Jeffrey Sachs written piece in PNAS: "A call for an independent inquiry into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus"; chart below compares other viruses, code PRRARSVAS only in WUHAN-Hu-1; PREDICT, DEFUSE
Jeffrey Sachs written piece in PNAS: "A call for an independent inquiry into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus"; chart below compares other viruses, code PRRARSVAS only in WUHAN-Hu-1; PREDICT, DEFUSE
PRRARSVAS....this is the FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE, this is the culprit, this is the genetic code inserted as part of Gain-of-Function (GoF) that Fauci, Baric, Francis Collins, Daszak et al. inserted!
Dr Alexander please explain to me why we should trust this gentleman now? I really want to but he is very late to the party. I absolutely question his motives and need an acid test from him to demonstrate his contrition to redeem himself from the catastrophic damage he has authorship in. Politely we can lay it off on naïveté, but we’re beyond that, that is bull shit. Why should we trust someone stupid enough to establish the committee panels he did. I’m old fashioned, I don’t.
If I wanted to inject the whole world with a "vaccine" against a very bad virus, I could easily produce the sequences in my papers. And then have the world argue whether the virus came from nature or from a lab...
The simple question is WHY this "virus" and this "vaccine" give exactly the same symptoms as the toxicity of nanotechnology, or even more precisely as the toxicity of graphene????
If you access the Fauci emails, there was/is a heavily redacted email circa 2016/17, cannot remember exactly when, circulated to Farrar/Fauci/Vallance (at the time Head of R&D GSK)/Daszak and a host of others including some scientists in Europe - and Baric at UniNCal CH if I remember correctly - in which a virus is discussed and the comment is made that an element of it "looks engineered". Fauci email to a US Health quango colleague then instructs him to be available at a moment's notice and that he "has work to do".....and so the desperate cover up begins.
The fact of a non naturally occurring DNA sequence in "the virus" - which I believe alludes to the chimeric virus similar to that which Baric wrote about in the 2015/16 paper - is not new and the sequence was identified years ago; whether it is the same sequence as this guy has "discovered", I do not know. I also believe that this sequence was what enabled the chimeric initially non humano-pathogenic virus to be able to attach to the ACE2 receptor elements of human cell tissue - and thus enter that cell to replicate the spike protein, i.e the exact result of the gain of function research, denied by Fauci, but bought by funds provided to and passed on by Fauci, to Daszak at EcoAlliance, by the US taxpayer, and then to WIV.
Might be wrong here as I am not a scientist; but this all started in the US, developed in the US until the research was banned and then someone decided that the gullible CCP run lab in Wuhan should get the gig to develop it just in case it was so lethal a leak in the US would be curtains for those involved.....?
Interestingly, the nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG which contains the furin cleavage site has so far only been found in 2 places: the coof-virus and a Moderna patent from 2016/17. And by pure coincidence, the current CEO of Moderna was CEO of BioMérieux, the company that built the Wuhan BSL-4 lab. In a sane world, these facts alone would warrant multiple investigations, but no, there is absolutely nothing to see here.
You need to understand how cover stories work to understand there was no virus. The whole Wuhan leak story is a red herring. That's what the $ 6 million paid for.
If it were true, there'd all be jailed for creating and releasing a bioweapon, for murder. They're smart people with smart lawyers. They're aware of history and what happened to Nazi doctors. It's not real. It's propaganda. And that's all it needed to be to accomplish their goals.
Dr. Alexander - as a doctor - if your patient had liver failure, but also had a cold, and you knew he had eaten a poisonous mushroom, would you blame the cold or the mushroom for the need for a liver transplant?
If you understand the mechanism of graphene toxicity and what it causes, and if you know that graphene has been used, would you get involved in investigating whether the mysterious virus came from bats, pangolins or Fauci?
Or would you first look at the poison that was used and is causing the exact same result that this, the patient encountered?
If I overdose on certain drugs, but also have a runny nose and cough, would you treat my drug-induced collapse with antiviral drugs?
"Democide is a term coined by American political scientist Rudolph Rummel to describe the '... killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command.' According to Rummel, this definition covers a wide range of deaths, including ... mass deaths due to governmental acts of criminal omission and neglect ... This definition covers any murder of any number of persons by any government. Rummel created democide as an extended term to include forms of government murder not covered by genocide. According to Rummel, democide surpassed war as the leading cause of non-natural death in the 20th century."
I hope that Sachs doesn't get arkancided. Telling the truth is frowned on by the security surveillance police state. It could lead to the masses becoming unhappy about democide and having thoughts of Nuremberg.
I have a request and I suspect I speak for many of your readers. I am absolutely besieged in Covid data. What I am short of is meaning. When you send out these gems could you write a FEW sentences explaining why it is important. Thank you for all you do.
While we are at it, why not explore the origin of ANY virus. At least if they find one I might believe others exist. Anyway, these inquiries often lead to nothing and besides, to do an honest investigation, the truth would need to be made known. That simply will never happen since the CDC (the keeper of viruses, I assume) or the FDA, fauci or Chapel Hill NC will never give up all the gruesome details.
You need to understand how cover stories work to understand there was no virus. The whole Wuhan leak story is a red herring. That's what the $ 6 million paid for.
If it were true, there'd all be jailed for creating and releasing a bioweapon, for murder. They're smart people with smart lawyers. They're aware of history and what happened to Nazi doctors. It's not real. It's propaganda. And that's all it needed to be to accomplish their goals.
