Jeffrey Sachs written piece in PNAS: "A call for an independent inquiry into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus"; chart below compares other viruses, code PRRARSVAS only in WUHAN-Hu-1; PREDICT, DEFUSE
PRRARSVAS....this is the FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE, this is the culprit, this is the genetic code inserted as part of Gain-of-Function (GoF) that Fauci, Baric, Francis Collins, Daszak et al. inserted!
Sachs is out on the limb in some sense so we have to praise his bravery at this time! But one eye opened! We need more!
2018 grant proposal terms ‘DEFUSE’ involving Wuhan Institute of Virology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and EcoHealth Alliance.
Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Dr Alexander please explain to me why we should trust this gentleman now? I really want to but he is very late to the party. I absolutely question his motives and need an acid test from him to demonstrate his contrition to redeem himself from the catastrophic damage he has authorship in. Politely we can lay it off on naïveté, but we’re beyond that, that is bull shit. Why should we trust someone stupid enough to establish the committee panels he did. I’m old fashioned, I don’t.
If I wanted to inject the whole world with a "vaccine" against a very bad virus, I could easily produce the sequences in my papers. And then have the world argue whether the virus came from nature or from a lab...
The simple question is WHY this "virus" and this "vaccine" give exactly the same symptoms as the toxicity of nanotechnology, or even more precisely as the toxicity of graphene????