suppression.
Two issues follow. First, systemic immunity to any respiratory tract infection will be less effective and less durable than the protection to which we are accustomed from vaccines used to prevent systemic infection (such as measles), because of its tie to immune suppression. This fact has been neglected by those making vaccination decisions. Second, genetic vaccines are liable to dysregulation and unpredictable outcomes, as synthesis of spike protein (the antigen) is not localised, but present throughout the body, with spike protein manufacture lasting weeks to months. The amount of antigen and the dynamic of its production is uncontrolled, creating critical dose-response parameters that influence the net immune response, underpinned by reports of poor vaccine quality control with variations between lots. These factors promote net immune suppression.
The influenza vaccine model – imperfect though it may be — predicted all the above findings for genetic COVID vaccines: short duration, variable low level community protection (20-60%), but favouring protection against more severe disease. Experience led to annual pre-season influenza immunisation emphasising the critical importance of spaced vaccination, to avoid immune suppression.
Influenza vaccine history emphasises the myth and aura that has spread about the “innovative technology” of genetic vaccines: both mRNA and DNA vector vaccines have been ineffective in earlier limited human studies, with no evidence of advantage over antigen-based vaccines (including a recent study comparing a mRNA influenza vaccine with a split antigen vaccine); development of the COVID vaccine took twice as long to market compared to appropriate influenza antigen vaccines in earlier Influenza pandemics; and they incorporated untested delivery systems capable of dysregulating genetic information, that being the holy ground of human biology no vaccine should dare enter. Genetic vaccines were hoisted on the world at “warp speed” with no idea of their biologic impact, or the adverse event profile. They had great patents creating a huge commercial opportunity which converted into historic and extraordinary windfall profits. It’s as simple as that.
An important difference between influenza vaccination and genetic COVID vaccines is the observation that, following influenza vaccination, there is a 10% reduction in overall mortality in the vaccinated population. That compares with the finding of “increased community deaths of about 10%” across the COVID-19 vaccinated world – correlating with vaccination dynamics ... "
Covidiocy
The Problem with the COVID Narrative
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/covidiocy/2022/11/the-problem-with-the-covid-narrative/
Beautiful, fearless authorship!! May GOD bestow abundant blessings upon you and yours, Dr.. Alexander.
Yes, it’s getting old. Who knows how much from Covid vs with Covid — impossible to know and the best we can do is chart review to detect obvious cases like 6 gunshots to the chest or hit by a car w internal bleeding— you get the picture obviously with your good examples. And, that chart review should be done. If only to vindicate brave whistleblowers who tried to stop the misdiagnosis in their medical networks where they profited from these misdiagnoses at the expense of the public having accurate information. You make a number of interesting points. Enough with the euthanasia! 💜
Great essay. I want to send it to so many people but they're still consumed by the narrative, to greater or lesser degrees. Is this just a very hard lesson in life? We can be artificially convinced to take up opposite sides of a fence and then remain divided for a very long time. Some kind of extreme passivity has been bred in people. Even after finding out that the vaccine doesn't prevent spread, they cling to their thought patterns. Knowing that their numbers are large (or at least appear to be), it's easier for them to alienate a few loved ones than face the idea that they were wrong. Sorry is definitely the hardest word.
"uniting in love and rage"??
on the face of it these two are mutually exclusive, and even if on pondering it i might consider that it is a possibility none of us are spiritual enough to have the kind of love whereby our fury is righteous.
Not when anger is deemed righteous by its love FOR the person one is angry at. This is the nature of God's love, but not of anyone else, for if righteous anger is determined only by the evil one is angry at then the Soviet Armies, raping their way across Germany in 1945 were righteously angry.
Really? I know trhis i not so
so rage it will be for rage is all we have
one thing that seems to be forgotten here is thateven if the vaxx were safe and effective it still is experimental: and if experimental l IT IS ILLEGAL TO COERCE IT BY ANY MEANS. This is the Nuremberg Code and it shows that te law was broken.
even, and i will repeat myself if the vaxx were safe and effective
and at the risk of beabouring the obvious, it is experimental for it takes YEARS to establish by long term observation the long term safety of th treatment offered: until then it is experimetnal buy definition
as for doubting the cause of deaths being the vaxx, there is skepticism and then there is simple refusal to face facts. Dr Mike Yeadon demonstrates that the causality is clear and known. Given the things observed, all appearing after the vaxx rollout and many being never seen before, the burden of proof is on the other side, those who insist that the vaxx is safe and effetive
as for whether it is too late for some to cease being a tool of poopression, well, I think it is. For when one becomes a tool of such the conscience is deadened. and when fully dead it truly is too late for people to come back from their evil choices. EVil is not a party game to be put aside when tired of. It is a lifestyle choice when the evil embraced is virulent enough, and this never repented of
Well written article. I did not get the jab and was skeptical to begin with, and as time went on, I realized my decision was sound. In the article when you stated that some people would stop reading at the point, they became uncomfortable and stop it reminded me of a funny but ridiculous pun I read once. It goes like this someone who smoked read an article about the horrors of smoking that he decided to stop reading altogether lol this is the same kind of twisted thinking that the faithful followers of Fauci have. Once I saw the entire puzzle it became clear to me what the objective is and it is world control of humanity, transhumanism and Malthusian population reduction by several methods. Remember what Benjamin Rush warned us against, A medical terrine becoming a reality and now it is.
Glad Im not alone. Thank you Dr A
You are right. This is just one piece of the puzzle they are using to dominate us all. Are you familiar with James Corbett at the Corbett report? If not, then you should take a look at his archives and videos. He has had his finger on the pulse for a long time and is a brilliant investigator. You will be blown away at the information he has made available.