Paul, this is extremely hard to read with all the screen shots. Is there not a link to read the report from the source? Jeffrey Sachs was also just interviewed by Bobby Kennedy, which I thought was a very well done interview, as well
Dr Alexander please explain to me why we should trust this gentleman now? I really want to but he is very late to the party. I absolutely question his motives and need an acid test from him to demonstrate his contrition to redeem himself from the catastrophic damage he has authorship in. Politely we can lay it off on naïveté, but we’re beyond that, that is bull shit. Why should we trust someone stupid enough to establish the committee panels he did. I’m old fashioned, I don’t.
If I wanted to inject the whole world with a "vaccine" against a very bad virus, I could easily produce the sequences in my papers. And then have the world argue whether the virus came from nature or from a lab...
The simple question is WHY this "virus" and this "vaccine" give exactly the same symptoms as the toxicity of nanotechnology, or even more precisely as the toxicity of graphene????
If you access the Fauci emails, there was/is a heavily redacted email circa 2016/17, cannot remember exactly when, circulated to Farrar/Fauci/Vallance (at the time Head of R&D GSK)/Daszak and a host of others including some scientists in Europe - and Baric at UniNCal CH if I remember correctly - in which a virus is discussed and the comment is made that an element of it "looks engineered". Fauci email to a US Health quango colleague then instructs him to be available at a moment's notice and that he "has work to do".....and so the desperate cover up begins.
The fact of a non naturally occurring DNA sequence in "the virus" - which I believe alludes to the chimeric virus similar to that which Baric wrote about in the 2015/16 paper - is not new and the sequence was identified years ago; whether it is the same sequence as this guy has "discovered", I do not know. I also believe that this sequence was what enabled the chimeric initially non humano-pathogenic virus to be able to attach to the ACE2 receptor elements of human cell tissue - and thus enter that cell to replicate the spike protein, i.e the exact result of the gain of function research, denied by Fauci, but bought by funds provided to and passed on by Fauci, to Daszak at EcoAlliance, by the US taxpayer, and then to WIV.
Might be wrong here as I am not a scientist; but this all started in the US, developed in the US until the research was banned and then someone decided that the gullible CCP run lab in Wuhan should get the gig to develop it just in case it was so lethal a leak in the US would be curtains for those involved.....?
Interestingly, the nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG which contains the furin cleavage site has so far only been found in 2 places: the coof-virus and a Moderna patent from 2016/17. And by pure coincidence, the current CEO of Moderna was CEO of BioMérieux, the company that built the Wuhan BSL-4 lab. In a sane world, these facts alone would warrant multiple investigations, but no, there is absolutely nothing to see here.
You need to understand how cover stories work to understand there was no virus. The whole Wuhan leak story is a red herring. That's what the $ 6 million paid for.
If it were true, there'd all be jailed for creating and releasing a bioweapon, for murder. They're smart people with smart lawyers. They're aware of history and what happened to Nazi doctors. It's not real. It's propaganda. And that's all it needed to be to accomplish their goals.
Dr. Alexander - as a doctor - if your patient had liver failure, but also had a cold, and you knew he had eaten a poisonous mushroom, would you blame the cold or the mushroom for the need for a liver transplant?
If you understand the mechanism of graphene toxicity and what it causes, and if you know that graphene has been used, would you get involved in investigating whether the mysterious virus came from bats, pangolins or Fauci?
Or would you first look at the poison that was used and is causing the exact same result that this, the patient encountered?
If I overdose on certain drugs, but also have a runny nose and cough, would you treat my drug-induced collapse with antiviral drugs?
What happened to logic?
"Democide is a term coined by American political scientist Rudolph Rummel to describe the '... killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command.' According to Rummel, this definition covers a wide range of deaths, including ... mass deaths due to governmental acts of criminal omission and neglect ... This definition covers any murder of any number of persons by any government. Rummel created democide as an extended term to include forms of government murder not covered by genocide. According to Rummel, democide surpassed war as the leading cause of non-natural death in the 20th century."
I hope that Sachs doesn't get arkancided. Telling the truth is frowned on by the security surveillance police state. It could lead to the masses becoming unhappy about democide and having thoughts of Nuremberg.
Ahh… the 4 HIV inserts. Dr A, can we agree that SARSCOV2 does not cause a cold/flu? No matter how mild covid presents, it is long-term BAD NEWS!!
Can we advise everyone to AVOID GETTING THIS BIOWEAPON AT ALL COSTS???
Dr. Alexander,
I have a request and I suspect I speak for many of your readers. I am absolutely besieged in Covid data. What I am short of is meaning. When you send out these gems could you write a FEW sentences explaining why it is important. Thank you for all you do.
While we are at it, why not explore the origin of ANY virus. At least if they find one I might believe others exist. Anyway, these inquiries often lead to nothing and besides, to do an honest investigation, the truth would need to be made known. That simply will never happen since the CDC (the keeper of viruses, I assume) or the FDA, fauci or Chapel Hill NC will never give up all the gruesome details.
Why is this guy all of a sudden changing his tune?
This movie sucks.
You need to understand how cover stories work to understand there was no virus. The whole Wuhan leak story is a red herring. That's what the $ 6 million paid for.
If it were true, there'd all be jailed for creating and releasing a bioweapon, for murder. They're smart people with smart lawyers. They're aware of history and what happened to Nazi doctors. It's not real. It's propaganda. And that's all it needed to be to accomplish their goals.
Read the substack below, this is how you can verify it's lab origin:
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/how-to-blast-your-way-to-the-truth
Paul, this is extremely hard to read with all the screen shots. Is there not a link to read the report from the source? Jeffrey Sachs was also just interviewed by Bobby Kennedy, which I thought was a very well done interview, as well